1. Introduction
The influenza virus causes an acute respiratory infection known as influenza. Each year, there are around 1 billion cases of seasonal influenza, of which 3 to 5 million are severe cases [1]. There are four different varieties of influenza viruses: A, B, C, and D. Influenza A virus (IAV) is further subdivided into multiple subtypes, such as H1N1, H5N1, H3N2, and H7N9, based on the combination of surface proteins [2], with the H1N1 and H3N2 subtypes currently prevalent in humans. Increasing studies indicate that H1N1 infection can cause lung epithelial cell damage, leading to cytokine storms and severe acute pneumonia, and can also result in diseases like acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), further increasing mortality and morbidity rates [3,4]. Due to the high variability of influenza, vaccines often do not provide sufficient protection; the main antiviral drugs used in clinics currently are neuraminidase inhibitors (such as oseltamivir) and M2 ion channel blockers (such as amantadine). Oseltamivir, the most widely used NA inhibitor globally, can cause adverse reactions like vomiting and body pain; M2 blockers have a high resistance rate and are no longer recommended clinically [5,6]. Thus, researching and developing effective and safe antiviral drugs is crucial.
Studies have shown that autophagy is involved in the pathogenesis of type A H1N1 influenza [7,8]. Autophagy, a conserved process in eukaryotic cells, involves the transport of substrates (such as damaged organelles, protein aggregates, and invading pathogens) from the cytoplasm to lysosomes under the regulation of autophagy-related genes (ATG), forming autolysosomes, where the substrates are degraded [9]. One of the pivotal players in the process of autophagy is the 1A/1B light chain 3 (LC3 or GABARAP), which p62 (Sequestosome 1, SQSTM1) can bind to, facilitating its assembly into autophagosomes. These autophagosomes subsequently merge with lysosomes to form autolysosomes, where the enclosed cargo, including ubiquitinated proteins, is degraded [10,11]. Research shows that H1N1 can induce the initiation of autophagy, increasing LC3 expression and leading to the accumulation of autophagosomes to facilitate virus replication [12,13,14]. Therefore, autophagy can be a focal point in researching drugs for treating H1N1.
Chinese medicine, with its advantages of high safety, multiple pathways, and multiple targets, is receiving increasing attention. Qingxing granules (QX), a traditional Chinese medicine formula used clinically for treating influenza, consists of ten ingredients: Artemisiae Annuae Herba, Armeniacae Semen Amarum, Bupleuri Radix, Scutellariae Radix, Forsythiae Fructus, Puerariae Lobatae Radix, Talcum, Mori Folium, Amomi Fructus Rotundus, and Poria. Studies indicate that baicalin from Scutellariae Radix can regulate the influenza virus protein NS1 through the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, thereby exerting anti-influenza virus activity [15]. Compounds in Artemisiae Annuae Herba can alleviate inflammation caused by H1N1 infection through the TLR4/NF-κB (p65) signaling pathway [16]. Compounds in Bupleuri Radix can reduce H1N1 virus replication and pro-inflammatory cytokine production and improve pathological changes in lung tissues [17]. Preliminary studies suggest that Qingxing granules have antipyretic and analgesic effects and can treat dengue fever through the PERK/ATF6 pathway [18]. However, due to the complex components of QX, the underlying action mechanisms in treating H1N1 are unknown.
Network pharmacology can create a “Compound-Protein/Gene-Disease” network, a rational approach for analyzing traditional Chinese medicine formulas [19]. This study established an in vivo “Component-Target” network for QX and used disease databases to determine H1N1 disease targets. We then built a PPI network for QX and explored key targets and pathways for QX treatment of H1N1 through online databases and enrichment analysis. Subsequently, we successfully established a mouse model of H1N1 infection and validated the potential mechanism of QX in treating type A H1N1 influenza in an H1N1-infected mouse model experiment. In order to meet our goals, we followed the technology roadmap outlined in Figure 1.
2. Results
2.1. Component Target Prediction of Qingxing Granules
Ninety-one candidate compounds were chosen from the TCMSP database based on the selection criteria of OB ≥ 30% and DL ≥ 0.18. Among these, 16 compounds were derived from Artemisia annua, 8 from bitter almond, 11 from Bupleurum, 28 from baicalin, 13 from Forsythia, 2 from Pueraria root, 16 from mulberry leaf, 9 from cardamom, and 1 from Poria. Following their extraction from the PubChem database, the canonical SMILES of the 91 compounds were loaded into SwissADME. A total of 786 possible targets of the QX effective components were found.
2.2. “Medicinal Material-Effective Component-Target” Network Map of Qingxing Granules
A “Medicinal Material-Effective Component-Target” network map was created using Cytoscape 3.9.1 using the effective components and possible targets of QX, as seen in Figure 2. The network consists of 886 nodes and 5668 edges. Table 1 contains the specifics of the top 10 compounds, which were determined by their degree value. The 2D structures of the compounds were drawn using ChemDraw 20.0 software.
2.3. Prediction of Influenza A H1N1 Targets
Targets were collected from GenCards, OMIM, and GEO databases. Next, by filtering and normalizing the data in line with the Protein Database (Uniprot,
2.4. Prediction of Autophagy-Related Genes
Autophagy-related genes were selected from the KEGG, HADb, and HAMdb databases. Following the removal of duplicate genes, 821 autophagy-related targets were found.
2.5. Prediction of Qingxing Granules PPI Network
Figure 3A shows a Venn diagram illustrating the junction of disease targets, autophagy-related targets, and probable targets of QX’s effective components. The diagram shows 296 common targets between QX’s potential targets and disease targets and 75 common targets among QX’s potential targets, disease targets, and autophagy-related targets. These 75 intersecting targets were inputted into STRING 12.0, and a PPI network map of QX treatment for influenza A H1N1 was constructed using Cytoscape 3.9.1 (Figure 3B). The network contains 73 nodes and 919 edges. Analysis of the network revealed an average node degree of 25.178, with 32 targets higher than the average. The top 10 core targets were: BCL2, CASP3, NFKB1, MTOR, JUN, TNF, HSP90AA1, EGFR, HIF1A, and MAPK3 (details of core targets in Table 2).
