It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Future socioeconomic climate pathways have regional water-quality consequences whose severity and equity have not yet been fully understood across geographic and economic spectra. We use a process-based, terrestrial-freshwater ecosystem model to project 21st-century river nitrogen loads under these pathways. We find that fertilizer usage is the primary determinant of future river nitrogen loads, changing precipitation and warming have limited impacts, and CO2 fertilization-induced vegetation growth enhancement leads to modest load reductions. Fertilizer applications to produce bioenergy in climate mitigation scenarios cause larger load increases than in the highest emission scenario. Loads generally increase in low-income regions, yet remain stable or decrease in high-income regions where agricultural advances, low food and feed production and waste, and/or well-enforced air pollution policies balance biofuel-associated fertilizer burdens. Consideration of biofuel production options with low fertilizer demand and rapid transfer of agricultural advances from high- to low-income regions may help avoid inequitable water-quality outcomes from climate mitigation.
This study suggests consideration of biofuel production options with low fertilizer demand and rapid transfer of agricultural advances from high- to low-income regions that may help avoid inequitable water-quality outcomes from climate mitigation.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Princeton University; Princeton, Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Princeton, USA (GRID:grid.16750.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 5006)
2 NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory; Princeton, Princeton, USA (GRID:grid.482795.5) (ISNI:0000 0000 9269 5516)
3 Princeton University, High Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton, USA (GRID:grid.16750.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 5006)
4 CEA–CNRS–UVSQ, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement (LSCE), Gif-sur-Yvette, France (GRID:grid.457340.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0584 9722)