It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Soil texture is one of the most important elements to consider before planting and tillage. These features affect the product selection and regulate its water permeability. Discrimination of soils by determining soil texture features requires an intense workload and is time-consuming. Therefore, having a powerful tool and knowledge for texture-based soil discrimination could enable rapid and accurate discrimination of soils. This study focuses on presenting new models for 6 different soil sample groups (Soil_1 to Soil_6) based on 12 different machine learning algorithms that can be utilized for various problems. As a result, overall accuracy values were determined as greater than 99.2% (Trilayered Neural Network). The greatest accuracy value was found in Bayes Net (99.83%) and followed by Subspace Discriminant (99.80%). In the Bayes Net algorithm, MCC (Matthews Correlation Coefficient) and F-measure values were obtained as 0.994 and 0.995 for Soil_4 and Soil_6 sample groups while these values were 1.000 for other soil groups. Soil types can visually vary based on their texture, mineral composition, and moisture levels. The variability of this can be influenced by fertilization, precipitation levels, and soil cultivation. It is important to capture the images in soil conditions that are more stable. In conclusion, the present study has proven the feasibility of rapid, non-destructive, and accurate discrimination of soils by image processing-based machine learning.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Erciyes University, Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Kayseri, Turkey (GRID:grid.411739.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2331 2603)
2 Skierniewice, Poland (GRID:grid.411739.9)
3 Erciyes University, Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Kayseri, Turkey (GRID:grid.411739.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2331 2603)
4 Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University, Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Karaman, Turkey (GRID:grid.440455.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1755 486X)
5 Ankara University, Department of Agricultural Machinery and Technologies Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ankara, Turkey (GRID:grid.7256.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0940 9118)