Effects of first year COVID-19 pandemic on urology practice in three major Arab Countries: Sub-Analysis of a survey by Arab association of urology research group

Abstract

Background and objectives

The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic on March 11, 2020. The health care system faced tremendous challenges in providing ethical and high-quality care. The impact of COVID-19 on urological practices varied widely worldwide, including in Arab countries. This study aimed to compare the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on urology practice in Egypt, the KSA, and the UAE during the first year of the pandemic.

Methods

This sub-analysis assessed the demographics and COVID-19’s effects on urological practice in terms of adjustments to hospital policy, including outpatient consultations, the management of elective and urgent surgical cases, and the continuation of education across the three countries. The availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) and urologists’ emotional, physical, and verbal intimidation during COVID-19 were also compared.

Results

Regarding the impact on hospital policy, consultations replaced by telemedicine were significantly higher in the KSA (36.15%), followed by the UAE (33.3%), then Egypt (10.4%) (P = 0.008). Elective cases requiring ICU admission were 65.1% in Egypt, 45.2% in the KSA, and 58.2% in the UAE and were performed only in high-risk patients. PPE was freely available in 20.8% of the Egyptian hospitals compared to 83.3% in the KSA and 81.8% in the UAE. Online courses were significantly higher in Egypt (70.8%), followed by the UAE (53%) and the KSA (41.7%) (P = 0.02). Emotional intimidation was higher than verbal intimidation, representing 80%, 75.9%, and 76% in the UAE, KSA, and Egypt, respectively.

Conclusion

This sub-analysis outlined significant hospital policy changes across the three Arab countries. Exposure to emotional, verbal, and physical intimidation was observed. The development of teleconsultations and online platforms for educational purposes was observed.

Introduction

At the beginning of January 2020, the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) was isolated in a Chinese city called Wuhan. The World Health Organization (WHO) mentioned it as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The virus spread rapidly to more than 200 countries worldwide; as a result, WHO declared it a global pandemic on March 11, 2020. COVID-19 substantially impacted healthcare delivery and workers [1–4]. The insufficiency of personal protective equipment (PPE) exacerbated the condition in most hospitals worldwide. The workload of hospitals has increased considerably, and governments and hospital systems have taken many healthcare measures to adapt to this load. Many hospitals had to turn to quarantine to serve only COVID-19 patients [1, 2].

Residents of all specialties witnessed significant changes to their training environments [5]. Several national and international urology conferences offering hands-on training courses, including the European Association of Urology (EAU) and the American Urological Association (AUA) annual meetings, were postponed [6]. Therefore, innovative methods, such as online webinars, were created to keep physicians updated and their medical knowledge and spirit high during the challenging pandemic conditions [3]. To reduce exposure and maintain necessary PPE, the surgical volume was significantly reduced or even suspended [5]. Most surgical subspecialties canceled elective surgeries and served only emergency and non-deferrable oncologic surgeries. Social distancing became mandatory in the clinics, and the number of appointments was limited for urgent cases [1]. In some centers, clinics were prioritized, and non-urgent patients were consulted over Telemedia and postponed for at least six months. Moreover, case discussions and ward rounds were canceled [6].

Surgical training programs in vascular, general, and orthopedic surgery witnessed a dramatic decline, a delay in elective treatment, and a significant expansion of telemedicine services [7]. The rapid wave of COVID-19 cases has caused redistribution and reorganization of health services, including urology. Additionally, the decline in practical and surgical training hours affected urological trainees, who were not an exception [8].

To protect the patient’s and the surgeon’s safety, new methods have been devised to use minimally invasive surgeries for urological diseases during this pandemic. Additionally, hospitals had to comply with the varying degrees of elective operations that were less urgent and tightly restricted [9]. However, the basis of prioritization, deferral duration, the consequences of deferral and delay, and the success of alternative medical and surgical treatment methods were not evaluated [8].