2.6. GO Enrichment Analysis
We used the DAVID database for the GO analysis of targets in the PPI network. The gene ratio (%) was used to pick the top 10 GO keywords (p < 0.05) for BP, CC, and MF data in descending order of magnitude. The top five BPs include peptidyl-serine phosphorylation, protein phosphorylation, positive regulation of NF-kappaB signaling, regulation of macroautophagy, and positive regulation of the apoptotic process, as illustrated in Figure 4. The macromolecular complex, cytosol, endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondrion, and perinuclear area of cytoplasm are the top five CCs. Enzyme binding, kinase activity, protein kinase activity, protein serine/threonine/tyrosine kinase activity, and protein kinase activity are the top five MFs.
2.7. KEGG Pathway Enrichment Analysis
We used the DAVID database to do a KEGG pathway enrichment analysis on the 75 candidate targets. Based on the gene ratio (%) in descending order, we identified the top 20 pathways (p < 0.05). Measles, hepatitis B, apoptosis, PD-L1 expression and the PD-1 checkpoint pathway in cancer, and the HIF-1 signaling pathway are the top five pathways shown in Figure 5.
2.8. Determination of the Main Chemical Components in QX
As shown in Figure 6 and Table 3, seven marked components were separated within 195 min. The retention times for amygdalin, puerarin, baicalin, phillyrin, wogonoside, baicalein, and wogonin were as follows: 24.373, 32.883, 97.435, 103.697, 119.764, 134.340, and 157.575 min, respectively.
2.9. Molecular Docking
We obtained the protein structures corresponding to the top four core targets (BCL2, CASP3, NFKB1, MTOR) from the PDB database, and selected the top three compounds in Qingxing granules (details in Table 4) and seven compounds from HPLC results for molecular docking. Using AutoDock Vina 1.2.0, we input 40 sets of target proteins and compound small molecules, calculating the affinity values for each binding site (results in Table 3). A binding energy of less than −5 indicates good binding activity between the ligand and receptor. Among the 40 sets, 39 sets were successfully bound, with 38 sets having affinity values less than −5 kcal/mol. We have displayed some of the molecular docking results in Figure 7.
2.10. Improved Effects of QX on Mice Infected with H1N1
To explore the effect of QX on mice infected with H1N1, we conducted an in vivo animal experiment. As shown in Figure 8a, the lung index of the virus group was 0.22 ± 0.026, significantly higher than the control group’s (0.098 ± 0.005, p < 0.01) value. In contrast to the virus group, the medium-dose QX group (14.42 g/kg) and the oseltamivir group showed improved lung indices (0.162 ± 0.011 and 0.163 ± 0.017, respectively) (p < 0.05). The lung indices of the Lianhua Qingwen (LHQW), low-dose QX group (7.21 g/kg), and high-dose QX group (28.84 g/kg) were lower compared to the infection group, with lung indices of 0.181 ± 0.016, 0.188 ± 0.009, and 0.18 ± 0.012, respectively. The results of H1N1 virus titration in the lung tissues of mice are shown in Figure 8b. Compared to the normal group, the H1N1 virus significantly increased in the lung tissues of the virus group (p < 0.01). Compared to the virus group, the lung tissue H1N1 viral loads decreased in the LHQW group, OSE group, QX medium-dose group (14.42 g/kg), and QX high-dose group (28.84 g/kg), with the exception of the QX low-dose group (7.21 g/kg) (p < 0.01; p < 0.01; p < 0.05; p < 0.05). As shown in Figure 8c, we compared blood parameters among different groups of mice. Blood samples were collected on the 6th day after infection, examining alterations in monocytes, lymphocytes, and white blood cells. When compared to the normal control group, the total white blood cells, lymphocytes, and monocytes in the virus group significantly decreased (p < 0.01; p < 0.01; p < 0.01). The total counts of white blood cells, lymphocytes, and monocytes increased when the QX medium dose (14.42 g/kg) was administered (p < 0.01; p < 0.01; p < 0.01). The gross morphology of mouse lung tissues is shown in Figure 8d, where lung tissues of the virus group were slightly larger in volume, darker in color, and showed mostly congested and edematous solidified areas. The areas of solidification in the OSE and medium-dose QX group mice were reduced. The histopathological sections of the lung tissues stained with HE are shown in Figure 8e. The virus group showed severe lung damage, developing into interstitial pneumonia, characterized by a large number of collapsed alveoli, thickened alveolar walls, severe inflammatory infiltration around the bronchi, and bleeding. Compared to the virus group, the alveolar collapse in the medium-dose QX (14.42 g/kg), LHQW, and OSE groups was lighter, and there was some inhibition of the development of interstitial pneumonia, with improved congestion in alveolar walls and interstitial vessels.
2.11. Transmission Electron Microscopy
The effect of the medium dose of Qingxing granules (14.42 g/kg) on the number of autophagosomes and autolysosomes in the lung epithelial cells of mice infected with H1N1 was observed under a transmission electron microscope. Figure 9a shows that the model group mice’s lung tissue had a significantly higher number of autophagosomes and autolysosomes than the normal group’s. In contrast, the medium dose group (14.42 g/kg) of QX significantly reduced the number of autophagosomes and autolysosomes in the lung tissue, indicating that the medium dose of QX (14.42 g/kg) can inhibit the formation of autophagosomes and autolysosomes in mice infected with H1N1.
2.12. Western Blot
Western blot studies were used to determine the levels of protein expression for LC3, p62, p-mTOR, and mTOR. As can be shown in Figure 9b, the virus group had higher (p < 0.01) expression levels of LC3-II and lower (p < 0.01; p < 0.05) expression levels of p62 and p-mTOR/mTOR than the normal group. Following QX treatment, p62 and p-mTOR/mTOR expression rose, whereas LC3-II expression levels were suppressed. The amounts of LC3-II in the QX low, medium, and high dose groups all dramatically dropped (p < 0.01; p < 0.01; p < 0.01). After receiving the low and medium dose groups, the level of p62 increased (p < 0.01; p < 0.01). Following treatment with the low, medium, and high dose groups of QX, the expression of p-mTOR/mTOR significantly increased (p < 0.01; p < 0.01; p < 0.01).
