It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Human language relies on the correct processing of syntactic information, as it is essential for successful communication between speakers. As an abstract level of language, syntax has often been studied separately from the physical form of the speech signal, thus often masking the interactions that can promote better syntactic processing in the human brain. However, behavioral and neural evidence from adults suggests the idea that prosody and syntax interact, and studies in infants support the notion that prosody assists language learning. Here we analyze a MEG dataset to investigate how acoustic cues, specifically prosody, interact with syntactic representations in the brains of native English speakers. More specifically, to examine whether prosody enhances the cortical encoding of syntactic representations, we decode syntactic phrase boundaries directly from brain activity, and evaluate possible modulations of this decoding by the prosodic boundaries. Our findings demonstrate that the presence of prosodic boundaries improves the neural representation of phrase boundaries, indicating the facilitative role of prosodic cues in processing abstract linguistic features. This work has implications for interactive models of how the brain processes different linguistic features. Future research is needed to establish the neural underpinnings of prosody-syntax interactions in languages with different typological characteristics.
An MEG study in native English speakers on naturalistic speech comprehension suggests that prosodic boundaries enhance the neural encoding of syntactic phrase boundaries.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Donhauser, Peter W. 2 ; Gwilliams, Laura 3
; Merlo, Paola 4
; Golestani, Narly 5
1 University of Geneva, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Geneva, Switzerland (GRID:grid.8591.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2175 2154)
2 Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (GRID:grid.461715.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0499 6482)
3 Stanford University, Department of Psychology, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8956)
4 University of Geneva, Department of Linguistics, Geneva, Switzerland (GRID:grid.8591.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2175 2154); University of Geneva, University Centre for Informatics, Geneva, Switzerland (GRID:grid.8591.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2175 2154)
5 University of Geneva, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Geneva, Switzerland (GRID:grid.8591.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2175 2154); University of Vienna, Brain and Language Lab, Cognitive Science Hub, Vienna, Austria (GRID:grid.10420.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2286 1424); University of Vienna, Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria (GRID:grid.10420.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2286 1424)