Our previously published study [10] described significant changes to urological practice among urologists throughout the Arab world in the initial year of the COVID-19 pandemic. These alterations were most evident in hospitals’ regulations governing outpatient consultations, elective and emergency surgical procedures, and the transition to telemedicine. Arab urologists encountered significant difficulties in public and commercial sectors, with some experiencing verbal, emotional, and physical intimidation. While the transient changes in the Arab urological practice have been well documented [10], the differences among major Arab countries remain uncertain. Therefore, this sub-analysis was done to compare the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic during its initial year on urology practice in Egypt, the KSA, and the UAE.

Materials and methods

Study sampling and design

This quantitative, descriptive, comparative research was conducted through an online survey created and administered using a secure website utilizing Google Forms. The survey was distributed to every member of the Arab Association of Urology (AAU) through email in two waves, following approval from the AAU Board [10].

Our local ethics committee of Benha University revised this study and received approval (Rc-14-3-2023). Additionally, this study was conducted in line with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent modifications. The voluntary survey completion was considered "written and verbal" consent to participate in the study. All ethical considerations were taken into account.

Both calls occurred in 2021, the first on January 7 and the second on February 15. During this time, two reminders were sent out. Respondents were urged to complete most questions since they were made obligatory. Before submitting their response, respondents could use the "Back" button to make any necessary changes to their responses. No respondent was offered the option to use the same email address to submit multiple responses.

The Arab Association of Urology (AAU) website was used to promote this poll, and the AAU offered a free one-year membership to the first ten respondents. The questionnaire was developed based on a review of relevant literature. Most of the questions were collected from a verified international survey conducted by the Société Internationale d’Urologie and published by Gravas et al. [11]. The authors included a few pertinent questions, such as intimidation exposure, the influence on private practice, and the psychological effects of COVID-19. The research team pre-tested the survey’s usability and technical issues to ensure that all the questions were appropriate.

The survey included a variety of open-ended, closed-ended, and Likert-scale questions to determine the participants’ age, gender, place of origin, kind of practice (private hospital, military hospital, academic hospital, or teaching hospital), and position (trainee, specialist, consultant, lecturer, assistant professor, or professor).

The survey evaluated the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on various facets of urological practice, including changes to hospital policies for elective surgical cases, particularly those necessitating intensive care unit admission. It also assessed changes in the outpatient clinic activities, including complete closure, replacement by telemedicine, restriction to follow-ups only, and limitation to specific cases. Moreover, the triage policy was evaluated for some common urological procedures, such as radical cystectomy, varicocelectomy, transurethral resection of the prostate, transurethral resection of bladder tumor, radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, non-obstructive stones, obstructive stones, and radical nephrectomy, on a scale of 0 to 5, with 0 denoting the lowest priority and 5 the highest.

The survey included the shift in hospital policies for emergency cases, such as those requiring immediate intervention, and the policies related to surgical tools, including the use of disposable scopes. Furthermore, the survey covered other topics such as the availability and type of PPE, ongoing medical education, private practice, psychological and behavioural health, and intimidating exposure.

There was no collection of any personally identifiable data. To avoid unwanted access, anonymized data were electronically collected in Google Forms before being transferred and saved in an electronic spreadsheet format (Microsoft Excel 2010, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA).

Statistical methods

The sample size for the original survey was calculated using Epi-info software version 7.2.5.0 based on an expected delay in the urological services of 31% according to Teoh et al. The minimum sample size calculated was 128 participants. The margin of error and confidence level were adjusted at 8% and 95%, respectively [2]. SPSS Version 26 was used for data analysis (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics were done using numbers and percentages. All findings were compared between the three Arab countries using the Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. All statistical tests were two-sided. Significance was defined as a P-value less than 0.05.

