You may have access to the free features available through My Research. You can save searches, save documents, create alerts and more. Please log in through your library or institution to check if you have access.
You may have access to different export options including Google Drive and Microsoft OneDrive and citation management tools like RefWorks and EasyBib. Try logging in through your library or institution to get access to these tools.
ReferencesAchtenW,
NielsenL,
AertsRet al. (2010) Towards domestication of Jatropha curcas.
Biofuels, 1, 91–107.
AchtenW,
VerchotL,
FrankenY,
MathijsE,
SinghV,
AertsR,
MuysB (2008) Jatropha biodiesel production and use.
Biomass and Bioenergy, 32, 1063–1084.
AnsleyRJ,
MirikM,
CastellanoMJ (2010) Structural biomass partitioning in regrowth and undisturbed mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa): implications for bioenergy uses.
GCB Bioenergy, 2, 26–36.
ArnoldJEM,
JongmaJH (1977) Fuelwood and Charcoal in the Developing Countries. FAO, Unasylva, 29 pp.
BailisR,
BakaJ (2010) Greenhouse gas emissions and land use change from Jatropha curcas-based jet fuel in Brazil.
Environmental Science and Technology, 44, 8684–8691.
BeheraSK,
SrivastavaP,
TripathiR,
SinghJP,
SinghN (2010) Evaluation of plant performance of Jatropha curcas L. under different agro-practices for optimizing biomass – a case study.
Biomass and Bioenergy, 34, 30–41.
Biofuels Digest (2009) The Blunder Crop: a Biofuels Digest special report on jatropha biofuels development. In: Biofuels Digest (ed
LaneJ), Ascension Publishing Inc., Miami, FL.
da SilvaJMC (2009) Caatinga (NT1304), World Wildlife Fund (WWF). Available at: http://www.worldwildlife.org/wildworld/profiles/terrestrial/nt/nt1304_full.html
(accessed 12 January 2010).DehueB,
HettingaW (2008) GHG Performance Jatropha Biodiesel. Ecofys, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 44 pp.
Endelevu Energy (2009) Jatropha Reality Check: A field assessment of the agronomic and economic viability of Jatropha and other oilseed crops in Kenya. Nairobi, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH: 146. Available at: http://www.worldagroforestry.org/downloads/publications/PDFs/B16599.PDF
(accessed 1 March 2010).FACT (2009) The Jatropha Handbook. Eindhoven, FACT Foundation. Available at: http://www.fact-foundation.com/en/Knowledge_and_Expertise/Handbooks?session=0jms26sq38nnrr6772bhtls4i2
(accessed 29 October 2009).FAO (1997) Estimating biomass and biomass change in tropical forests, A Primer. FAO Forestry Paper. Food and Agriculture Organization FD, FAO, Rome, Italy, 55 pp.
FargioneJ,
HillJ,
TilmanD,
PolaskyS,
HawthorneP (2008) Land clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt.
Science, 319, 1235–1238.
FearnsidePM (2000) Global warming and tropical land-use change: greenhouse gas emissions from biomass burning, decomposition and soils in forest conversion, shifting cultivation and secondary vegetation.
Climatic Change, 46, 115–158.
FearnsidePM,
LashofDA,
Moura-CostaP (2000) Accounting for time in Mitigating Global Warming through land-use change and forestry.
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 5, 239–270.
FoleyG,
BarnardG,
BelieresJF,
JonckersK (1987) Energy for the People: A Dossier on Woodfuel in the Developing World. Commission of the European Communities Panos Institute, London.
FrancisG,
EdingerR,
BeckerK (2005) A concept for simultaneous wasteland reclamation, fuel production, and socio-economic development in degraded areas in India: need, potential and perspectives of Jatropha plantations.
Natural Resources Forum, 29, 12–24.
GEXSI (2008) Global Market Study on Jatropha: Final Report. Global Exchange for Social Investment, London and Berlin
(prepared for the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF)): 187. Available at: http://www.jatropha-platform.orgGhezeheiS,
AnnandaleJ,
EversonC (2009) Shoot allometry of Jatropha curcas.
Southern Forests, 71, 279–286.
