Introduction
Public health interventions in times of global health crises have been noted to be very impactful on health systems [1,2]. The global health infrastructure has undergone substantial modifications since the introduction of COVID-19. The COVID-19 pandemic, which was initially discovered in Wuhan, China, in late 2019, affected nearly every region of the planet, taking many lives and having tremendous impact on all facets of human society [3]. As of 8th June 2023, more than 690, 032, 285 cases of COVID-19 have been recorded with 6,889, 153 deaths globally [4]. Ghana reported the first two cases of COVID-19 on March 12th, 2020 [5]), and as of April 2023, a total of 171, 657 cases of COVID-19 with associated 1,462 deaths had been recorded in Ghana [6]. To assuage the escalating cases and death toll from COVID-19, the Government of Ghana established several measures based on the WHO’s recommendations, involving physical distancing, regular handwashing with soap under running water and rubbing of hands with alcohol-based sanitizers [5,7].
The COVID-19 pandemic has shone a light on hand hygiene as an inexpensive, widely applicable response [3]. Hand hygiene remains a significant component in preventing many transmissible infections including COVID-19 and diarrheal diseases [8–11]. It generally refers to any action involving hand cleansing with the principal objective of removing dirt, organic material and/or microorganisms [12,13]. Numerous microorganisms have been found to have their richest habitat in the human palm including those associated with faeco-oral diseases, highlighting the importance of hand cleanliness in infection prevention [14,15]. In underdeveloped nations, diarrheal illnesses continue to be a serious public health concern. It remains one of the commonest preventable causes of morbidity and mortality, responsible for 1.6 and over 0.5 million deaths among all age groups and children under 5 years, respectively [16]. In Ghana, like other low-income countries, diarrhea ranks among the top ten causes of morbidity and mortality, killing more than 14,000 children annually in Ghana [15,17]. Jin et al. (2020) defined diarrhea as the passing of loose stools more than three times per day. Diarrhea is commonly caused by bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae [18,19]; viruses such as rotavirus and adenovirus and parasites such as Giardia [20].
Maintaining good hand hygiene is still one of the best strategies to get rid of pathogens and stop the spread of infectious diseases. To stop the spread of COVID-19, it was stressed how important it was to maintain personal cleanliness, especially when it came to washing your hands with soap or alcohol-based sanitizer [21,22]. Though COVID-19 and many diarrheal diseases share different aetiologic agents, they have one thing in common: using the intervention of hand hygiene to break the cycle of infection. The habit of hand hygiene has recorded a significant improvement around the world since the onset of COVID-19 [11].
In Ghana, hand hygiene was declared mandatory and a pre-requisite for entering public places as part of the COVID mitigating strategies [5]. Several studies have documented the benefits of hand hygiene on diarrheal diseases [23,24]. But till date, there is a paucity of research looking at the effects of this hand hygiene practice instituted during the COVID-19 pandemic on diarrheal cases. This study, therefore, fills that lacuna by drawing on diarrheal disease data before and during the COVID-19 pandemic to assess the effects of COVID hand hygiene protocols on diarrheal diseases in Ghana.
Methods
Study design
This was a descriptive cross-sectional study that examined diarrhea cases between February 2018 and March 2022 using secondary data obtained from Ghana’s District Health Information Management System (DHIMS 2). DHIMS 2 is an integrated web-based electronic database that is used for the storage and management of aggregated data across health facilities in Ghana.
