It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Although different ecological factors shape adaptative evolution in natural habitats, we know little about how their interactions impact local adaptation. Here we used eight generations of experimental evolution with outcrossing Brassica rapa plants as a model system, in eight treatment groups that varied in soil type, herbivory (with/without aphids), and pollination mode (hand- or bumblebee-pollination), to study how biotic interactions affect local adaptation to soil. First, we show that several plant traits evolved in response to biotic interactions in a soil-specific way. Second, using a reciprocal transplant experiment, we demonstrate that significant local adaptation to soil-type evolved in the “number of open flowers”, a trait used as a fitness proxy, but only in plants that evolved with herbivory and bee pollination. Whole genome re-sequencing of experimental lines revealed that biotic interactions caused a 10-fold increase in the number of SNPs across the genome with significant allele frequency change, and that alleles with opposite allele frequency change in different soil types (antagonistic pleiotropy) were most common in plants with an evolutionary history of herbivory and bee pollination. Our results demonstrate that the interaction with mutualists and antagonists can facilitate local adaptation to soil type through antagonistic pleiotropy.
Little is known about the interaction of different ecological factors in shaping adaptive evolution in natural habitats. This study found that plants evolved local adaption to different soils, but only when they interacted with aphid- herbivores and bumblebee-pollinators.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 University of Zürich, Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Zürich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.7400.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0650); University of Basel, Department of Environmental Sciences, Basel, Switzerland (GRID:grid.6612.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0642)
2 University of Zürich, Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Zürich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.7400.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0650); Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Agroécologie, INRAE, Institut Agro, Univ. Bourgogne, Dijon, France (GRID:grid.493090.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 4910 6615)
3 University of British Columbia, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada (GRID:grid.17091.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2288 9830)
4 University of Zürich, Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Zürich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.7400.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0650)