Predictive factors of successful sperm retrieval on microdissection testicular sperm extraction in Japanese men

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate retrospectively the outcomes of microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) and to identify the parameters predicting successful sperm retrieval in this cohort of patients.

Methods

After excluding patients with normal testicular volume and serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level who received conventional TESE, this study included 329 consecutive NOA patients undergoing micro-TESE at our institution. The significance of several factors, including age, testicular volume, etiology and serum levels of FSH, luteinizing hormone (LH) and serum testosterone (T), as predictors of successful sperm retrieval, was evaluated.

Results

Of the 329 men included in this series, 246 (74.8 %), 40 (12.2 %), and 43 (13.1 %) were pathologically diagnosed with Sertoli cell only, maturation arrest, and hypospermatogenesis, respectively. Spermatozoa were retrieved in 97 (29.5 %) of these 329 men by micro-TESE. Older age and non-idiopathic etiology were significantly associated with the probability of successful sperm retrieval; however, there were no significant effects of testicular volume as well as serum levels of FSH, LH, and T on sperm retrieval outcome. Furthermore, Johnsen score of the micro-TESE specimen showed a significant association with whether spermatozoa were successfully retrieved. Univariate analysis of preoperative parameters identified older age and non-idiopathic etiology as significant predictors of successful sperm retrieval, of which only etiology appeared to be independently related to successful sperm retrieval on multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Spermatozoa are significantly less likely to be successfully retrieved by micro-TESE in men with idiopathic azoospermia.

References Ishikawa T, Nose R, Yamaguchi K et al. Learning curves of microdissection testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril, 2010, 94, 1008–1011 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.108 Okada H, Dobashi M, Yamazaki T et al. Conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol, 2002, 168, 1063–1067 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64575-2 Ramasamy R, Yagan N, Schlegel PN. Structural and functional changes to the testis after conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Urology, 2005, 65, 1190–1194 10.1016/j.urology.2004.12.059 Tsujimura A, Matsumiya K, Miyagawa Y et al. Prediction of successful outcome of microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol, 2004, 172, 1944–1947 10.1097/01.ju.0000142885.20116.60 Bromage SJ, Falconer DA, Lieberman BA et al. Sperm retrieval rates in subgroups of primary azoospermic males. Eur Urol, 2007, 51, 534–540 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.032 Tunc L, Kırac M, Gurocak S, Yucel A, AlkıKupeli B, Alkıbay T, Bozkirli I. Can serum Inhibin B and FSH levels, testicular histology and volume predict the outcome of testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia?. Int Urol Nephrol., 2006, 38 (3–4) 629–635 Hopps CV, Mielnik A, Goldstein M et al. Detection of sperm in men with Y chromosome microdeletions of the AZFa AZFb and AZFc regions. Hum Reprod, 2003, 18, 1660–1665 10.1093/humrep/deg348 Brandell RA, Mielnik A, Liotta D et al. AZFb deletions predict the absence of spermatozoa with testicular sperm extraction: preliminary report of a prognostic genetic test. Hum Reprod, 1998, 13, 2812–2815 10.1093/humrep/13.10.2812 Martinez M, BERNABÉS M, Gomez E et al. Screening for AZF deletion in a large series of severely impaired spermatogenesis patients. J Androl, 2000, 21, 651–655 Reijo R, Alagappan RK, Page D et al. Severe oligozoospermia resulting from deletions of azoospermia factor gene on Y chromosome. Lancet, 1996, 347, 1290–1293 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90938-1 Klingmuller D, Haidl G. Inhibin B in men with normal and disturbed spermatogenesis. Hum Reprod, 1997, 12, 2376–2378 10.1093/humrep/12.11.2376 Shiraishi K. Hormonal therapy for non-obstructive azoospermia: basic and clinical perspectives. Reprod Med Biol., 2015, 14 (2) 65–72 10.1007/s12522-014-0193-1 Mitchell V, Robin G, Boitrelle F et al. Correlation between testicular sperm extraction outcomes and clinical, endocrine and testicular histology parameters in 120 azoospermic men with normal serum FSH levels. Int J Androl, 2011, 34, 299–305 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2010.01094.x Ziaee SA, Ezzatnegad M, Nowroozi M et al. Prediction of successful sperm retrieval in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia. Urol J, 2006, 3, 92–96 Su L-M, Palermo GD, Goldstein M, Veeck LL, Rosenwaks Z, Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for nonobstructive azoospermia: testicular histology can predict success of sperm retrieval. J urol., 1999, 161 (1) 112–6 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62079-2 Seo JT, Ko WJ. Predictive factors of successful testicular sperm recovery in non-obstructive azoospermia patients. Int J Androl, 2001, 24, 306–310 10.1046/j.1365-2605.2001.00307.x Hassan MA, Killick SR. Effect of male age on fertility: evidence for the decline in male fertility with increasing age. Fertil Steril, 2003, 79 (Suppl 3) 1520–1527 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00366-2 Ramasamy R, Trivedi NN, Reifsnyder JE et al. Age does not adversely affect sperm retrieval in men undergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Fertil Steril, 2014, 101, 653–655 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.11.123 Tournaye H, Verheyen G, Nagy P et al. Are there any predictive factors for successful testicular sperm recovery in azoospermic patients?. Hum Reprod., 1997, 12 (1) 80–86 10.1093/humrep/12.1.80