Study site
Ghana is a West African country sharing border with Cote d’Ivoire to the west, Burkina Faso to the north, Togo to the east, and the Gulf of Guinea and the Atlantic Ocean to the south (Fig 1). Ghana consists of a total of sixteen administrative regions and 261 districts. The Greater Accra (17.7%), Ashanti (17.6%), Eastern (9.5%), and Central (9.3%) regions comprise almost half of Ghana’s population, which is estimated to be 31 million [25]. Ghana’s average household size is 3.6 and its annual population growth rate is 2.1% [25]. Most health institutions in Ghana are publicly owned, although they receive help from private, faith-based, traditional, and alternative service providers which help the healthcare system in Ghana. Health services are delivered at diverse levels: tertiary-level (teaching hospitals), secondary-level (regional and district hospitals), and primary- (health centers, and Community-based Health Planning Services (CHPS). Almost all levels of facilities manage diarrhea cases and enter aggregated data into DHIMS 2 database monthly.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Data source and variables
In Ghana, all healthcare facilities are required by the Ministry of Health (MoH) and the Ghana Health Service (GHS) to capture, and report aggregated data on all services provided on specific reporting forms every month. These data are validated by a data validation team in each healthcare facility before the 5th of the ensuing month for accuracy and validity before feeding into the District Health Information Management System (DHIMS 2) database. Healthcare facilities in Ghana during the COVID-19 pandemic continuously collated, validated, and reported data on essential healthcare indicators including cases of diarrheal disease into DHIMS 2. On the 19th of June 2023, monthly data on diarrhea cases were extracted from DHIMS 2 spanning the period from February 2018 to March 2022 for all 16 regions of Ghana to characterize the disease by place and time.
Statistical analysis
Data on diarrheal disease were extracted from DHIMS 2 and cleaned using Microsoft Excel 2016 and later imported in R software for analysis. To be able to measure the effect of hand hygiene protocol on diarrheal disease, the data were divided into the pre-COVID period (February 2018 to February 2020) and the COVID period (March 2020 to March 2022). Data were summarized using descriptive statistics such as mean with standard deviation and median with interquartile range. Levene’s test for equality of variances and Shapiro Wilks test for normality of the number of diarrhea cases between the pre-and-post COVID-19 hand hygiene period were conducted, after which a two-sample t-test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were conducted to estimate the effect of COVID-19 hand hygiene protocols on diarrhea cases across the 16 regions in Ghana. Further, Google’s causal impact package in R [27] which is designed for interrupted time series (ITS), was used to evaluate the effect of an intervention or event by comparing observed outcomes to a counterfactual scenario (what would have happened if the COVID-19 hand hygiene protocol had not been implemented) was used to estimate the causal effect of the introduction of the COVID-19 hand hygiene protocol on diarrhea cases. The Causal Impact package utilized a Bayesian Structure Time Series (BSTS) model to estimate the counterfactual scenario, which represents what would have happened to diarrhea cases without the introduction of the hand hygiene protocol. This model considered both the pre-intervention (February 2018 to February 2020) and intervention (March 2020 to March 2022) periods and incorporated covariates information. The Outpatient department (OPD) attendance was identified as a potential confounding covariate and controlled for because it reflects health-seeking behavior which can influence the number of diarrheal cases recorded. Including the out-patient department attendance as a covariate was to rule out/mitigate OPD attendance as a possible cause of any observed differences. All statistical analyses were considered statistically significant at a 95% Confidence Interval with a 5% level (p < 0.05) of significance.
Ethical considerations
This study utilized only aggregated secondary data and was carried out as part of efforts to improve quality of both COVID-19 and diarrheal diseases management in Ghana.
This study aligns with Helsinki’s ethical guidelines on the use of secondary data and did not require ethical approval since the study only used aggregated secondary data which did not contain personal identifiers of patients [28].
This research did not involve any direct interaction or involvement with human participants; instead, the data used in the study were taken from pre-existing datasets and repositories that had no personal identifiers. It is also important to note that the secondary data used in this study came from reliable sources that follow high ethical standards and procedures for data gathering and distribution [29].
The researchers are devoted to advancing accountability and transparency in research techniques, as well as to making knowledge contributions that advance society while upholding the participants’ rights to privacy.
