It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Leguminous crop Tephrosia candida has high biomass production and contains a substantial quantity of nutrients within its biomass. Starting in 2019, a long-term study was done to find the best Tephrosia candida dose for mulching in guava orchards. The study had four treatments: T1 = 3.0 kg dry biomass m−2 of the plant basin, T2 = 2.0 kg, T3 = 1.0 kg, and T4 = control (no mulch). Every year, the treatments imposed in the month of August. The third year (2021–2022) results indicated that mulching with 3 kg of biomass m−2 increased trunk diameter, fruit yield, fruit weight, specific leaf area, total leaf chlorophyll, and leaf macro- and micro-nutrients. At 3.0 kg m−2, mulching improved soil properties such as EC, available nitrogen, available phosphorus, exchangeable potassium, DTPA extractable micronutrients (Fe, Zn, Cu, and Mn), total organic carbon (Ctoc), soil organic carbon (Csoc), organic carbon fractions, and microbial biomass carbon between 0–0.15 m and 0.15–0.30 m. There was an increasing trend in dehydrogenase activity (DHA) and fluorescein diacetate (FDA). The Tephrosia leaf litter exhibited decay constants of 1.27 year−1, and the carbon content was 40.11%. Therefore, applying Tephrosia biomass mulching at a rate of 3.0 kg m−2 is a viable long-term solution for enhancing soil fertility and sequestering carbon.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Barhi, Hazaribagh, India (GRID:grid.418196.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2172 0814); Indian Agricultural Research Institute, The Graduate School, New Delhi, India (GRID:grid.418196.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2172 0814)
2 ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Farming System Research Centre for Hill and Plateau Region, Plandu, Ranchi, India (GRID:grid.469932.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2203 3565); ICAR-National Research Centre on Litchi, Muzaffarpur, India (GRID:grid.506047.0)
3 ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Farming System Research Centre for Hill and Plateau Region, Plandu, Ranchi, India (GRID:grid.469932.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2203 3565)
4 Krishi Anusandhan Bhawan - II, ICAR, Horticultural Science Division, New Delhi, India (GRID:grid.418105.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 0643 7375)
5 ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Division of Seed Science and Technology, New Delhi, India (GRID:grid.418196.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2172 0814)
6 Tripura Centre, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Lembucherra, India (GRID:grid.469932.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2203 3565)
7 Krishi Anusandhan Bhawan - II, ICAR, Natural Resource Management Division, New Delhi, India (GRID:grid.418105.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 0643 7375)