3. Discussion
Influenza A virus (IAV) is an acute infectious respiratory disease that poses a significant threat to human society, severely affecting public health and the economy. The necessity for research and development of safe and effective antiviral treatments is underscored by the potential of antiviral drugs, such as amantadine and oseltamivir, to produce drug resistance [21,22]. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) offers advantages in treating H1N1 infection such as multi-target effects, low resistance, and high safety. Notably, autophagy is involved in the disease process of H1N1; the virus can activate autophagy initiation, increase autophagosome formation, and simultaneously block autophagosome–lysosome fusion to inhibit the autophagic degradation pathway, promoting viral replication [23]. Consequently, in this work, we employed network pharmacology to forecast QX’s targets for treating H1N1, and we corroborated these results through animal studies.
Using network pharmacology, we constructed a target network, identifying 91 effective components of QX and selecting the 10 most relevant compounds based on the network, including quercetin, kaempferol, and isorhamnetin, which have been experimentally proven to treat H1N1. Quercetin has been shown by Bipin Vaidya et al. to inhibit H1N1 virus multiplication by controlling the production of important proteins such as heat shock proteins, fibronectin 1, and prohibitin [24]. Neuraminidase (NA), a glycoprotein on the surface of the influenza virus, facilitates viral movement in the respiratory tract by catalyzing the cleavage of sialic acid residues [25]. Ai-Lin Liu et al. discovered that kaempferol can inhibit H1N1 by suppressing the NA protein [26]. During autophagy, the protein LC3, which is known as an autophagy marker and is involved in the process, changes from cytoplasmic LC3-I to membrane-bound LC3-II. LC3-II is widely used to quantify autophagic activity, reflecting the number of autophagosomes [27]. Ahmed Abdal Dayem et al. found that isorhamnetin could inhibit virus-induced autophagy by suppressing the lipidation of LC3-II [28].
In summary, the effective components of QX likely exert their therapeutic effects on H1N1 through synergistic relationships. Based on the results of the PPI network analysis, we identified the ten most significant potential targets of QX in the treatment of H1N1 as follows: BCL2, CASP3, NFKB1, MTOR, JUN, TNF, HSP90AA1, EGFR, HIF1A, and MAPK3. We then deduced that QX might treat H1N1 via pathways such as the PD-1 checkpoint pathway, apoptosis, HIF-1 signaling route, autophagy, and NOD-like receptor signaling pathway based on the findings of GO and KEGG enrichment analyses.
Research conducted on animals has demonstrated that QX can ameliorate pathological abnormalities in the lung tissues of infected mice, reduce the lung index and the viral titer of H1N1 in lung tissue, and undo modifications in the total white blood cells, lymphocytes, and monocytes in the blood of infected mice. Using electron microscopy, we were able to detect an increase in autophagosomes in the lung tissues of H1N1-infected mice, which subsequently decreased following treatment with a modest dose of QX. A key regulator of cellular metabolism, mTOR is a serine/threonine kinase. Autophagy is triggered when the mTOR signaling pathway is inhibited [29]. Western blot analysis revealed that following H1N1 infection, mouse lung tissue displayed increased expression of the proteins LC3-II, but p62 and p-mTOR/mTOR levels declined. Following QX treatment, p-mTOR/mTOR and p62 expression were increased, whereas LC3-II protein expression was decreased. From these findings, we conclude that H1N1 infection causes pathological damage in mouse lung tissue and can inhibit the mTOR pathway, inducing autophagy and leading to the accumulation of autophagosomes. In mice infected with H1N1, QX can ameliorate the pathological alterations in the lung tissues, stimulate the mTOR pathway, and inhibit autophagy.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Screening of Active Biological Compounds and Related Targets in Qingxing Granules
The Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology Database (TCMSP,
4.2. Network Construction of “Medicinal Material-Active Component-Target” of Qingxing Granules
Using Cytoscape software (version 3.9.1) [34], we established and visualized the “Medicinal Material-Active Component-Target” network. In the network, nodes represent medicinal materials, active components, and targets, while edges represent their interactions.
4.3. Collection of Targets Related to Influenza A H1N1
We gathered targets associated with the H1N1 sickness from the GeneCards (
4.4. Collection of Autophagy-Related Genes
The Human Autophagy Database (HADb,
4.5. Construction and Analysis of the Protein–Protein Interaction (PPI) Network
The important targets of the Qingxing granules’ effective components, H1N1’s sickness targets, and autophagy-related targets were uploaded to the Venny database (version 2.1,
4.6. GO Enrichment Analysis and KEGG Pathway Enrichment Analysis
KEGG pathway analysis and GO functional annotation were performed using the DAVID database (version 6.8,
4.7. Medicinal Herbs
Guangzhou Hancao Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China) supplied Artemisiae Annuae Herba (batch number: 191001), Scutellariae Radix (batch number: 200302), Puerariae Lobatae Radix (batch number: 191201), Forsythiae Fructus (batch number: 200201), Mori Folium (batch number: 200301), Bupleuri Radix (batch number: 200201), Amomi Fructus Rotundus (batch number: 191001), and Poria (batch number: 200401). Guangzhou Zhixin Chinese Herbal Medicine Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China) supplied Armeniacae Semen Amarum (batch number: 200201) and Talcum (batch number: 200201). All the above herbs have been identified by Chief Pharmacist Xiaohong Yuan from the Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine.
4.8. Preparation Process of Qingxing Granules
The formula ratio of QX (batch number:20201028) is as follows: Artemisia annua: bitter almond: Bupleurum: baicalin: Forsythia: Pueraria root: Talc: mulberry leaf: cardamom: Poria (5:5:5:5:5:5:3:5:5:5). These ten kinds of medicinal slices were weighed in proportion, 10 times the volume of water was added, the mixture was soaked for 30 min, and decocted twice, each for 2 h. The decoction (400 mesh) was filtered and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure at 80 °C (vacuum degree −0.090 to −0.1 MPa) until the relative density reached 1.05 to 1.15 (60–70 °C) to obtain a concentrated extract. Then, the product was vacuum dried at 70 °C to obtain a dry paste-like powder, used as crude medicine. The details of the medicinal materials of Qingxing granules are provided in Table 5.