Results
Descriptive statistics and differences in diarrhea cases before and during the introduction of COVID-19 hand hygiene protocol in Ghana
A total of 5,645,533 diarrhea cases were reported in Ghana from February 2018 to March 2022. Before the introduction of the COVID-19 hand hygiene protocol, a total of 2,991,054 diarrhea cases were reported, accounting for about 53% of all diarrhea cases reported for the period under study. The median diarrhea cases reported before the introduction of the protocol was 121,383 with an inter-quartile range (IQR) of 13,869 cases with a minimum and maximum of 97,557 and 139,162 cases, respectively. During the observation of the COVID-19 hand hygiene protocol, the median reported diarrheal cases was 106,155 with an IQR of 12,744 with 78,861 as the minimum diarrhea cases reported and 148,273 as the maximum cases reported for the period (Table 1). A two-sample t-test confirmed a significant difference between the average number of diarrhea cases reported before and during the introduction of the COVID-19 hand hygiene protocol in Ghana (difference = 13,463, 95% CI [5847.19, 21,078.81], t (48) = 3.55, p = 0.001; Cohen’s d = 1.01, 95% CI [0.41, 1.59]) (Fig 2).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Sub-national analysis of differences in diarrhea cases before and during the introduction Of COVID-19 handwashing protocol in Ghana
Table 2 presents the effect of COVID-19 hand hygiene protocol on diarrhea cases across the 16 regions in Ghana. In the Ahafo region, there was a statistically significant reduction in diarrhea cases (Mean difference = 429.3, CI: 155.9–702.8, p = 0.003) with a Cohen’s d = 0.89, indicating a large effect. Statistically significant reductions in diarrhea cases were observed in the Central, Eastern, Greater Accra, Northern, Upper East, Upper West, Volta, and Western regions, with varying effect sizes, particularly, the Volta region with the highest effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.31). Marginal reductions in diarrhea cases were observed in the Ashanti and Bono regions, however, these reductions were not statistically significant (p = 0.074 and p = 0.097, respectively). The North East region observed a non-significant increase in diarrhea cases (Mean difference = -493.3, p = 0.109), as also, observed in Oti and Savannah regions. Countrywide, there was a statistically significant reduction (Mean difference = 841.4, CI: 344.2–1338.6, p = 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.23), indicating that the introduction of hand hygiene protocol had a moderate effect on the reduction of diarrhea cases in Ghana.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Impact of COVID-19 hand hygiene protocol on diarrheal disease in Ghana
The impact of the COVID-19 hand hygiene protocol on diarrhea case incidence varied across regions in Ghana. Nationwide, the average number of diarrhea cases after the introduction of the COVID-19 hand hygiene protocol was 106179. By contrast, the absence of the protocol would have resulted in an average of 119283 (95% CI: 114931, 123638) cases. The Absolute effect of the introduction of the protocol was a reduction in diarrhea cases by -13104 (95% CI: -17459, -8752). The relative effect expresses this reduction as a percentage, indicating a -11.0% (95% CI: -14%, -7.8%) decrease in diarrhea cases in Ghana (Fig 3). Resultant test statistics revealed a high statistical significance (p<0.001) and a probability of causal effect of 99.9%. In the Ahafo region, a significant reduction of 6.5% (p-value: 0.001) in diarrhea cases was observed, demonstrating the protocol’s effectiveness. Similarly, in the Central and Eastern regions, the protocol had significant positive impacts, with reductions of 10% and 11%, respectively (both p-values: 0.001). The Greater Accra region experienced the most substantial impact, with a significant 24% reduction (p-value: 0.001). The Northern region followed with a 19% reduction (p-value: 0.001), also experienced a significant reduction. Ashanti, Upper East, and Upper West regions demonstrated reductions of 11%, 11%, and 10%, respectively (p-values: 0.003), while the Volta region saw a 14% reduction (p-value: 0.001) (Table 3).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Discussion
Ghana, like many countries worldwide, saw a significant shift in public health strategies with the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Hand hygiene became one of the several measures introduced during the pandemic in Ghana by the government. Scientific evidence indicates that hand hygiene is one of the most efficient measures of controlling infections [30,31]. For instance, a Cochrane meta-analysis brought to light sufficient evidence that hand hygiene is a very cost-effective preventive measure in reducing gastrointestinal infections including diarrheal diseases [32,33].
This study examined the relationship between the incidence of diarrhea cases in Ghana and the adoption of hand hygiene throughout the COVID-19 period. The data spanned from February 2018 to March 2022, incorporating the pre- hand hygiene protocol and hand hygiene protocol periods to discern trends in diarrhea cases nationwide and across various regions within Ghana.
The findings from both descriptive statistics from national and sub-national analyses revealed a notable reduction in diarrheal cases following the COVID-19 hand hygiene regime.
The study’s findings demonstrate a significant decrease in diarrheal cases following the institution of COVID-19 hand hygiene protocols in Ghana. Twelve (12) out of the 16 regions saw significant reductions of diarrhea cases with the advent of the protocols. This agrees with a study conducted in Ethiopia with a nationwide reduction in the prevalence of diarrhea and pneumonia cases among under five children and variation in the administrative regions after hand hygiene practice was instituted [34].
