It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Quantum fluctuations can inhibit long-range ordering in frustrated magnets and potentially lead to quantum spin liquid (QSL) phases. A prime example are gapless QSLs with emergent U(1) gauge fields, which have been understood to be described in terms of quantum electrodynamics in 2+1 dimension (QED3). Despite several promising candidate materials, however, a complicating factor for their realisation is the presence of other degrees of freedom. In particular lattice distortions can act to relieve magnetic frustration, precipitating conventionally ordered states. In this work, we use field-theoretic arguments as well as extensive numerical simulations to show that the U(1) Dirac QSL on the triangular and kagome lattices exhibits a weak-coupling instability due to the coupling of monopoles of the emergent gauge field to lattice distortions, leading to valence-bond solid ordering. This generalises the spin-Peierls instability of one-dimensional quantum critical spin chains to two-dimensional algebraic QSLs. We study static distortions as well as quantum-mechanical phonons. Even in regimes where the QSL is stable, the singular spin-lattice coupling leads to marked temperature-dependent corrections to the phonon spectrum, which provide salient experimental signatures of spin fractionalisation. We discuss the coupling of QSLs to the lattice as a general tool for their discovery and characterisation.
Quantum spin liquids can emerge in frustrated magnets where quantum fluctuations prevent long-range order. Seifert et al. show that spin-lattice couplings can relieve magnetic frustration and destabilise 2D gapless quantum spin liquid states with fractionalised excitations, analogous to the 1D spin-Peierls instability.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 University of California, Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, Santa Barbara, USA (GRID:grid.133342.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9676); University of Cologne, Institute for Theoretical Physics, Cologne, Germany (GRID:grid.6190.e) (ISNI:0000 0000 8580 3777)
2 Physics Department, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Garching, Germany (GRID:grid.6936.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 2966); Munich Center for Quantum Science and Technology (MCQST), München, Germany (GRID:grid.510972.8)
3 Physics Department, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Garching, Germany (GRID:grid.6936.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 2966); Munich Center for Quantum Science and Technology (MCQST), München, Germany (GRID:grid.510972.8); Imperial College London, Blackett Laboratory, London, United Kingdom (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111)