Results

Two hundred fifty-five AAU members from three Arab nations (Egypt, the KSA, and the UAE) responded to this survey. The majority were males. Participants’ demographics are presented in Table 1. The position was significantly different among the participants (P = 0.001). Most were consultants and specialists from the UAE (34.8% and 43.9%, respectively). Academic hospitals were significantly higher in Egypt (P < 0.001). Teaching and military hospitals were significantly higher in the KSA (P = 0.004 and 0.002, respectively), while private hospitals were significantly higher in the UAE (P = 0.001) (Table 1).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Regarding the impact on hospital policy, telemedicine was significantly higher in the KSA (36.15%), followed by the UAE (33.3%) and Egypt (10.4%) (P = 0.008). Completely closed and restricted consultations for follow-up and specific cases were insignificantly different between the studied countries (P = 0.2, 0.09, and 0.4, respectively) (Table 2).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Respondents in the three countries reported changes to hospital policies regarding elective urology interventions without a significant difference among the studied countries (P = 0.144). Approximately one quarter (25.5%) reported cancellation of elective interventions in the UAE, compared to 12.9% in the KSA and 9.4% in Egypt (Table 2).

Regarding policies for elective cases needing ICU admission, no significant difference was reported between the studied countries (P = 0.240). Surgeries, such as TURBT and radical nephrectomy, were highly prioritized compared to the other procedures in the studied countries. Varicocelectomy and stones without obstruction had the lowest priority and were not done in most cases (Table 2 and Fig 1).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

In the UAE, most respondents (97%) reported that preoperative COVID-19 testing was available to all patients, compared to 61.1% in the KSA and 22.9% in Egypt. On the other hand, 52.1% of Egyptian respondents reported preoperative COVID-19 testing was only offered for patients suspected of COVID-19, compared to 27.8% in the KSA and 1.5% in the UAE (Table 2).

No significant difference was detected in hospital PPE use, including surgical masks, goggles, face shields, and N95 or FFP3 masks (P = 0.55, 0.06, 0.12, and 0.09, respectively) (Table 2).

PPE availability significantly differed between the studied countries (P < 0.001). About one-quarter (20.8%) reported that PPE was readily available in Egyptian hospitals compared to 83.3% and 81.8% in the KSA and UAE, respectively. In contrast, 46.6% reported limited availability in Egyptian hospitals compared to 16.7% and 13.6% in the KSA and UAE, respectively. Only 14.6% reported no availability in the Egyptian hospitals, compared to 0.0% and 4.5% in the KSA and the UAE, respectively (Table 3).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Most respondents stated that during COVID-19, urology education changed, forcing them to use online learning methods. Continuing education with online courses was significantly different among the studied countries. The highest was observed in Egypt (70.8%), followed by the UAE (53.0%) and the KSA (41.7%) (P = 0.02). Online webinars and videos were insignificantly different between the studied countries (P = 0.06 and 0.30, respectively) (Table 3).

Regarding private practice during COVID-19, there was a severe decline in the number of patients, with an insignificant difference between the studied countries (P = 0.340) (Table 3).

Respondents were subjected to emotional, physical, and verbal intimidation. Emotional intimidation was the highest (80% in the UAE, 75.9% in the KSA, and 76% in Egypt), with no significant difference between the studied countries (P = 0.62) (Table 3 and Fig 2).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Discussion

The COVID-19 pandemic is considered the worst challenge to healthcare systems worldwide, resulting in a shift to a community-centered approach instead of patient-centered medical care [6].

The EAU has divided elective urological interventions based on the timeline of clinical harm into low risk (no harm by 6 months), intermediate risk (no harm by 3–4 months), and high risk (no harm by 6 weeks). Therefore, selecting the modality of surgical intervention was a crucial parameter during the COVID pandemic and was based on the available scientific and social evidence [6, 12].

The Urology Collaborative Online Video Didactics, utilizing the internet during the COVID-19 pandemic, offered a lecture series on Zoom. The New York section of the AUA also offered the Educational Multi-institutional Program for Instructing Residents (EMPIRE). Many of these Telemedia lectures were recorded as resources for urology education and activities [2].

