It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The branching plasticity of soybean, i.e. its ability to adjust branch development to planting density, differs among cultivars. Field experiments are required to measure the degree of branching plasticity, but such experiments require a great deal of time and labor, and it is difficult to analyze and compare a large number of cultivars. A simple evaluation method needs to be established to investigate branching plasticity for a wide range of materials. Therefore, we conducted two methods to estimate this value. In the first method, we investigated the relationship between the number of branching nodes and intra-row planting distance with a gradient of distance between plants (5, 7.5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 cm). The slope of the regression line between these two factors revealed significant differences among soybean cultivars, and was correlated with the measured values of branching plasticity determined in field experiments in 2015 and 2017. In the second method, the top of the stem was pinched out between the first and second leaf nodes at the V4 stage, and then the number of branch nodes was counted at maturity. There were differences in the number of branching nodes among cultivars, and a significant positive correlation between these values and the branching plasticity values measured in the 2015 and 2017 field experiments. Considering the time and effort required for field management and morphological surveys, the pinching method is considered to be an effective and simple method to evaluate branching plasticity.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Laboratory of Crop Science, Department of Sustainable Agriculture, Rakuno Gakuen University, Ebetsu, Japan
2 Laboratory of Crop Science, Department of Sustainable Agriculture, Rakuno Gakuen University, Ebetsu, Japan; Institute of cereal and oil crops, Hebei Academy of agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang, China
3 Laboratory of Crop Science, Department of Agronomy, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan