This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
Nursing theory can function as a description, an explanation, guidance, or a prediction. Specifically, it can describe situations in nursing disciplines, explain relationships between phenomena, guide nursing practice, and predict nursing outcomes. Moreover, it may also provide a framework for analyzing and solving problems in nursing research, nursing management, nursing education, and clinical nursing [1]. Nursing theory has been developed for over a century, and relatively mature nursing theories, construction ideas, and methods have been established [2]. Bibliometrics visualize research results through literature analysis and bibliometric mapping to identify major trends in research development. As an effective tool for Big Data processing, bibliometrics has been widely applied in qualitative assessments of the development status and academic influence of a specific field [3]. However, no systematic bibliometric analysis of literature related to nursing theory has been conducted.
The Web of Science (WoS) database has adopted a set of strict selection procedures and an objective evaluation process. It includes the most authoritative and influential scholars, journals, and literature in various disciplines. Moreover, it clearly demonstrates a division of disciplines. Therefore, this study analyzed relevant literature on nursing theory research from the past 33 years, using the WoS database and the visualization analysis software VOSviewer, to understand the growth patterns, research hotspots, and development trends of nursing theory research publications worldwide, which can serve as a reference to promote clinical nursing theory research.
2. Data and Methods
2.1. Data Source
WoS is the largest academic literature database covering the largest number of disciplines in the international academic community [4]. The journals included in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) and Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) are mainly based on their impact factor (IF), which reflects the average citation frequency of journal articles. However, the journals included in the Arts and Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI) are based on the peer review results of major scholars in related disciplines worldwide. Therefore, the WoS core collection (SCI-E, SSCI, and A&HCI) database was selected, and an advanced search was performed. The search formula was set as TS = (nursing OR nurse OR nurses OR care OR caring) and TS = (theory OR theories); language type: English; document type: article & review; and time range: January 1, 1990–December 31, 2022 (retrieval date was January 6, 2022). In total, 44465 pieces of bibliographic information were downloaded. The downloaded bibliography was imported using NoteExpress software, and the duplicate content-checking function was used to remove duplicate documents. Incomplete bibliographies, character profiles, hospital or institution introductions, manuscript appointments, and documents with irrelevant research topics were eliminated after two investigators read the titles, abstracts, keywords, and other information, resulting in a final total of 23,180 documents. Data collection flow chart is shown in Figure 1.
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
2.2. Analysis Methods
The bibliometric analysis approach is based on bibliometrics theory and uses the literature information in the research field for analysis and investigation. This approach is currently widely applied in scientific research that uses existing literature as the research object. VOSviewer is a visualization tool for creating network diagrams that can perform quantitative analysis of literature and draw visual diagrams to reveal research hotspots and trends in a certain field. Each node in the visualization map represents a cited keyword, and the size of the node indicates the citation frequency. Connections between two nodes indicate the cocitation of a keyword, and the connection’s thickness reflects the strength of that link. The distance between two nodes indicates a correlation in the co-occurrence network.
3. Results
3.1. Number of Publications and Cumulative Publications on Nursing Theory
In the past 33 years, 23,180 articles related to nursing theory have been published and included in the WoS database. Figure 2 shows the general trend. In 1990, the database included only two publications, which increased to 154 articles by 1995, while the number of publications declined in 1996 and 1997. Compared with the number of publications in 1997, the number was higher from 1998 to 2011. During this period, the number of publications increased yearly until it reached 849 in 2011 and then fell again in 2012. In 2013, the number of publications gradually increased again, reaching its highest point in 2021, with an annual publication volume of 2177 articles and 1880 articles in 2022, which, despite being slightly lower than 2021, was still over twice the volume of ten years prior.
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
3.2. Distribution of Country (Region) of Nursing Theory Literature
A total of 130 countries (regions) had publications on nursing theory, with relatively concentrated distribution (Table 1), mainly in North America and Europe, such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and the Netherlands, as well as Australia. The United States provided 8,745 published articles, far exceeding other countries and accounting for 37.73% of the total publications. The United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and the Netherlands accounted for approximately 13.95%, 8.81%, 7.56%, and 3.59% of the published articles, respectively. Regarding the number of published articles, the top five countries accounted for 71.64% of the total number of publications in nursing theory. A total of 808 articles on nursing theory were published in China (ranking sixth overall).
