Silencing women’s sexuality: global AIDS policies and the case of the female condom

Abstract

Introduction

The female condom is the only evidence-based AIDS prevention technology that has been designed for the female body; yet, most women do not have access to it. This is remarkable since women constitute the majority of all HIV-positive people living in sub-Saharan Africa, and gender inequality is seen as a driving force of the AIDS epidemic. In this study, we analyze how major actors in the AIDS prevention field frame the AIDS problem, in particular the female condom in comparison to other prevention technologies, in their discourse and policy formulations. Our aim is to gain insight into the discursive power mechanisms that underlie the thinking about AIDS prevention and women’s sexual agency.

Methods

We analyze the AIDS policies of 16 agencies that constitute the most influential actors in the global response to AIDS. Our study unravels the discursive power of these global AIDS policy actors, when promoting and making choices between AIDS prevention technologies. We conducted both a quantitative and qualitative analysis of how the global AIDS epidemic is being addressed by them, in framing the AIDS problem, labelling of different categories of people for targeting AIDS prevention programmes and in gender marking of AIDS prevention technologies.

Results

We found that global AIDS policy actors frame the AIDS problem predominantly in the context of gender and reproductive health, rather than that of sexuality and sexual rights. Men’s sexual agency is treated differently from women’s sexual agency. An example of such differentiation and of gender marking is shown by contrasting the framing and labelling of male circumcision as an intervention aimed at the prevention of HIV with that of the female condom.

Conclusions

The gender-stereotyped global AIDS policy discourse negates women’s agency in sexuality and their sexual rights. This could be an important factor in limiting the scale-up of female condom programmes and hampering universal access to female condoms.