4.9. HPLC Analysis of Qingxing Granules
The main chemical components of QX were identified through high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Chromatographic separation was carried out using a high-performance liquid chromatograph (Shimadzu LC-20AT) (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan), equipped with an Agela Technologies Venusil ASB C18 column (5 μm, 4.6 mm × 250 mm). The reference standards are as follows: baicalin (batch number: B20570, purity: 98%), baicalein (batch number: B20571, purity: 98%), wogonoside (batch number: B20488, purity: 98%), wogonin (batch number: B20489, purity: 98%), phillyrin (batch number: B20725, purity: 98%), amygdalin (batch number: B20687, purity: 98%), and puerarin (batch number: B20446, purity: 98%). All reference standards were purchased from Shanghai Yuanye Bio-Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile (A) and 0.1% phosphoric acid solution (B). Gradient elution was performed according to the conditions specified in Table 6. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, the column temperature was 30 °C, the detection wavelength was 210 nm, and the injection volume was 10 μL.
4.10. Molecular Docking
The Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology Database (TCMSP) had the top 3 chemicals, which were listed as mol2 format files and sorted by degree value in descending order. The compounds from the HPLC results were added as mol2 format files. The top four core target proteins identified from the PPI network analysis were entered into the Protein Database (PDB,
4.11. Animals and Viruses
Specific pathogen-free (SPF) female BALB/c mice, weighing 12 ± 2 g, provided by Guangzhou Southern Medical University Laboratory Animal Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China; production license: SCXK (Yue) 2021-0041) were adaptively bred for a week at a temperature of 20–25 °C with unrestricted access to food and drink. All animal research at Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Industrial Park has been approved by the Experimental Animal Management and Use Committee (approval number: PZ23096).
H1N1 (influenza virus A/PR/8/34, PR8) was provided by the Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Drug Screening at Southern Medical University. The virus strain was stored at −80 °C.
4.12. Animal Model
The mouse model infected with H1N1 was developed in the manner previously outlined [45]. The mice were randomly assigned to seven groups after a week of adaptive feeding: Lianhua Qingwen (LHQW), oseltamivir (OSE), blank control, model control, low-dose, medium-dose, and high-dose Qingxing granules groups. All mice, except those in the blank control group, were intraperitoneally injected with 1% pentobarbital sodium (0.1 mL/10 g) and intranasally administered 50 μL of virus solution (H1N1) (LD50 = 10−3.85/50 μL [46]), while the blank control group received an equal volume of PBS. According to the “Pharmacological Research Methods of Traditional Chinese Medicine”, the drug gavage dosage for mice was calculated based on the body surface area conversion between humans and mice. The blank group mice were given an equal volume of saline by gavage every day, and the infected group mice were given QX (7.21, 14.42, 28.84 g/kg/day), oseltamivir (St. Louis, MO, USA), or Lianhua Qingwen (batch number: B2111137) (YILING, Shijiazhuang, China) by gavage every day for five consecutive days. On the sixth day, the mice were intraperitoneally injected with 1% pentobarbital sodium (0.1 mL/10 g) for anesthesia. Following anesthesia, orbital blood collection was performed on the mice. Subsequently, the mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation to obtain lung tissues, and the lung index was recorded.
4.13. Routine Blood Test
Mouse blood was collected and counted using an automatic blood analyzer (ADVIA 2120i, SIEMENS, Erlangen, Germany) to observe white blood cells, lymphocytes, and monocytes.
The viral load of the H1N1 influenza virus in mouse lung tissues was detected using the cytopathic effect method. The right lower lobes of the lungs were harvested for the assay. After grinding the lung tissues, they were centrifuged to obtain the viral supernatant. The viral supernatant was diluted in a 10-fold gradient and added to MDCK cells to observe and record the cytopathic holes.
4.14. Hematoxylin and Eosin (HE) Staining
The lung tissues of mice were embedded in paraffin after being treated with 4% paraformaldehyde. After dividing each tissue into 4 μm sections, the pathological changes were examined and assessed using a microscope (BX63, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) after each section had been stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Pathological scoring of the degree of damage to lung tissue is rated on a scale of 0 to 3 [47].
4.15. Transmission Electron Microscopy
After being fixed for 24 h in 2.5% glutaraldehyde, fresh lung tissue was washed three times with PBS for 10 min at a time. Subsequently, the tissue was fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 2 h, followed by three washes with PBS, each for 10 min. The samples then underwent a series of dehydration steps with ethanol and acetone, followed by acetone soaking. After each sample was embedded, an ultramicrotome was used to create ultrathin slices with a thickness of about 100 nm. After that, the sections were stained with lead citrate and uranyl acetate and then examined using a transmission electron microscope (Tecnai G2 Spirit, FEI Company (Hillsboro, OR, USA)) to observe the number of autophagosomes and autolysosomes, as well as the ultrastructure of the alveolar epithelial cells in H1N1 model rats.
4.16. Western Blot Analysis
Western blot was used to assess the expression levels of mTOR, p-mTOR, LC3, and p62 proteins in lung tissues. After lung tissue samples were gathered, lung tissue protein extracts were made in phosphatase and protease inhibitor-containing RIPA lysis buffer. Protein was separated using 10% (#PG112) and 12.5% (#PG113) PAGE gels (EpiZyme, Shanghai, China) and subsequently placed onto PVDF membranes in equal amounts. The membranes were blocked for one hour at room temperature using a fast-blocking solution (#PS108P), and then they were incubated with primary antibodies against mTOR (#2983S) (1:1000), p-mTOR (#2971S) (1:1000), p62 (#23214S) (1:1000), and LC3A/B (#12741S) (1:1000) for an entire night at 4 °C. These antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danfoss, MA, USA), and GAPDH (#LF206) (1:3000) was purchased from Epizyme (Shanghai, China). After three five-minute washes in Tris-buffered saline with Tween-20 (TBST), the membranes were incubated for an hour at room temperature with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody goat anti-rabbit IgG (#LF102) (EpiZyme, Shanghai, China). Using a SuperSignal chemiluminescent substrate kit (#SQ201L) (EpiZyme, Shanghai, China), the membranes were detected after being rinsed five more times with TBST, each for five minutes. ImageJ software version 1.48 was utilized for quantitative analysis of protein bands.
4.17. Statistical Analysis
Version 27.0 of SPSS was used to analyze all of the study’s data. Standard deviation (S.D.) ± mean is how the data are displayed. ANOVA in one direction was used to examine group differences. p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant in statistics.