Table 1
List of the top 30 countries (regions) in terms of the cumulative number of publications in WoS from 1990 to 2022.
No | Country | Documents |
1 | USA | 8745 |
2 | England | 2681 |
3 | Canada | 2043 |
4 | Australia | 1753 |
5 | Netherlands | 832 |
6 | China | 808 |
7 | Sweden | 465 |
8 | Norway | 442 |
9 | Scotland | 382 |
10 | Germany | 376 |
11 | Singapore | 301 |
12 | Spain | 255 |
13 | Denmark | 227 |
14 | Brazil | 202 |
15 | Italy | 195 |
16 | France | 177 |
17 | Israel | 165 |
18 | Finland | 149 |
19 | Belgium | 145 |
20 | South Africa | 133 |
21 | Japan | 129 |
22 | Ireland | 124 |
23 | New Zealand | 120 |
24 | Iran | 117 |
25 | Wales | 105 |
26 | South Korea | 104 |
27 | Switzerland | 104 |
28 | India | 87 |
29 | Turkey | 77 |
30 | Northern Ireland | 66 |
3.3. Subject Categories in Nursing Theory Publications
The published literature related to nursing theory included a total of 141 disciplines, with 12730 publications involving one discipline, 7983 publications involving two disciplines, 1710 publications involving three disciplines, and 99 publications involving four disciplines (Table 2). Among all the included disciplines, the top five were nursing, health care sciences and services, public, environmental, occupational health, psychology, and medicine general internal, as shown in Table 3.
Table 2
Subject categories involved in WoS publications from 1990 to 2022.
No | Subject category | Documents |
1 | 4 | 99 |
2 | 3 | 1710 |
3 | 2 | 7983 |
4 | 1 | 12730 |
Table 3
Top 30 disciplines involved in WoS publications from 1990 to 2022.
No | Subject | Documents |
1 | Nursing | 4016 |
2 | Health care sciences & services | 2031 |
3 | Public, environmental, & occupational health | 1939 |
4 | Psychology | 1526 |
5 | Medicine general internal | 1129 |
6 | Education & educational research | 926 |
7 | Geriatrics & gerontology | 883 |
8 | Social sciences-other topics | 784 |
9 | Business & economics | 693 |
10 | Computer science | 643 |
11 | Psychiatry | 523 |
12 | Family studies | 491 |
13 | Environmental sciences & ecology | 437 |
14 | Oncology | 406 |
15 | Information science & library science | 323 |
16 | Social work | 301 |
17 | Engineering | 251 |
18 | Neurosciences & neurology | 246 |
19 | Rehabilitation | 231 |
20 | Behavioral sciences | 204 |
21 | Pediatrics | 173 |
22 | Sociology | 165 |
23 | Dentistry, oral surgery, & medicine | 145 |
24 | Life sciences & biomedicine-other topics | 137 |
25 | Obstetrics & gynecology | 116 |
26 | Chemistry | 95 |
27 | Research & experimental medicine | 93 |
28 | Communication | 89 |
29 | Cardiovascular system & cardiology | 88 |
30 | Anthropology | 85 |
3.4. Distribution of Institutions (Units) of Nursing Theory Publications
A total of 753 institutions (units) have published literature on nursing theory, and the top 30 institutions (units) and their cumulative number of publications are shown in Table 4. Most of the top 20 institutions in terms of publication volume were from the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia. The University of Toronto and University of Alberta in Canada ranked highest, with 128 and 109 articles, respectively, followed by the University of Washington, University of North Carolina, University of California, San Francisco, and University of Michigan.
Table 4
List of the top 30 institutions (units) of the cumulative number of publications in WoS from 1990 to 2022.