References UNAIDS. Intensifying HIV prevention. UNAIDS policy position paper. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2005. Chimbiri A. The condom is an ‘intruder’ in marriage: evidence from rural Malawi. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64: 1102–15. Peters A, Jansen W, van Driel F. The female condom: the international denial of a strong potential. Reprod Health Matters. 2010;18(35): 119–28. Peters A, Scharf M, van Driel F, Jansen W. Where does public funding for HIV prevention go to? The case of condoms versus microbicides and vaccines. Global Health. 2010;6(23): 1–23. UNAIDS. UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2010. UNAIDS. Gender and HIV/AIDS. UNAIDS technical update. Geneva: UNAIDS; 1998. Connell RW. Gender and power: society, the person and sexual politics. Sydney: Allen & Unwin; 1987. Butler J. The psychic life of power theories in subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1997. Butler J. Gender trouble. Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge; 1990. Fausto-Sterling A. “Dueling dualisms” in sexing the body: gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Vintage Books; 1978. p. 3–13. Hawkesworth M. “Confouding gender” signs. J Women Cult Soc. 1997;22(3): 649–85. Rutter V, Schwartz P. The gender of sexuality. Exploring sexual possibilities. 2nd ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield; 2012. Mohanty CT. Under western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. In: Mohanty CT, Russo A, Torres L, editors. Third world women and the politics of feminism. Indianapolis: Indiana UP; 1991. p. 51–80. Raday F. Culture, religion and gender. Int J Constitutional Law. 2003;1(4): 663–715. Brock K, Cornwall A, Gaventa J. Working Paper 143. Power, knowledge and political spaces in the framing of poverty policy. Sussex: Institute of Development Studies; 2001. Lewicki RJ, Saunders D, Minton JW. Essentials of negotiation. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin; 2001. Rabinow P, Rose N. Biopower today. BioSocieties. 2006;1: 195–217. Rushton S. Framing AIDS: securitization, development-ization, rights-ization. Glob Health Gov. 2010;5(1): 1–17. Fee E, Krieger N. Public health then and now understanding AIDS: historical interpretations and the limits of biomedical individualism. Am J Public Health. 1993;83(10): 1477–86. Foucault M. The history of sexuality. Vol. I: an introduction. Translated from French by Robert Huxley. London: Allen Lane; 1997. Connell RW, Messerschmidt JW. Hegemonic masculinity. Rethinking the concept. Gend Soc. 2005;19(6): 829–59. Higgins JA, Hoffman S, Dworkin SL. Rethinking gender, heterosexual men, and women's vulnerability to HIV/AIDS. Am J Public Health. 2010;100: 435–45. Holland J, Ramazonoglu C, Sharpe S, Thomson R. Pleasure, pressure and power: some contradictions of gendered sexuality. Sociol Rev. 1992;40(4): 645–74. Jewkes R. Gender inequities must be addressed in HIV prevention. Science. 2010;329(7): 145–7 Edwards WM, Coleman E. Defining sexual health: a descriptive overview. Arch Sex Behav. 2004;33(3): 189–95. de Jong J. The role and limitations of the Cairo International Conference on Population and Development. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(6): 941–53. Glasier A, Gülmezoglu AM, Schmid GP, Moreno CG, van Look PFA. Sexual and reproductive health: a matter of life and death. Geneva: World Health Organisation. Sex Reprod Health. 2006;1: 1–13. Gerntholtz L, Gibbs A, Willan S. The African women's protocol: bringing attention to reproductive rights and the MDGs. PLoS Med. 2011;8(8): 1000429. WHO. Defining sexual health. [cited 2013 May 3]. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/gender_rights/sexual_health/en Institute of Development Studies (IDS). IDS Policy Briefing 2006: Issue 28. Brighton: University of Sussex; 2006. UNAIDS, WHO. 2006 Epidemic update. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2007. Parikh SA. The political economy of marriage and HIV: the ABC approach, “safe” infidelity, and managing moral risk in Uganda. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(7): 1198–208. Anderson E. Infectious women: gendered bodies and HIV in Malawi. Int Fem J Polit. 2012;14(2): 267–87. Lee LM, McKenna MT, Janssen RS. Classification of transmission risk in the national HIV/AIDS surveillance system. Public Health Rep. 2006;118(5): 400–7. Merson M, O'Maley J, Serwadda D, Apisuk C. The history and challenge of HIV prevention. Lancet. 2008;372(9637): 475–88. Busza J. Caught in ideological crossfire: one tale of prostitution, politicians and the pandemic. In: Boesten J, Poku NK, editors. Gender and HIV/AIDS. Farnham: Ashgate; 2005. p. 103–9. Yoder JD, Tobias A, Snell AF. When declaring “I am a feminist” matters: labeling is linked to activism. Sex Roles. 2011;64: 9–18. Duffy L. Suffering, shame and silence. The stigma of HIV/AIDS. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2005;16(1): 13–20. Petros G, Airhihenbuwa CO, Simbabyi L, Ramlagan S, Brown B. HIV/AIDS and “othering” in South Africa: the blame goes on. Cul Health Sex. 2006;8(1): 67–77. Mills E. Beyond the disease of discrimination. A critical analysis of HIV-related stigma in KTC Cape Town. Cape Town: Centre for social science research; 2004. Lawness S, Kippax S, Crawford J. Dirty, diseased and undeserving. The positioning of HIV+ women. Soc Sci Med. 1996;43(9): 1371–7. Campbell C, Gibbs A. Stigma, gender and HIV: case studies of intersectionality. In: Boesten J, Poku NK, editors. Gender and HIV AIDS. Farnham: Ashgate; 2005. p. 29–46. Goffman E. Stigma. London: Penguin; 1963. Deacon H, Stephney I, Prosafendis S. Understanding HIV/AIDS stigma. A theoretical and methodological analysis. Cape Town: HSRC Press; 2005. Malcolm A, Aggleton P, Bronfman M, Galvao J, Mane P, Verrall J. HIV-related stigmatisation and discrimination: its forms and contexts. Crit Public Health. 1998;8(4): 347–70. Brekhus W. A sociology of the unmarked: redirecting our focus. Sociol Theor. 1998;16(1): 34–51. Cameron D. Working with spoken discourse. London: Sage; 2001. Graham LJ. Discourse analysis and the critical use of Foucault. Paper presented at Australian association for research in education. Annual Conference. 27 Nov–1 Dec. Sydney; 2005. Seckinelgin H. International politics of HIV/AIDS. Global disease – local pain. London: Routledge; 2007. Rushton S. The global governance of AIDS 2000–2015: what has driven the global governance response. European research paper. Paper for ISA Council Annual convention March 16–19. Aberystwyth: Centre for Health and International Relations; 2011. UNGASS. Uniting for universal access towards zero new HIV infections, zero-discrimination, and zero AIDS related death. New York: United Nations;2011. UNAIDS. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Getting to zero. UNAIDS 2011–2015 strategy. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2010. UNDP. Leadership for results. UNDP's response to HIV/AIDS. New York: UNDP; 2005. UNESCO. UNESCO's strategy for HIV/AIDS. Paris: UNESCO; 2011. WHO. The global health sector strategy on HIV/AIDS 2011–2015. Geneva: WHO; 2011. UNIFEM. Women: meeting the challenges of HIV/AIDS. New York: UNIFEM; 2005. UNICEF. Opportunity in crisis. Preventing HIV from early adolescence to young adulthood. New York: UNICEF; 2011. DFID. Achieving Universal Access. The UK's strategy for halting and reversing the spread of HIV in the developing world [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2012 May 5]. Available from: http://www.appghivaids.org.uk/…/government.html Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Choices and opportunities. Policy memorandum HIV/AIDS and sexual and reproductive health and rights in foreign policy [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2012 May 5]. Available from: http://www.minbuza.nl/binaries/content/assets/minbuza/en/import/en/key_topics/development_cooperation/dutch_development_policy/millennium_development_goals_mdgs/dutch_aim_for_mdg_5/sexual-and-reproductive-health-and-rights-srhr-in-dutch-foreign-policy/ SIDA. Government, the right to a future: policy for Sweden's International HIV and AIDS efforts [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2012 May 5]. Available from: http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/13/32/42/418c92ab.pdf PEPFAR. Guidance for the prevention of sexually transmitted HIV infections [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2012 May 5]. Available from: http://www.pepfar.gov/guidance/171094.htm Global Fund AIDS Tuberculosis Malaria. The global fund strategy 2012–2016: investing for impact [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2012 May 5]. Available from: http://www.theglobalfund.org/documents/core/strategies/Core_GlobalFund_Strategy_en World Bank. The World Bank's commitment to HIV/AIDS in Africa. Our agenda for action, 2007–2011. Washington: World Bank; 2008. EU. A European programme for action to confront HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis 2007–2011 [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2012 Aug 9]. Available from: http://www.eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2005;0179:FIN:EN;PD Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The Gates Foundation's HIV strategy [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2012 May 5]. Available from: http://www.gatesfoundation.org/hivaids/…/hiv-strategy Global HIV Prevention Working Group. Bringing HIV prevention to scale: an urgent global priority [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2012 May 5]. Available from: http://www.globalhivprevention.org/pdfs/PWG-HIV_prevention_report_FINAL.pdf Interagency Coalition on AIDS and Development (ICAD). Tools, trends and new technologies in HIV prevention. Canada Factsheet of ICAD Interagency Coalition on AIDS and Development. Ottawa: Interagency Coalition AIDS and Development; 2010. Obaid T. Speech at International AIDS Conference in Mexico [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2011 Nov 1]. Available from: http://www.unfpa.org Ryan AB. Post-positivist approaches to research. In: Antonesa M, Fallon H, Ryan AB, Ryan A, Walsh T, Borys, L, editors. Researching and writing your thesis: a guide for postgraduate students. Maynooth: MACE; 2006. p. 12–26. Hankivsky O, Cormier R. Intersectionality. Moving women's health research and policy forward. Vancouver: Women's Health Research Network; 2009. UNFPA. HIV prevention gains momentum. Successes in female condom programming: tips for negotiating safer sex; helping women to overcome social taboos and marketing female condoms to groups at risk. New York: UNFPA; 2011. Baeten JM, Grant R. Use of Antiretrovirals for HIV prevention: what do we know and what don't we know? Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2013;10(2): 142–51. Food and Drug Administration USA. Report of the seventy-fourth meeting of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Devices Panel. Silverspring: Food and Drug Administration; 2008. WHO. Defining sexual health. Report of a technical consultation on sexual health, held from 28–31 January in 2002. Geneva: WHO; 2006. Poku K. Africa's AIDS crisis in context: ‘how the poor are dying’. Third World Q. 2001;22(2): 191–204. West C, Zimmerman DH. Doing Gender. Gend Soc. 1978;1(2): 125–51. Holmberg A. Doing gender, a question of power. Stockholm: Forum syd forlag; 2005. Austveg B, Sundby J. Reproductive health – the millennium goal farthest from being achieved. Tidsskr Nor Legeforen. 2011;19(131): 1907–9. Boyle GJ, George H. Sub-Saharan African randomised clinical trials into male circumcision and HIV transmission: methodological, ethical and legal concerns. J Law Med. 2011;19(2): 316–34. Shelton JD. A tale of two-component generalised HIV epidemics. Lancet. 2010;375(9719): 964–6. Hellsten SK. Rationalising circumcision: from tradition to fashion, from public health to individual freedom – critical notes on cultural persistence of the practice of genital mutilation. J Med Ethics. 2004;30: 248–53. Gwandire C. The ethical concerns of using medical male circumcision in HIV prevention in Sub-Saharan Africa. S Afr J Bioeth Law. 2011;4(4): 89. Susser I, Stein Z. Culture, sexuality and women's agency in the prevention of HIV/AIDS in Southern Africa. Public Health Matters. 2000;90(90): 1044. Day K, Johnson S, Milnes K, Rickett B. Exploring women's agency and resistance in health-related contexts: contributor's introduction. Fem Psychol. 2010;20: 238–41. Charania MR, Crepaz N, Guenther-Gray C, Henny K, Liau A, Willis LA, Lyles LM. Efficacy of structural-level condom distribution interventions: a meta-analysis of US and International studies: 1998–2007. AIDS Behav. 2011; 15: 1283–97. Davis M, Squire C. HIV Technologies In: Davis M, Squire NK, editors. HIV treatment and prevention technologies in international perspective. New York: Palgrave MacMillan; 2010. p. 8–28. Riley GA, Baah-Odoom D. Do stigma, blame and stereotyping contribute to unsafe sexual behaviour? A test of claims about the spread of HIV/AIDS arising from social representation theory and the AIDS risk reduction model. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(3): 600–7. Ailio J. Governing Sub-Saharan HIV/AIDS through gender, Alternatives: Global, Local. Political. 2011;36(4): 345–58. Neal T, Lichtenstein B, Brodsky SL. Clinical implications of stigma in HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections. Int J STD AIDS. 2010; 21: 158–60. Quevedo-Gómez MC, Krumeich A, Abadía-Barrero CE, Pastrana-Salcedo E, van den Borne H. Machismo, public health and sexuality-related stigma in Cartagena. Cult Health Sex. 2012;14(2): 223–35. Burman E. Gender, sexuality and power in groups. Group Anal. 2002;35(4): 540–59. Tolman DL. Female adolescent sexuality: an argument for a developmental perspective on the new view of women's sexual problems. Women Ther. 2002;24(1–2): 195–209.