All health systems worldwide have struggled to deal with the COVID-19 epidemic due to the unexpected surge in cases [13]. The effect of rescheduling and postponing the procedures may have harmed patients, especially when the time frame was not even predictable. Therefore, the urological care priority and selecting the intervention modality during that pandemic should have been based on scientific evidence and local strategic context [1]. Different demands have necessitated reconfiguring the usual healthcare service delivery model worldwide, including Arab countries, which are the main focus of the current study [13, 14].

In the present study, telemedicine use in urology was significantly higher in the KSA (36.15%), followed by the UAE (33.3%) and Egypt (10.4%). This positive attitude towards telemedicine in the KSA was similarly reported by Alajwari et al. [15]. Most participants (70.0%) believed telemedicine might lower transportation expenses and save time, labour, and costs. In Dubai, Al-Sharif et al. [16] reported high satisfaction levels with telemedicine but identified specific areas for improvement. They found that patients with higher education and those who experienced a shorter duration of teleconsultations were more satisfied, so it is recommended that guidelines define the optimal telemedicine consultation duration.

From an Egyptian perspective, Abdelmotagly et al. [17] evaluated 200 patients’ experiences with remote urology clinics and concluded that half of the patients (46%) prefer face-to-face consultations. This result could be explained by the need for physical examination (e.g., inguinoscrotal and penile referrals) or a language or hearing barrier. Therefore, it is essential to triage patients and provide them with thorough information about what to expect from remote consultation [18].

In our study, more than one-third of elective surgeries were postponed in Egypt and the UAE, compared to half in the KSA. This finding is consistent with the recommendations of international organizations and the measures adopted to mitigate the negative impacts of the COVID-19 epidemic [19–21]. Most Saudi governmental hospitals applied these measures [22].

Egypt recorded the highest rates (65.1%), followed by the UAE (58.2%) and the KSA (45.2%) in terms of high-priority surgeries such as kidney stone obstruction and cancer operations, including TURBT and radical nephrectomy. In line with these findings, Raheem et al. [23] indicated that urology elective treatments in the KSA declined by 34.3% in the first three months of 2020 compared to the same period in 2019, along with prioritizing emergency interventions to prevent permanent disease development or organ destruction, such as urolithiasis-related procedures.

The use of PPE was essential in urology because most patients are elderly and have a variety of co-morbidities, rendering them highly susceptible to COVID-19 [24]. Due to the disruption in global medical supply networks, there was a fear of running out of supplies worldwide [25]. Based on our findings, only 20% reported that Egyptian hospitals had free access to PPE, which is available in most Saudi and Emirati hospitals. This shortage could be explained by the fact that the Egyptian market heavily depends on imported medical equipment. Imports were halted during the initial COVID-19 wave, resulting in severe shortages [26]. Furthermore, Osman et al. [27] revealed that less than one-third of Egyptian healthcare workers wore throwaway clothing or scrubs due to the lack of PPE. Consequently, local infection control teams recommended various techniques to reuse face masks and respirators [26].

Urological education had to change quickly in response to the COVID-19 epidemic [28, 29]. Our observations revealed that 70.8% of urologists in Egypt continued their education online, compared to 53% and 147% in the UAE and KSA, respectively. Omil-Lima et al. [30] proved the effectiveness of an online urology course. They believed that online education would continue after the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, Tanidir Y et al. [3] proved that the webinar was an effective method for sharing scientific information with many advantages, including low cost and reaching many participants virtually without contact. Although COVID-19 vaccines have been developed, there is a common perspective that the pandemic will last beyond 2022 [31]. As a result, virtual learning continues to be a vital tool for medical education across the entire field of urology.

Globally, there was relevant mental stress and uncertainty about the COVID-19 pandemic among urologists [32–34]. The psychological discomfort and the intense fear of infection were significant burdens [29]. Residents were frequently kept apart from their loved ones to curb the spread of COVID-19, resulting in heightened isolation [35]. The adverse emotional effects of the pandemic have been observed in the healthcare field, particularly concerning the long working hours and social distancing [3].