The national-level study revealed a statistically significant difference between the average number of reported cases of diarrhea before and during the COVID-19 handwashing regimen’s adoption. The observed reduction of 13,463 cases (95% CI [5847.19, 21,078.81]) during the protocol implementation period reflects a substantial effect, suggesting a potential positive influence of enhanced hygiene practices on reducing diarrhoea morbidity [35].
Sub-national analyses further revealed regional variations on the effect of the hand hygiene protocol on diarrhea cases. Greater Accra region had biggest percentage reduction with 24% of the total diarrhea cases. This could be because, Greater Accra region was the hardest-hit region by COVID-19 [7,36], as compared to the other regions, hence it had more access to hand hygiene facilities and associated sensitization than the other regions or been more precautious than the others due to the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths occurring around them. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Greater Accra was termed as the “hotspot” area which led to the implementation of most of the COVID-19 restrictions such as lockdowns, restriction on public gatherings, the closure of borders in these regions for public safety and the institution of mandatory hand hygiene protocols at all public places [36,37]. Ghanaians residing in the Greater Accra region exhibited an increased level of consciousness regarding personal hygiene, while a subset of individuals held skepticism towards the legitimacy of these efforts [38]. Ghanaians had never been the best at washing their hands, even before the COVID-19 pandemic started. For example, some studies on the habits of Ghanaian adolescents in Accra found that most young people did not follow a hand hygiene practice [39,40].
According to Kyei-Arthur et al. (2023) regular washing of hands was the easiest COVID-19 preventive protocol practiced by individuals. This encouraged high compliance with the hand hygiene protocol. In Ghana, audio communications were used to address personal hygiene and hand washing in transport terminals, markets and other public areas within the regions [5]. Even though the number of hospital admissions for non-COVID-19 patients decreased, residents of communities showed initiative in improving their health. This strict adherence to established guidelines and a heightened emphasis on self-care practices may have resulted in the most substantial reduction in diarrheal diseases in these regions.
Several regions, including Ahafo, Central, Eastern, Greater Accra, Northern, Upper East, Upper West, and Volta, recorded statistically significant reductions in diarrheal cases during the protocol period. These reductions ranged from 6.5% to 24%, signifying the effectiveness of hand hygiene interventions in reducing diarrheal diseases within these regions.
It is crucial to remember, nevertheless, that not all regions saw statistically significant decreases. Some regions, such as Bono East, North-East, Oti, and Western North, demonstrated non-significant changes in diarrheal cases. This may be because these are newly created regions from the already existing 10 regions in Ghana and therefore the results observed might stem from variations in socio-economic factors, healthcare infrastructure, cultural practices, or other unmeasured contextual variables affecting the efficacy of the hand hygiene protocol in these areas.
By highlighting the importance of the handwashing regimen in preventing an estimated 11.0% (95% CI: -14%, -7.6%) of diarrhea cases worldwide, the causal effect analysis validated the reported reductions in diarrheal cases. The varied regional effects underscore the nuanced nature of the intervention’s effectiveness across different parts of Ghana.
The strengths of this paper are found in its detailed analysis that covers both national and sub-national levels and offers a nuanced understanding of the effect of the intervention. The absence of a control group and the use of OPD attendance as the possible confounding variable are some of limitations that could have an impact on the reported declines because of the use of secondary data.
Conclusion
The findings suggest an association between the implementation of COVID-19 hand hygiene protocols and reduced diarrheal disease burden in Ghana. This study demonstrates that the hand hygiene regimen that was implemented during COVID-19 in Ghana led to an 11% decrease in diarrheal infections, with regional variations. Twelve (12) out of the 16 regions showed significant reductions in diarrhea cases with the Greater Accra region (the hotspot of COVID-19 in Ghana) recording the highest reduction in diarrheal diseases during this period. Sustained and targeted public health interventions on hand hygiene practices are advocated to further mitigate diarrheal morbidity, particularly in regions where the effect was less pronounced.
