It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
As regions around the world invest billions in new infrastructure to overcome increasing water scarcity, better guidance is needed to facilitate cooperative planning and investment in institutionally complex and interconnected water supply systems. This work combines detailed water resource system ensemble modeling with multiobjective intelligent search to explore infrastructure investment partnership design in the context of ongoing canal rehabilitation and groundwater banking in California. Here we demonstrate that severe tradeoffs can emerge between conflicting goals related to water supply deliveries, partnership size, and the underlying financial risks associated with cooperative infrastructure investments. We show how hydroclimatic variability and institutional complexity can create significant uncertainty in realized water supply benefits and heterogeneity in partners’ financial risks that threaten infrastructure investment partnership viability. We demonstrate how multiobjective intelligent search can design partnerships with substantially higher water supply benefits and a fraction of the financial risk compared to status quo planning processes. This work has important implications globally for efforts to use cooperative infrastructure investments to enhance the climate resilience and financial stability of water supply systems.
Hamilton and colleagues demonstrate critical water supply risks and financial tradeoffs for California utilities investing in cooperative infrastructure projects and develops computational methods for designing more resilient partnerships under uncertainty.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Cornell University, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 877X); Confluency, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.527747.4)
2 Cornell University, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 877X)
3 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, USA (GRID:grid.10698.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2248 3208); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Center on Financial Risk in Environmental Systems, Gillings School of Global Public Health, UNC Institute for the Environment, Chapel Hill, USA (GRID:grid.10698.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2248 3208)