It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Understanding the combined effects of risk factors on all-cause mortality is crucial for implementing effective risk stratification and designing targeted interventions, but such combined effects are understudied. We aim to use survival-tree based machine learning models as more flexible nonparametric techniques to examine the combined effects of multiple physiological risk factors on mortality. More specifically, we (1) study the combined effects between multiple physiological factors and all-cause mortality, (2) identify the five most influential factors and visualize their combined influence on all-cause mortality, and (3) compare the mortality cut-offs with the current clinical thresholds. Data from the 1999–2014 NHANES Survey were linked to National Death Index data with follow-up through 2015 for 17,790 adults. We observed that the five most influential factors affecting mortality are the tobacco smoking biomarker cotinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), plasma glucose, sex, and white blood cell count. Specifically, high mortality risk is associated with being male, active smoking, low GFR, elevated plasma glucose levels, and high white blood cell count. The identified mortality-based cutoffs for these factors are mostly consistent with relevant studies and current clinical thresholds. This approach enabled us to identify important cutoffs and provide enhanced risk prediction as an important basis to inform clinical practice and develop new strategies for precision medicine.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Michigan, School for Environment and Sustainability, Ann Arbor, USA (GRID:grid.214458.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7347)
2 University of Michigan, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, USA (GRID:grid.214458.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7347); Harvard Medical School, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Boston, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:000000041936754X)
3 Tsinghua University, School of Environment, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.12527.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 0662 3178)
4 University of Michigan, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, USA (GRID:grid.214458.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7347)
5 University of Michigan, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, USA (GRID:grid.214458.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7347); Technical University of Denmark, Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark (GRID:grid.5170.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 8870)