No | Organization | Country | Documents |
1 | University of Toronto | Canada | 128 |
2 | University of Alberta | Canada | 109 |
3 | University of Washington | United States of America | 108 |
5 | University of North Carolina | United States of America | 104 |
6 | University of California, San Francisco | United States of America | 103 |
7 | University of Michigan | United States of America | 99 |
8 | Monash University | Australia | 98 |
9 | University of Wisconsin | United States of America | 95 |
10 | University of Pennsylvania | United States of America | 94 |
11 | University of Illinois | United States of America | 92 |
12 | Karolinska Institute | Sweden | 89 |
13 | University of Sydney | Australia | 85 |
14 | University of British Columbia | Canada | 83 |
15 | King’s College London | United Kingdom | 80 |
16 | McMaster University | United Kingdom | 79 |
17 | University of Missouri | United States of America | 75 |
18 | University of California, Los Angeles | United States of America | 74 |
19 | University of Nottingham | United Kingdom | 71 |
20 | University of Gothenburg | Sweden | 70 |
21 | University of Sheffield | United Kingdom | 67 |
22 | University of Minnesota | United States of America | 65 |
23 | University of Oslo | Norway | 61 |
24 | Linkoping University | Sweden | 59 |
25 | Columbia University | United States of America | 58 |
26 | University of Melbourne | Australia | 57 |
27 | University of Sao Paulo | Brazil | 56 |
28 | Boston University | United States of America | 55 |
29 | University of Queensland | Australia | 54 |
30 | McGill University | Canada | 52 |
3.5. Journal Distribution of Nursing Theory Publications
The 23,180 research articles on nursing theory were published across 204 journals. The top 30 journals are listed in Table 5. The Journal of Advanced Nursing (IF 3.057) had the largest collection of nursing theory-related articles, with 985 articles published in 33 years. This was followed by the Journal of Clinical Nursing, Nurse Education Today, and BMC Health Services Research, each with collections of over 450 relevant publications, with IFs of 4.423, 3.906, and 2.908, respectively. According to Bradford’s law [5] (i.e., if the journals are divided into three levels based on the number of publications on a certain subject within a certain period of time to make the number of relevant papers contained in each level equal, that is, exactly equal to one-third of the total number of articles on this subject published in all journals), it can be seen that the articles at the first level (core level) came from n1 journals, which are small in number but with the highest efficiency. After calculation, the core journals publishing articles on nursing theory were the top 30 journals, which included 7,766 related articles, accounting for approximately 33.50% of the total number of articles.
Table 5
Top 30 journals in terms of the cumulative number of publications in WoS from 1990 to 2022.
No | Journal | Publications |
1 | Journal of advanced nursing | 1202 |
2 | Journal of clinical nursing | 588 |
3 | Nurse education today | 544 |
4 | BMC health services research | 514 |
5 | Social science & medicine | 506 |
6 | Nursing science quarterly | 415 |
7 | Qualitative health research | 362 |
8 | BMJ open | 361 |
9 | Advances in nursing science | 276 |
10 | International journal of nursing studies | 225 |
11 | Scandinavian journal of caring sciences | 204 |
12 | Implementation science | 186 |
13 | Journal of evaluation in clinical practice | 170 |
14 | Midwifery | 161 |
15 | Journal of medical internet research | 158 |
16 | BMC public health | 153 |
17 | Nursing ethics | 147 |
18 | Patient education and counseling | 145 |
19 | PLOS one | 140 |
20 | Children and youth services review | 132 |
21 | Journal of nursing management | 129 |
22 | Revista latino-americana de enfermagem | 128 |
23 | Nursing inquiry | 123 |
24 | Journal of general internal medicine | 120 |
25 | Cancer nursing | 117 |
26 | British journal of social work | 115 |
27 | Journal of interprofessional care | 114 |
28 | Academic medicine | 113 |
29 | Journal of nursing scholarship | 111 |
30 | Revista da escola de enfermagem da usp | 107 |
3.6. Distribution of Highly Productive Authors in Nursing Theory Publications
A total of 57,853 authors were included in the publications on nursing theory, and Table 6 lists the top 20 most active authors. The most productive author of research articles on nursing theory was France Légaré from the Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Canada, who has published 31 related articles, followed by Jeremy M. Grimshaw from the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada, who has published 28 articles, and Susan Michie from the Department of Clinical, Educational, and Health Psychology at the University College London; Marie Johnston from the Health Psychology Group at the University of Aberdeen; and Barbara Riegel from the School of Nursing at the University of Pennsylvania, who have all published more than 20 related articles. An analysis of cooperative research of the top 80 authors is shown in Figure 3. Most authors shared connections, indicating the establishment of cooperative relationships with a small number of noncollaborators around the cooperative network [6]. The closeness of the cooperative relationships between authors can be seen from the network density. The top ten most highly productive authors all had collaborators, indicating the vital importance of cooperation between researchers.
Table 6
Top 20 highly productive authors in terms of the cumulative number of publications in WoS from 1990 to 2022.