5. Conclusions
The findings of our investigation have demonstrated that one important mechanism by which QX may protect against H1N1 is via activating the mTOR signaling pathway, indicating that QX is a promising drug to treat H1N1.
Original idea by C.D.; M.M., H.D. and L.Z. carried out the data collection and drafted the manuscript with guidance from S.Z.; H.Z., J.Z., J.S., M.M. and C.D. contributed with additions and amendments; H.D. and Z.F. carried out molecular docking and free energy calculation; H.D., L.Z. and S.Y. supplemented the animal experiments. H.D. and H.S. analyzed the data and processed the images. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
All animal research at Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Industrial Park has been approved by the Experimental Animal Management and Use Committee (Application Approval: PZ23096, approved in June 2023).
Not applicable.
Data are contained within the article and
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Figure 3. Core target screening of Qingxing granules. (A) Venn diagrams of QX “Component Target-Disease Target” and “Component Target-Disease Target-Autophagy Gene”; (B) PPI network of QX treatment for H1N1.
Figure 7. Molecular docking models of key compounds and core targets. (a) AmygdalinmTOR; (b) baicalein-mTOR; (c) baicalin-mTOR; (d) phillyrin-mTOR; (e) puerarin-mTOR; (f) wogonin-mTOR; (g) wogonoside-mTOR; (h) phillyrin-CASP3; (i) phillyrin-BCL2; (j) wogonoside-BCL2.
Figure 8. Improvement effect of QX on mice infected with H1N1. (a) Changes in lung index of different groups of mice; (b) changes in H1N1 virus titers in lung tissues of mice from different groups; (c) variations in the overall white blood cell, lymphocyte, and monocyte characteristics in mouse blood; (d) the gross appearance of lung tissues from different groups of mice; (e) HE staining observations of mice in different groups. Scale bar = 100 µm; (f) The lung tissue was assessed using a histopathological grading scale, which ranged from 0 (indicating no alterations) to 3 (representing severe pathological conditions). Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, compared with the virus group; ## p < 0.01, compared with the Control group.
Figure 9. Qingxing granules affect mice infected with H1N1 through autophagy. (a) Observation of the number of autophagosomes and autolysosomes in the normal group, virus group, and medium-dose QX group mice under transmission electron microscopy. The red arrow points to the target as the autophagosome. The yellow arrow points to the autolysosome. Scale bar = 1 µm; (b) LC3, p62, and p-mTOR/mTOR expression measurements in mouse lung tissue employing Western blot research. Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, compared with the virus group; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, compared with the Control group.
The specifics of the top 10 compounds.
Mol ID | Compound Name | Molecular Function | 2D Structure | Degree | BC | CC | ASPL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOL000228 | (2R)-7-hydroxy-5-methoxy-2-phenylchroman-4-one | C16H14O4 | [Image omitted. Please see PDF.] | 131 | 0.0628 | 0.3839 | 2.6045 |
MOL000098 | Quercetin | C15H10O7 | [Image omitted. Please see PDF.] | 108 | 0.0093 | 0.3767 | 2.6542 |
MOL000258 | Dehydrodiisoeugenol | C19H20O4 | [Image omitted. Please see PDF.] | 108 | 0.0513 | 0.3751 | 2.6655 |
MOL000006 | Luteolin | C15H10O6 | [Image omitted. Please see PDF.] | 106 | 0.0087 | 0.3748 | 2.6677 |
MOL000260 | 5-[(2R,3R)-7-methoxy-3-methyl-5-[(E)-prop-1-enyl]-2,3-dihydrobenzofuran-2-yl]-1,3-benzodioxole | C20H20O4 | [Image omitted. Please see PDF.] | 105 | 0.0777 | 0.3729 | 2.6813 |
MOL000239 | Jaranol | C17H14O6 | [Image omitted. Please see PDF.] | 104 | 0.0106 | 0.3745 | 2.6700 |
MOL000422 | Kaempferol | C15H10O6 | [Image omitted. Please see PDF.] | 104 | 0.0078 | 0.3754 | 2.6632 |
MOL000354 | Isorhamnetin | C16H12O7 | [Image omitted. Please see PDF.] | 102 | 0.0069 | 0.3732 | 2.6790 |
MOL004609 | Areapillin | C18H16O8 | [Image omitted. Please see PDF.] | 102 | 0.0068 | 0.3729 | 2.6813 |
MOL000490 | Petunidin | C16H13O7+ | [Image omitted. Please see PDF.] | 101 | 0.0087 | 0.3735 | 2.6768 |
The top 10 core targets.
Number | Target Name | Degree | BC | CC | ASPL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | BCL2 | 56 | 0.04368725 | 0.81818182 | 1.22222222 |
2 | CASP3 | 56 | 0.04635699 | 0.81818182 | 1.22222222 |
3 | NFKB1 | 54 | 0.03216106 | 0.8 | 1.25 |
4 | MTOR | 54 | 0.052009 | 0.8 | 1.25 |
5 | JUN | 53 | 0.03213428 | 0.79120879 | 1.26388889 |
6 | TNF | 53 | 0.03952339 | 0.79120879 | 1.26388889 |
7 | HSP90AA1 | 51 | 0.03260088 | 0.77419355 | 1.29166667 |
8 | EGFR | 50 | 0.03866376 | 0.76595745 | 1.30555556 |
9 | HIF1A | 50 | 0.03640685 | 0.76595745 | 1.30555556 |
10 | MAPK3 | 49 | 0.05609154 | 0.75789474 | 1.31944444 |
QX feature map datasheet.
Marker Ingredients | Retention Time (min) | Peak Area | Relative Retention Time | Relative Peak Area |
---|---|---|---|---|
Amygdalin | 24.373 | 412935 | 0.2501 | 0.0251 |
Puerarin | 32.883 | 869521 | 0.3375 | 0.0529 |
Baicalin | 97.435 | 16427378 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 |
Phillyrin | 103.697 | 201714 | 1.0643 | 0.0123 |
Wogonoside | 119.764 | 2860469 | 1.2292 | 0.1741 |
Baicalein | 134.34 | 188517 | 1.3788 | 0.0115 |
Wogonin | 157.575 | 252499 | 1.6172 | 0.0154 |
The affinity value of the main ligands with receptors (n = 40).
