Introduction
Improved productivity of cattle in smallholder households in sub-Saharan Africa has been shown to increase milk available for consumption and sale and resulted in increased household expenditures on health and child education [1–3]. However, genetic improvement is limited by the enhanced susceptibility of higher producing cattle breeds to endemic vector-borne infectious disease as compared to lower producing indigenous breeds. As a result, smallholder farmers who lack the resources for disease prevention in improved breeds using acaricides/insecticides or treatment of sick animals are unable to improve milk production [4].
In west Africa, anaplasmosis, caused by the rickettsial pathogen Anaplasma marginale, is endemic with high prevalence and causes acute, usually mild disease in indigenous breeds but severe, often fatal, disease in improved cattle breeds [5–10]. Notably however, animals that recover from acute disease remain protected from subsequent disease despite repeated exposure [11, 12]. We hypothesized that stimulation of an innate immune response in higher productivity, genetically improved cross-breed cattle would provide protection against severe disease during the acute phase, thus allowing progression to long-term immunity. To test this hypothesis, we inoculated F1 Friesian-Sanga calves with a synthetic Toll-like Receptor (TLR) 7 agonist formulated with saponin and water-in-oil emulsion, assessed the innate immune responses, and then exposed the animals to natural tick-borne challenge within a highly endemic region of Ghana. Major Histocompatibility Locus (MHC) haplotype matched control calves were exposed together with the experimental group. Following confirmation of naturally transmitted A. marginale infection in all calves, protection from severe disease that required antibiotic treatment and mortality was assessed and compared between the two groups. The trial was then repeated for reproducibility. Here we report the outcome of these experimental trials and discuss the results in the context of stimulating innate immunity to allow genetic improvement of cattle in sub-Saharan Africa.
Materials and methods
TLR agonist formulation
Synthetic TLR agonist imiquimod stimulates TLR7 [13–16] and has been shown to bind and stimulate the cognate receptor on bovine cells. For our set of experiments, 1 mg of TLR7 agonist (imiquimod, Chemagis) and 1 mg of semi-purified saponins from Quillaja saponaria (VetSap, Desert King) were delivered in 1 ml of a water-in-oil emulsion containing 53.5% v/v mineral oil (USP grade, Spectrum Chemical), 6.5% v/v isostearic acid (TCI), 0.97% w/v mannide monooleate (Sigma Aldrich), 0.2% w/v cholesterol (J.T. Baker), and phosphate buffered saline (Gibco) prepared by high shear mixing followed by gamma irradiation at the Access to Advanced Health Institute (formerly known as the Infectious Diseases Research Institute, Seattle, WA USA). Immediately before use, the formulation was resuspended by vigorous shaking.
Source of crossbred calves and MHC DRB3 haplotypes
Three-month old Friesian x Sanga (F1) calves, seronegative for A. marginale by Msp5 CI-ELISA [17], were obtained from Amrahia Dairy Farm and Animal Research Institute of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research of Ghana. To control for potential confounding effects of MHC haplotype on the immune responses [18–20], calves were MHC haplotyped and all were confirmed to express DRB3*2404, DRB3*2711, DRB3*2405, DRB3*2406, and DRB3*2407, alleles common within the Sanga breed from Ghana. For trial 1, three-month old Friesian x Sanga calves were allocated randomly to two equal groups. The experimental group (n = 10) was injected with the TLR agonist/saponin emulsion and the control group (n = 10) was left untreated. For trial 2, the experiment was replicated using 45 Friesian x Sanga calves per group.
Animal care and use
Calves in the experimental group were inoculated subcutaneously with 1 ml of TLR7 agonist formulated with saponin and water-in-oil emulsion. Blood collection by jugular venipuncture from calves in both groups was <10 ml (approximately 0.2% blood volume) per day for eight days pre- and post-injection and then weekly. Neither inoculation or venipuncture requires analgesia or anesthesia. Calves were allowed to graze on pasture by day, during which time there was natural exposure to ticks (i.e. there was no deliberate feeding of ticks on animals nor deliberate infection with A. marginale). All calves were examined daily and oxytetracycline treatment was instituted immediately following the onset of a priori defined clinical parameter of anemia in order to relieve suffering. Treated calves were separated from the group and monitored twice daily. No animals were intentionally sacrificed during the study. The cattle used in this study were treated in strict accordance with guidelines set by University of Ghana Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and the protocol for blood sampling was approved by the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NIACUC protocol number: 2015-01-5X).
