It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Stroke is a leading cause of disability, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is routinely acquired for acute stroke management. Publicly sharing these datasets can aid in the development of machine learning algorithms, particularly for lesion identification, brain health quantification, and prognosis. These algorithms thrive on large amounts of information, but require diverse datasets to avoid overfitting to specific populations or acquisitions. While there are many large public MRI datasets, few of these include acute stroke. We describe clinical MRI using diffusion-weighted, fluid-attenuated and T1-weighted modalities for 1715 individuals admitted in the upstate of South Carolina, of whom 1461 have acute ischemic stroke. Demographic and impairment data are provided for 1106 of the stroke survivors from this cohort. Our validation demonstrates that machine learning can leverage the imaging data to predict stroke severity as measured by the NIH Stroke Scale/Score (NIHSS). We share not only the raw data, but also the scripts for replicating our findings. These tools can aid in education, and provide a benchmark for validating improved methods.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, USA (GRID:grid.254567.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 9075 106X); CUSHR, Clemson University School of Health Research, Clemson, USA (GRID:grid.26090.3d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0665 0280); Neurosurgery, and Radiology, Prisma Health, Departments of Medicine, Greenville, USA (GRID:grid.413319.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0406 7499)
2 University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, USA (GRID:grid.254567.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 9075 106X)
3 University of South Carolina, Department of Psychology, Columbia, USA (GRID:grid.254567.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 9075 106X)
4 Georgia Institute of Technology, Partnership for an Advanced Computing Environment, Atlanta, USA (GRID:grid.213917.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4943)
5 University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, USA (GRID:grid.254567.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 9075 106X); Neurosurgery, and Radiology, Prisma Health, Departments of Medicine, Greenville, USA (GRID:grid.413319.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0406 7499)
6 Neurosurgery, and Radiology, Prisma Health, Departments of Medicine, Greenville, USA (GRID:grid.413319.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0406 7499)
7 University of South Carolina, Linguistics Program, Columbia, USA (GRID:grid.254567.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 9075 106X)
8 University of South Carolina, Department of Neurology, Columbia, USA (GRID:grid.254567.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 9075 106X)