According to the current study, urologists suffered from intimidation for being doctors, whether emotional, physical, or verbal, with insignificant differences among the three countries. However, emotional intimidation was the most prevalent in the UAE, Egypt, and the KSA (80%, 76%, and 75.9%, respectively). These alarming findings demonstrate how supporting and monitoring urologists’ mental well-being during epidemics is just as crucial as maintaining their physical health [28, 32].

This study has some limitations. The study was cross-sectional, and the overall response rate was not reported. Additionally, recall bias might have affected the results. Nevertheless, this is the first study to compare three major Arab countries regarding urology practice from various perspectives during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed many challenges on urology healthcare workers. A substantial proportion of urologists reported insufficient training and the lack of PPE during the 1st year of the pandemic in the three countries. While telemedicine was successfully implemented in managing Saudi and Emirati patients, further enhancements are needed in Egypt. The flexibility of the three countries in managing elective cases contributed to reducing the spread of COVID-19. In contrast to KSA and UAE, Egypt reported inadequate PPE availability. Urologists across the studied countries responded well to online education to fill the gap during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, different aspects of intimidation were reported, which might have added to the load on healthcare workers in the three Arab countries. We believe that the results of the present study will help the urology departments in these three countries take the required precautions for any possible future mass casualty events.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the cooperation and patience of all study participants. The authors would also acknowledge the role of Jeff John from the Arab Association of Urology for sending out the questionnaire and collecting the data.

Citation: Elmohamady B, Omar M, El-Dakhakhny AS, Sayedahmed K, Ghazwani Y, Bin Hamri S, et al. (2024) Effects of first year COVID-19 pandemic on urology practice in three major Arab Countries: Sub-Analysis of a survey by Arab association of urology research group. PLoS ONE 19(1): e0293458. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293458

About the Authors:

Basheer Elmohamady

Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Urology, Benha Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt

ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6623-4059

Mohamed Omar

Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Department of Urology, Menoufiya University Hospital, Menoufiya, Egypt

Amr S. El-Dakhakhny

Roles: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Department of Urology, Benha Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt

Khalid Sayedahmed

Roles: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Department of Urology, Menoufiya University Hospital, Menoufiya, Egypt

Yahia Ghazwani

Roles: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft

Affiliations: College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, KSA, Division of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, MNGHA, Riyadh, KSA

Saeed Bin Hamri

Roles: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft

Affiliations: College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, KSA, Division of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, MNGHA, Riyadh, KSA

Abdullah Alkhayal

Roles: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft

Affiliations: College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, KSA, Division of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, MNGHA, Riyadh, KSA

Khalid Alrabeeah

Roles: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft

Affiliations: College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, KSA, Division of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, MNGHA, Riyadh, KSA

Wissam Kamal

Roles: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Department of Urology, King Fahd Hospital, Jeddah, KSA

Mohamed Abbasy

Roles: Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Emergency Medicine Department, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada

ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6882-2305

Yasser Farahat

Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliations: Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt, Urology Department, Sheikh Khalifa General Hospital, Umm Al Quwain, UAE

Yasser A. Noureldin

Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliations: Department of Urology, Benha Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt, Division of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, MNGHA, Riyadh, KSA, Urology Department, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada

ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5498-2076

References

1. Bozkurt O, Sen V, Irer B, Sagnak L, Onal B, Tanidir Y, et al. Nation‐wide analysis of the impact of Covid‐19 pandemic on daily urology practice in Turkey. Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Apr;75(4):e13735. pmid:32996259

2. Teoh JY, Ong WL, Gonzalez-Padilla D, Castellani D, Dubin JM, Esperto F, et al. A global survey on the impact of COVID-19 on urological services. Eur Urol. 2020 Aug 1;78(2):265–75. pmid:32507625

3. Tanidir Y, Gokalp F, Akdogan N, Batur AF, Sekerci CA, Egriboyun S, et al. How did the COVID‐19 pandemic affect audience’s attitudes in webinars?. Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Jul;75(7):e14239. pmid:33866644