Measurement of induced innate response
The rectal temperature and the sizes of pre-scapular lymph node of each calf were examined daily for four days prior to injection with the TLR agonist/saponin emulsion and for the control group calves to record pre-treatment parameters. Subsequently, 1ml of the agonist preparation was injected subcutaneously into calves (n = 10) in the experimental group. Calves (n = 10) in the control group were not injected. The rectal temperature and sizes of the lymph nodes from individual calves were measured, at same time (08:00 hours), daily for additional four days post-inoculation. Blood was collected daily and serum levels of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 were measured by capture cytokine-specific antibody ELISA (NEO Scientific Biolab, Cambridge, Massachusetts) and a standard curve constructed using the SoftMax® Pro 6 Software. The data were shown as the mean (+/- standard deviation) for all pre- and post-inoculation timepoints for individual calves in each group and reported at the group level as mean (+/- standard error). Significance between the TLR agonist/saponin emulsion injected and control groups was determined by the Student’s t-test with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons.
Detection of infection
Screening for A. marginale infection was done using msp5 PCR of peripheral blood and by Msp5 CI-ELISA to detect seroconversion [17, 21–23].
Antibiotic treatment
All calves were observed clinically twice daily and packed cell volume (PCV) determined. If PCV decreased to ≤ 28, treatment with 20mg/kg long-acting tetracycline was initiated and the animal moved to a separate pen. Treatment was repeated twice at 48-hour intervals.
Weight gain
Calves in Trial 1 were weighed at day 0, day 28 and 48 to measure effects of stimulation of innate immunity and acute A. marginale infection. A subset of calves from Trials 1 and 2 (n = 10 per group) were maintained on pasture for 13 months to determine if there were any long-term adverse effects on weight gain. Calves were weighed at 28-day intervals in the morning before they were taken out for grazing and the mean monthly gain determined.
Results
Synthetic TLR7 agonist/saponin emulsion injection stimulates innate immunity of crossbred calves
In Trial 1, the rectal temperature from each calf was recorded each day for four days post-inoculation and compared to the same period prior to TLR7 agonist/saponin injection. This controls for individual variation among the calves. Similarly, the temperatures were collected on the same days and same time for the non-inoculated control calves. Calves in the TLR7 agonist/saponin emulsion experimental group developed significantly increased temperatures following injection (increase of 0.98°C ± 0.08°C; p = 0.00003) as compared to pre-inoculation temperatures (Table 1 and S1 Table), while there was no significant change for the control calves (0.19°C ± 0.10°C; p = 0.49). The mean rectal temperature for the experimental group during the four days following TLR7 agonist/saponin injection was significantly higher than that of the control group over the same period (p = 0.001).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Similarly, there were significant increases in the diameter of the pre-scapular lymph node in all experimental calves (Table 2 and S2 Table). The increase was significantly higher over the four days following TLR7 agonist/saponin emulsion injection as compared to the four days prior (p = 0.00001) and significantly greater than the diameter of the lymph nodes of the control calves (p = 0.0001), which did not increase in size (p = 0.28).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Consistent with the innate inflammatory response indicated by the increases in rectal temperature and lymph node size, IL-6 levels significantly increased (p = 0.00001) over the four-day period in the TLR7 agonist/saponin emulsion group as compared to the control group (Table 3 and S3 Table).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Synthetic TLR7 agonist/saponin injection reduces subsequent need for antibiotic treatment and mortality of crossbred calves following A. marginale infection
In Trial 1, all calves tested positive by PCR and Msp5 CI-ELISA for A. marginale within 22 days of exposure to field challenge. This was expected given the high levels of transmission in Ghana [7]. Calves were monitored daily and antibiotic treatment was initiated if PCV decreased to 28% or below. Of the control group (n = 10) that did not receive the TLR7 agonist/saponin emulsion, 8 calves met the stated criteria for antibiotic treatment while 3 calves in the TLR7 agonist/saponin emulsion injected group required antibiotics (Table 4). The mean low PCV was significantly greater in the experimental group as compared to the control group (Table 4). Despite antibiotic treatment, 6 calves in the control group died as compared to 1 in the experimental group (Table 4). Based on these results, the trial was then independently repeated using larger group sizes, n = 45 for each group.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
In trial 2, A. marginale infection was again confirmed in all calves within three weeks of natural exposure. Of the 45 calves in the control group, 34 calves (76%) met antibiotic treatment criteria while 16 of 45 (36%) in the TLR7 agonist/saponin injected group required treatment (Table 5). In the control group, 15 calves died, despite treatment, while in the experimental group 3 died (Table 5).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
IL-6 levels correlate with protection against anemia due to A. marginale infection
The mean IL-6 levels were plotted against the mean PCV level of each calf in both groups from Trial 1 (Fig 1 and S4 Table). There was a statistically significant correlation (r = 0.74; p<0.0001) between IL-6 levels and anemia, at the individual calf level, regardless of the group.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
The X values represent the mean percent packed cell volume (% PCV) of all 20 calves (n = 10 for control and 10 for calves injected with the TLR7 agonist/saponin emulsion. The Y values represent the corresponding mean log IL-6 (pg/ml) of individual calves. R is: 0.742; P = 0.0001; R2 = 0.55.
Synthetic TLR agonist/saponin emulsion injection does not interfere with the long-term weight gain of calves
We also examined whether TLR7 agonist/saponin emulsion injection and short-term stimulation of the innate immune response had a long-term impact on weight gain. The average weight gain of calves injected with the TLR7 agonist/saponin in Trials 1 and 2 was 1.72kg ± /month compared with 1.67kg ± /month for the control group. The overall body weight at the end of the trial was not significantly different (p = 0.38) between the two groups.
Discussion
Anaplasma marginale is highly endemic in Ghana, throughout sub-Saharan Africa, and in most tropical and subtropical countries [7, 21, 22]. Severe morbidity and mortality occur during the acute phase of infection, when bacteremia levels exceed 109 per ml. Notably, animals that survive acute infection develop life-long immunity [11, 12]. As a result, two strategies have been used to manage disease impact. The first is the use of a live vaccines, which involves deliberate infection of cattle with a less virulent subspecies A. marginale ss. centrale [23–26]. Although generally effective, the widespread use of the live vaccine has been constrained by the requirement for a cold chain based on preservation in liquid nitrogen, which is difficult and expensive to ensure in low-income tropical countries. The second approach has been to rely on indigenous breeds of cattle which, although equally susceptible to infection, are significantly more resistant to developing severe morbidity and mortality [27–33]. Although effective, the inability to introduce higher productivity traits into indigenous breeds by crossbreeding without increased susceptibility to severe morbidity and mortality has resulted in lower productivity and decreased economic gains for smallholder farmers. Relevant to the cross-bred cattle used in this current study, F1 Sanga x Friesian cows provide approximately twice the daily milk yield as compared to Sanga cows raised under the same pasture conditions [34–36]. Even minor increases in milk production have been shown to translate into increased household income and expenditures on additional food, health care, and education [2, 37]. Based on the concept that there is an energetic trade-off between resources dedicated to innate immunity versus productivity, we tested the hypothesis that direct stimulation of the innate immune system would provide sufficient short-term protection in crossbred cattle to avoid severe morbidity and mortality. The selection of the synthetic TLR7 agonist imiquimod and its incorporation into a slow-release water-in-oil emulsion was based on the evidence that bovine TLRs 7 and 8 responded to stimulation with cytokine release [13, 14, 16, 38, 39]. The confirmation that F1 Sanga x Friesian crossbred cattle responded with significantly increased temperatures, enlarged regional lymph nodes, and IL-6 levels over the first four days post-injection indicated innate immune stimulation. The subsequent significant reduction in need for antibiotic treatment and reduced mortality, confirmed in two independent trials with a total of 55 animals per group, support the efficacy of this approach. Notably, tracking subsequent weight gain of animals in the second trial group revealed no significant difference between the TLR7 agonist/saponin emulsion injected and control cattle, indicating that any energetic trade-off between innate immunity and productivity was transient. This latter finding is important as the overall goal is to increase productivity for the smallholder farmer.
This study is a proof of concept that supports an overall approach to managing severe disease due to A. marginale infection. There are several important caveats. The first is that although there was a statistically significant reduction in the need for antibiotic treatment and in mortality, multiple animals in the TLR7 agonist/saponin injected groups required treatment and 7% died (versus 38% in the controls). We did not include a control group of age-matched Sanga cattle that would have allowed us to determine if the TLR agonist/saponin induced a similar level of protection as fully indigenous cattle, which would be a relevant benchmark. Secondly, the selection of agonist was largely empirical based on the ability of TLR 7 agonist/saponin stimulation to increase CD4+ T cell secretion of IFN-γ [40], previously show to associate with immune protection against A. marginale challenge [41]. Similarly, the dose and formulation were also empirical and unlikely to be optimal. However, the correlation between protection from anemia as a measure of disease severity and IL-6 levels suggests that IL-6 is a measurable parameter to optimize agonist, dose and formulation. It is notable that the components employed in the formulation are low cost and commercially available, and the processing requires minimal equipment. Additional or different agonists, doses, or slow-release formulation should be tested with the goal of reducing antibiotic treatment and mortality to less than or equal to that of the fully indigenous Sanga. In addition, the duration of innate immunity and protection induced by the TLR7 agonist/saponin is unknown. In the current study conducted in an endemic region with a high level of transmission, challenge occurred within three weeks following natural exposure for which short-term protection may be sufficient. In regions with lower transmission or where transmission is seasonal, the duration of protection becomes a key question and requires additional experimentation. Finally, efficacy was only tested against acute A. marginale infection. However, there are multiple infectious diseases of tropical and subtropical livestock, including babesiosis and East Coast Fever, that have a similar course of acute disease followed by life-long antigen specific immunity; the approach of short-term stimulation of innate immunity may be an effective strategy for protection against multiple pathogens.
