It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Natural selection can drive organisms to strikingly similar adaptive solutions, but the underlying molecular mechanisms often remain unknown. Several amphibians have independently evolved highly adhesive skin secretions (glues) that support a highly effective antipredator defence mechanism. Here we demonstrate that the glue of the Madagascan tomato frog, Dyscophus guineti, relies on two interacting proteins: a highly derived member of a widespread glycoprotein family and a galectin. Identification of homologous proteins in other amphibians reveals that these proteins attained a function in skin long before glues evolved. Yet, major elevations in their expression, besides structural changes in the glycoprotein (increasing its structural disorder and glycosylation), caused the independent rise of glues in at least two frog lineages. Besides providing a model for the chemical functioning of animal adhesive secretions, our findings highlight how recruiting ancient molecular templates may facilitate the recurrent evolution of functional innovations.
Some amphibians defend themselves against predators by producing a highly adhesive skin secretion, effectively preventing their ingestion. This study shows how changes in the structure and expression of two proteins underlay the parallel evolution of these defence glues in different frog lineages.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Ecology, Evolution & Genetics Research Group (bDIV), Biology Department, Brussels, Belgium (GRID:grid.8767.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2290 8069)
2 University of Mons, Biology of Marine Organisms and Biomimetics Unit, Research Institute for Biosciences, Mons, Belgium (GRID:grid.8364.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2184 581X); University of Innsbruck, Evolutionary and Developmental Biology, Department of Zoology, Innsbruck, Austria (GRID:grid.5771.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2151 8122)
3 Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Center for Structural Biology, VIB-VUB and Structural Biology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium (GRID:grid.8767.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2290 8069)
4 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Proteomics Core - SyBioMa, Leuven, Belgium (GRID:grid.5596.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0668 7884)
5 Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Center for Structural Biology, VIB-VUB and Structural Biology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium (GRID:grid.8767.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2290 8069); HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, Budapest, Hungary (GRID:grid.425578.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0512 3755)
6 University of Mons, Biology of Marine Organisms and Biomimetics Unit, Research Institute for Biosciences, Mons, Belgium (GRID:grid.8364.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2184 581X)