Compound | Affinity | Protein | BCL2 | CASP3 | NFKB1 | MTOR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(2R)-7-hydroxy-5-methoxy-2-phenylchroman-4-one | −5.17 | −6.26 | −4.77 | −5.63 | ||
Quercetin | −5.58 | −5.59 | −5.30 | −5.61 | ||
Dehydrodiisoeugenol | −6.01 | −6.06 | −6.06 | −5.38 | ||
Amygdalin | −6.97 | −6.56 | −7.06 | −5.99 | ||
Puerarin | −6.69 | −6.50 | −5.85 | −5.80 | ||
Baicalin | −6.85 | −6.52 | −6.75 | −5.85 | ||
Phillyrin | −7.56 | −7.15 | −7.09 | −7.15 | ||
Wogonoside | −7.21 | −6.94 | −6.49 | −6.36 | ||
Baicalein | −5.13 | −5.55 | / | −5.39 | ||
Wogonin | −5.33 | −5.64 | −5.01 | −5.36 |
The details of the medicinal materials of Qingxing granules.
Number | Herb Name Chinese Spelling | English Name | Latin Name | Plant Part | Weight Percentage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Qing Hao | Artemisiae Annuae Herba | Artemisia annua L. | Aboveground | 10.42% |
2 | Ku Xingren | Armeniacae Semen Amarum | Prunus armeniaca L. var. ansu Maxim. | Seed | 10.42% |
3 | Chai Hu | Bupleuri Radix | Bupleurum chinense DC. | Root | 10.42% |
4 | Huang Qin | Scutellariae Radix | Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi | Root | 10.42% |
5 | Lian Qiao | Forsythiae Fructus | Forsythia suspensa (Thunb.) Vahl | Fructus | 10.42% |
6 | Ge Gen | Puerariae Lobatae Radix | Pueraria lobata (Willd.) Ohwi | Root | 10.42% |
7 | Hua Shi | Talcum | Talcum | Ore | 10.42% |
8 | Sang Ye | Mori Folium | Morus alba L. | Leaf | 10.42% |
9 | Dou Kou | Amomi Fructus Rotundus | Amomum kravanh Pierre ex Gagnep. | Fructus | 6.25% |
10 | Fu Ling | Poria | Poria Cocos (Schw.) Wolf | Sclerotium | 10.42% |
Qingxing granules mobile phase gradient.
Time (min) | Mobile Phase A (%) | Mobile Phase B (%) |
---|---|---|
0~10 | 5% | 95% |
10~15 | 5~10% | 95~90% |
15~55 | 10~12% | 90~88% |
55~60 | 12~16% | 88~84% |
60~80 | 16~18% | 84~82% |
80~100 | 18~22% | 82~78% |
100~140 | 22~26% | 78~74% |
140~160 | 26~56% | 74~44% |
160~170 | 56~90% | 44~10% |
170~195 | 90~5% | 10~95% |
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
References
1. World Health Organization (WHO). Influenza (Seasonal). 2023. Volume 2023. Available online: https://www.who.int/ (accessed on 19 December 2023).
2. Park, J.E.; Ryu, Y. Transmissibility and severity of influenza virus by subtype. Infect. Genet. Evol.; 2018; 65, pp. 288-292. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2018.08.007] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30103034]
3. Hagau, N.; Slavcovici, A.; Gonganau, D.N.; Oltean, S.; Dirzu, D.S.; Brezoszki, E.S.; Maxim, M.; Ciuce, C.; Mlesnite, M.; Gavrus, R.L. et al. Clinical aspects and cytokine response in severe H1N1 influenza A virus infection. Crit. Care; 2010; 14, R203. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9324]
4. Huo, C.; Tang, Y.; Li, X.; Han, D.; Gu, Q.; Su, R.; Liu, Y.; Reiter, R.J.; Liu, G.; Hu, Y. et al. Melatonin alleviates lung injury in H1N1-infected mice by mast cell inactivation and cytokine storm suppression. PLoS Pathog.; 2023; 19, e1011406. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1011406]
5. Antipov, E.A.; Pokryshevskaya, E.B. The effects of adverse drug reactions on patients’ satisfaction: Evidence from publicly available data on Tamiflu (oseltamivir). Int. J. Med. Inf.; 2019; 125, pp. 30-36. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.02.005]
6. Uyeki, T.M.; Hui, D.S.; Zambon, M.; Wentworth, D.E.; Monto, A.S. Influenza. Lancet; 2022; 400, pp. 693-706. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00982-5]
7. Zang, F.; Chen, Y.; Lin, Z.; Cai, Z.; Yu, L.; Xu, F.; Wang, J.; Zhu, W.; Lu, H. Autophagy is involved in regulating the immune response of dendritic cells to influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 infection. Immunology; 2016; 148, pp. 56-69. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imm.12587] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26800655]
8. Zhou, Z.; Jiang, X.; Liu, D.; Fan, Z.; Hu, X.; Yan, J.; Wang, M.; Gao, G.F. Autophagy is involved in influenza A virus replication. Autophagy. Autophagy; 2009; 5, pp. 321-328. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4161/auto.5.3.7406] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19066474]
9. Lőrincz, P.; Juhász, G. Autophagosome-Lysosome Fusion. J. Mol. Biol.; 2020; 432, pp. 2462-2482. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2019.10.028]
10. Komatsu, M.; Waguri, S.; Koike, M.; Sou, Y.-S.; Ueno, T.; Hara, T.; Mizushima, N.; Iwata, J.-I.; Ezaki, J.; Murata, S. et al. Homeostatic levels of p62 control cytoplasmic inclusion body formation in autophagy-deficient mice. Cell; 2007; 131, pp. 1149-1163. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.035]
11. Lee, Y.K.; Lee, J.A. Role of the mammalian ATG8/LC3 family in autophagy: Differential and compensatory roles in the spatiotemporal regulation of autophagy. BMB Rep.; 2016; 49, pp. 424-430. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5483/bmbrep.2016.49.8.081]
12. Gannagé, M.; Dormann, D.; Albrecht, R.; Dengjel, J.; Torossi, T.; Rämer, P.C.; Lee, M.; Strowig, T.; Arrey, F.; Conenello, G. et al. Matrix protein 2 of influenza A virus blocks autophagosome fusion with lysosomes. Cell Host Microbe; 2009; 6, pp. 367-380. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2009.09.005] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19837376]
13. Yeganeh, B.; Ghavami, S.; Rahim, M.N.; Klonisch, T.; Halayko, A.J.; Coombs, K.M. Autophagy activation is required for influenza A virus-induced apoptosis and replication. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Mol. Cell Res.; 2018; 1865, pp. 364-378. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2017.10.014] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29108912]
14. Zhirnov, O.P.; Klenk, H.D. Influenza A virus proteins NS1 and hemagglutinin along with M2 are involved in stimulation of autophagy in infected cells. J. Virol.; 2013; 87, pp. 13107-13114. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jvi.02148-13] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24027311]
15. Nayak, M.K.; Agrawal, A.S.; Bose, S.; Naskar, S.; Bhowmick, R.; Chakrabarti, S.; Sarkar, S.; Chawla-Sarkar, M. Antiviral activity of baicalin against influenza virus H1N1-pdm09 is due to modulation of NS1-mediated cellular innate immune responses. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.; 2014; 69, pp. 1298-1310. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt534] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24458510]