Supporting information
S1 Table. Rectal temperature of calves.
The rectal temperatures of individual calves in the control and experimental (TLR agonist) groups four days prior to and four days following injection.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306092.s001
(DOCX)
S2 Table. Lymph node sizes.
The diameter of prescapular lymph nodes of individual calves in the control and experimental (TLR agonist) groups four days prior to and four days following injection.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306092.s002
(DOCX)
S3 Table. IL-6 levels in individual calves.
The IL6 levels (pg/ml) of individual calves in the control and experimental (TLR agonist) groups 24, 48, and 72 hours following injection.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306092.s003
(DOCX)
S4 Table. Mean IL-6 levels and mean PCV in individual calves.
The mean IL6 levels (pg/ml) and the mean PCV (%) of individual calves in the control and experimental (TLR agonist) groups.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306092.s004
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank Mr Abdulai Mamah for the care and maintenance of calves. We also acknowledge Mr Jonathan Quaye for his technical support and Dr Francis Dogodzi for his veterinary assistance.
References
1. 1. Nutrition FA. Livestock—Technical Guidance to Harness the Potential of Livestock for Improved Nutrition of Vulnerable Populations in Programme Planning. FAO: Rome, Italy. 2020.
2. 2. Marsh TL, Yoder J, Deboch T, McElwain TF, Palmer GH. Livestock vaccinations translate into increased human capital and school attendance by girls. Science Adv. 2016. 2(12):e1601410. pmid:27990491.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
3. 3. Steinfeld H, Wassenaar T, Jutzi S. Livestock production systems in developing countries: status, drivers, trends. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2006. 25(2):505–16. pmid:17094693.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
4. 4. Nwafor IC, Nwafor CU. African smallholder farmers and the treatment of livestock diseases using ethnoveterinary medicine: A commentary. Pastoralism. 2022. 12(1):29. pmid:35789586.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
5. 5. Kolo A. Anaplasma species in Africa—A century of discovery: A review on molecular epidemiology, genetic diversity, and control. Pathogens. 2023. 12(5):702.. pmid:37242372
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
6. 6. Atif FA. Alpha proteobacteria of genus Anaplasma (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae): Epidemiology and characteristics of Anaplasma species related to veterinary and public health importance. Parasitology. 2016. 143(6):659–85. pmid:26932580.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
7. 7. Beckley CS, Shaban S, Palmer GH, Hudak AT, Noh SM, Futse JE. Disaggregating tropical disease prevalence by climatic and vegetative zones within tropical West Africa. PLoS One. 2016. 11(3):e0152560. pmid:27022740.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
8. 8. Marcelino I, De Almeida AM, Ventosa M, Pruneau L, Meyer DF, Martinez D, et al. Tick-borne diseases in cattle: applications of proteomics to develop new generation vaccines. J. of Proteomics. 2012. 75(14):4232–50. pmid:22480908.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
9. 9. Bell-Sakyi L, Koney EB, Dogbey O, Walker AR. Incidence and prevalence of tick-borne haemoparasites in domestic ruminants in Ghana. Veterinary Parasitol. 2004. 124(1–2):25–42. pmid:15350659.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
10. 10. Uilenberg G. International collaborative research: significance of tick-borne hemoparasitic diseases to world animal health. Veterinary Parasitol. 1995. 57(1–3):19–41. pmid:7597784.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
11. 11. Palmer GH, Rurangirwa FR, Kocan KM, Brown WC. Molecular basis for vaccine development against the ehrlichial pathogen Anaplasma marginale. Parasitol. Today. 1999. 15(7):281–6. pmid:10377531.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
12. 12. Palmer G.H., Bankhead T., and Seifert H.S. Antigenic variation in bacterial pathogens. Microbiol. Spectrum. 2016. 4:10.1128. pmid:26999387
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
13. 13. Kumar H, Kawai T, Akira S. Pathogen recognition by the innate immune system. Internat. Rev. Immunol. 2011. 30(1):16–34. pmid:21235323.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
14. 14. Tomai MA, Miller RL, Lipson KE, Kieper WC, Zarraga IE, Vasilakos JP. Resiquimod and other immune response modifiers as vaccine adjuvants. Expert Rev. Vaccines. 2007. 6(5):835–47. pmid:17931162.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
15. 15. Cristofaro P, Opal SM. Role of Toll-like receptors in infection and immunity: clinical implications. Drugs. 2006. 66:15–29. pmid:16398566.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