4. Kaye AD, Okeagu CN, Pham AD, Silva RA, Hurley JJ, Arron BL, et al. Economic impact of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare facilities and systems: International perspectives. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2021 Oct 1;35(3):293–306. pmid:34511220

5. Ogwal A, Oyania F, Nkonge E, Makumbi T, Galukande M. Prevalence and predictors of cancellation of elective surgical procedures at a Tertiary Hospital in Uganda: a cross-sectional study. Surg Res Pract. 2020 March 19;2020.

6. FaRidi MS, Khan J, GOEL H, SOOD R. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Urology Practice: Review of Literature. J Clin Diagn Res. 2020 December 1;14(12).

7. Sarpong NO, Emile-Victor KU, Christian ON, Yu-Fen CH, Boettner F, Edwin PS, et al. Reduction in hospital length of stay and increased utilization of telemedicine during the "return-to-normal" period of the COVID-19 pandemic does not adversely influence early clinical outcomes in patients undergoing total hip replacement: a case-control study. Acta Orthop. 2022;93:528. pmid:35694790

8. Fonseka T, Ellis R, Salem H, Brennan PA, Terry T. The effects of COVID-19 on training within urology: lessons learned in virtual learning, human factors, non-technical skills and reflective practice. J Clin Urol. 2021 Jan;14(1):29–35.

9. Quah LJ, Tan BK, Fua TP, Wee CP, Lim CS, Nadarajan G, et al. Reorganising the emergency department to manage the COVID-19 outbreak. Int J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;13(1):1–1.

10. Noureldin YA, Elmohamady B, El-Dakhakhny AS, Omar M, Desoky EE, Ghazwani Y, et al. How did the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic affect urology practice in Arab countries? A cross-sectional study by the Arab Association of Urology research group. Ther Adv Urol. 2022 Feb;14:17562872221079492.

11. Gravas S, Bolton D, Gomez R, Klotz L, Kulkarni S, Tanguay S, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on urology practice: a global perspective and snapshot analysis. J Clin Med. 2020 June 3;9(6):1730. pmid:32503305

12. Thapa BB, Shrestha D, Bista S, Thapa S, Niranjan V. Urology during COVID-19 pandemic crisis: a systematic review. Surg J. 2021 Jan 15;7(01):e3–10. pmid:33469564

13. Razu SR, Yasmin T, Arif TB, Islam MS, Islam SM, Gesesew HA, et al. Challenges faced by healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative inquiry from Bangladesh. Front Public Health. 2021;9:1024. pmid:34447734

14. Mosadeghrad AM. Factors influencing healthcare service quality. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014 Jul;3(2):77. pmid:25114946

15. Alajwari HA, Alfayez A, Alsalman D, Alanezi F, Alhodaib H, Al-Rayes S, et al. Knowledge and attitude of Saudi Arabian citizens towards telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int Health. 2022 Nov;14(6):604–9. pmid:34893850

16. Al-Sharif GA, Almulla AA, AlMerashi E, Alqutami R, Almoosa M, Hegazi MZ, et al. Telehealth to the Rescue During COVID-19: A Convergent Mixed Methods Study Investigating Patients’ Perception. Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 30;9:730647. pmid:34917570

17. Abdelmotagly Y, Elmohamady B, Paramore L, Kummar R, Nedas T, Hindley R, et al. The Impact of Remote Urology Outpatient Clinics during the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Endolum Endourol. 2021 Nov 19;4(3):e17–25.