Supporting information
S1 Data.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309202.s001
(XLS)
S2 Data.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309202.s002
(LOG)
References
1. 1. Kumar S. and Preetha G. S., “Health Promotion: An Effective Tool for Global Health,” Indian J. Community Med., vol. 37, no. 1, p. 5, Jan. 2012, pmid:22529532
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
2. 2. Lucero-Prisno D. E. I. I. I. et al., “Top ten public health challenges to track in 2022,” Public Heal. Challenges, vol. 1, no. 3, p. e21, Sep. 2022,
* View Article
* Google Scholar
3. 3. Giné-Garriga R. et al., “COVID-19 water, sanitation, and hygiene response: Review of measures and initiatives adopted by governments, regulators, utilities, and other stakeholders in 84 countries,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 795, p. 148789, Nov. 2021, pmid:34243010
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
4. 4. World health organization, “Weekly epidemiological update on COVID-19–8 June 2023.” Accessed: Aug. 11, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on-covid-19—8-june-2023.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
5. 5. Bonful H. A., Addo-Lartey A., Aheto J. M. K., Ganle J. K., Sarfo B., and Aryeetey R., “Limiting spread of COVID-19 in Ghana: Compliance audit of selected transportation stations in the Greater Accra region of Ghana,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 9, Sep. 2020, pmid:32915888
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
6. 6. Ghana Health Service, “COVID-19 Situation Dashboard | Ghana.” Accessed: Aug. 11, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ghs.gov.gh/covid19/dashboardm.php.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
7. 7. Kenu E. et al., “Epidemiology of COVID-19 outbreak in Ghana, 2020,” Ghana Med. J., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 5–15, Dec. 2020, pmid:33976436
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
8. 8. Dhandapani S. et al., “Comparison of hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers in Intensive care units and wards of COVID-19: A large scale multicentric study in India,” Am. J. Infect. Control, vol. 51, no. 3, p. 304, Mar. 2023, pmid:36223872
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
9. 9. Wichaidit W. et al., “Effectiveness of a large-scale handwashing promotion intervention on handwashing behaviour in Dhaka, Bangladesh,” Trop. Med. Int. Heal., vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 972–986, Aug. 2019, pmid:31173422
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
10. 10. Najnin N. et al., “Impact of adding hand-washing and water disinfection promotion to oral cholera vaccination on diarrhoea-associated hospitalization in Dhaka, Bangladesh: evidence from a cluster randomized control trial,” Int. J. Epidemiol., vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 2056–2066, Dec. 2017, pmid:29025064
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
11. 11. Rahman Zuthi M. F., Hossen M. A., Pal S. K., Mazumder M. H., Hasan S. M. F., and Hoque M. M., “Evaluating knowledge, awareness and associated water usage towards hand hygiene practices influenced by the current COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh,” Groundw. Sustain. Dev., vol. 19, p. 100848, Nov. 2022, pmid:36164324
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
12. 12. CDC, “Handwashing and hand sanitizer use at home, at play, and out and about,” 2023. Accessed: Aug. 11, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/45127.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
13. 13. WHO, “WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care: First Global Patient Safety Challenge Clean Care Is Safer Care—PubMed.” Accessed: Aug. 11, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23805438/.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
14. 14. Vandegrift R. et al., “Cleanliness in context: reconciling hygiene with a modern microbial perspective,” Microbiome, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 76, Jul. 2017, pmid:28705228
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
15. 15. Apanga P. A. and Kumbeni M. T., “Factors associated with diarrhoea and acute respiratory infection in children under-5 years old in Ghana: an analysis of a national cross-sectional survey,” BMC Pediatr., vol. 21, no. 1, Dec. 2021, pmid:33581716
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
16. 16. Saloni Dattani, Fiona Spooner, Hannah Ritchie, and Max Roser, “Diarrheal Diseases—Our World in Data.” Accessed: Aug. 11, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ourworldindata.org/diarrheal-diseases?ref=planksip-r.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
17. 17. Asamoah A., Ameme D. K., Sackey S. O., Nyarko K. M., and Afari E. A., “Diarrhoea morbidity patterns in Central Region of Ghana,” Pan Afr. Med. J., vol. 25, 2016, pmid:28149442
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
