1 Introduction
Mercury () is a global pollutant that can be emitted to the atmosphere from both natural and anthropogenic sources. Humans have changed the biogeochemical cycle through industrial development and land use practices that have increased atmospheric concentrations and altered reservoir distributions (Obrist et al., 2018; Driscoll et al., 2013; Selin, 2009). Mercury is a toxin that can cause neurological and cardiovascular health effects depending on the duration, magnitude, and chemical form of exposure (Lyman et al., 2020a; Driscoll et al., 2013; Selin, 2009). In the atmosphere, exists as gaseous elemental (; GEM), gaseous – commonly referred to as GOM (gaseous oxidized mercury) or RGM (reactive gaseous mercury) – and particulate-bound mercury (PBM). Elemental is relatively inert and has an atmospheric lifetime on the scale of months (Bishop et al., 2020). Oxidized ( ), however, is much more reactive and water soluble, resulting in an atmospheric lifetime on the scale of days to a week in the planetary boundary layer (PBL) (Lyman et al., 2020a). Thus, when undergoes oxidation to form , it is much more readily deposited into ecosystems, where it can methylate and bioaccumulate within food systems, with potential environmental and health consequences (Driscoll et al., 2013; Selin, 2009).
While international and domestic regulations have led to decreases in global background ambient concentrations (Obrist et al., 2018; Lyman et al., 2020a), local conditions can vary significantly because of differences in the magnitude of urban and industrial emissions (Driscoll et al., 2013). Global background terrestrial concentrations also vary spatially; concentrations in the Northern Hemisphere reportedly range from 1.5 to 1.7 , and those in the Southern Hemisphere range from 1.0 to 1.3 (Sprovieri et al., 2016), caused by the higher concentration of urban areas and greater anthropogenic emissions in the Global North (Mao et al., 2016). Mercury species have also been shown to exhibit variability with altitude. Elemental is typically well mixed in the PBL, while has been shown to increase in concentration with elevation (Swartzendruber et al., 2006; Faïn et al., 2009; Lyman and Jaffe, 2012; Gratz et al., 2015; Shah et al., 2016). The atmosphere is considered to be a minor reservoir of ( 5 ) compared to soil (1450 ) and marine ecosystems (280 ), but it is the dominant pathway for inputs to ecosystems via deposition (Driscoll et al., 2013; Obrist et al., 2018; Lyman et al., 2020a). Oxidized can be deposited via precipitation or dry deposition to both terrestrial and marine ecosystems. Recent work has posited that global models underestimate the importance of uptake by vegetation and oceans and are therefore biased toward deposition (Sonke et al., 2023; Fu et al., 2021).
The chemical oxidation-reduction mechanisms of in the atmosphere, which determine its environmental fate, are complex and not fully understood (Dibble et al., 2020; Lyman et al., 2020a; Shah et al., 2021; Castro et al., 2022). Previous studies have indicated multiple possible major oxidants of in the atmosphere. While oxidation can occur in the stratosphere, driven by a photosensitized oxidation mechanism (Saiz-Lopez et al., 2022), as well as in both the marine and continental boundary layers (Lyman et al., 2020a), recent studies have suggested that oxidation occurs primarily in the free troposphere and the leading oxidants are halogens, such as atomic bromine (), and the hydroxyl radical (OH) (Dibble et al., 2020). Oxidation in the free troposphere is thought to be driven by a two-step mechanism, in which ozone () acts as a secondary oxidant (Shah et al., 2021; Castro et al., 2022). Previous studies have reported -initiated oxidation in the free troposphere (Gratz et al., 2015; Coburn et al., 2016). A companion paper to this study further demonstrated that iodine-initiated oxidation may compete with - and -initiated oxidation at cold temperatures and may be important for understanding the oxidation mechanism (Lee et al., 2024). This chemical cycling creates a pool of within the free troposphere (Lyman and Jaffe, 2012; Shah et al., 2016; Weiss-Penzias et al., 2015).
Large uncertainties exist in the rate constants of the oxidation mechanism, and there remains a shortage of experimental data (Castro et al., 2022). Part of this uncertainty comes from limitations in commercial instrument and measurement accuracy (Jaffe et al., 2014; Lyman et al., 2020b; Gustin et al., 2024). Most measurements of atmospheric to date have relied on KCl denuders, which exhibit a low bias (Lyman et al., 2020b, and references therein). The extent of this low bias cannot be directly quantified, as most measurements have been uncalibrated (Gustin et al., 2015; Jaffe et al., 2014). Thus, these datasets likely suffer from an underestimation of atmospheric concentrations (Lyman et al., 2020b).
Previous studies at mountaintop observatories in the US, Taiwan, and France have examined temporal trends in atmospheric concentrations and consistently showed evidence of high concentrations of in the clean, dry air of the free troposphere (Swartzendruber et al., 2006; Faïn et al., 2009; Sheu et al., 2010; Timonen et al., 2013; Fu et al., 2016). One such site is Storm Peak Laboratory (SPL), a high-elevation, continental research station in the US Rocky Mountains. Past work at SPL documented transitions between the PBL and the free troposphere using long-term measurements of aerosols and trace gases (Collaud Coen et al., 2018). Moreover, studies by Obrist et al. (2008) and Faïn et al. (2009) investigated the influence of anthropogenic sources, as well as the effects of meteorology and air mass chemical composition on speciated compounds. However, these and other mountaintop studies historically relied on instrumentation that likely underestimated concentrations (Lyman et al., 2020b).
In this study, we employed a calibrated measurement technique with higher time resolution and improved measurement accuracy compared to other available methods (Lyman et al., 2020b; Elgiar et al., 2024). Data were collected at SPL above Steamboat Springs, Colorado, during two 6-month periods in spring and summer 2021 and 2022. We examined meteorology, air mass composition, and atmospheric transport during periods of elevated to more accurately quantify the concentrations of and to identify its origins in a continental atmosphere.
2 Methods
2.1 Site description
The data used in this study were collected at Storm Peak Laboratory (3220 ; 40.455° N, 106.744° W) above Steamboat Springs, Colorado. SPL is a permanent high-elevation research facility within the Rocky Mountains along the Continental Divide. The site is optimally located to characterize the remote continental atmosphere and transitions between the PBL and the free troposphere (Faïn et al., 2009; Collaud Coen et al., 2018). SPL receives prevailing westerly winds, creating a clear upwind fetch (Faïn et al., 2009). The site is located east of the agricultural Yampa Valley and approximately 19 from downtown Steamboat Springs (Fig. ). SPL is also located east and downwind of three coal-fired power plants, located in Hayden, Colorado; Craig, Colorado; and Vernal, Utah, but otherwise sits in a relatively remote location with few nearby point sources that could influence atmospheric composition at the laboratory.
2.2 Data collection
2.2.1 Dual-channel measurements of and
The Utah State University (USU) dual-channel measurement system operated at SPL from 12 March 2021 to 11 October 2021 and 3 March 2022 to 22 September 2022. The operation, validation, quality assurance, and quality control of this system at SPL are described in detail in Elgiar et al. (2024). Briefly, the dual-channel system pulls ambient air through the main Teflon-coated aluminum inlet at a rate of 9 into a weatherproof box containing a thermal converter and a pair of in-series cation exchange membranes. The thermal converter is constructed of quartz, packed with quartz chips, and maintained at a temperature of 650 to convert to such that total is measured ( ) (Lyman et al., 2020b). The cation exchange membranes remove from the sample airstream, allowing only to pass through (Miller et al., 2019). A valve switches between the thermal converter and the cation exchange membranes every 5 min. During each 5 min period, two 2.5 measurements are recorded by the downstream Tekran 2537X vapor analyzer. Oxidized concentrations are computed as the difference between (a) two consecutive 2.5 measurements averaged together and (b) the average of the 2.5 measurement preceding and the one following the consecutive measurements. As such, the system generates a complete set of measurements (, , ) every 10 min. Inlet and sample lines are maintained at a temperature of 110 to minimize contamination and wall losses.
Elemental mercury vapor injections on the Tekran 2537X were performed every 6 to 8 weeks using a Tekran 2505 calibration unit to verify the permeation rate of the internal calibration source. The soda lime trap upstream of the 2537X (used to prevent passivation of the internal gold traps) and the dual-channel system's cation exchange membranes were replaced every 2 weeks, while the inlet was replaced every 4 weeks. The dual-channel system was also verified for measurement accuracy with an International System of Units-traceable (SI) calibrator that injected known amounts of , , and into the inlet on a weekly basis, as described in Elgiar et al. (2024). All final and concentrations were increased by 8 % to account for a suspected bias in the Dumarey equation used for calculating vapor pressure of for manual injections (Elgiar et al., 2024; de Krom et al., 2021). The 1 h average detection limits for measurements were 12 7 (mean 95 % confidence interval of weekly detection limit tests conducted throughout the measurement season) in 2021 and 6 2 in 2022. The detection limits were calculated as 3 times the standard deviation of measurements of during times when both channels were sampling -free air. The percent standard uncertainty for and with the dual-channel system, which takes into account the uncertainty budget for the Tekran 2537X analyzer (following the methodology of Brown et al., 2008), as well as the performance of the dual-channel component of the system, was 8 % (Elgiar et al., 2024). The placement of the dual-channel component of the system (e.g., the box containing the thermal converter and cation exchange membranes) outdoors and immediately upstream of the inlet and the development of an automated calibration system for and compounds were both key improvements to the dual-channel system for the present study.