No | Author | Institution | Publications |
1 | Légaré, France | Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, 1050, Avenue de la Médecine, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6 Canada | 31 |
2 | Grimshaw, Jeremy M. | Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute - General Campus, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada | 28 |
3 | Francis, Jill J. | Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute - General Campus, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | 25 |
4 | Michie, Susan | Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB, UK | 24 |
5 | Johnston, Marie | Health Psychology Group, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, Scotland, UK | 21 |
6 | Lingard, Lorelei | Centre for Education Research & Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, and Professor Faculty of Education, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada | 21 |
7 | Riegel, Barbara | School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia | 20 |
8 | Greenhalgh, Trisha | Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK | 18 |
9 | Presseau, Justin | Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; School of Epidemiology & Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada | 17 |
10 | Eccles, Martin P. | Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK | 17 |
11 | Vellone, Ercole | Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy | 17 |
12 | Braithwaite, Jeffrey | Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia | 17 |
13 | Mair, Frances S. | General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, GB, UK | 16 |
14 | May, Carl R. | Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom | 15 |
15 | Granek, Leeat | School of Health Policy and Management and Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada | 15 |
16 | Ni, Pengsheng | Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA | 14 |
17 | Gagnon, Marie-Pierre | Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Québec, Canada | 14 |
18 | Marchal, Bruno | Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium | 14 |
19 | Goodman, Claire | Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, university of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration-East of England (ARC-EoE), Cambridge, United Kingdom | 14 |
20 | Williams, Geoffrey C. | Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA | 13 |
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
3.7. Top 10 Funding Organizations for Publications on Nursing Theory
Scientific research funds may significantly promote the development of health care, and the funded research articles may reflect the latest scientific research level to a certain extent and are highly informative documents. The science funding system has become a strong driving force for the rapid development of nursing research, has produced excellent output, and has contributed greatly to scientific research articles [7]. Among the 23,180 publications related to nursing theory, 18,966 were funded, involving 197 funding categories in total. Table 7 shows the top ten funding agencies. The US Department of Health and Human Services funded the largest number of nursing theory publications, followed by the US National Institutes of Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, National Natural Science Foundation of China, and UK National Institute for Health and Care Research.
Table 7
Top 10 funding agencies from which publications on nursing theory in WoS from 1990 to 2022 received funding.
No | Funding | Publications |
1 | United States Department of Health Human Services | 1935 |
2 | National Institutes of Health (NIH) | 1526 |
3 | Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) | 327 |
4 | National Natural Science Foundation of China | 276 |
5 | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) | 235 |
6 | National Institute of Mental Health | 214 |
7 | Economic Social Research Council (ESRC) | 209 |
8 | Agency for Healthcare Research Quality | 207 |
9 | National Science Foundation (NSF) | 203 |
10 | European Commission | 201 |
3.8. Co-Occurrence Analysis and Coword Clustering Analysis of High-Frequency Keywords in Nursing Theory Publications
Coword clustering is a multivariate statistical method that measures the relationships between data and provides classifications based on similarities between index data. According to bibliometrics principles, no uniform standards are placed on the number of high-frequency words in coword clustering analysis. Should the number of high-frequency words be too small, it would be unable to reflect the structure of the subject. Conversely, a selection range that is too large would interfere with the analysis. At present, words with a cumulative frequency reaching approximately 40% of the total frequency are generally selected as high-frequency words [8]. In this study, 23,180 nursing theory-related publications in 33 years included a total of 47,365 keywords. After thorough consideration of expert advice and multiple adjustments, keywords with a frequency greater than or equal to 80 were selected (125 keywords) to plot the co-occurrence network of high-frequency keywords in nursing theory publications from 1990 to 2022 found on WoS (Figure 4). The research hotspots were summarized based on specific literature content, co-occurrence of high-frequency keywords, teaching experience, clinical experience, research experience, and the software’s clustering function to ultimately obtain seven hotspots in nursing theory research from 1990 to 2022 as follows: primary health care, psychological ethics, social support, nursing intervention, nursing education and research, older people and chronic diseases, and quality of life (Table 8).
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
Table 8
List of research hotspots in the clustering of high-frequency keywords in nursing theory publications in WoS from 1990 to 2022.
