It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
During economic choice, options are often considered in alternation, until commitment. Nonetheless, neuroeconomics typically ignores the dynamic aspects of deliberation. We trained two male macaques to perform a value-based decision-making task in which two risky offers were presented in sequence at the opposite sides of the visual field, each followed by a delay epoch where offers were invisible. Surprisingly, during the two delays, subjects tend to look at empty locations where the offers had previously appeared, with longer fixations increasing the probability of choosing the associated offer. Spiking activity in orbitofrontal cortex reflects the value of the gazed offer, or of the offer associated with the gazed empty spatial location, even if it is not the most recent. This reactivation reflects a reevaluation process, as fluctuations in neural spiking correlate with upcoming choice. Our results suggest that look-at-nothing gazing triggers the reactivation of a previously seen offer for further evaluation.
Neural mechanisms underlying the canonical computations underlying economic choice are not fully understood. Here authors show that gaze is highly relevant in decision processes, both at the behavioral level and at the neural level for value encoding gating and reactivation, for choice evaluation and reevaluation.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Center for Brain and Cognition, Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.5612.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2172 2676); Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.5612.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2172 2676)
2 University of Minnesota, Department of Neuroscience, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Minneapolis, USA (GRID:grid.17635.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8657)
3 Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Houston, USA (GRID:grid.39382.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2160 926X)
4 Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Center for Brain and Cognition, Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.5612.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2172 2676); Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.5612.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2172 2676); Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Serra Húnter Fellow Programme, Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.5612.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2172 2676)