It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Recently, targeted degradation has emerged as a powerful therapeutic modality. Relying on “event-driven” pharmacology, proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) can degrade targets and are superior to conventional inhibitors against undruggable proteins. Unfortunately, PROTAC discovery is limited by warhead scarcity and laborious optimization campaigns. To address these shortcomings, analogous protein-based heterobifunctional degraders, known as bioPROTACs, have been developed. Compared to small-molecule PROTACs, bioPROTACs have higher success rates and are subject to fewer design constraints. However, the membrane impermeability of proteins severely restricts bioPROTAC deployment as a generalized therapeutic modality. Here, we present an engineered bioPROTAC template able to complex with cationic and ionizable lipids via electrostatic interactions for cytosolic delivery. When delivered by biocompatible lipid nanoparticles, these modified bioPROTACs can rapidly degrade intracellular proteins, exhibiting near-complete elimination (up to 95% clearance) of targets within hours of treatment. Our bioPROTAC format can degrade proteins localized to various subcellular compartments including the mitochondria, nucleus, cytosol, and membrane. Moreover, substrate specificity can be easily reprogrammed, allowing modular design and targeting of clinically-relevant proteins such as Ras, Jnk, and Erk. In summary, this work introduces an inexpensive, flexible, and scalable platform for efficient intracellular degradation of proteins that may elude chemical inhibition.
Targeted degradation has emerged as a powerful therapeutic modality. In this study, the authors develop a lipid-based platform to deliver recombinant bioPROTACs into cells for targeted protein degradation, providing a platform for efficient intracellular degradation of proteins that may elude chemical inhibition.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 University of Pennsylvania, Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972)
2 University of Pennsylvania, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972); University of Pennsylvania, Department of Cancer Biology and Epigenetics Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972)
3 University of Pennsylvania, Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972); University of Pennsylvania, Penn Institute for RNA Innovation, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972)