It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Heat delivered by the ocean circulation is melting the Antarctic ice sheet from below. This melt is largest where warm Circumpolar Deep Water accesses the continental shelf and reaches the ice shelf cavities. Future melt rate projections are based on ocean thermal forcing derived from climate models, which tend to be biased warm around Antarctica. The bias has been attributed to unresolved ocean processes that occur at scales poorly represented in models. Using a high-resolution model of the Denman Glacier region we show that seafloor roughness unresolved in climate models suppresses the impact of warm water on ice sheet melting. Seafloor roughness slows down the shelf circulation, reducing the presence of warm water over the shelf and the heat transport towards the ice cavities. As a result, the total meltwater discharge drops by 4 Gt year−1. Our results suggest a mechanism missing in global ocean and climate models that could reduce the spread in climate projections.
Bathymetry-based numerical simulations suggest small-scale seafloor roughness in the continental shelf of East Antarctica slows the circulation of circumpolar deep water and limits heat supply to the ice shelf—a mechanism missing from climate models.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 University of Tasmania, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Hobart, Australia (GRID:grid.1009.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 826X); University of Tasmania, Australian Antarctic Program Partnership, Hobart, Australia (GRID:grid.1009.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 826X)
2 University of Tasmania, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Hobart, Australia (GRID:grid.1009.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 826X); University of Tasmania, Australian Antarctic Program Partnership, Hobart, Australia (GRID:grid.1009.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 826X); University of New South Wales, ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes, Sydney, Australia (GRID:grid.1005.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4902 0432); Australian Centre for Excellence in Antarctic Science, Hobart, Australia (GRID:grid.1005.4)
3 University of Tasmania, Australian Antarctic Program Partnership, Hobart, Australia (GRID:grid.1009.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 826X); CSIRO Environment, Hobart, Australia (GRID:grid.1009.8)