16. 16. Heil F, Hemmi H, Hochrein H, Ampenberger F, Kirschning C, Akira S, et al. Species-specific recognition of single-stranded RNA via toll-like receptor 7 and 8. Science. 2004. 303(5663):1526–9. pmid:14976262.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
17. 17. Knowles D, Torioni de Echaide S, Palmer G, McGuire T, Stiller D, McElwain T. Antibody against an Anaplasma marginale MSP5 epitope common to tick and erythrocyte stages identifies persistently infected cattle. J. Clin. Micro. 1996. 34(9):2225–30. pmid:8862589.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
18. 18. Kwok AJ, Mentzer A, Knight JC. Host genetics and infectious disease: new tools, insights and translational opportunities. Nature Rev. Genetics. 2021. 22(3):137–53. pmid:33277640.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
19. 19. McDevitt H. The discovery of linkage between the MHC and genetic control of the immune response. Immunol. Reviews. 2002. 185(1):78–85. pmid:12190924.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
20. 20. Stear MJ, Bishop SC, Mallard BA, Raadsma H. The sustainability, feasibility and desirability of breeding livestock for disease resistance. Res. Vet. Sci. 2001. 71(1):1–7. pmid:11666141.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
21. 21. Battilani M, De Arcangeli S, Balboni A, Dondi F. Genetic diversity and molecular epidemiology of Anaplasma. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2017. 49:195–211. pmid:28122249.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
22. 22. Aubry P, Geale DW. A review of bovine anaplasmosis. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2011. 58(1):1–30. pmid:21040509.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
23. 23. Bell-Sakyi L, Palomar AM, Bradford EL, Shkap V. Propagation of the Israeli vaccine strain of Anaplasma centrale in tick cell lines. Vet. Microbiol. 2015. 179(3–4):270–6. pmid:26210950.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
24. 24. Hammac GK, Ku PS, Galletti MF, Noh SM, Scoles GA, Palmer GH, et al. Protective immunity induced by immunization with a live, cultured Anaplasma marginale strain. Vaccine. 2013 31(35):3617–22. pmid:23664994.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
25. 25. Abdala AA, Pipano E, Aguirre DH, Gaido AB, Zurbriggen MA, Mangold AJ, et al. Frozen and fresh Anaplasma centrale vaccines in the protection of cattle against Anaplasma marginale infection. Rev. Elev. Med. Vet. Pays Trop. 1990. 43(2):155–8. pmid:2092348.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
26. 26. Theiler A. Gallsickness of imported cattle and the protective inoculation against this disease. Agric. J. Union South Africa. 1912. 3:7–46.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
27. 27. Pal A, Chakravarty AK. Disease resistance for different livestock species. Genetics and Breeding for Disease Resistance of Livestock. 2020. 271.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
28. 28. Bishop SC, Woolliams JA. Genomics and disease resistance studies in livestock. Livestock Science. 2014. 166:190–8. pmid:26339300
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
29. 29. Davies G, Genini S, Bishop SC, Giuffra E. An assessment of opportunities to dissect host genetic variation in resistance to infectious diseases in livestock. Animal. 2009. 3(3):415–36. pmid:22444313.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
30. 30. Ahmed JS, Glass EJ, Salih DA, Seitzer U. Innate immunity to tropical theileriosis. Innate Immunity. 2008. 14(1):5–12. pmid:18387915.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
31. 31. Beutler B, Jiang Z, Georgel P, Crozat K, Croker B, Rutschmann S, et al. Genetic analysis of host resistance: Toll-like receptor signaling and immunity at large. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2006. 24:353–89. pmid:16551253
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
32. 32. Bakheit MA, Latif AA. The innate resistance of Kenana cattle to tropical theileriosis (Theileria annulata infection) in the Sudan. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2002. 969(1):159–63. pmid:12381583.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
33. 33. Aguilar-Delfin I, Homer MJ, Wettstein PJ, Persing DH. Innate resistance to Babesia infection is influenced by genetic background and gender. Infect. Immun. 2001. 69(12):7955–8. pmid:11705985.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
34. 34. Osei-Amponsah R, Asem EK, Obese FY. Cattle crossbreeding for sustainable milk production in the tropics. International J. Livestock Prod. 2020. 11(4):108–13.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
35. 35. Obese FY, Acheampong DA, Darfour-Oduro KA. Growth and reproductive traits of Friesian x Sanga crossbred cattle in the Accra plains of Ghana. African J. Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development. 2013. 18;13(2).
