It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Identifying faces requires configural processing of visual information. We previously proposed that the poor visual acuity experienced by newborns in their first year of life lays the groundwork for such configural processing by forcing integration over larger spatial fields. This hypothesis predicts that children treated for congenital cataracts late in life will exhibit persistent impairments in face- but not object-identification, because they begin their visual journey with higher than newborn acuity. This would not be the case for patients whose pretreatment condition has allowed for initial low acuity vision, like that of a newborn. Here, we test this prediction by assessing the development of facial identification skill in three groups: patients treated for congenital cataracts whose pretreatment visual acuity was worse than that of a newborn, patients whose pretreatment acuity was better than that of a newborn, and age-matched controls. We find that while both patient groups show significant gains in object-identification, the emergence of face identification is determined by pretreatment acuity: patients with pre-operative acuity worse than a newborn did not show any improvements on face-identification tasks despite years of visual experience, whereas those with pretreatment acuity comparable to a newborn improved on both the object- and face-identification tasks. These findings not only answer our research question but also provide new insights into the role of early visual acuity in facial identification development. We discuss these results in the context of both typical and atypical visual development.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.116068.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2341 2786)
2 New York University, Department of Psychology, New York, USA (GRID:grid.137628.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8753)
3 Regions Hospital, Bloomington, USA (GRID:grid.415858.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0087 6510)
4 Project Prakash, Dr. Shroff’s Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India (GRID:grid.440313.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1804 356X)
5 Technical University of Denmark, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark (GRID:grid.5170.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 8870)
6 Project Prakash, Dr. Shroff’s Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India (GRID:grid.440313.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1804 356X); Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Dr. Shroff’s Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India (GRID:grid.440313.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1804 356X)
7 Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Dr. Shroff’s Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India (GRID:grid.440313.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1804 356X)