Table 1
Summary statistics of , , trace gas, and aerosol (particulate matter 1 ) scattering () measurements by season and for each study year at SPL. The intermittent negative concentrations for observed between 2–11 May 2021 (2 % of hourly data) and one value in 2022 were excluded from the values reported in this table. See Sect. for details.
2021 | 2022 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spring | Summer | All | Spring | Summer | All | ||
() | mean SDmedianmax | 1.31 0.091.341.661332 | 1.24 0.141.252.381727 | 1.27 0.131.302.383059 | 1.26 0.12 1.291.661718 | 1.25 0.101.251.672061 | 1.25 0.111.271.673779 |
() | mean SDmedianmax | 82 49705201323 | 120 411152531709 | 103 491025203032 | 80 40732391694 | 86 29851972053 | 83 35802393747 |
() | mean SDmedianmax | 48 950691934 | 57 857882473 | 53 954884407 | 51 651802208 | 53 653842409 | 52 652844617 |
() | mean SDmedianmax | 1.9 0.51.9121928 | 2.1 0.72.0152473 | 2.1 0.61.9154401 | 1.3 1.01.0182207 | 1.3 0.61.26.32567 | 1.3 0.81.1184774 |
() | mean SDmedianmax | 0.0 0.10.01.11934 | 0.0 0.20.03.32540 | 0.0 0.20.03.34474 | 0.0 0.30.05.82195 | 0.0 0.20.03.22409 | 0.0 0.20.05.84604 |
() | mean SDmedianmax | NANANANA | 201 9417518591586 | NANANANA | 133 201342112208 | 123 241212762568 | 128 231282764776 |
() | mean SDmedianmax | 5 35171849 | 55 78278162476 | 34 6498164325 | 4 33332175 | 11 1081642460 | 7 851644635 |
NA: all instances of “NA” in tables refer to “not available”.
The dual-channel system may occasionally report negative values for when the concentration is greater than the corresponding measurement used in the difference calculation (Dunham-Cheatham et al., 2023). This may occur in plumes of rapidly changing concentrations or for other reasons related to instrument performance that are as yet not fully understood. In this study, negative concentrations of hourly averaged were computed only intermittently between 2–11 May 2021, most notably during two approximately 24 periods between 2 and 4 May, as well as for approximately 10 on 10 May. We therefore excluded several pairs of hourly averaged and concentrations during this early May 2021 period ( 65; 2 % of the 12 March–15 September 2021 data). Removing these points did not change the 2021 mean, median, or standard deviation of within the measurement precision shown in Table ; the spring 2021 mean SD decreased from 1.32 0.10 to 1.31 0.09 . For , the exclusion of these values increased the 2021 mean SD from 101 52 (median of 101) to 103 49 (median of 102) and increased the spring 2021 mean SD from 77 54 (median of 67) to 82 49 (median of 70) . In 2022, there was only one negative value for the hourly averaged concentrations, and that value, along with the corresponding concentration, was also removed. Other extended gaps in the datasets, related to instrument malfunction or operator error, included the periods from 12 May to 6 June, 29 June to 9 July, and 2 to 10 August in 2021, as well as 27 June to 1 July and 16 to 23 August in 2022.
2.2.2 Criteria gas and meteorological measurementsSeveral criteria gases and meteorological parameters related to this study were continuously measured at SPL. Meteorological data were measured on the roof of SPL at a height of 10 above ground level () at a 5 time resolution. Measured meteorological parameters included temperature, relative humidity (RH), wind speed and direction, and barometric pressure. These data were quality-assured and made publicly available by MesoWest (
Ozone, nitrogen oxides (), sulfur dioxide (), and aerosol properties such as scattering and absorption at 450, 550, and 700 were measured at a time resolution of 1 min and calibrated daily. Ozone was measured using a Thermo model 49i analyzer with a precision of 1.0 . Nitrogen oxides were measured with a Thermo model 42i –– analyzer with a precision of 0.2 . Sulfur dioxide was measured using a Thermo model 43i analyzer with a precision of the greater value of either 1 % or 1 . Aerosol properties were measured with a TSI model 3562 nephelometer. Analysis for this paper relied on scattering ( ) as the representative aerosol metric, in part for direct comparison with related studies (e.g., Timonen et al., 2013) and because the aerosol absorption data had more frequent gaps. Aerosol data were corrected to STP (standard temperature and pressure) conditions and quality-controlled and quality-assured by NOAA ESRL GML (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earth System Research Laboratories Global Monitoring Laboratory) (Andrews et al., 2019). Carbon monoxide (CO) was measured beginning on 9 July 2021 with a Teledyne model 300E, from which average values were logged every 2.5 in 2021 and every minute in 2022. The analyzer performed an automatic zero every 4 in -free air; routine on-site spans for could not be performed due to COVID-19-related site access limitations, but based on those able to be performed before, during, and after the study, the measurement accuracy was estimated to be within 25 %.
2.3 Data analysis and modeling techniques
2.3.1 Statistical treatment of data
The measurement data were averaged to 1 h intervals corresponding to the beginning of each hour to compare all the variables at the same time step. Analyses in the present paper focus specifically on measurements made from 13 March 2021 to 15 September 2021 and from 3 March 2022 to 15 September 2022, encompassing two complete 6-month periods each year. We defined spring as 1 March to 31 May and summer as 1 June to 15 September given prior knowledge of the seasonal climatology and transport patterns (Obrist et al., 2008; Hallar et al., 2016). For example, past work has shown that trans-Pacific transport as well as stratospheric subsidence occur more commonly in springtime (Hallar et al., 2016), while summertime air masses at SPL are frequently impacted by biomass burning and different transport patterns (Obrist et al., 2018). Additionally, concentrations have been shown to vary seasonally within the Northern Hemisphere, driven largely by seasonal meteorology (Xu et al., 2022; Custódio et al., 2022).
In this study, statistical significance was defined as 0.05. Reduced major axis (RMA) regressions were used to calculate linear regression slopes to account for uncertainty in both variables, as recommended for air quality data (Ayers, 2001). Correlation analysis was performed using Pearson's correlation coefficients (), and comparisons of means were calculated using two-tailed independent sample tests and Mann–Whitney tests.
Lastly, we estimated that at least one-third of the 10 min averaged measurements in June–September 2021 showed evidence of smoke presence, whereas this was detected in less than 5 % of data for the same time frame in 2022. The presence of smoke was based on preliminary criteria of 150 , 30 , and 35 for a minimum of 1 h and confirmation of overhead smoke using the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Hazard Mapping System Fire and Smoke Product (NOAA HMS) (accessed via the AirNow Tech Navigator, 2023).
Table 2
Event mean SD for , , RH, , , and .
Event | Date(MST) | () | () | RH(%) | () | () | () |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 12:00 on 1 Apr 2021 to06:00 on 6 Apr 2021 | 1.12 0.07 | 137 38 | 26 8 | 40 3 | NA | 4.5 0.6 |
2 | 23:00 on 24 Apr 2021 to05:00 on 27 Apr 2021 | 1.18 0.06 | 121 25 | 38 16 | 53 3 | NA | 5.0 1.5 |
3 | 02:00 on 30 Apr 2021 to00:00 on 2 May 2021 | 1.22 0.06 | 115 47 | 34 7 | 51 3 | NA | 2.6 0.3 |
4 | 14:00 on 7 Jun 2021 to08:00 on 11 Jun 2021 | 1.03 0.15 | 147 52 | 20 7 | NA | NA | 18.0 21.4 |
5 | 23:00 on 13 Jun 2021 to21:00 on 15 Jun 2021 | 1.03 0.09 | 156 46 | 13 4 | 49 4 | NA | 20.3 18.5 |
6 | 12:00 on 22 Aug 2021 to23:00 on 30 Aug 2021 | 1.08 0.08 | 139 31 | 36 16 | 52 5 | 150 30 | 19.3 21.6 |
7 | 05:00 on 6 Sep 2021 to05:00 on 11 Sep 2021 | 1.12 0.07 | 173 28 | 20 7 | 63 5 | 230 50 | 49.5 21.6 |
8 | 19:00 on 13 Sep 2021 to07:00 on 16 Sep 2021 | 1.29 0.10 | 163 32 | 35 14 | 63 6 | 160 20 | 23.1 9.7 |
9 | 00:00 on 10 May 2022 to15:00 on 12 May 2022 | 1.09 0.10 | 135 50 | 35 15 | 54 5 | 120 10 | 2.7 0.8 |
10 | 19:00 on 25 May 2022 to18:00 on 27 May 2022 | 1.13 0.08 | 120 34 | 39 10 | 49 3 | 110 20 | 5.2 1.2 |
11 | 04:00 on 3 Jun 2022 to04:00 on 5 Jun 2022 | 1.08 0.08 | 100 21 | 38 10 | 56 3 | 110 20 | 3.9 1.1 |
12 | 00:00 on 7 Jun 2022 to17:00 on 11 Jun 2022 | 1.18 0.07 | 124 19 | 38 10 | 57 7 | 130 10 | 4.9 1.4 |
13 | 18:00 on 12 Jun 2022 to23:00 on 13 Jun 2022 | 1.09 0.10 | 117 46 | 38 30 | 55 5 | 110 40 | 21.3 31.0 |
14 | 17:00 on 15 Jun 2022 to15:00 on 17 Jun 2022 | 1.12 0.07 | 118 13 | 28 11 | 59 7 | 130 30 | 13.7 10.0 |
15 | 07:00 on 20 Jun 2022 to02:00 on 23 Jun 2022 | 1.12 0.08 | 116 20 | 30 9 | 60 5 | 120 10 | 7.0 3.6 |
16 | 07:00 on 20 Jul 2022 to23:00 on 22 Jul 2022 | 1.21 0.08 | 120 12 | 35 9 | 59 3 | 120 20 | 10.6 2.2 |
17 | 00:00 on 25 Jul 2022 to23:00 on 27 Jul 2022 | 1.21 0.06 | 100 30 | 49 21 | NA | 140 30 | 16.8 5.8 |
18 | 18:00 on 11 Sep 2022 to23:00 on 13 Sep 2022 | 1.14 0.05 | 107 22 | 31 25 | 55 6 | 140 20 | 26.9 10.9 |
These events had evidence of smoke from local or regional biomass burning.