Clustering | Research hotspot | Keywords |
1 | Primary healthcare | Primary care, health policy, healthcare, implementation, ethnography, leadership, evidence-based practice, evaluation, patient safety, simulation, quality of care, quality improvement, primary health care |
2 | Psychological ethics | HIV/AIDS, COVID-19, parenting, ethics, attachment, health, depression, stress, spirituality, well-being, mental health, autonomy, risk, decision-making, gender, resilience |
3 | Social support | Stigma, culture, women, parental care, social support, disability, adolescents, children, Canada, barriers |
4 | Nursing intervention | Motivation, theory of planned behavior, self-efficacy, self-management, knowledge, diabetes, chronic illness, self-determination theory, health promotion, attitudes, prevention, intervention, physical activity, self-care, intervention, adherence |
5 | Nursing education and research | Nursing, nursing education, qualitative research, nursing practice, concept analysis, grounded theory, philosophy, theory, power, focus groups, public health, phenomenology, grounded theory, game theory, empowerment, learning, Australia, nursing research, nursing theory, recovery |
6 | Older people and chronic diseases | Communication, cancer, caregivers, dementia, older people, coping, caregiving, dementia, palliative care, long-term care, communication, family, interviews, |
7 | Quality of life | Quality of life, rehabilitation, job satisfaction, nurses, nurses, item response theory, anxiety |
3.9. Topic Evolution of Nursing Theory Publications
3.9.1. 1990–2000
A total of 4047 keywords were identified. In this study, keywords (65) with a frequency greater than or equal to seven were selected to plot the co-occurrence network of high-frequency keywords in nursing theory publications in WoS from 1990 to 2000 (Figure 5). The research hotspots were summarized based on specific literature content, co-occurrence of high-frequency keywords, teaching experience, clinical experience, research experience, and the software’s clustering function to ultimately obtain 10 hotspots of nursing theory research from 1990 to 2022 as follows: psychology, ethics, family nursing, nursing outcomes, quality of life, primary health care, children and adolescents, nursing research, theoretical models, and cancer and chronic diseases (Table 9).
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
Table 9
List of research hotspots in the clustering of high-frequency keywords in nursing theory publications in WoS from 1990 to 2000.
Clustering | Research hotspot | Keywords |
1 | Psychology | Mental health, social support, decision making, depression, compliance, motivation |
2 | Ethics | Ethics, sexual selection, AIDS, justice |
3 | Family nursing | Communication, family, coping, self-care, women, knowledge |
4 | Nursing outcome | Nursing, quality of care, patient satisfaction, education, nursing knowledge, outcomes, reflection, nursing practice, managed care |
5 | Quality of life | Hope, participation, quality of life, physicians, doctor-patient relationship, empowerment, nurses |
6 | Primary healthcare | Culture, health policy, health care, primary health care, economic evaluation, health, health promotion, primary care, policy |
7 | Children and adolescents | Learning, adolescents, children, pregnancy, parental care |
8 | Nursing research | Phenomenology, grounded theory, methodology, nursing research, evaluation, qualitative research, epistemology, concept analysis, philosophy, research |
9 | Theoretical model | Theory-practice gap, nursing theory, models, parse theory, human becoming theory, theory of planned behavior, systems theory |
10 | Cancer chronic diseases | Chronic illness, cancer, dementia |
3.9.2. 2001–2011
A total of 14,367 keywords were identified. In this study, keywords (135) with a frequency greater than or equal to 20 were selected to plot the co-occurrence network of high-frequency keywords in nursing theory publications in WoS from 2001 to 2011 (Figure 6). The research hotspots were summarized based on specific literature content, co-occurrence of high-frequency keywords, teaching experience, clinical experience, research experience, and the software’s clustering function to ultimately obtain 15 hotspots of nursing theory research from 2001 to 2011 as follows: health promotion, nurse decision-making, evidence-based practice, methodology, long-term care, parental care, women’s health, home-based care, hospice care, older people, sexually-transmitted diseases (STDs), qualitative research, assessment, nursing practice, and philosophy (Table 10).
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
Table 10
List of research hotspots in the clustering of high-frequency keywords in nursing theory publications in WoS from 2001 to 2011.