18. 18. Lian J. et al., “Epidemiological, clinical, and virological characteristics of 465 hospitalized cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) from Zhejiang province in China,” Influenza Other Respi. Viruses, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 564, Sep. 2020, pmid:32397011
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
19. 19. Uppal B., Perween N., Aggarwal P., and Kumar S. K., “A comparative study of bacterial and parasitic intestinal infections in India,” J. Clin. Diagn. Res., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. DC01–DC04, Mar. 2015, pmid:25954615
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
20. 20. Shrivastava A. K., Kumar S., Mohakud N. K., Suar M., and Sahu P. S., “Multiple etiologies of infectious diarrhea and concurrent infections in a pediatric outpatient-based screening study in Odisha, India,” Gut Pathog., vol. 9, no. 1, Apr. 2017, pmid:28400860
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
21. 21. Leslie R. A., Zhou S. S., and Macinga D. R., “Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 by commercially available alcohol-based hand sanitizers,” Am. J. Infect. Control, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 401–402, Mar. 2021, pmid:32818578
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
22. 22. Suen L. K. P., So Z. Y. Y., Yeung S. K. W., Lo K. Y. K., and Lam S. C., “Epidemiological investigation on hand hygiene knowledge and behaviour: a cross-sectional study on gender disparity,” BMC Public Health, vol. 19, no. 1, Apr. 2019, pmid:30975130
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
23. 23. Amegah K. E. et al., “Determinants of Hand Hygiene Practice at Critical Times among Food Handlers in Educational Institutions of the Sagnarigu Municipality of Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Study,” Environ. Health Insights, vol. 14, 2020, pmid:33088180
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
24. 24. Ofosu Addo Henry, “(PDF) Water Handling And Hygiene Practices On The Transmission Of Diarrhoeal Diseases And Soil Transmitted Helminthic Infections In Communities In Rural Ghana.” Accessed: Aug. 11, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327857707_Water_Handling_And_Hygiene_Practices_On_The_Transmission_Of_Diarrhoeal_Diseases_And_Soil_Transmitted_Helminthic_Infections_In_Communities_In_Rural_Ghana.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
25. 25. “Ghana Statistical Services.” Accessed: Nov. 24, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://statsghana.gov.gh/ghfactsheet.php.
26. 26. Kwabla M. P. et al., “Factors associated with COVID-19 knowledge among Ghanaians: A national survey,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 11, p. e0276381, Nov. 2022, pmid:36355696
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
27. 27. Brodersen K. H., Gallusser F., Koehler J., Remy N., and Scott S. L., “Inferring causal impact using bayesian structural time-series models,” Ann. Appl. Stat., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 247–274, 2015,
* View Article
* Google Scholar
28. 28. Carlson R. V., Boyd K. M., and Webb D. J., “The revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: Past, present and future,” Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol., vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 695–713, Jun. 2004, pmid:15151515
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
29. 29. DHIMS2, “District Health Information Management System 2 (DHIMS2).” Accessed: Jun. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://registry.betterehealth.eu/ehealth-solution/district-health-information-management-system-2-dhims2.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
30. 30. Aiello A. E. and Larson E. L., “What is the evidence for a causal link between hygiene and infections?,” Lancet Infect. Dis., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 103–110, Feb. 2002, pmid:11901641
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
31. 31. Aiello A. E., Coulborn R. M., Perez V., and Larson E. L., “Effect of Hand Hygiene on Infectious Disease Risk in the Community Setting: A Meta-Analysis,” Am. J. Public Health, vol. 98, no. 8, p. 1372, Aug. 2008, pmid:18556606
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
32. 32. Allegranzi B. and Pittet D., “Role of hand hygiene in healthcare-associated infection prevention,” J. Hosp. Infect., vol. 73, pp. 305–315, 2009, pmid:19720430
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
33. 33. Vaz Nery S. et al., “The role of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions in reducing soil-transmitted helminths: interpreting the evidence and identifying next steps,” Parasit. Vectors, vol. 12, no. 1, May 2019, pmid:31138266
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
34. 34. Negsso A. et al., “Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of acute diarrheal disease and pneumonia among under 5 children in Ethiopia- A database study,” PLOS Glob. public Heal., vol. 3, no. 6, Jun. 2023, pmid:37315030