2.3.2 Identification of events of elevated oxidized mercuryEvents of elevated were initially defined as time periods when concentrations exceeded the seasonal mean by at least 1 standard deviation (Table ) for a minimum of 24 . Adjacent periods of elevated were counted as the same event if they appeared to represent the same air mass, based on concurrent meteorological and trace gas measurements (e.g., consistently similar , , and trace gas concentrations and RH before and after a brief intrusion of air associated with the boundary layer). Additional hours were then included in the events at the beginning and end of periods of high in order to capture the transition between air mass conditions. In total, we identified 18 events of prolonged high in the 2021 and 2022 measurement periods (Table ). All events had at least 85 % data coverage. We characterized the events through statistical analysis of , trace gases, and meteorology as well as air mass transport analysis (Sects. and ) in order to understand the origins of the air masses containing elevated concentrations of . We also analyzed the June 2022 measurement period as a case study because it contained relatively continuous records of all measured species and included five distinct events of high (Events 11–15; Table ), separated by periods of depleted that were defined as Non-events 1–5 (Sect. ). Non-event 5 was made to include the 24 following the end of Event 15. Analysis of the measurement data within and between events was complemented by a simulation of air mass origins, as described below.
2.3.3 Air mass transport analysis using HYSPLIT–STILT
The Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory model, integrating features from the Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport model (HYSPLIT–STILT), is a Lagrangian particle dispersion model (Loughner et al., 2021; Lin et al., 2003) that was used to investigate the history of air masses arriving at SPL. For each of the 18 events and 5 non-events presented here, an ensemble of 1000 air parcels were released at SPL at 3 h intervals and traced for 240 backward in time. The air parcels were initialized at 5 above ground level and transported with stochastic motions (simulating turbulence) with HYSPLIT–STILT, driven by meteorological fields from the 3 meteorology from the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh model (HRRR; Dowell et al., 2022; NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, 2024), as well as the 0.25° 0.25° meteorology from the Global Forecast System (GFS; NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, 2024). Nesting HRRR meteorology within the relatively coarse GFS meteorological fields was necessary for simulating atmospheric transport over the Pacific Ocean. Along each air parcel's backward trajectory, position, the mixed-layer depth, precipitation rate, RH, temperature, and total cloud cover from the meteorological fields were sampled at 1 min intervals, providing insight into the spatial origin and meteorological conditions associated with each air mass.
2.3.4 Principal component analysis
We used the principal component analysis (PCA) multivariate factor technique to investigate the interrelationships between measured variables and identify broad patterns in air mass composition at SPL. Factor analysis methods have been utilized in several studies involving continuous atmospheric measurements in both urban/industrial and remote environments (Swartzendruber et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2007; Lynam and Keeler, 2006; Tokarek et al., 2018). Other methods such as positive matrix factorization (PMF) or non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) are recommended for quantitative identification of source–receptor relationships (Hopke and Jaffe, 2020) and are often applied in urban/industrial environments using data from a common instrument (e.g., a suite of volatile organic compound (VOC) measurements, as in Peng et al., 2022, and Gkatzelis et al., 2021). Though PCA is an unweighted least-squares method (Hopke and Jaffe, 2020), it has the advantage in the present study as an exploratory approach that can indicate both the magnitude and sign of the statistical relationships between variables (Jolliffe and Cadima, 2016). PCA is also advantageous at SPL where the combined dataset came from multiple continuous instruments with different measurement scales, and the objective was to use the underlying nature of statistical covariances to broadly characterize air mass compositions at SPL. PCA results were considered in tandem with the case study analysis to extrapolate the conditions under which enhancements in or other variables were observed.
We applied PCA with varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization (IBM SPSS v29.0.1.1) to each of the four sampled seasons in this study. Spring and summer were modeled separately, considering prior knowledge of seasonal climatology and transport (Obrist et al., 2008; Hallar et al., 2016), because air mass composition at SPL in summer 2021 was intermittently impacted by local or regional wildfire smoke (Sect. ) and because the instrument was not operational in spring 2021. We additionally modeled the full 2022 measurement period (1 March–15 September 2022) because there was notably less evidence for regional wildfire smoke in the air at SPL during summer 2022.
Input variables for PCA included , , , , , , water vapor mixing ratio, and barometric pressure. Wind speed was excluded given its weak communalities in the output for most seasons. Although was generally better correlated with RH (Sect. ), the water vapor mixing ratio was used in place of RH in PCA as a potentially better indicator of atmospheric moisture content and because the upper bound of 100 % in RH measurements influences its statistical distribution. Moreover, after filtering the data for RH 85 % to exclude periods when SPL may have been in cloud, the Pearson's and values for vs. water vapor mixing ratio in each season did not substantially change in comparison to vs. RH, indicating that water vapor mixing ratio was a robust predictor of , even if not as strong as RH (Table ). Sulfur dioxide was excluded because it was near 0 on average (Table ), with enhancements observed only in short-lived fresh combustion plumes.
Prior to running PCA, variables with larger than 0.5 (moderate skew) or larger than 1.0 (high skew) were log-transformed. If the did not improve, then the non-log-transformed variable was retained. All variables with 1.0 improved following log transform. In most seasons, also needed to be shifted by its minimum before transformation due to small negative values. Data points 3 standard deviations above or below the dataset mean were then removed as outliers ( 2 % of values for each variable). Lastly, variables were standardized (mean of 0, standard deviation of 1) by subtracting that variable's mean and dividing by the standard deviation for the sample period. Data were excluded listwise by the model, meaning all data for a given hourly timestamp were removed from the model if one or more variables had no data. This technique ensured that there were no missing data in the input dataset but reduced the total number of timestamps included in each input dataset by 40 % in spring 2021 ( 1169), 55 % in summer 2021 ( 1147), 29 % in spring 2022 ( 1575), 33 % in summer 2022 ( 1729), and 31 % in spring–summer 2022 ( 3299). The larger-percent reductions during 2021 reflect the delayed start of measurements and several prolonged maintenance periods; nevertheless, there were ample cases per variable to confirm data suitability for PCA.
Suitable solutions were identified using the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy for the overall dataset and for individual variables (preferring outputs with KMO 0.5) and Bartlett's test of sphericity ( 0.05). Individual variables were also considered for inclusion in the final solution based on extraction communalities of 0.5. The final number of factors was chosen based on the criteria of eigenvalues of 1.
Figure 1
Time series of hourly averaged concentrations of (blue) and (red) in units of nanograms per cubic meter () between 1 March and 15 September of 2021 and 2022, as measured by the dual-channel system at Storm Peak Laboratory above Steamboat Springs, Colorado. Please note that the date format in this and following figures is month/day/year.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
3 Results and discussion3.1 Data overview
3.1.1 Mercury overview
Figure and Table summarize the hourly averaged measurements of and trace gases from the 2021 and 2022 periods. Overall, mean concentrations varied minimally from 2021 (1.27 0.13 ) to 2022 (1.25 0.11 ), from spring to summer in each year or from one season to that same season in the following year, even though tests for comparisons of seasonal means all indicated statistically significant differences ( 0.01). The largest mean difference in was from spring to summer 2021 but was still less than a 0.1 change. Mean concentrations were not significantly different between the two spring seasons ( 0.33), whereas the summer 2021 mean was significantly higher ( 0.001) than in summer 2022.