Clustering | Research hotspot | Keywords |
1 | Health promotion | Health, depression, autonomy, health promotion, risk, health care, breast cancer, prevention, UK, trust, compliance, adherence, culture, phenomenology |
2 | Nurse decision-making | Motivation, health policy, communication, learning, evaluation, decision-making, nurse education, intervention, primary health care |
3 | Evidence-based practice | Self-efficacy, interaction, midwifery, pregnancy, attachment, interviews, primary care, leadership, evidence-based medicine, attachment theory, family nursing, focus groups, evidence-based practice, parenting, family |
4 | Methodology | Education, decision making, ethics, uncertainty, bioethics, rehabilitation, USA, methodology |
5 | Long-term care | Dementia, power, job satisfaction, critical theory, long-term care, older people, Internet, empowerment |
6 | Parental care | Parental care, Canada, game theory, quality of care, sexual selection |
7 | Women’s health | Women, diabetes, women’s health, research, children, attitudes, practice, knowledge, adolescents, self-care, pain, patient safety, disability, stigma |
8 | Home-based care | Nursing care, nurses, managed care, concept analysis, nursing, home care, quality, mental health, chronic illness, nursing education, ethnography |
9 | Hospice care | Hope, palliative care, cancer, coping, stress, patient education, measurement, aging, asthma, spirituality |
10 | Elderly | Elderly, care, caregiving, grounded theory, caring, aged |
11 | STD | HIV/AIDS, gender |
12 | Qualitative research | Qualitative research, social support, theory development, qualitative, qualitative methods |
13 | Assessment | Caregivers, validity, reliability, assessment |
14 | Nursing practice | Theory, theory of planned behavior, nursing practice, nursing research, nursing theory, item response theory, parse |
15 | Philosophy | Public health, quality of life, philosophy |
3.9.3. 2012–2022
A total of 30,457 keywords were identified. In this study, keywords (121) with a frequency greater than or equal to 40 were selected to plot the co-occurrence network of high-frequency keywords of nursing theory publications in WoS from 2012 to 2022 (Figure 7). The research hotspots were summarized based on specific literature content, co-occurrence of high-frequency keywords, teaching experience, clinical experience, research experience, and the software’s clustering function to ultimately obtain eight hotspots of nursing theory research from 2012 to 2022 as follows: patient-centered, grounded theory, psychological ethics, nursing education, nursing intervention, nursing theory, quality of life, and aging (Table 11).
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
Table 11
List of research hotspots in the clustering of high-frequency keywords in nursing theory publications in WoS from 2012 to 2022.
Clustering | Research hotspot | Keywords |
1 | Patient-centered | Knowledge translation, patient safety, chronic illness, primary care, patient-centered care, technology, public health, healthcare, implementation, hospital, ethnography, leadership, integrated care, evaluation, social support, primary care, evidence-based practice, risk, health policy, older people, quality improvement, process evaluation |
2 | Grounded theory | Communication, cancer, qualitative research, family, grounded theory, qualitative, coping, palliative care, family, adolescents, children, attachment, decision-making, qualitative methods, decision-making, interviews, identity, resilience |
3 | Psychological ethics | HIV/AIDS, COVID-19, stigma, stress, pregnancy, mental health, India, gender, mental health, women, barriers, South Africa, Canada, health disparities |
4 | Nursing education | Nursing education, education, nursing, nurse, well-being, medical education, nursing students, medical education, Australia, simulation, China, assessment, job satisfaction |
5 | Nursing intervention | Adherence, exercise, knowledge, health, health promotion, attitudes, motivation, behavior change, self-efficacy, prevention, self-care, self-management, Internet, intervention, physical activity, heart failure, diabetes, intervention, prevention, obesity |
6 | Nursing theory | Ethics, nursing practice, concept analysis, theory of planned behavior, self-determination theory, game theory, health, spirituality, culture, nursing theory, item response theory, theory, research, phenomenology, item response theory, autonomy |
7 | Quality of life | Breast cancer, quality of life, rehabilitation, older adults, dementia, disability, depression, quality of care, stroke, long-term care, psychometrics, anxiety |
8 | Aging | Parenting, parental care, decision-making, aging, parents, recovery |
4. Discussion
4.1. International Research on Nursing Theory Has Been Active
Nursing is an interdisciplinary subject [9]. The number of publications related to nursing theory has shown an annual increase in recent years, with nearly 10,000 nursing theory publications involving more than two disciplines. The top eight journals with the highest number of publications are the Journal of Advanced Nursing (IF 3.057), Journal of Clinical Nursing (IF 4.423), Nurse Education Today (IF 3.906), BMC Health Services Research (IF 2.908), Social Science & Medicine (IF 5.379), Nursing Science Quarterly (IF 0.833), Qualitative Health Research (IF 4.233), and BMJ Open (IF 3.007), with a cumulative percentage of 19.38%. The latest research findings of nursing theory may be learned and drawn on by paying more attention to these journals.
