It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Evaporation control is a critical facility resource during solidification experiments that limits processing time and must be tracked to ensure facility health. A thermodynamic analysis was performed on a ternary FeCrNi sample processed onboard the International Space Station (ISS) using ESA Electromagnetic Levitation (EML) facility in a microgravity environment. A non-ideal solution-based mathematical model was applied for the overall sample mass loss prediction during this study. The overall sample mass loss prediction is consistent with the post-flight mass loss measurements. The species-specific findings from this study were validated using post-mission SEM-EDX surface evaluations by three different facilities. The bulk composition prediction was validated using SEM-EDX and wet chemical analysis. The non-ideal solution model was then applied to predict the composition of the dust generated during EML testing. The thicknesses of the deposited layer on the EML coil at various locations were also calculated using the geometry of the facility and results were validated with near-real-time dust layer predictions from toxicity tracking software developed by the German Space Center (DLR) Microgravity User Support Center (MUSC).
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Tufts University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Medford, USA (GRID:grid.429997.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7531)
2 Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut für Materialphysik im Weltraum, Köln, Germany (GRID:grid.7551.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 8983 7915)
3 Service de Corrosion et du Comportement des Matériaux, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, Gif Sur-Yvette, France (GRID:grid.460789.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4910 6535)
4 Ulm University, Institute of Functional Nanosystems, Ulm, Germany (GRID:grid.6582.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9748)
5 Wilhelm-Runge-Straße, Institute of Quantum Technologies, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Ulm, Germany (GRID:grid.7551.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 8983 7915)
6 Empa Swiss Federated Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Center for X-ray Analytics, Dübendorf, Switzerland (GRID:grid.7354.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2331 3059)