It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The broad spread of cooperative robots into many application domains has resulted in a demand for intuitive and effective solutions for teleoperated control. A relevant role in teleoperation has been assumed by impedance controllers, that allow the increase of stability and accuracy during interaction. This paper aims to test a teleoperation method based on an impedance controller, namely tele-impedance control, that is usable in unstructured environments since it relies only on wearable sensors. The proposed solution maps the joint stiffness and position of the human user, computed through six EMG and two M-IMU sensors, into the remote system to be teleoperated. We developed a 2-DoFs virtual task involving virtual physical interactions to compare the performance of our solution with the one of a traditional position-based controller. The study has been conducted on five healthy participants, who experienced both controllers in two different sessions. The tele-impedance approach has proved to be less physically demanding and more intuitive than the position-based one. Experimental data also allow us to investigate the strategy employed by the volunteers in the case of remote interactions, while using the two controllers. Of note, even though with the position controller the variation of subject impedance has no effect on the virtual arm, participants still tend to regulate both impedance and position of their own arm.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Universitá Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, NeXT Lab: Research Unit of Neurophysiology and Neuroengineering of Human-Technology Interaction, Rome, Italy (GRID:grid.9657.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 5329)
2 Newcastle University, Neurorobotics Lab, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (GRID:grid.1006.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0462 7212)
3 Universitá Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, CREO Lab: Research Unit of Advanced Robotics and Human-Centred Technologies, Rome, Italy (GRID:grid.9657.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 5329); Fondazione Santa Lucia, NeuroRobot Lab: Laboratory of Robotic Neurorehabilitation, Rome, Italy (GRID:grid.417778.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0692 3437)
4 Universitá Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, NeXT Lab: Research Unit of Neurophysiology and Neuroengineering of Human-Technology Interaction, Rome, Italy (GRID:grid.9657.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 5329); Newcastle University, Neurorobotics Lab, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (GRID:grid.1006.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0462 7212)