16. Zhou, Y.J.; Zhang, J.; Wu, B.; Li, Z.; Wu, J.; Bie, M.J. Therapeutic Effect of Artesunate on Influenza A Viral Pneumonia. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2022; 53, pp. 1055-1060. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12182/20221160205]
17. Chen, J.; Duan, M.; Zhao, Y.; Ling, F.; Xiao, K.; Li, Q.; Li, B.; Lu, C.; Qi, W.; Zeng, Z. et al. Saikosaponin A inhibits influenza A virus replication and lung immunopathology. Oncotarget; 2015; 6, pp. 42541-42556. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.6448] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26637810]
18. Ai, Y. Study of the Effects and Mechanisms of Qingxing Granules in Treating Dengue Fever Based on In Vivo and In Vitro Models. Master’s Thesis; Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine: Guangzhou, China, 2023; [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.27044/d.cnki.ggzzu.2023.000060]
19. Zhang, R.; Zhu, X.; Bai, H.; Ning, K. Network Pharmacology Databases for Traditional Chinese Medicine: Review and Assessment. Front. Pharmacol.; 2019; 10, 123. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00123] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30846939]
20. UniProt: The universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2017; 45, pp. D158-D169. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1099] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27899622]
21. Abdelwhab, E.M.; Veits, J.; Mettenleiter, T.C. Biological fitness and natural selection of amantadine resistant variants of avian influenza H5N1 viruses. Virus Res.; 2017; 228, pp. 109-113. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2016.11.032]
22. Mitrasinovic, P.M. Advances in the structure-based design of the influenza A neuraminidase inhibitors. Curr. Drug Targets; 2010; 11, pp. 315-326. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/138945010790711932]
23. Guo, X.; Zhang, Z.; Lin, C.; Ren, H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Qu, Y.; Li, H.; Ma, S.; Xia, H. et al. A/(H1N1) pdm09 NS1 promotes viral replication by enhancing autophagy through hijacking the IAV negative regulatory factor LRPPRC. Autophagy; 2023; 19, pp. 1533-1550. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2022.2139922] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36300799]
24. Vaidya, B.; Cho, S.Y.; Oh, K.S.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, Y.O.; Jeong, E.H.; Nguyen, T.T.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, I.S.; Kwon, J. et al. Effectiveness of Periodic Treatment of Quercetin against Influenza A Virus H1N1 through Modulation of Protein Expression. J. Agric. Food Chem.; 2016; 64, pp. 4416-4425. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00148] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27157719]
25. Yang, J.; Liu, S.; Du, L.; Jiang, S. A new role of neuraminidase (NA) in the influenza virus life cycle: Implication for developing NA inhibitors with novel mechanism of action. Rev. Med. Virol.; 2016; 26, pp. 242-250. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmv.1879] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27061123]
26. Liu, A.-L.; Wang, H.-D.; Lee, S.M.; Wang, Y.-T.; Du, G.-H. Structure-activity relationship of flavonoids as influenza virus neuraminidase inhibitors and their in vitro anti-viral activities. Bioorg. Med. Chem.; 2008; 16, pp. 7141-7147. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2008.06.049] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18640042]
27. Mizushima, N.; Yoshimori, T. How to interpret LC3 immunoblotting. Autophagy; 2007; 3, pp. 542-545. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4161/auto.4600] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17611390]
28. Abdal Dayem, A.; Choi, H.Y.; Kim, Y.B.; Cho, S.G. Antiviral effect of methylated flavonol isorhamnetin against influenza. PLoS ONE; 2015; 10, e0121610. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121610] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25806943]
29. Kim, Y.C.; Guan, K.L. mTOR: A pharmacologic target for autophagy regulation. J. Clin. Investig.; 2015; 125, pp. 25-32. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1172/jci73939]
30. Ru, J.; Li, P.; Wang, J.; Zhou, W.; Li, B.; Huang, C.; Li, P.; Guo, Z.; Tao, W.; Yang, Y. et al. TCMSP: A database of systems pharmacology for drug discovery from herbal medicines. J. Cheminform.; 2014; 6, 13. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-6-13] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24735618]
31. Liu, Y.; Li, S.; Liu, D.; Wei, H.; Wang, X.; Yan, F. Exploration of the potential mechanism of Pushen capsule in the treatment of vascular dementia based on network pharmacology and experimental verification. J. Ethnopharmacol.; 2022; 298, 115632. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2022.115632]
32. Kim, S.; Thiessen, P.A.; Bolton, E.E.; Chen, J.; Fu, G.; Gindulyte, A.; Han, L.; He, J.; He, S.; Shoemaker, B.A. et al. PubChem Substance and Compound databases. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2016; 44, pp. D1202-D1213. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv951]
33. Daina, A.; Michielin, O.; Zoete, V. SwissADME: A free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci. Rep.; 2017; 7, 42717. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep42717] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28256516]
34. Su, G.; Morris, J.H.; Demchak, B.; Bader, G.D. Biological network exploration with Cytoscape 3. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform.; 2014; 47, pp. 8-13. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471250953.bi0813s47] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25199793]
35. Safran, M.; Dalah, I.; Alexander, J.; Rosen, N.; Iny Stein, T.; Shmoish, M.; Nativ, N.; Bahir, I.; Doniger, T.; Krug, H. et al. GeneCards Version 3: The human gene integrator. Database; 2010; 2010, baq020. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/baq020] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20689021]
36. Amberger, J.S.; Bocchini, C.A.; Schiettecatte, F.; Scott, A.F.; Hamosh, A. OMIM.org: Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM®), an online catalog of human genes and genetic disorders. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2015; 43, pp. D789-D798. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1205] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25428349]
