It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Microgrid fault identification models are developed via integration of extensive data collection, pre-processing of collected data, current & voltage segmentation, feature representation, identification of variant feature sets, their classification & post-processing operations. Existing models that perform microgrid fault identification are either highly complex, or cannot be applied for heterogeneous fault types. Moreover, these models also showcase large variance in terms of their qualitative & quantitative performance levels. Due to these issues, it is difficult for researchers to identify optimum models for their performance-specific deployment use cases. To overcome these issues, a detailed review of different microgrid fault detection & mitigation models in needed, which can evaluate their performance in terms of qualitative & quantitative parameters. Thus, this text initially discusses characteristics of some of the recently proposed microgrid fault detection models in terms of their functional nuances, application specific advantages, deployment specific limitations, and context-specific future research scopes. After referring this discussion, it was observed that linear models that incorporate pattern recognition are highly useful for fault pre-emption and mitigation purposes. This text also compares these models in terms of their accuracy of detection, delay needed for fault identification, computational complexity, deployment cost, and scalability metrics.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Research Scholar, EE, G H Raisoni University Amravati, India
2 Asso. Prof. EE, G H Raisoni Institute of Engg. & Tech. Pune, India
3 Asst. Prof. EE, Nagpur Institute of Technology, Nagpur, India
4 Asst. Prof. EE, G H Raisoni Institute of Engg. & Tech. Nagpur, India