18. Connor MJ, Winkler M, Miah S. COVID‐19 pandemic–is virtual urology clinic the answer to keeping the cancer pathway moving?. BJU Int. 2020 Jun;125(6):E3–4. pmid:32232915

19. Rajwa P, Przydacz M, Zapała P, Wieckiewicz G, Ryszawy J, Chorągwicki D, et al. How has the COVID-19 pandemic impacted Polish urologists? Results from a national survey. Cent European J Urol. 2020;73(3):252. pmid:33133649

20. Ribal MJ, Cornford P, Briganti A, Knoll T, Gravas S, Babjuk M, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines Office Rapid Reaction Group: an organisation-wide collaborative effort to adapt the European Association of Urology guidelines recommendations to the coronavirus disease 2019 era. Eur Urol. 2020 Jul 1;78(1):21–8. pmid:32376137

21. Stensland KD, Morgan TM, Moinzadeh A, Lee CT, Briganti A, Catto JW, et al. Considerations in the triage of urologic surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur Urol. 2020 Jun;77(6):663. pmid:32279903

22. Al-Zahrani MA, Alkhamees M, Almutairi S, Aljuhayman A, Alkhateeb S. Impact of COVID-19 on urology practice in Saudi Arabia. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 April 7;14:1379–92. pmid:33854387

23. Raheem AA, Banihani O, Abasher A, Alotay A, Alyami FA, Alsaad TA, et al. Pediatric urology surgical practice in the time of COVID-19: Results from tertiary Saudi Arabia hospitals. Urol Ann. 2021 Oct;13(4):397. pmid:34759653

24. Nguyen LH, Drew DA, Joshi AD, Guo CG, Ma W, Mehta RS, et al. Risk of symptomatic Covid-19 among frontline healthcare workers. medRxiv. 2020 January 1.

25. Bhaskar S, Tan J, Bogers ML, Minssen T, Badaruddin H, Israeli-Korn S, et al. At the epicenter of COVID-19–the tragic failure of the global supply chain for medical supplies. Front Public Health. 2020:821. pmid:33335876

26. El-Sokkary RH, Khater WS, El-Kholy A, Eldin SM, Gad DM, Bahgat S, et al. Compliance of healthcare workers to the proper use of personal protective equipment during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. J Infect Public Health. 2021 Oct 1;14(10):1404–10. pmid:34344624

27. Osman DM, Khalaf FR, Ahmed GK, Abdelbadee AY, Abbas AM, Mohammed HM. Worry from contracting COVID-19 infection and its stigma among Egyptian health care providers. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2022 Dec;97(1):1–0.

28. Khusid JA, Kashani M, Fink LE, Weinstein CS, Gupta M. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on urology residents: a narrative review. Curr Urol Rep. 2021 Sep;22(9):45. pmid:34427779

29. Smigelski M, Movassaghi M, Small A. Urology virtual education programs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Curr Urol Rep. 2020 Dec;21:1–4.

30. Omil-Lima D, Fernstrum A, Gupta K, Jella T, Muncey W, Mishra K, et al. Urologic education in the era of COVID-19: results from a webinar-based reconstructive urology lecture series. Urology. 2021 June 1;152:2–8. pmid:33766718

31. Del Rio C, Malani PN. COVID-19 in 2022—The Beginning of the End or the End of the Beginning?. JAMA. 2022 Jun 28;327(24):2389–90. pmid:35622357

32. Apfelbeck M, Staehler M, Rodler S, Stredele R, Chaloupka M, Mumm JN, et al. Does pandemic anxiety affect urology health care workers?. Urol Int. 2021 Feb 26;105(3–4):192–8. pmid:33477161

33. Silva AG, Diaz JO, Görgen AR, Schwengber VH, Oliveira RT, Tavares PM, et al. Brazilian Urologist’s mental health aspects during the Covid-19 pandemic. Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Jul 30;47:882–6.

34. Del Zingaro M, Cochetti G, Maiolino G, Stivalini D, Manfredini G, Tancredi A, et al. Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on stress levels of urologic patients. Open Med. 2021 August 25;16(1):1198–205. pmid:34514166

35. Chan EP, Stringer L, Wang PZ, Dave S, Campbell JD. The impact of COVID-19 on Canadian urology residents. Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Jun;14(6):E233. pmid:32525801