4.2. The United States Has the Leading Nursing Theory Research Globally
Foreign research institutions with publications on nursing theory were mainly found to be in economically developed countries, such as the United States and some European countries. Over 90% of the top 20 most highly productive authors were from universities and affiliated teaching hospitals. Over one-third of the foreign nursing theory research articles were from the United States. These publications received the most funding from the United States Health and Human Services Department and the National Institutes of Health, showing that the nursing theory research in the United States is at the forefront of the world, leading the developmental trends in nursing theory today.
4.3. Cooperative Research Will Be the Trend for Future Nursing Theory Studies
Scientific research cooperation is an effort that can significantly improve scientific research capacity without much investment and has become the mainstream method of social science research today. This study’s results show that highly productive authors generally have collaborators, indicating the importance of cooperation among researchers.
4.4. Cluster Analysis of High-Frequency Keywords Revealed That Nursing Theory Research Tends toward Focusing on Clinical Application and Verification
Keywords are the natural language that reflects the core content of research. The more keywords appear in a document, the more the main research content can be represented. The more the number of co-occurrences of two high-frequency keywords, the stronger the association between the two. After clustering, the keywords may further reflect the focus of the research field and the academic topics in which researchers are interested.
We summarized the research hotspots based on the specific literature content and keyword cluster analysis. Finally, seven hot categories of nursing theory research from 1990 to 2022 formed, including primary health care, psychological ethics, social support, nursing intervention, nursing education and research, older people and chronic diseases, and quality of life. Nursing theory research has also focused on psychological ethics and social support on top of meeting patients’ most basic primary health care requirements. There is more and more research on nursing theories, and a variety of nursing theories have been formed, such as Oram’s self-care theory, Erickson’s psychosocial development theory, and Piaget’s cognitive development theory, which effectively guide clinical nursing practice and have been verified and tested in the process of clinical nursing practice. In the 21st century, many countries have become aging societies, and nursing theory has also often been applied in the care of older people and chronic diseases to improve patients’ quality of life. Theoretical research is inseparable from the development of nursing education. Further improvements in theory will require more research based on clinical practice.
From 1990 to 2000, there were 10 research hotspots related to nursing theory, including psychology, ethics, family care, care outcomes, quality of life, primary health care, adolescents, nursing research, theoretical models, and cancer chronic diseases. From 2001 to 2012, nursing theory research formed fifteen research hotspots, including health promotion, nurse decision-making, evidence-based practice, methodology, long-term care, parental care, women’s health, home care, hospice care, the elderly, sexually transmitted diseases, qualitative research, assessment, nursing practice, and philosophy. From 2013 to 2022, eight research hotspots related to nursing theory have been formed, including patient-centered, grounded theory, psychological ethics, nursing education, nursing intervention, nursing theory, quality of life, and aging. In terms of the research object, theoretical research has evolved from children and adolescents at the beginning to women’s health and has recently moved its focus to application among older adults. In terms of research content, theoretical research has changed from family or home-based care to patient-centered clinical care. Regarding nursing outcomes, theoretical research has changed from patient safety and health promotion to improving the quality of life. Research methods have changed from concept analysis at first to qualitative research and specific, grounded theories. In terms of other aspects, given the convenience of the Internet and mobile data acquisition today, nursing theory research has become increasingly concerned with the actual needs of patients. It aims to change the behaviors of nurses and patients to promote health through evidence-based, theory-guided interventions.
5. Conclusions
In summary, bibliometric methods and VOSViewer software were used in this study to analyze the literature in English on nursing theory included in the WoS database during the 33 years between 1990 and 2022. Historical changes in nursing theory were explored based on the annual number of publications, and the authoritative academic journals of nursing theory were identified based on the number of articles published. Moreover, the leaders of the theoretical discipline and their academic research teams were identified according to the authors and institutions. Moreover, the research hotspots and developmental trends of nursing theory were explored based on keyword clustering and topic evolution analysis. Nursing theory research has been increasingly applied to clinical practice and tested or verified through disease intervention. The theoretical research is inseparable from the development of nursing education. The methodologies of theoretical studies should be specific and diversified. Further improvement in nursing theory requires patient-centered clinical practice [10]. Therefore, according to the suggestions and guidance of nursing theory and nursing practice in this study, the advancement of this study will be very conducive to improving and enhancing nursing management and thus has vital guiding significance for the nursing discipline.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Fund Program for the Scientific Activities of Selected Returned Overseas Professionals in Shanxi Province (20230050), and we would like to thank this fund for the financial affords of this study.
[1] Z. Ruifang, H. Shifan, Z. Chichen, W. Qian, Y. Qi, D. Zhiguang, "Research progress in domestic and foreign and review on clinical nursing theory," Chinese Nursing Research, vol. 33 no. 9, pp. 1514-1521, 2019.
[2] L. Yang, Z. Haiou, Z. Hualiang, L. Pengwei, S. Qinqin, "Inspiration and thinking about nursing theory research in China based on construction of western nursing theory," Chinese Journal of Nursing, vol. 50 no. 8, pp. 986-990, 2015.
[3] P. Kokol, H. Blažun Vošner, "Historical, descriptive and exploratory analysis of application of bibliometrics in nursing research," Nursing Outlook, vol. 67 no. 6, pp. 680-695, DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2019.04.009, 2019.
[4] W. Su, G. Hwang, C. Chang, "Bibliometric analysis of core competencies associated nursing management publications," Journal of Nursing Management, vol. 30 no. 7, pp. 2869-2880, DOI: 10.1111/jonm.13795, 2022.
[5] Z. Weijin, L. Jia, "The research of co-word analysis(1)-the process and methods of co-word analysis," Journal of Information, vol. 5, pp. 70-72, 2008.
[6] Z. Yu, Y. Kehu, Bibliometric Analysis on Nursing Education Research, 2014.
[7] Z. Juan, "Study on the distribution of academic articles based on Bradford’s law," Modern Information, vol. 5, pp. 26-28, 2007.
[8] Z. Ruifang, L. Mengyue, S. Yanbing, X. Meng, H. Shifan, D. Zhiguang, "A bibliometric analysis of publication of funded studies in nursing research from web of science, 2008–2018," Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 18, 2020.
[9] L. J. Labrague, Z. Al Hamdan, D. M. McEnroe-Petitte, "An integrative review on conflict management styles among nursing professionals: implications for nursing management," Journal of Nursing Management, vol. 26 no. 8, pp. 902-917, DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12626, 2018.
[10] G. Doleman, D. Twigg, "Development, implementation and evaluation of a professional practice model: a scoping review," Journal of Nursing Management, vol. 30 no. 7, pp. 3519-3534, DOI: 10.1111/jonm.13820, 2022.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2024 Ruifang Zhu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
Background and Purpose. Nursing theory can provide a framework for analyzing and solving problems in nursing research, nursing management, nursing education, and clinical nursing. The development of nursing theory has been more than one hundred years and has gradually developed mature. However, no bibliometric analysis has been conducted on nursing theory. Methods. This study adopted bibliometric approaches and analyzed the nursing theory research literature included in the Web of Science database during the 33 years between 1990 and 2022 using VOSviewer software. The source countries and regions, subject categories and distributions of institutions/units, journals, and highly productive authors of 23,180 nursing theory publications from the past 33 years were analyzed. The top ten funding agencies of nursing theory literature were also analyzed. Cluster and topic evolution analyses were performed on high-frequency keywords in nursing theory literature. Results. Historical trends in nursing theory were explored based on the number of articles published each year. The authoritative academic journals of nursing theory were identified based on the number of articles published, and the leaders of nursing theory and their academic research teams were identified based on the authors and their institutions. Moreover, the research hotspots and development trends in nursing theory were explored based on keyword clustering and topic evolution analysis. Thus, it is helpful to guide nursing practice and effectively solve nursing problems in nursing management. Conclusion. Research on nursing theory has been increasingly applied in clinical practice and tested or verified through clinical interventions in treating diseases. Theoretical research is inseparable from the development of nursing education. Moreover, research methods should be specific and diverse. Further improvement of theories depends on patient-centered clinical practice. Therefore, this study plays an important role in the continuous enrichment and development of nursing theory, which is conducive to further promoting the progress of nursing management and nursing discipline.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Editorial Office First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University Taiyuan 030001 Shanxi, China; School of Nursing Shanxi Medical University Taiyuan 030001 Shanxi, China
2 School of Nursing Shanxi Medical University Taiyuan 030001 Shanxi, China