It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Providing adequate counseling on mode of delivery after induction of labor (IOL) is of utmost importance. Various AI algorithms have been developed for this purpose, but rely on maternal–fetal data, not including ultrasound (US) imaging. We used retrospectively collected clinical data from 808 subjects submitted to IOL, totaling 2024 US images, to train AI models to predict vaginal delivery (VD) and cesarean section (CS) outcomes after IOL. The best overall model used only clinical data (F1-score: 0.736; positive predictive value (PPV): 0.734). The imaging models employed fetal head, abdomen and femur US images, showing limited discriminative results. The best model used femur images (F1-score: 0.594; PPV: 0.580). Consequently, we constructed ensemble models to test whether US imaging could enhance the clinical data model. The best ensemble model included clinical data and US femur images (F1-score: 0.689; PPV: 0.693), presenting a false positive and false negative interesting trade-off. The model accurately predicted CS on 4 additional cases, despite misclassifying 20 additional VD, resulting in a 6.0% decrease in average accuracy compared to the clinical data model. Hence, integrating US imaging into the latter model can be a new development in assisting mode of delivery counseling.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Obstetrics Department, University and Hospitalar Centre of Coimbra, Faculty of Medicine of University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal (GRID:grid.8051.c) (ISNI:0000 0000 9511 4342); Maternidade Doutor Daniel de Matos, Coimbra, Portugal (GRID:grid.8051.c)
2 University of Coimbra, Department of Informatics Engineering, Centre for Informatics and Systems of the University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal (GRID:grid.8051.c) (ISNI:0000 0000 9511 4342)
3 University of Coimbra, Department of Physics, Coimbra, Portugal (GRID:grid.8051.c) (ISNI:0000 0000 9511 4342)
4 Obstetrics Department, University and Hospitalar Centre of Coimbra, Faculty of Medicine of University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal (GRID:grid.8051.c) (ISNI:0000 0000 9511 4342)