Government of Brazil (2006) Plano Nacional de Agroenergia Brasilia, Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento: 120. Available at: http://www.biodiesel.gov.br/docs/PLANONACIONALDOAGROENERGIA1.pdf
(accessed 1 March 2010).Government of India (2009) National Policy on Biofuels. Ministry of New & Renewable Energy. Available at: http://mnes.nic.in/policy/biofuel-policy.pdf
(accessed 1 March 2010).HenningRK (2003) Jatropha curcas L. in Africa: Assessment of the impact of the dissemination of ‘the Jatropha System’ on the ecology of the rural area and the social and economic situation of the rural population (target group) in selected countries in Africa. Weissensberg, Germany, Baganí. Available at: http://www.underutilized-species.org/record_details.asp?id=417
(accessed 1 March 2010).HoefnagelsR,
SmeetsE,
FaaijA (2010) Greenhouse gas footprints of different biofuel production systems.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 1661–1694.
HohneN,
WartmannS,
HeroldA,
FreibauerA (2007) The rules for land use, land use change and forestry under the Kyoto Protocol-lessons learned for the future climate negotiations.
Environmental Science & Policy, 10, 353–369.
IFEU C, University of Hohenheim (2008) Basic data for Jatropha production and use Institute for Energy and Environmental Research Heidelberg (Heidelberg G), The Central Salt & Marine Chemicals Research Institute (Bhavnagar IaTI, Of Animal Production in the Tropics and Subtropics UOHG). Heidelberg, Bhavnagar, Hohenheim.
IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan.
KendallA,
ChangB,
SharpeB (2009) Accounting for time-dependent effects in biofuel life cycle greenhouse gas emissions calculations.
Environmental Science & Technology, 43, 7142–7147.
LapolaDM,
PriessJA,
BondeauA (2009) Modeling the land requirements and potential productivity of sugarcane and jatropha in Brazil and India using the LPJmL dynamic global vegetation model.
Biomass and Bioenergy, 33, 1087–1095.
LimaALA,
RodalMJN (2010) Phenology and wood density of plants growing in the semi-arid region of northeastern Brazil.
Journal of Arid Environments, 74, 1363–1373.
MwangiE,
SwallowB (2005)
Invasion of Prosopis juliflora and local livelihoods: Case study from the Lake Baringo area of Kenya. World Agroforestry Centre, Working Paper, 3.
NdongR,
Montrejaud-VignolesM,
Saint GironsO,
GabrielleB,
PirotR,
DomergueM,
SablayrollesC (2009) Life cycle assessment of biofuels from Jatropha curcas in West Africa: a field study.
GCB Bioenergy, 1, 197–210.
PalanisamiK,
VenkatramR,
LavanyaSM,
SinghRD,
RamamurthyA (2008) District Agriculture Plan: Virudhunugar District. Coimbatore, India, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, National Agricultural Development Programme (NADP), Centre for Agricultural and Rural Development Studies (CARDS): 211. Available at: http://agritech.tnau.ac.in/govt_schemes_services/pdf/govt_schemes_nadp_dap_Virudhunagar.pdf
(accessed 2 March 2010).PalmieriF,
dos SantosHG,
GomesIA,
LumbrerasJF,
AglioMLD (2003) The Brazilian soil classification system. In: Soil Classification: A Global Desk Reference (eds
RiceT,
EswaranH,
StewartBA,
AhrensR), pp. 127–146. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
PearsonT,
WalkerS,
BrownS (2005) Sourcebook for Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry Projects, Winrock International: 57. Available at: http://www.winrock.org/ecosystems/files/winrock-biocarbon_fund_sourcebook-compressed.pdf
(accessed 2 March 2010).PrueksakornK,
GheewalaSH (2006) Energy and greenhouse gas implications of biodiesel production from Jatropha curcas L. In: The 2nd Joint International Conference on ‘Sustainable Energy and Environment (SEE 2006). Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment (JGSEE), Thonburi, Thailand.
ReinhardtG,
BeckerK,
ChaudharyDRet al. (2008) Basic data for Jatropha production and use: updated version. Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, Heidelberg, 11 pp. Available at: http://www.biofuel-africa.orgReinhardtG,
GaertnerS,
MuenchJ,
vonFalkensteinE (2007) Screening Life Cycle Assessment of Jatropha Biodiesel. Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, Heidelberg.