* View Article
* Google Scholar
36. 36. Obese FY, Dafour-Oduro KA, Gomda Y, Bekoe E. Reproductive performance following artificial insemination in Sanga and Crossbred (Friesian x Sanga) cows in the Accra Plains of Ghana. Sustainable Improvement of Animal Production and Health. FAO of the United Nations, Rome. 2010 Jul 1:201–3.
37. 37. Choudhury S, Headey DD. Household dairy production and child growth: Evidence from Bangladesh. Econ. Human Biol. 2018. 30:150–61. pmid:30048913
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
38. 38. Alghsham R, Rasheed Z, Shariq A, Alkhamiss AS, Alhumaydhi FA, Aljohani AS, et al. Recognition of pathogens and their inflammatory signalling events. Open Access Macedonian J. Med. Sci. (OAMJMS). 2022. 10(F):462–7.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
39. 39. Mogensen TH. Pathogen recognition and inflammatory signalling in innate immune defences. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009. 22(2):240–73. pmid:19366914.
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
40. 40. Sajiki Y, Konnai S, Okagawa T, Maekawa N, Nakamura H, Kato Y, et al. A TLR7 agonist activates bovine Th1 response and exerts antiviral activity against bovine leukemia virus. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2021. 114:103847. pmid:32888966
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
41. 41. Brown WC, Zhu D, Shkap V, McGuire TC, Blouin EF, Kocan KM, et al. The repertoire of Anaplasma marginale antigens recognized by CD4(+) T-lymphocyte clones from protectively immunized cattle is diverse and includes major surface protein 2 (MSP-2) and MSP-3. Infect. Immun. 1998. 66:5414–22.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
Citation: Futse JE, Zumor-Baligi S, Ashiagbor CNK, Noh SM, Fox CB, Palmer GH (2024) An adjuvant formulation containing Toll-like Receptor 7 agonist stimulates protection against morbidity and mortality due to Anaplasma marginale in a highly endemic region of west Africa. PLoS ONE 19(8): e0306092. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306092
About the Authors:
James E. Futse
Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
E-mail: [email protected]
Affiliation: Animal Disease Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture, College of Basic and Applied Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana
ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9204-4945
Songliedong Zumor-Baligi
Roles: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology
Affiliation: Animal Disease Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture, College of Basic and Applied Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana
Charles N. K. Ashiagbor
Roles: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology
Affiliation: Animal Disease Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture, College of Basic and Applied Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana
Susan M. Noh
Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Visualization, Writing – review & editing
Affiliations: Animal Diseases Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Pullman, Washington, United States of America, Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America, Paul G. Allen School for Global Health, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America
ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8160-9074
Christopher B. Fox
Roles: Data curation, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing
Affiliations: Access to Advanced Health Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States of America, Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
Guy H. Palmer
Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Affiliations: Paul G. Allen School for Global Health, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America, Institute for Tropical Infectious Diseases, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
[/RAW_REF_TEXT]
[/RAW_REF_TEXT]
1. Nutrition FA. Livestock—Technical Guidance to Harness the Potential of Livestock for Improved Nutrition of Vulnerable Populations in Programme Planning. FAO: Rome, Italy. 2020.
2. Marsh TL, Yoder J, Deboch T, McElwain TF, Palmer GH. Livestock vaccinations translate into increased human capital and school attendance by girls. Science Adv. 2016. 2(12):e1601410. pmid:27990491.
3. Steinfeld H, Wassenaar T, Jutzi S. Livestock production systems in developing countries: status, drivers, trends. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2006. 25(2):505–16. pmid:17094693.
4. Nwafor IC, Nwafor CU. African smallholder farmers and the treatment of livestock diseases using ethnoveterinary medicine: A commentary. Pastoralism. 2022. 12(1):29. pmid:35789586.
5. Kolo A. Anaplasma species in Africa—A century of discovery: A review on molecular epidemiology, genetic diversity, and control. Pathogens. 2023. 12(5):702.. pmid:37242372
6. Atif FA. Alpha proteobacteria of genus Anaplasma (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae): Epidemiology and characteristics of Anaplasma species related to veterinary and public health importance. Parasitology. 2016. 143(6):659–85. pmid:26932580.
7. Beckley CS, Shaban S, Palmer GH, Hudak AT, Noh SM, Futse JE. Disaggregating tropical disease prevalence by climatic and vegetative zones within tropical West Africa. PLoS One. 2016. 11(3):e0152560. pmid:27022740.
8. Marcelino I, De Almeida AM, Ventosa M, Pruneau L, Meyer DF, Martinez D, et al. Tick-borne diseases in cattle: applications of proteomics to develop new generation vaccines. J. of Proteomics. 2012. 75(14):4232–50. pmid:22480908.