37. Barrett, T.; Wilhite, S.E.; Ledoux, P.; Evangelista, C.; Kim, I.F.; Tomashevsky, M.; Marshall, K.A.; Phillippy, K.H.; Sherman, P.M.; Holko, M. et al. NCBI GEO: Archive for functional genomics data sets–update. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2013; 41, pp. D991-D995. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1193] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23193258]
38. Bermejo-Martin, J.F.; Martin-Loeches, I.; Rello, J.; Antón, A.; Almansa, R.; Xu, L.; Lopez-Campos, G.; Pumarola, T.; Ran, L.; Ramirez, P. et al. Host adaptive immunity deficiency in severe pandemic influenza. Crit. Care; 2010; 14, R167. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9259] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20840779]
39. Zhang, K.; Zhang, B.; Jin, H.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y. Differential expression of autophagy related genes in tongue cancer and its influence on prognosis based on TCGA and HADb database. Oral Biomed.; 2020; 11, pp. 232-236. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8603.2020.04.005]
40. Kanehisa, M.; Furumichi, M.; Tanabe, M.; Sato, Y.; Morishima, K. KEGG: New perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2017; 45, pp. D353-D361. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1092] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27899662]
41. Wang, N.N.; Dong, J.; Zhang, L.; Ouyang, D.; Cheng, Y.; Chen, A.F.; Lu, A.P.; Cao, D.S. HAMdb: A database of human autophagy modulators with specific pathway and disease information. J. Cheminform.; 2018; 10, 34. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-018-0289-4]
42. von Mering, C.; Jensen, L.J.; Snel, B.; Hooper, S.D.; Krupp, M.; Foglierini, M.; Jouffre, N.; Huynen, M.A.; Bork, P. STRING: Known and predicted protein-protein associations, integrated and transferred across organisms. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2005; 33, pp. D433-D437. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki005]
43. Huang, D.W.; Sherman, B.T.; Lempicki, R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc.; 2009; 4, pp. 44-57. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.211] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19131956]
44. Burley, S.K.; Berman, H.M.; Kleywegt, G.J.; Markley, J.L.; Nakamura, H.; Velankar, S. Protein Data Bank (PDB): The Single Global Macromolecular Structure Archive. Methods Mol. Biol.; 2017; 1607, pp. 627-641. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7000-1_26] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28573592]
45. Ma, Q.; Huang, W.; Zhao, J.; Yang, Z. Liu Shen Wan inhibits influenza a virus and excessive virus-induced inflammatory response via suppression of TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway in vitro and in vivo. J. Ethnopharmacol.; 2020; 252, 112584. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2020.112584] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31972325]
46. Sang, H. Study on Anti-Influenza A Virus Effect of Cepharanthine in Vitro and Vivo; Southern Medical University: Guangzhou, China, 2023; [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.27003/d.cnki.gojyu.2022.000622]
47. Matute-Bello, G.; Winn, R.K.; Jonas, M.; Chi, E.Y.; Martin, T.R.; Liles, W.C. Fas (CD95) induces alveolar epithelial cell apoptosis in vivo: Implications for acute pulmonary inflammation. Am. J. Pathol.; 2001; 158, pp. 153-161. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63953-3] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11141488]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Background: H1N1 is one of the major subtypes of influenza A virus (IAV) that causes seasonal influenza, posing a serious threat to human health. A traditional Chinese medicine combination called Qingxing granules (QX) is utilized clinically to treat epidemic influenza. However, its chemical components are complex, and the potential pharmacological mechanisms are still unknown. Methods: QX’s effective components were gathered from the TCMSP database based on two criteria: drug-likeness (DL ≥ 0.18) and oral bioavailability (OB ≥ 30%). SwissADME was used to predict potential targets of effective components, and Cytoscape was used to create a “Herb-Component-Target” network for QX. In addition, targets associated with H1N1 were gathered from the databases GeneCards, OMIM, and GEO. Targets associated with autophagy were retrieved from the KEGG, HAMdb, and HADb databases. Intersection targets for QX, H1N1 influenza, and autophagy were identified using Venn diagrams. Afterward, key targets were screened using Cytoscape’s protein–protein interaction networks built using the database STRING. Biological functions and signaling pathways of overlapping targets were observed through GO analysis and KEGG enrichment analysis. The main chemical components of QX were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), followed by molecular docking. Finally, the mechanism of QX in treating H1N1 was validated through animal experiments. Results: A total of 786 potential targets and 91 effective components of QX were identified. There were 5420 targets related to H1N1 and 821 autophagy-related targets. The intersection of all targets of QX, H1N1, and autophagy yielded 75 intersecting targets. Ultimately, 10 core targets were selected: BCL2, CASP3, NFKB1, MTOR, JUN, TNF, HSP90AA1, EGFR, HIF1A, and MAPK3. Identification of the main chemical components of QX by HPLC resulted in the separation of seven marker ingredients within 195 min, which are amygdalin, puerarin, baicalin, phillyrin, wogonoside, baicalein, and wogonin. Molecular docking results showed that BCL2, CASP3, NFKB1, and MTOR could bind well with the compounds. In animal studies, QX reduced the degenerative alterations in the lung tissue of H1N1-infected mice by upregulating the expression of p-mTOR/mTOR and p62 and downregulating the expression of LC3, which inhibited autophagy. Conclusions: According to this study’s network pharmacology analysis and experimental confirmation, QX may be able to treat H1N1 infection by regulating autophagy, lowering the expression of LC3, and increasing the expression of p62 and p-mTOR/mTOR.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Artemisinin Research Center, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China;
2 Sci-Tech Industrial Park, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510330, China;
3 Artemisinin Research Center, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China;
4 Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510330, China;
5 The Eighth Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China;