3.1.2 Trace gas overview
Mean values of , , , and aerosol scattering were significantly different ( 0.01) between the two spring seasons (excluding , which was not available in spring 2021) and between the two summer seasons (Table ). Mean values were also significantly different between each spring season and the corresponding summer from that year with the exception of in 2022 ( 0.52). It was notable that displayed a relatively flat diel pattern, with mean diel amplitudes of only 4 in both spring seasons and 2–3 in the summer seasons, lacking the pronounced daytime enhancement that is commonly seen at lower-elevation sites (Fig. ). This behavior was similar to what has been reported at other high-elevation sites that were less influenced by daytime production from local precursor emissions or by nighttime loss processes in the presence of sources (Mueller, 1994; Monks et al., 2000; Bien and Helmig, 2018; Brodin et al., 2010), suggesting that SPL was routinely influenced by the background free troposphere even in the summertime. Higher mean concentrations of , , , and aerosol scattering in summer 2021 compared to 2022 may be related, at least in part, to observed differences in the frequency of wildfire smoke presence (Sect. ).
We also considered the potential influence of the three upwind coal-fired power plants, located 40, 80, and 200 west of SPL, on concentrations measured at SPL. These plants were shown to influence air mass composition at SPL through emissions of that can contribute to new particle formation (Hallar et al., 2016). A goal was to determine whether elevated or concentrations occurred primarily in the background atmosphere or also under the influence of local or regional point-source emissions. Air masses at SPL were initially defined as power-plant-impacted using the 95th percentile of 10 averaged concentrations from the 2021 measurement period. We then examined local wind speed and direction measurements at SPL along with 24 HYSPLIT back trajectories. We also considered several case studies of the highest concentrations in each season. Together, these observations showed that higher concentrations of reliably corresponded to a westerly source region representative of the three upwind power plants. Smoke-impacted periods (Sect. ) were excluded from this analysis.
Mean and concentrations in spring were statistically significantly different between power-plant-impacted and non-impacted air masses; however, the differences were small enough that we did not consider them to be detectable within instrument precision ( 0.02 , +4 ). Differences in summertime measurements of and between the two types of air masses were also statistically significantly different but only slightly elevated in power-plant-impacted air masses ( +0.04 , +12 ). Yet, the coefficients of determination between and as well as and within power-plant-impacted periods were very low in both spring and summer ( 0.00–0.03), indicating that little to no variation in species could be explained by the variability in . We therefore concluded that the three coal-fired power plants upwind of SPL did not significantly contribute to ambient measurements made at SPL. The lack of a measurable enhancement in at the lab when the coal-fired power plant signature was evident can likely be attributed to power plant emissions controls and lower--content coal (Benson, 2003).
3.1.3 Comparison to similar studies
Mean concentrations in this study (1.27 0.13 in 2021 and 1.25 0.11 in 2022) were lower than those reported at other remote mountaintop observatories between 2005–2016, including the Mt. Bachelor Observatory (MBO) in central Oregon, USA (1.54 0.176 from May–August 2005, Swartzendruber et al., 2006); the Lulin Atmospheric Background Station (LABS; 1.73 from April 2006 to December 2007, Sheu et al., 2010); the Pic du Midi Observatory in southern France (PDM; 1.86 0.27 from November 2011–November 2012, Fu et al., 2016); and previously at SPL (1.51 0.11 from October 2006—May 2007, Obrist et al., 2008; 1.6 0.3 from April–July 2008, Faïn et al., 2009). The observed means at SPL in 2021 and 2022 were also lower than estimated global background concentrations in the Northern Hemisphere (1.5–1.7 ; Sprovieri et al., 2016; Mao et al., 2016). One plausible explanation for these differences is the reported declines in ambient concentrations in the Northern Hemisphere from the 1990s to 2005–2013, although the magnitudes of reported trends are variable from region to region, ranging from less than 1 % to as much as 3.3 in northern latitude sites (Lyman et al., 2020a, and references therein). Meanwhile Slemr et al. (2011) estimated decreasing trends from 1996 to 2009 of 0.047 (1.4 ) and 0.035 0.006 (2.7 ) for the Northern Hemisphere and Southern Hemisphere, respectively. Weigelt et al. (2015) reported a decline of 0.021–0.023 in from 1996 to 2013 at the Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) station in Mace Head, Ireland, one of the longest-running background measurement stations in the Northern Hemisphere. Since the mid-2000s, some studies have reported more modest decreases or even increases in some locations, attributed to variable anthropogenic emission trends and biomass burning, changes in cycling and exchange rates, and the effects of temperature on deposition rates (Lyman et al., 2020a, and references therein). There remain considerable uncertainty and inconsistency in analyses of atmospheric trends, largely because of incomplete emission inventories and a lack of both spatial and long-term measurement coverage (Sonke et al., 2023; Lyman et al., 2020a).
Figure 2
Boxplots of concentration measurements by hour of the day (MST) for (a, b) and (c, d), showing diel variability during the (a, c) spring and (b, d) summer seasons of the study years. The centerline of each boxplot represents the median concentration, the box represents the interquartile range, and upper (lower) whiskers are either the maximum (minimum) value or the upper-quartile (lower-quartile) value plus (minus) 1.5 times the interquartile range. Outliers are not shown.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Keeping these spatiotemporal trends and sources of uncertainty in mind, we compared the mean concentrations at SPL from Obrist et al. (2008) and Faïn et al. (2009) ( 1.56 ) with the mean at SPL in 2021 and 2022 ( 1.26 ). Considering this drop of 0.3 over 14 years, it can be estimated that the more recent measurements were lower by 0.021 ( 1.4 ), values that are within the range of reported downward trends in Northern Hemisphere background concentrations (Slemr et al., 2011; Weigelt et al., 2015; Lyman et al., 2020a; Sonke et al., 2023). Such a difference could also be related to changes in measurement technology between earlier studies and the present one; i.e., gaseous (a.k.a. RGM or GOM) that was not retained on the KCl denuder in the earlier SPL studies may have instead been captured downstream as , resulting in an overestimate of concentrations (Lyman et al., 2010). Even so, total would still have been conserved; yet, the mean ( 1 SD) concentrations of were only 1.37 0.11 and 1.34 0.09 in 2021 and 2022, respectively, suggesting that SPL may in fact have experienced declining ambient concentrations over time.
Table 3Event RMA regression slopes SE for vs. ; Pearson correlation coefficients for vs. , RH, , and ; and ratios of and .
Event | Slope SE | Pearson's value | ratio | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
vs. | |||||||
vs. | vs. | vs. RH | vs. | (%) | (unitless) | ||
1 | 0.52 0.03 | 0.63 | 0.37 | 0.03 | 0.55 | 11 3 | 0.12 0.04 |
2 | 0.45 0.02 | 0.55 | 0.28 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 9 2 | 0.10 0.03 |
3 | 0.76 0.01 | 0.95 | 0.53 | 0.71 | 0.59 | 9 4 | 0.10 0.04 |
4 | 0.35 0.02 | 0.92 | 0.79 | NA | 0.40 | 15 5 | 0.18 0.07 |
5 | 0.52 0.01 | 0.96 | 0.50 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 14 4 | 0.16 0.06 |
6 | 0.41 0.02 | 0.75 | 0.60 | 0.20 | 0.40 | 12 3 | 0.13 0.04 |
7 | 0.37 0.02 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.59 | 0.20 | 13 2 | 0.16 0.03 |
8 | 0.21 0.01 | 0.74 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.09 | 12 2 | 0.13 0.03 |
9 | 0.46 0.03 | 0.76 | 0.63 | 0.04 | 0.46 | 11 4 | 0.13 0.05 |
10 | 0.40 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.52 | 0.20 | 0.66 | 10 3 | 0.11 0.03 |
11 | 0.28 0.01 | 0.94 | 0.41 | 0.28 | 0.76 | 9 2 | 0.09 0.03 |
12 | 0.29 0.02 | 0.41 | 0.61 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 10 2 | 0.11 0.02 |
13 | 0.45 0.02 | 0.85 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.49 | 10 4 | 0.11 0.05 |
14 | 0.18 0.01 | 0.53 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.36 | 10 1 | 0.11 0.02 |
15 | 0.45 0.02 | 0.57 | 0.63 | 0.87 | 0.45 | 9 2 | 0.10 0.02 |
16 | 0.16 0.01 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 9 1 | 0.10 0.02 |
17 | 0.46 0.02 | 0.74 | 0.78 | NA | 0.64 | 9 2 | 0.09 0.03 |
18 | 0.45 0.01 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 9 2 | 0.09 0.02 |
0.05, 0.001.