9. Bell-Sakyi L, Koney EB, Dogbey O, Walker AR. Incidence and prevalence of tick-borne haemoparasites in domestic ruminants in Ghana. Veterinary Parasitol. 2004. 124(1–2):25–42. pmid:15350659.
10. Uilenberg G. International collaborative research: significance of tick-borne hemoparasitic diseases to world animal health. Veterinary Parasitol. 1995. 57(1–3):19–41. pmid:7597784.
11. Palmer GH, Rurangirwa FR, Kocan KM, Brown WC. Molecular basis for vaccine development against the ehrlichial pathogen Anaplasma marginale. Parasitol. Today. 1999. 15(7):281–6. pmid:10377531.
12. Palmer G.H., Bankhead T., and Seifert H.S. Antigenic variation in bacterial pathogens. Microbiol. Spectrum. 2016. 4:10.1128. pmid:26999387
13. Kumar H, Kawai T, Akira S. Pathogen recognition by the innate immune system. Internat. Rev. Immunol. 2011. 30(1):16–34. pmid:21235323.
14. Tomai MA, Miller RL, Lipson KE, Kieper WC, Zarraga IE, Vasilakos JP. Resiquimod and other immune response modifiers as vaccine adjuvants. Expert Rev. Vaccines. 2007. 6(5):835–47. pmid:17931162.
15. Cristofaro P, Opal SM. Role of Toll-like receptors in infection and immunity: clinical implications. Drugs. 2006. 66:15–29. pmid:16398566.
16. Heil F, Hemmi H, Hochrein H, Ampenberger F, Kirschning C, Akira S, et al. Species-specific recognition of single-stranded RNA via toll-like receptor 7 and 8. Science. 2004. 303(5663):1526–9. pmid:14976262.
17. Knowles D, Torioni de Echaide S, Palmer G, McGuire T, Stiller D, McElwain T. Antibody against an Anaplasma marginale MSP5 epitope common to tick and erythrocyte stages identifies persistently infected cattle. J. Clin. Micro. 1996. 34(9):2225–30. pmid:8862589.
18. Kwok AJ, Mentzer A, Knight JC. Host genetics and infectious disease: new tools, insights and translational opportunities. Nature Rev. Genetics. 2021. 22(3):137–53. pmid:33277640.
19. McDevitt H. The discovery of linkage between the MHC and genetic control of the immune response. Immunol. Reviews. 2002. 185(1):78–85. pmid:12190924.
20. Stear MJ, Bishop SC, Mallard BA, Raadsma H. The sustainability, feasibility and desirability of breeding livestock for disease resistance. Res. Vet. Sci. 2001. 71(1):1–7. pmid:11666141.
21. Battilani M, De Arcangeli S, Balboni A, Dondi F. Genetic diversity and molecular epidemiology of Anaplasma. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2017. 49:195–211. pmid:28122249.
22. Aubry P, Geale DW. A review of bovine anaplasmosis. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2011. 58(1):1–30. pmid:21040509.
23. Bell-Sakyi L, Palomar AM, Bradford EL, Shkap V. Propagation of the Israeli vaccine strain of Anaplasma centrale in tick cell lines. Vet. Microbiol. 2015. 179(3–4):270–6. pmid:26210950.
24. Hammac GK, Ku PS, Galletti MF, Noh SM, Scoles GA, Palmer GH, et al. Protective immunity induced by immunization with a live, cultured Anaplasma marginale strain. Vaccine. 2013 31(35):3617–22. pmid:23664994.
25. Abdala AA, Pipano E, Aguirre DH, Gaido AB, Zurbriggen MA, Mangold AJ, et al. Frozen and fresh Anaplasma centrale vaccines in the protection of cattle against Anaplasma marginale infection. Rev. Elev. Med. Vet. Pays Trop. 1990. 43(2):155–8. pmid:2092348.
26. Theiler A. Gallsickness of imported cattle and the protective inoculation against this disease. Agric. J. Union South Africa. 1912. 3:7–46.
27. Pal A, Chakravarty AK. Disease resistance for different livestock species. Genetics and Breeding for Disease Resistance of Livestock. 2020. 271.
28. Bishop SC, Woolliams JA. Genomics and disease resistance studies in livestock. Livestock Science. 2014. 166:190–8. pmid:26339300
29. Davies G, Genini S, Bishop SC, Giuffra E. An assessment of opportunities to dissect host genetic variation in resistance to infectious diseases in livestock. Animal. 2009. 3(3):415–36. pmid:22444313.
30. Ahmed JS, Glass EJ, Salih DA, Seitzer U. Innate immunity to tropical theileriosis. Innate Immunity. 2008. 14(1):5–12. pmid:18387915.
