It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
While human vision spans 220°, traditional functional MRI setups display images only up to central 10-15°. Thus, it remains unknown how the brain represents a scene perceived across the full visual field. Here, we introduce a method for ultra-wide angle display and probe signatures of immersive scene representation. An unobstructed view of 175° is achieved by bouncing the projected image off angled-mirrors onto a custom-built curved screen. To avoid perceptual distortion, scenes are created with wide field-of-view from custom virtual environments. We find that immersive scene representation drives medial cortex with far-peripheral preferences, but shows minimal modulation in classic scene regions. Further, scene and face-selective regions maintain their content preferences even with extreme far-periphery stimulation, highlighting that not all far-peripheral information is automatically integrated into scene regions computations. This work provides clarifying evidence on content vs. peripheral preferences in scene representation and opens new avenues to research immersive vision.
How scenes are represented in the brain across the full visual field is unknown. Here, the authors develop a novel method to present wide-angled scenes in an fMRI scanner, finding classic scene regions’ clear preference for image content over peripheral stimulation
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Harvard University, Department of Psychology, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 754X)
2 Harvard University, Center for Brain Science, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 754X)
3 Harvard University, Center for Brain Science, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 754X); Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiology, Boston, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:000000041936754X); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, USA (GRID:grid.32224.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 0386 9924)
4 Harvard University, Department of Psychology, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 754X); Harvard University, Center for Brain Science, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 754X); Harvard University, Kempner Institute for Biological and Artificial Intelligence, Boston, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 754X)