In contrast, concentrations of measured with the dual-channel measurement system in 2021 (103 49 ) and 2022 (83 35 ) (Table ) were considerably higher than the previous measurements made at SPL using the KCl denuder system (Faïn et al., 2009). Summing the April–July 2008 mean measurements of GOM (20 ) and PBM (9 ) in Faïn et al. (2009), it can be estimated that the mean during that study period was 29 , which is lower than the spring–summer means in 2021 and 2022 3.6 and 2.8 times, respectively. The maximum GOM PBM concentration Faïn et al. (2009) recorded during GOM enhancement events was 159 (Event 4), which is 3.3 times lower than the 2021 maximum (520 ) and 1.5 times lower than the 2022 maximum (239 ). Relatedly, mean measurements of GOM and PBM at other mountaintop sites using the KCl denuder system were, respectively, 43 and 5.2 (MBO, USA; Swartzendruber et al., 2006), 12.1 and 2.3 (LABS, Taiwan; Sheu et al., 2010), and 27 and 14 (PDM, France; Fu et al., 2016). While these sites occasionally saw large spikes on the order of hundreds of picograms per cubic meter (), it is particularly striking that mean concentrations in the present study were consistently higher than these other sites by a factor of roughly 2 to 5. These observations have important implications for the accurate representation of total speciation in ambient air. For example, estimates of the fraction of atmospheric composed of gaseous have ranged from 2 %–20 % depending on sampling location and instrumentation (Dunham-Cheatham et al., 2023; Gustin et al., 2023; Osterwalder et al., 2021; Steffen et al., 2008). During events of elevated in the present study (Sect. ), the maximum percent of ranged from 12 %–22 %, with a mean ( SD) of 11 2 %. Comparatively, the previous study at SPL using KCl denuders had a mean ratio during enhanced RGM events of approximately 3 1 % (Faïn et al., 2009). The recent measurements at SPL using the dual-channel system thus represent a significant contribution to the research field in the ability to report verified, accurate, and reliably higher concentration measurements than in past studies.
In both years and for all sampled seasons, did not display a pronounced diel pattern (Fig. ). Elemental generally displayed higher concentrations throughout the day in spring 2021 compared to the same hours in summer 2021 and spring 2022, whereas the spread of data at each hour was larger in summer 2021 and spring 2022. Nevertheless, the diel curves were relatively flat across the hours within all sampled seasons. This finding is in contrast to previous work by Obrist et al. (2008) at SPL, who reported a distinct springtime diel pattern for . Oxidized , however, displayed markedly higher concentrations during the spring daytime (Fig. ), with maxima centered around 11:00–12:00 MST and mean diel amplitudes of 58 in spring 2021 and 32 in spring 2022. On a monthly basis (not shown), daytime enhancements were the most pronounced in March 2021, with a mean diel amplitude of 117 . In both years, this pattern diminished throughout the spring and into the summer, with mean diel summer amplitudes of 16 (2021) and 19 (2022). The diel curves for also emphasize the overall higher concentrations measured throughout all hours of the day in summer 2021, particularly overnight, as compared to summer 2022 (Fig. , Table ).
Higher daytime concentrations of were also observed at SPL by Faïn et al. (2009). The authors attributed this behavior to surface heating processes and uplift of boundary layer air; however, the daytime maxima during that study tended to occur later in the day, closer to 15:00 MST. In both 2021 and 2022, aerosol scattering also peaked at midday in spring (Fig. ), but the amplitude of this enhancement was very small (0.9–2.3 ). Aerosol scattering was significantly correlated with in spring 2021, when the daytime enhancement was strongest ( 0.30). These factors could indicate that upslope pollution flow from the local boundary layer contributed to elevated daytime or that the elevated was due to the breakup of the polluted nighttime boundary layer in the Yampa Valley and transport of its pollutants to the site. However, , , , and water vapor mixing ratio did not show a notable peak in daytime that would support the notion of transport or mixing from the local boundary layer. If the source of daytime was the breakup of the polluted Yampa Valley boundary layer, it is also not clear why only , and not , was elevated. In many other studies, urban pollution is associated with and not just pollution (Driscoll et al., 2013). The cause of the early spring daytime maximum at SPL thus remains an open question.
The lack of diel variability in and a daytime peak in seen in present and past work at SPL is in contrast to other mountaintop studies which reported higher overnight and in the early-morning hours, typically attributed to a shallow planetary boundary layer and subsidence of -rich air from the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UT–LS) (Swartzendruber et al., 2006; Sheu et al., 2010; Fu et al., 2016). Nighttime subsidence of from the UT–LS at MBO, PDM, and LABS was also supported by observations of lower RH, higher , and air mass back trajectories pointing to upper-tropospheric transport. Further analysis at MBO also identified episodes of high with transport from the marine boundary layer or trans-Pacific transport of combustion emissions from East Asia (Timonen et al., 2013). The more continental nature of SPL is one likely factor that contributed to the different features and transport pathways associated with higher than these other mountaintop sites, as any air masses influenced by the marine boundary layer or trans-Pacific sources may have been diluted by regional continental air masses before reaching the site. Faïn et al. (2009) also showed, and we confirmed in the present work (Sect. ), that high- events at SPL were not associated with UT–LS subsidence and were instead influenced by transport from within the low to middle free troposphere, at least in the 10 of simulated transport history.
3.2 Multi-day events of enhanced3.2.1 Behaviors in , , and atmospheric transport
Based on the criteria described in Sect. , we identified 18 events of enhanced during the 2021 and 2022 measurement periods. Three events occurred during spring 2021, five during summer 2021, two during spring 2022, and eight during summer 2022 (Table ). Across all events, elevated concentrations were associated with concurrent decreases in and RH (Fig. ). Relative humidity was consistently low during the event periods, with a mean ( SD) event RH of 32 16 %. This observation of high in very dry air masses is consistent with the results of Faïn et al. (2009), who concluded that enhancements at SPL were associated with air masses in the dry (RH 40 %) free troposphere. In all events but Event 10, was significantly anticorrelated with (Pearson's 0.95 to 0.41, 0.001), and in all events but Event 14, was significantly anticorrelated with RH (Pearson's 0.81 to 0.28, 0.05). Similar to Faïn et al. (2009), was also anticorrelated with the water vapor mixing ratio during 12 events (Pearson's 0.74 to 0.12, 0.05). RMA regression slopes ( SE) for vs. during each event ranged from 0.76 0.01 to 0.16 0.01 (Table ), with an average event slope ( SD) of 0.39 0.14. Though previous work at SPL also showed negative RGM–GEM slopes during high-RGM events, the magnitudes were only between 0.07 to 0.18, with an average of 0.10 (Faïn et al., 2009). This difference likely reflects, at least in part, the improved accuracy of the dual-channel system in measuring than previously used instrumentation (Sect. ). The slope of all hourly data during event periods ( SE) in 2021 and 2022 was 0.38 0.09 (Fig. ).
Figure 3
vs. for hourly measurements during all 18 events, color-coded by RH. was significantly anticorrelated with (Pearson's 0.55, 0.001) and RH (Pearson's 0.56, 0.001). The slope of the RMA regression ( SE) was 0.38 0.09, which is similar to the average of all 18 event slopes ( SD), which was 0.39 0.14.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
By contrast, measurements of enhanced nighttime RGM at MBO during summer 2005 showed a slope nearer to unity for RGM vs. GEM (0.89) (Swartzendruber et al., 2006). These events, as well as other instances of enhanced RGM at MBO, were hypothesized to have UT–LS influence (Swartzendruber et al., 2006; Timonen et al., 2013). An aircraft study also reported an – regression slope for air originating from the upper troposphere that was similarly close to unity (0.93) and a slope of 0.53 for stratospheric air (Lyman and Jaffe, 2012). The lack of mass closure under stratospheric influence was attributed to the idea that decreases toward the stratosphere, while the ratio of simultaneously increases with altitude (Swartzendruber et al., 2006; Lyman and Jaffe, 2012). While a few slopes of individual events in the present study showed values closer to unity (e.g., Event 3 of 0.76 0.01), the total slope of all events was much lower than that seen in air masses influenced by the UT–LS. Meanwhile, Fu et al. (2021) found a slope of 0.44 0.10 for vs. during one event of free-tropospheric air mass intrusion at PDM, similar to the mean slope we report here. Unlike the majority of events we identified at SPL, they reported a lack of common air mass origins across their 8 event, and after correcting for this based on reported latitudinal GEM differences, they obtained a corrected slope of 0.88, implying that most of the was retained within the sampled air masses. Given the relative consistencies in air mass origins (Fig. ) during our events, the majority of which were 5 or fewer (Table ), we did not attempt such a correction.