31. Beutler B, Jiang Z, Georgel P, Crozat K, Croker B, Rutschmann S, et al. Genetic analysis of host resistance: Toll-like receptor signaling and immunity at large. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2006. 24:353–89. pmid:16551253
32. Bakheit MA, Latif AA. The innate resistance of Kenana cattle to tropical theileriosis (Theileria annulata infection) in the Sudan. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2002. 969(1):159–63. pmid:12381583.
33. Aguilar-Delfin I, Homer MJ, Wettstein PJ, Persing DH. Innate resistance to Babesia infection is influenced by genetic background and gender. Infect. Immun. 2001. 69(12):7955–8. pmid:11705985.
34. Osei-Amponsah R, Asem EK, Obese FY. Cattle crossbreeding for sustainable milk production in the tropics. International J. Livestock Prod. 2020. 11(4):108–13.
35. Obese FY, Acheampong DA, Darfour-Oduro KA. Growth and reproductive traits of Friesian x Sanga crossbred cattle in the Accra plains of Ghana. African J. Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development. 2013. 18;13(2).
36. Obese FY, Dafour-Oduro KA, Gomda Y, Bekoe E. Reproductive performance following artificial insemination in Sanga and Crossbred (Friesian x Sanga) cows in the Accra Plains of Ghana. Sustainable Improvement of Animal Production and Health. FAO of the United Nations, Rome. 2010 Jul 1:201–3.
37. Choudhury S, Headey DD. Household dairy production and child growth: Evidence from Bangladesh. Econ. Human Biol. 2018. 30:150–61. pmid:30048913
38. Alghsham R, Rasheed Z, Shariq A, Alkhamiss AS, Alhumaydhi FA, Aljohani AS, et al. Recognition of pathogens and their inflammatory signalling events. Open Access Macedonian J. Med. Sci. (OAMJMS). 2022. 10(F):462–7.
39. Mogensen TH. Pathogen recognition and inflammatory signalling in innate immune defences. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009. 22(2):240–73. pmid:19366914.
40. Sajiki Y, Konnai S, Okagawa T, Maekawa N, Nakamura H, Kato Y, et al. A TLR7 agonist activates bovine Th1 response and exerts antiviral activity against bovine leukemia virus. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2021. 114:103847. pmid:32888966
41. Brown WC, Zhu D, Shkap V, McGuire TC, Blouin EF, Kocan KM, et al. The repertoire of Anaplasma marginale antigens recognized by CD4(+) T-lymphocyte clones from protectively immunized cattle is diverse and includes major surface protein 2 (MSP-2) and MSP-3. Infect. Immun. 1998. 66:5414–22.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Efficient cattle production and provision of animal-sourced foods in much of Africa is constrained by vector-borne bacterial and protozoal diseases. Effective vaccines are not currently available for most of these infections resulting in a continuous disease burden that limits genetic improvement. We tested whether stimulation of innate immunity using the Toll-like Receptor (TLR) 7 agonist imiquimod, formulated with saponin and water-in-oil emulsion, would protect against morbidity and mortality due to Anaplasma marginale, a tick-borne pathogen of cattle highly endemic in west Africa. In Trial 1, haplotype matched Friesian x Sanga (F1) A. marginale negative calves were allocated to either the experimental group (n = 10) and injected with the synthetic TLR 7 agonist/saponin formulation or to an untreated control group (n = 10). TLR7 agonist/saponin injected calves responded with significantly elevated rectal temperature, enlarged regional lymph nodes, and elevated levels of IL-6 post-injection as compared to control group calves. All calves were then allowed to graze in pasture for natural exposure to tick transmission. All calves in both groups acquired A. marginale, consistent with the high transmission rate in the endemic region. The need for antibiotic treatment, using pre-existing criteria, was significantly lower in the experimental group (odds ratio for not requiring treatment was 9.3, p = 0.03) as compared to the control group. Despite treatment, 6/10 calves in the control group died, reflecting treatment failures that are typical of anaplasmosis in the acute phase, while mortality in the experimental group was 1/10 (odds ratio for survival was 13.5, p = 0.03). The trial was then repeated using 45 Friesian x Sanga calves per group. In Trial 2, the odds ratios for preventing the need for treatment and for mortality in the TLR7 agonist/saponin experimental group versus the control group were 5.6 (p = 0.0002) and 7.0 (p = 0.004), respectively, reproducing the findings of the initial trial. Together these findings demonstrate that innate immune stimulation using a TLR7 agonist formulated with saponin and water-in-oil emulsion provides significant protection against disease caused by tick borne A. marginale in highly susceptible cross-bred cattle, critically important for their potential to increase productivity for smallholder farmers in Africa.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer