It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In the continental margin of the northeastern South China Sea, the sea level fluctuations since the Last Glacial Maximum have profoundly impacted the sedimentary environment. Our sub-bottom profiler data show a sedimentation process change from deposition to erosion during the Last Glacial Maximum. After the widespread erosion, the sedimentation process returned depositional throughout the Holocene, probably due to the rise of the sea level. This sedimentary process results in a widespread sedimentary unconformity in the continental slope, providing a benchmark for the end of the Last Glacial Maximum. Analyzing the sediment cores, we affirm that the change in current intensity is the primary factor controlling the sedimentary environments. The current intensities strengthened during the eustatic lowstand and weakened during the highstand periods, leading to alternating erosional and depositional processes. The widespread distribution of the erosive surface represents a regional-scale change in the sedimentary environment instead of a local event.
Following fluctuations in sea level and current intensity during the Last Glacial Maximum a hiatus in sedimentation was detected in the northeastern South China Sea expressed as a regional unconformity in the continental margin, suggest analyses of a sedimentary core drilled across the unconformity.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 National Central University, Department of Earth Sciences, Taoyuan, Taiwan (GRID:grid.37589.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0532 3167)
2 National Central University, Department of Earth Sciences, Taoyuan, Taiwan (GRID:grid.37589.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0532 3167); Academia Sinica, Institute of Earth Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.28665.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2287 1366)
3 National Taiwan University, Institute of Oceanography, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.19188.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 0546 0241)
4 Ifremer, Geo-Ocean,UMR6538, Univ-Brest, CNRS, Plouzané, France (GRID:grid.4825.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0641 9240)
5 Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France (GRID:grid.460782.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 4910 6551)
6 CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Géosciences Montpellier, Montpellier, France (GRID:grid.4444.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2112 9282)
7 National Central University, Center for Environmental Studies, Taoyuan, Taiwan (GRID:grid.37589.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0532 3167)
8 Ministry of Economic Affairs, Geological Survey and Mining Management Agency, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.453052.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0638 5423)