Figure 4
The percentage of transport time that high- event air masses spent at each altitude above ground level () averaged across all 18 events. In general, the majority of air mass transport fell in the low to middle altitudes, while the air masses spent less of the transport time within the planetary boundary layer (PBL) or in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UT–LS). Bars are color-coded by layers of the atmosphere. The PBL was explicitly calculated by the HYSPLIT–STILT model, but the other altitude groupings are general approximations.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Instead, we propose that the lack of mass closure may be caused by upwind oxidation followed by loss via deposition during transport or scavenging of by cloud droplets (Fu et al., 2021; Lyman and Jaffe, 2012; Swartzendruber et al., 2006), explanations which are further supported by the modeled transport behavior during events at SPL. During all high- events at SPL in 2021 and 2022, the air mass back trajectories generally maintained transport within the low to middle free troposphere over the Pacific Ocean before subsiding over the continent (Fig. ). The back trajectories from all 18 events spent an average of 12 2 % and a maximum of 16 % of the total transport time in the PBL. Moreover, HYSPLIT–STILT transport analysis showed that event air masses spent on average just 13 5 % (Fig. ) and a maximum 24 % of transport time above 6 The median percent transport time spent in the 3–5 range (chosen here to approximate the low to middle free troposphere) during the events was 43 %. The nine air masses that spent greater than 43 % of their transport at these altitudes had significantly ( 0.001) higher mean concentrations (142 23 ) and spent significantly less time in the 0–2 range (30 3 %) than those that spent less than 43 % of transport in this altitude range (114 11 ; 38 4 % of transport in the 0–2 altitude range). The relatively limited influence from both the UT–LS and PBL on the sampled air masses indicated that extended periods of elevated at SPL likely originated in the low to middle free troposphere (Fig. ). A comparison to transport pathways of air masses associated with low is described in Sect. .
All HYSPLIT–STILT runs demonstrated that SPL experienced prevailing westerlies during the 18 events, as has been demonstrated in earlier work at the site (Faïn et al., 2009; Hallar et al., 2016). However, there was not a consistent directional origin evident by season (Fig. ) or in relation to covariance in other air mass tracers (Sect. ) during high- events. There was also large variability in whether the event air masses originated over the central Pacific, northern Pacific, or southwestern Pacific, as well as the horizontal distance covered in 10 of transport. Although 10 events showed some or all back trajectories approaching SPL from the southwest, there did not appear to be any consistency in air mass speed, altitude, or composition amongst this subgroup. The horizontal transport pathway alone, therefore, did not appear to directly influence the presence of high concentrations of at SPL.
There was some variation in the amount of time the simulated air masses spent over the North American continent (50 to 150 of the 10 transport), but differences were not associated with particular air mass compositions. Simulated air mass temperature was most dependent on season but generally increased over the continent. Additionally, all event back trajectories showed some upwind precipitation during the 10 but no precipitation within at least 50 of arrival at SPL. Simulated cloud cover during transport was generally higher (60 %–80 %) upwind of SPL and dropped substantially prior to the end of the trajectories, in most cases reaching near 0 % by arrival at SPL. These indices could account for the lack of mass closure between and . Relative humidity remained below 60 % during transport and consistently declined as the air masses approached the site. Therefore, the air masses in which high was measured at the site were generally dry and did not experience significant washout close to the measurement site.
In another study at MBO, maximum RGM GEM ratios ranged from 0.16 to 1.05 during high-RGM periods, with the largest ratios seen in air masses influenced by the marine boundary layer (MBL) that were marked by circulation above the ocean for at least 10 prior to arrival at MBO, as well as decreases in , aerosol scattering, and (Timonen et al., 2013). These MBL events were associated with higher concentrations of RGM and larger RGM GEM ratios than seen at SPL (Table ). By comparison, the mean ratio (SD) of during the 18 events at SPL was 0.12 0.03, and maximum values ranged from 0.13 to 0.29 (a comparison of these values to non-event times will be discussed in Sect. ). Mean ratios during summer 2021 Events 4–8 (0.15 0.02) were significantly higher than the rest of the events in the study (0.10 0.01) ( 0.001), possibly related to mean concentrations being significantly higher in summer 2021 than in other seasons (Sect. ). Nevertheless, air masses at SPL did not show behavior or composition comparable to that of MBL-influenced air at MBO. Understandably, by nature of the site locations, the air masses measured at SPL spent much more time over the continent (Fig. ), potentially allowing for more scavenging of during transport and therefore resulting in – regression slopes further from unity and a lower ratio of .
In conclusion, based upon the results of the HYSPLIT–STILT and other meteorological analysis, we posit that the lack of mass closure in the slopes of – regressions during the 18 events at SPL was likely caused by distant upwind oxidation followed by loss via deposition or cloud droplet uptake during transport. This finding is further supported by the analyses of trace gas measurements and of select non-event periods below.
3.2.2 Event air mass compositionConcentrations and relationships between other trace gases measured in this study varied across the events. Of the 16 events with sufficient measurement coverage, 7 showed significant positive correlations between and (Events 3, 6, 7, 8, 13, 15, and 18), with six of these seven events also having significant positive correlations between and aerosol scattering (all but Event 8) (Table ). These events were mostly in summer but occurred in both study years. Event 3 is shown in Appendix A as an example of this type of event (Fig. ). Ozone concentrations increased by approximately 10 to 20 during these events, concurrent with fluctuations in concentrations. Meanwhile, the magnitudes of aerosol scattering enhancements were more varied, ranging from approximately 30 to 120 , in part because scattering was generally lower during spring than summer, and some of the summer events also showed evidence of smoke (Sect. ).
While Faïn et al. (2009) reported similar transport altitudes for air masses associated with enhanced at SPL, they reported no relationship between and . Previous studies at the MBO and PDM mountaintop sites, however, also showed co-enhancements of and . Often, these enhancements occurred with simultaneous decreases in , , and aerosol scattering, which Swartzendruber et al. (2006), Timonen et al. (2013), and Fu et al. (2016) attributed to transport from the UT–LS. As previously discussed, however, HYSPLIT–STILT transport analysis during events at SPL did not show air masses at high enough altitudes to indicate UT–LS influence in the 10 of simulated transport (Fig. ), and thus we suggest that UT–LS air was not the source of co-enhanced and in these events.
High concentrations could also be generated as a secondary product of natural or anthropogenic combustion. For example, Timonen et al. (2013) reported events of enhanced , , aerosol scattering, and at MBO during springtime, when meteorological conditions favor long-range trans-Pacific air mass transport and can deliver anthropogenic pollution from the Asian continent (Timonen et al., 2013). Maximum concentrations during the seven events at SPL ranged from 58 to 74 , values which were comparable to the maximum values reported at MBO during events of high associated with influence from Asian long-range transport, which ranged from 69 to 77 (Timonen et al., 2013). However, all of the events in this study with positive correlations between and occurred during summertime, with the exception of Event 3 during spring 2021 (Fig. ). In all cases except for Event 8, back trajectories did not show transport from the Asian continent in the 10 histories (Fig. ). Alternatively, could have been picked up from the North American PBL and mixed with free-tropospheric air as the air masses traveled over the continent before arriving at SPL, or could have been produced in conjunction with , as their chemical production mechanisms both involve photochemical processes in dry air conditions.
The enhancement of during some summer events could also be a result of biomass burning, as can be a secondary product in smoke plumes of wildfires (Briggs et al., 2016). Of the 18 events, 8 occurred when SPL was in smoke from local or regional wildfires and experiencing elevated concentrations of combustion tracers, particularly and aerosol scattering (Sect. , Table ). Both and were significantly positively correlated with during three events (Events 13, 15, 18), and was above 150 during five events when was significantly correlated with (Events 6, 7, 8, 13, 18). Four events where was correlated with also showed positive correlations between and (Events 6–8, 18). Biomass burning has been shown to volatilize stored as and release it to the atmosphere. High levels of have not typically been reported in smoke plumes (McLagan et al., 2021; Obrist et al., 2007; Friedli et al., 2003), though all published measurements were collected using denuder-based methods. Elevated concentrations during the events under consideration here, which had concentrations of comparable to the seasonal means, may be coincidental to the presence of smoke in the air masses; i.e., it is possible that the smoky air was mixed with cleaner free-tropospheric air containing higher concentrations of . However, it is also possible that co-emitted halogens or aerosols in smoke plumes led to faster oxidation or scavenging of than in clean air, leading to elevated and PBM. Further work is needed to characterize the concentrations and chemistry of and in smoke plumes using verified measurement methods.
Of the 18 events, 7 showed significant anticorrelations between and scattering (Events 1, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 14; Table ). Oxidized in these events also tended to be significantly anticorrelated with but not always with other pollution tracers. Three of these events occurred when SPL was in smoke, and therefore scattering was elevated but showed measurable decreases when increased, indicating that SPL may have experienced some influence from cleaner, free-tropospheric air during these smoky periods. Event 5 (23:00 on 13 June to 21:00 MST on 15 June 2021) (Fig. ) was the only one of these cases where was significantly anticorrelated with (Pearson's 0.74, 0.001) and was also anticorrelated with (Pearson's 0.43, 0.001) and (Pearson's 0.34, 0.05). This event also had a particularly strong anticorrelation between and (Pearson's 0.96, 0.001) and RH (Pearson's 0.50, 0.001) and notably higher-altitude transport than other events (Fig. ); the air mass spent 23 % of transport time higher than 6 , compared to an average of 13 5 % for all events. Considering these factors, Event 5 appeared to have particularly clean air conditions, originating from higher in the free troposphere. However, the altitudes associated with Event 5 air mass transport were still not high enough to be considered UT–LS influenced, as the air mass trajectories spent 93 % of transport time below 8
Figure 5
Time series of (a) , , and ; (b) RH, , and ; and (c) CO and aerosol scattering for 04:00 on 3 June to 03:00 MST on 24 June 2022, showing the five events of enhanced that occurred in June 2022 and the five corresponding non-events (shaded in gray).