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
35. 35. Sharma Waddington H. and Cairncross S., “PROTOCOL: Water, sanitation and hygiene for reducing childhood mortality in low- and middle-income countries,” Campbell Syst. Rev., vol. 17, no. 1, Mar. 2021, pmid:37050969
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
36. 36. Owusu A. B., Yiran G. A. B., Afagbedzi S. K., and Takyi E., “District-level analysis of socio-demographic factors and COVID-19 infections in Greater Accra and Ashanti regions, Ghana,” Front. Public Heal., vol. 11, 2023, pmid:37124776
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
37. 37. Dzisi E. K. J. and Dei O. A., “Adherence to social distancing and wearing of masks within public transportation during the COVID 19 pandemic,” Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect., vol. 7, Sep. 2020, pmid:34173465
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
38. 38. Kyei-Arthur F., Agyekum M. W., Afrifa-Anane G. F., Larbi R. T., and Kisaakye P., “Perceptions about COVID-19 preventive measures among Ghanaian women,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 4, Apr. 2023, pmid:37043460
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
39. 39. Omari R., Zotor F., Baah-Tuahene S., and Arthur W., “Handwashing knowledge, attitudes, and practices in Ghana,” J. Prev. Med. Hyg., vol. 63, no. 1, p. E59, Mar. 2022, pmid:35647375
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
40. 40. Oppong T. B., Yang H., Amponsem-Boateng C., and Duan G., “Hand Hygiene Habits of Ghanaian Youths in Accra,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 16, no. 11, Jun. 2019, pmid:31163599
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
Citation: Adu GA, Amegah KE, Addo HO, Andoh T, Duvor F, Antwi G, et al. (2024) Reduction in diarrhea cases following implementation of COVID-19 hand hygiene interventions in Ghana: A causal impact analysis. PLoS ONE 19(8): e0309202. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309202
About the Authors:
George Asumah Adu
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
E-mail: [email protected]
Affiliation: Public Health Division, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana
ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8412-7954
Kingsley E. Amegah
Roles: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Department of Data Science and Economic Policy, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana
Henry Ofosu Addo
Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Department of Industrial and Health Sciences, Takoradi Technical University, Sekondi-Takoradi, Ghana
Theresa Andoh
Roles: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
Ferguson Duvor
Roles: Data curation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Public Health Division, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana
Gladys Antwi
Roles: Data curation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Epidemiology Department, GFELTP, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
Nana Yaw Peprah
Roles: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Public Health Division, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana
Ernest Kenu
Roles: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Epidemiology Department, GFELTP, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
Franklin Asiedu Bekoe
Roles: Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Public Health Division, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana
Keziah L. Malm
Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Public Health Division, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana
[/RAW_REF_TEXT]
1. Kumar S. and Preetha G. S., “Health Promotion: An Effective Tool for Global Health,” Indian J. Community Med., vol. 37, no. 1, p. 5, Jan. 2012, pmid:22529532
2. Lucero-Prisno D. E. I. I. I. et al., “Top ten public health challenges to track in 2022,” Public Heal. Challenges, vol. 1, no. 3, p. e21, Sep. 2022,
3. Giné-Garriga R. et al., “COVID-19 water, sanitation, and hygiene response: Review of measures and initiatives adopted by governments, regulators, utilities, and other stakeholders in 84 countries,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 795, p. 148789, Nov. 2021, pmid:34243010
4. World health organization, “Weekly epidemiological update on COVID-19–8 June 2023.” Accessed: Aug. 11, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on-covid-19—8-june-2023.
5. Bonful H. A., Addo-Lartey A., Aheto J. M. K., Ganle J. K., Sarfo B., and Aryeetey R., “Limiting spread of COVID-19 in Ghana: Compliance audit of selected transportation stations in the Greater Accra region of Ghana,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 9, Sep. 2020, pmid:32915888
6. Ghana Health Service, “COVID-19 Situation Dashboard | Ghana.” Accessed: Aug. 11, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ghs.gov.gh/covid19/dashboardm.php.
