Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for patients with Asherman's syndrome: menstrual and fertility outcomes

Abstract

Purpose

Most patients with Asherman's syndrome present with infertility and menstrual problems. In this retrospective clinical study, we analyzed patients with Asherman's syndrome who underwent hysteroscopic adhesiolysis to examine their associated symptoms, disease etiologies, and fertility outcomes.

Methods

Twenty-seven patients with Asherman's syndrome that were diagnosed using hysteroscopy were recruited. The chief complaints were infertility, hypomenorrhea, and amenorrhea. Each case of Asherman's syndrome was classified according to the American Fertility Society classification. Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis was performed in all cases and concomitant transabdominal ultrasonography was conducted in cases with extensive and dense adhesions.

Results

There were no complications associated with the hysteroscopic procedure. Normal menstrual cycles resumed in all cases. Of the 16 infertile patients, 9 conceived. Three patients achieved term deliveries and one patient is currently pregnant. None of the patients had obstetric complications. Two patients had spontaneous abortions, one had an ectopic pregnancy, one had an abortion at 16 weeks’ gestation due to cervical incompetence, and one had a molar pregnancy and required uterine artery embolization for uncontrolled hemorrhaging during a dilatation and curettage procedure.

Conclusions

Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis with transabdominal ultrasonography is a suitable treatment method for Asherman's syndrome. Subfertile patients with Asherman's syndrome undergoing adhesiolysis should be appropriately informed about the risk of associated life-threatening complications and preterm delivery.

References Thomson AJM, Abbott JA, Meegan Lenart RN, Vancaillie TG. Fluoroscopically guided synechiolysis for patients with Asherman's syndrome: menstrual and fertility outcome. Fertil Steril., 2007, 87, 405–410 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.035 Asherman JG. Amenorrhoea traumatica (alretica). J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp., 1948, 55, 22–30 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1948.tb07045.x Asherman JG. Traumatic intra-uterine adhesions. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp., 1950, 57, 892–896 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1950.tb06053.x Robinson JK, Colimon LM, Isaacson KB. Postoperative adhesiolysis therapy for intrauterine adhesions (Asherman's syndrome). Fertil Steril, 2008, 90, 409–414 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.034 Schenker JG. Etiology and therapeutic approach to synechia uteri. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 1996, 65, 109–113 10.1016/0028-2243(95)02315-J Al-Inany H. Intrauterine adhesions: an update. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2001, 80, 986–993 Soares SR, Barbosa dos Reis MM, Camargos AF. Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography in patients with uterine cavity diseases. Fertil Steril, 2000, 73, 406–411 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00532-4 Yasmin H. Hysteroscopic management of Asherman's syndrome. J Pak Med Assoc., 2007, 57, 553–555 The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988; 49: 944–55. Roge P, D'Ercole C, Cravello L, Boubli L, Blanc B. Hysteroscopic management of uterine synechiae: a series of 102 observations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol., 1996, 65, 189–193 10.1016/0301-2115(95)02342-9 Valle RF. Intrauterine adhesions: hysteroscopic diagnosis, classification, treatment, and reproductive outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol., 1988, 158, 1459–1470 Roy KK. Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with infertility due to Asherman's syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet., 2010, 281, 355–361 10.1007/s00404-009-1117-x Myers EM, Hurst BS. Comprehensive management of severe Asherman syndrome and amenorrhea. Fertil Steril., 2012, 97, 160–164 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.036 Fedele L, Bianchi S, Frontino G. Septums and synechiae: approaches to surgical correction. Clin Obstet Gynecol., 2006, 49, 767–788 10.1097/01.grf.0000211948.36465.a6 Zikopoulos KA. Live delivery rates in subfertile women with Asherman's syndrome after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis using the resectoscope or the Versapoint system. Reprod Biomed Online., 2004, 8, 720–725 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61654-9 Yu D, Li TC, Xia E, Huang X, Liu Y, Peng X. Factors affecting reproductive outcome of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for Asherman's syndrome. Fertil Steril., 2008, 89, 715–722 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.070 Pinar H. Intra-uterine adhesions and fertility outcome: how to optimize success?. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol., 2007, 19, 207–214 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32814a6473 Taylor PJ, Cumming DC, Hill PJ. Significance of intrauterine adhesions detected hysteroscopically in eumenorrheic infertile women and role of antecedent curettage in their formation. Am J Obstet Gynecol., 1981, 139, 239–242 Farhi J, Bar-Hava I, Homburg R, Dicker D, Ben-Rafael Z. Induced regeneration of endometrium following curettage for abortion: a comparative study. Hum Reprod., 1993, 8, 1143–1144 Barash A, Granot I, Fieldust S, Or Y. Successful pregnancy and delivery of a healthy baby after endometrial biopsy treatment in an in vitro fertilization patient with severe Asherman syndrome. Fertil Steril., 1956, 2009 (91) e1–e3 Sugimoto O. Diagnostic and therapeutic hysteroscopy for traumatic intrauterine adhesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol., 1978, 131, 539–547 Sanfilippo JS, Fitzgerald MR, Badawy SZ, Nussbaum ML, Yussman MA. Asherman's syndrome. A comparison of therapeutic methods. J Reprod Med., 1982, 27, 328–330 Fernandez H. Fertility after treatment of Asherman's syndrome stage 3 and 4. J Minim Invasive Gynecol., 2006, 13, 398–402 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.04.013 Siegler AM. Therapeutic hysteroscopic procedures. Fertil Steril., 1988, 50, 685–701 Deaton JL. Spontaneous uterine rupture during pregnancy after treatment of Asherman's syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol., 1989, 160, 1053–1054 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90159-2