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
The occurrence of events with either positive or negative relationships with aerosol scattering could be related to the relative abundance of gaseous vs. particulate (e.g., RGM/GOM vs. PBM). For example, an enhancement in aerosol scattering could indicate a higher proportion of PBM than during other events of elevated , whereas events with lower aerosol scattering could indicate more gaseous . A study at PDM showed that during events of elevated PBM, measured with the Tekran speciation system, aerosol number concentration was significantly anticorrelated with PBM (Fu et al., 2016). The authors posited that this relationship could indicate that atmospheric aerosol concentration may not play a significant role in PBM formation in the middle and upper free troposphere or rather that aerosol number concentration at PDM is driven by anthropogenic influence from the PBL and is therefore not representative of the composition of the middle to upper free troposphere at that site (Fu et al., 2016). However, it is difficult to directly and quantitatively compare aerosol number concentrations reported by Fu et al. (2016) with the aerosol scattering measurements made at SPL, given that scattering is also affected by aerosol size distribution. Moreover, because the dual-channel measurement system does not differentiate between gaseous and particle phases of , any relationship between these variables is speculative at this time.
3.2.3 June 2022 case studyJune 2022 contained five distinct events of elevated (Events 11–15), with periods of low in between events (referred to here as “non-events” and numbered 1 through 5) (Fig. ). The five events during this period had characteristics similar to the other 13 events from this study, such as depleted and low RH, but displayed variation in transport pathways, meteorology, and trace gas concentrations. More specifically, all the June 2022 events had strong and significant anticorrelations between and (Pearson's 0.94 to 0.41, 0.001; Table ), whereas the non-event – anticorrelations were either weaker (Non-events 1, 3, and 5) or not significant at the 0.05 level (Non-events 2 and 4) (Table ).
Table 4
June 2022 event–non-event mean SD for species, , RH, , and trace gases. Bolded values are significantly different at the 0.05 level.
() | () | () | RH(%) | () | () | () | () | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Events | 1.3 0.1 | 120 20 | 6.7 5.4 | |||||
Non-events | 1.4 0.1 | 130 20 | 7.8 7.1 |
Figure 6
Example vertical distributions of air mass trajectories for (a) Event 11 and (b) Non-event 1. Shading reflects the percentage of backward trajectories within a given altitude bin when aggregated to 6 intervals.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
The non-event air masses spent a significantly smaller percentage of transport time in the 3–5 altitude range (26 4 %) than the event air masses (40 7 %) ( 0.05) (Fig. ). Generally, event air masses tended to spend more time at altitudes associated with the low to middle free troposphere, whereas non-event air masses spent more time at lower altitudes and in the PBL (Figs. and ). June event air masses spent 52 % of transport time above 3 , whereas non-events spent 44 % of transport time above 3 . Additionally, the high- events showed significantly higher mean and concentrations and significantly lower mean , RH, and concentrations than the non-events (Table ). The ratio of was also significantly higher ( 0.05) during events (10 1 %) than non-events (6 1 %), and the amount of measured as was also significantly ( 0.001) higher during events (10 1 %) than non-events (7 1 %). Simulated precipitation for the air masses prior to arrival at SPL showed precipitation up to the simulation end time in Non-events 3, 4, and 5. The higher RH during non-event times concurrent with lower concentrations could indicate greater wet deposition or scavenging by clouds of than during event periods. Events 13 and 14 occurred when SPL was influenced by smoke from regional wildfires in Arizona and New Mexico, so both and aerosol scattering were elevated (Table ). Figure shows example transport models for Event 11 (04:00 on 3 June to 04:00 MST on 5 June 2022) and Non-event 1 (05:00 on 5 June to 23:00 MST on 6 June 2022). Event 11 showed higher transport altitudes, lower RH, and no precipitation directly prior to arrival at SPL, whereas Non-event 1 had lower atmospheric transport, higher RH, and more recent precipitation. The differences between event and non-event periods demonstrated that the commonalities in event air mass composition and transport could be attributed to the specific conditions under which oxidation occurred in the upwind atmosphere, as opposed to ambient atmospheric conditions seen locally at SPL.
3.3 Principal component analysis (PCA)Broadening these event-based analyses to the rest of the hourly measurement data, three factors explaining 60 %–70 % of the total variance were generated in the PCA data reduction technique applied to each of the sampled seasons in 2021 and 2022 (Table and B2) and for the combined 2022 spring–summer period (Table ). Although differences appeared in the magnitude and sign of variable loadings for each period, there were some notable features that all simulations had in common, as well as some consistent seasonal patterns. For example, all solutions contained two common factors: one representing clean background air with evidence of oxidation (little to no loading of most combustion tracers and inverse loadings of and ) and another representing anthropogenic and/or biogenic combustion (with some combination of , , aerosol scattering, , and loading having the same sign). In summer 2021 this factor explained the largest percent variance (32 %) and was likely dominated by the aforementioned biomass burning signature, whereas in summer 2022 it explained just 23 % of the variance and likely represented other local regional combustion sources (Tables and ). The third factor varied in its makeup, but in at least the 2022 applications there were shared loadings of pressure, water vapor mixing ratio, and aerosol scattering and an inverse loading of . Another consistent feature was that almost exclusively loaded inversely with , and on any factor where the two variables did display the same sign, one or both of their loadings were very small ( 0.3). Oxidized was usually but not always inversely related to the water vapor mixing ratio and in some solutions was positively associated with and aerosol scattering but did not load strongly with factors representing combustion sources. These broader features are complementary with the relationships observed during events of high (Sect. ).
Table 5
Factor loadings of each variable and the percentage of total variance explained by each factor, as obtained from principal component analysis for the spring–summer 2022 period. wvmr: water vapor mixing ratio.
2022 – all | |||
---|---|---|---|
Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | |
Pressure | 0.89 | 0.17 | 0.08 |
wvmr | 0.86 | 0.22 | 0.04 |
0.12 | 0.66 | 0.51 | |
0.11 | 0.78 | 0.20 | |
0.42 | 0.04 | 0.76 | |
0.02 | 0.72 | 0.17 | |
0.25 | 0.00 | 0.77 | |
0.59 | 0.53 | 0.26 | |
Variance explained | 30 % | 24 % | 17 % |
Here we describe the results of PCA application to the combined period of 1 March to 15 September 2022 (Table ); summaries of the individual spring and summer seasons are provided in Appendix B. Factor 1 (30 %) had strong positive loadings of pressure, water vapor, and aerosol scattering with a moderate negative loading of . This factor may represent particle climatology given SPL's history of spending a significant fraction of time in cloud and evidence for new particle formation during particular seasons and times of day (Hallar et al., 2016). Factor 2 (24 % of variance) reflects observations of oxidation within the clean, dry, remote free troposphere. Interestingly, both and aerosol scattering loaded strongly with the same sign as on this factor, a feature that also appeared to some degree in spring 2021 and in the separate analyses of spring 2022 and summer 2022. As shown in Sect. , about one-third of the 18 high- events also had positive correlations for vs. and vs. aerosol scattering. These relationships may point to the potential for oxidation in the presence of but not necessarily in air originating from the UT–LS. This may also suggest the propensity for to be found in the particulate form at SPL in certain instances, but we cannot confirm this due to the current inability of the dual-channel system to distinguish between phases of (e.g., GOM or PBM). Lastly, Factor 3 in 2022 (17 % of variance) represents combustion sources with positive loadings of , , and with more moderate loadings of and aerosol scattering. It is notable that in the full 2022 analysis, aerosol scattering distributed almost uniformly across all three factors, suggesting multiple drivers for the presence of aerosols at the site that likely vary by season, as evident in the separate spring and summer analyses.
4 ConclusionsIn this study, we examined air mass composition and transport of events of elevated at SPL, a high-elevation mountaintop site, over two 6-month periods in spring and summer 2021 and 2022. Unlike previous studies at mountaintop sites, we employed a dual-channel measurement system, which was calibrated with an SI-traceable calibration system and shown to produce unbiased measurements of (Elgiar et al., 2024). Elemental concentrations and patterns at SPL were similar to those reported in previous work, but mean and maximum concentrations in this study were approximately 3 times higher than earlier measurements at this site, and comprised on average more than 10 % of total atmospheric during high- events. We also demonstrated that concentrations at SPL were not affected by emissions from the three upwind coal-fired power plants, which can likely be attributed to power plant emission controls and lower content in western US coal. Events of elevated showed evidence of upwind oxidation, followed by loss during transport in the low to middle free troposphere and no evidence of UT–LS influence. PCA confirmed that measured at SPL was a result of oxidation in the background atmosphere.
Results from this study contribute to the current understanding of oxidation in a remote continental atmosphere. Additionally, the implementation of the dual-channel system provided measurements that were larger in magnitude and more accurate than commercially available instrumentation. Concurrent work related to this project at SPL further elaborates on the methodological improvements for measuring ambient and (Elgiar et al., 2024) and the potential contribution of iodine as an emerging oxidant (Lee et al., 2024). Collectively, the results of this campaign will importantly advance the current understanding of ambient origins, cycling, bioavailability, and ultimately ecosystem fate.