RomijnHA (2010) Land clearing and greenhouse gas emissions from Jatropha biofuels on African Miombo Woodlands.
Energy Policy, in press, doi: DOI: 10.1007/s10021-007-9035-x.
RSB (2009) RSB Principles & Criteria for Sustainable Biofuel Production: Version 1.0. Lausanne, Roundtable for Sustainable Biofuels. Available at: http://www2.epfl.ch/webdav/site/cgse/shared/Biofuels/Version%20One/Version%201.0/09-11-17%20RSB%20PCs%20Version%201%20%28clean%29.pdf
(accessed 14 January 2010).
SaxenaSK (1993) Ecology of Prosopis juliflora in the arid regions of India. In: Prosopis Species in the Arid and Semi-Arid Zones of India (eds
TewariJC,
PasiecznikNM,
HarshLN,
HarrisPJC), The Prosopis Society of India, the Henry Doubleday Research Association, and UNFAO Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
SchumacherBA (2002) Methods for the Determination of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) in Soils and Sediments. Las Vegas, NV, United States Environmental Protection Agency; Environmental Sciences Division; National Exposure Research Laboratory 23. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/esd/cmb/research/papers/bs116.pdf
(accessed 2 March 2010).SearchingerT,
HeimlichR,
HoughtonRAet al. (2008) Use of U.S. Croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change.
Science, 319, 1238–1240.
SempaioE,
SilvaGC (2005) Biomass equations for Brazilian semi-arid Caatinga plants.
Acta Botanica Brasilica, 19, 935–943.
StruijsJ (2008) Shinda Shinda – Option for Sustainable Bioenergy: a Jatropha Case Study. Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, 61 pp. Available at: http://www.rivm.nlTiessenH,
FellerC,
SampaioE,
GarinP (1998) Carbon sequestration and turnover in Semiarid Savannas and dry forest.
Climatic Change, 40, 105–117.
TrittonLH,
JW (1981) Biomass estimation for northeastern forests.
Ecological Society of America Bulletin, 62, 106–107.
USDA FAS (2008) Brazil Bio-fuels Annual – Biodiesel 2008. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Washington, DC
Available at: http://www.fas.usda.gov/gainfiles/200808/146295495.pdf
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Longer documents can take a while to translate. Rather than keep you waiting, we have only translated the first few paragraphs. Click the button below if you want to translate the rest of the document.
We present an analysis of direct land use change (dLUC) resulting from the conversion of semiarid woodlands in Brazil and India to Jatropha curcas, a perennial biofuel crop. The sites examined include prosopis woodlands, managed for woodfuel production under periodic coppicing, in southern India, and unmanaged caatinga woodlands in the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais. The jatropha plantations under consideration include pruned and unpruned stands and ranged from 2 to 4 years of age. Stocks of carbon in aboveground (AG) pools, including woody biomass, coarse debris, leaf litter, and herbaceous matter, as well as soil organic carbon (SOC) were evaluated. The jatropha plantations store 8–10 tons of carbon per hectare (t C ha−1) in AG biomass and litter when managed with regular pruning in both India and Brazil. Unpruned trees, only examined in Brazil, store less biomass (and carbon), accumulating just 3 t C ha−1 in AG pools. The two woodlands that were replaced with jatropha show substantial differences in carbon pools: prosopis contains ∼11 t C ha−1 in AG stocks of carbon, which was very close to the jatropha stand which replaced it. In contrast, caatinga stores ∼35 t C ha−1 in AG biomass. Moreover, no change in SOC was detected in land that was converted from Prosopis to jatropha. As a result, there is no detectable change in AG carbon stocks at the sites in South India where jatropha replaced prosopis woodlands. In contrast, large losses of AG carbon were detected in Central Brazil where jatropha replaced native caatinga woodlands. These losses represent a carbon debt that would take 10–20 years to repay.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Longer documents can take a while to translate. Rather than keep you waiting, we have only translated the first few paragraphs. Click the button below if you want to translate the rest of the document.
Details
Title
Carbon impacts of direct land use change in semiarid woodlands converted to biofuel plantations in India and Brazil
Author
Bailis, Rob 1 ; McCARTHY, HEATHER 1
1 Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, 195 Prospect St, New Haven, CT 06511, USA