Appendix A Study overview and events of high oxidized mercury
Figure A1
Site map of Storm Peak Laboratory and the location of the dual-channel system on the roof of the laboratory (Elgiar et al., 2024).
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Figure A2
Boxplots by hour of the day (MST) for (a, b) and (c, d) , showing diel variability during the (a, c) spring and (b, d) summer seasons of the study years. The centerline of each boxplot represents the median concentration, the box represents the interquartile range, and upper (lower) whiskers are either the maximum (minimum) value or the upper-quartile (lower-quartile) value plus (minus) 1.5 times the interquartile range. Outliers are not shown.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Figure A3
Composite maps of averaged HYSPLIT–STILT 10 back trajectories for all 18 events of elevated , color-coded by altitude above ground level (). Depicted trajectories represent the simulation average transport pathway of 1000 backward trajectories, with simulations initialized at 3 intervals throughout each event.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Figure A4
Event 3. (a) Descriptive statistics; (b) time series of , , RH, and ; (c) scatterplot of vs. with RH and ; and (d) an example vertical profile of HYSPLIT–STILT backward trajectories.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Figure A5
Event 5. (a) Descriptive statistics; (b) time series of , , RH, and ; (c) scatterplot of vs. with RH and ; and (d) an example vertical profile of HYSPLIT–STILT backward trajectories.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Figure A6
Composite maps of averaged HYSPLIT–STILT 10 back trajectories for the five non-events in the June 2022 case study.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Figure A7
The percentage of transport time that high- event air masses spent at each altitude above ground level () averaged for the five June 2022 events and the corresponding June 2022 non-events. Event air masses tended to spend more time at altitudes associated with the low to middle free troposphere, whereas non-event air masses spent more time at lower altitudes and in the PBL. Bars are color-coded by layers of the atmosphere. The PBL was explicitly calculated by the HYSPLIT–STILT model, but the other altitude groupings are general approximations.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Table A1Pearson's correlation coefficients and values for vs. water vapor mixing ratio (wvmr) for all data in the study period and for all times when relative humidity was below 85 % to limit the analysis to outside of periods when SPL was in cloud. While and wvmr were generally significantly anticorrelated, confirming wvmr as a suitable water vapor metric for PCA, RH had the most robust relationship with , similar to previous studies at SPL (Faïn et al., 2009).
vs. wvmr | All data | RH 85 % |
---|---|---|
Spring 2021 | 0.12 | 0.04 |
Summer 2021 | 0.54 | 0.54 |
Spring 2022 | 0.05 | 0.17 |
Summer 2022 | 0.53 | 0.50 |
All data | 0.12 | 0.24 |
0.05. 0.001.
Table A2Pearson correlation coefficients for the five non-events from the June 2022 case study.
vs. | RH | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-event 1 | 0.45 | 0.57 | 0.51 | 0.13 | 0.07 |
Non-event 2 | 0.13 | 0.32 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.49 |
Non-event 3 | 0.50 | 0.83 | 0.87 | 0.34 | 0.56 |
Non-event 4 | 0.13 | 0.42 | 0.46 | 0.19 | 0.24 |
Non-event 5 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.25 | 0.46 | 0.42 |
0.05. 0.001.
Appendix B Principal component analysisIn both spring periods, Factor 1 (27 %–28 % of total variance) was most notably marked by large inverse loadings of and . In spring 2021, Factor 1 also had strong loadings of pressure and aerosol scattering of the same sign as , whereas in spring 2022 there were strong loadings of and with the opposite sign of . Notably, both and distributed strongly on Factors 2 and/or 3 during the spring seasons but always inversely with one another. For , this may be related to the two different temporal patterns driving concentrations in the observations, with a strong diel cycle of high daytime in the early spring (Sect. ), along with the multi-day episodes of high seen throughout the study period (Sect. ). Meanwhile, also appeared to be associated with the same sign as combustion tracers such as , , and/or as well as with the water vapor mixing ratio (Table ).
Table B1Factor loadings of each variable and the percentage of total variance explained by each factor, as obtained from principal component analysis for the spring seasons of 2021 and 2022.
2021 | 2022 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | |
Pressure | 0.43 | 0.22 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.30 | 0.66 |
wvmr | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.81 | 0.09 | 0.22 | 0.76 |
0.39 | 0.27 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.35 | 0.15 | |
0.73 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.45 | 0.52 | 0.37 | |
NA | NA | NA | 0.72 | 0.08 | 0.36 | |
0.22 | 0.76 | 0.27 | 0.04 | 0.69 | 0.19 | |
0.09 | 0.84 | 0.27 | 0.72 | 0.16 | 0.11 | |
0.80 | 0.17 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.80 | 0.17 | |
Variance explained | 28 % | 18 % | 15 % | 27 % | 18 % | 16 % |
Factor loadings of each variable and the percentage of total variance explained by each factor, as obtained from principal component analysis for the summer seasons of 2021 and 2022.
2021 | 2022 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | |
Pressure | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.92 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.94 |
wvmr | 0.21 | 0.85 | 0.01 | 0.82 | 0.24 | 0.20 |
0.28 | 0.84 | 0.06 | 0.78 | 0.31 | 0.03 | |
0.11 | 0.81 | 0.09 | 0.83 | 0.06 | 0.01 | |
0.89 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.11 | 0.79 | 0.39 | |
0.51 | 0.16 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.23 | 0.18 | |
0.67 | 0.29 | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.79 | 0.14 | |
0.87 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.25 | 0.66 | 0.36 | |
Variance explained | 32 % | 27 % | 16 % | 33 % | 23 % | 15 % |
The two summer periods showed more consistency between one another in terms of the distributions of variables across different factors. In summer 2021, Factor 1 (32 % of total variance) appeared to represent combustion with strong loadings of the same sign for , , , and aerosol scattering and a weaker loading of . A similar factor appeared in summer 2022 but as Factor 2 (23 % of total variance) and with a weaker loading of compared to 2021. The previously mentioned strong influence of local or regional wildfire smoke during at least one-third of the summer 2021 period is likely driving the composition of Factor 1 in summer 2021, while the reduced presence of underlying smoke in summer 2022 but still with the existence of other regional combustion sources likely explains the presence of the combustion fingerprint as Factor 2 in summer 2022. Meanwhile, Factor 2 in 2021 (27 % of variance) and Factor 1 in 2022 (33 % of variance) are consistent with the proposed oxidation in the background dry free troposphere, as indicated by a strong inverse loading of with and also a strong inverse loading of with the water vapor mixing ratio, as well as very weak or inverse loadings of combustion tracers such as or . Interestingly, in summer 2022 this factor also had a strong loading of and a weak loading of aerosol scattering, both with the same sign as , but this was much less evident in summer 2021 (Table ).
Data availability
Ambient air data collected during this project are publicly available at 10.5281/zenodo.10699270 (Gratz et al., 2024).
Author contributions
LEG, SNL, AGH, and RV planned the campaign; TRE, SNL, LEG, AGH, and NSH collected the measurements; SNL and TRE developed and improved the dual-channel measurement system; EJD, LEG, TRE, and NWH analyzed the data; JCL developed and TYW ran the HYSPLIT–STILT model; EJD and LEG wrote the manuscript; and SNL, AGH, RV, TYW, CFL, PWP, NWH, JCL, TRE, and NSH reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Competing interests
The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.
Disclaimer
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.
Acknowledgements
Funding for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation (NSF) (award nos. 1951513, 1951514, 1951515, and 1951632). The authors thank Ian McCubbin, Dan Gilchrist, and Maria Garcia for assisting with instrument maintenance and data acquisition; Betsy Andrews of NOAA ESRL GML for providing aerosol data; and Megan Ostlie for working up the trace gas data. Colorado College undergraduate students Brandon Chan and Zoe Zwecker contributed to the preliminary data analyses related to the results presented in this paper.
Financial support
This research has been supported by the Directorate for Geosciences Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences (grant nos. 1951513, 1951514, 1951515, and 1951632).
Review statement
This paper was edited by Aurélien Dommergue and reviewed by two anonymous referees.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2024. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Mercury (
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 Chemistry Department, Reed College, Portland, OR 97202, USA
2 Bingham Research Center, Utah State University, Vernal, UT 84078, USA; current address: Bureau of Land Management, Vernal, UT 84078, USA
3 Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
4 Environmental Studies Program, Colorado College, Colorado Springs, CO 80903, USA; current address: BBA Water Consultants, Inc., Englewood, CO 80110, USA
5 Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; current address: Ramboll, New York, NY 10119, USA
6 Department of Microbiology and Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
7 Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA; CIRES, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
8 Storm Peak Laboratory, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
9 Bingham Research Center, Utah State University, Vernal, UT 84078, USA; Chemistry and Biochemistry Department, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA
10 Chemistry Department, Reed College, Portland, OR 97202, USA; Environmental Studies Program, Reed College, Portland, OR 97202, USA