7. Kenu E. et al., “Epidemiology of COVID-19 outbreak in Ghana, 2020,” Ghana Med. J., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 5–15, Dec. 2020, pmid:33976436
8. Dhandapani S. et al., “Comparison of hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers in Intensive care units and wards of COVID-19: A large scale multicentric study in India,” Am. J. Infect. Control, vol. 51, no. 3, p. 304, Mar. 2023, pmid:36223872
9. Wichaidit W. et al., “Effectiveness of a large-scale handwashing promotion intervention on handwashing behaviour in Dhaka, Bangladesh,” Trop. Med. Int. Heal., vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 972–986, Aug. 2019, pmid:31173422
10. Najnin N. et al., “Impact of adding hand-washing and water disinfection promotion to oral cholera vaccination on diarrhoea-associated hospitalization in Dhaka, Bangladesh: evidence from a cluster randomized control trial,” Int. J. Epidemiol., vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 2056–2066, Dec. 2017, pmid:29025064
11. Rahman Zuthi M. F., Hossen M. A., Pal S. K., Mazumder M. H., Hasan S. M. F., and Hoque M. M., “Evaluating knowledge, awareness and associated water usage towards hand hygiene practices influenced by the current COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh,” Groundw. Sustain. Dev., vol. 19, p. 100848, Nov. 2022, pmid:36164324
12. CDC, “Handwashing and hand sanitizer use at home, at play, and out and about,” 2023. Accessed: Aug. 11, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/45127.
13. WHO, “WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care: First Global Patient Safety Challenge Clean Care Is Safer Care—PubMed.” Accessed: Aug. 11, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23805438/.
14. Vandegrift R. et al., “Cleanliness in context: reconciling hygiene with a modern microbial perspective,” Microbiome, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 76, Jul. 2017, pmid:28705228
15. Apanga P. A. and Kumbeni M. T., “Factors associated with diarrhoea and acute respiratory infection in children under-5 years old in Ghana: an analysis of a national cross-sectional survey,” BMC Pediatr., vol. 21, no. 1, Dec. 2021, pmid:33581716
16. Saloni Dattani, Fiona Spooner, Hannah Ritchie, and Max Roser, “Diarrheal Diseases—Our World in Data.” Accessed: Aug. 11, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ourworldindata.org/diarrheal-diseases?ref=planksip-r.
17. Asamoah A., Ameme D. K., Sackey S. O., Nyarko K. M., and Afari E. A., “Diarrhoea morbidity patterns in Central Region of Ghana,” Pan Afr. Med. J., vol. 25, 2016, pmid:28149442
18. Lian J. et al., “Epidemiological, clinical, and virological characteristics of 465 hospitalized cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) from Zhejiang province in China,” Influenza Other Respi. Viruses, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 564, Sep. 2020, pmid:32397011
19. Uppal B., Perween N., Aggarwal P., and Kumar S. K., “A comparative study of bacterial and parasitic intestinal infections in India,” J. Clin. Diagn. Res., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. DC01–DC04, Mar. 2015, pmid:25954615
20. Shrivastava A. K., Kumar S., Mohakud N. K., Suar M., and Sahu P. S., “Multiple etiologies of infectious diarrhea and concurrent infections in a pediatric outpatient-based screening study in Odisha, India,” Gut Pathog., vol. 9, no. 1, Apr. 2017, pmid:28400860
21. Leslie R. A., Zhou S. S., and Macinga D. R., “Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 by commercially available alcohol-based hand sanitizers,” Am. J. Infect. Control, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 401–402, Mar. 2021, pmid:32818578
22. Suen L. K. P., So Z. Y. Y., Yeung S. K. W., Lo K. Y. K., and Lam S. C., “Epidemiological investigation on hand hygiene knowledge and behaviour: a cross-sectional study on gender disparity,” BMC Public Health, vol. 19, no. 1, Apr. 2019, pmid:30975130
23. Amegah K. E. et al., “Determinants of Hand Hygiene Practice at Critical Times among Food Handlers in Educational Institutions of the Sagnarigu Municipality of Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Study,” Environ. Health Insights, vol. 14, 2020, pmid:33088180
24. Ofosu Addo Henry, “(PDF) Water Handling And Hygiene Practices On The Transmission Of Diarrhoeal Diseases And Soil Transmitted Helminthic Infections In Communities In Rural Ghana.” Accessed: Aug. 11, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327857707_Water_Handling_And_Hygiene_Practices_On_The_Transmission_Of_Diarrhoeal_Diseases_And_Soil_Transmitted_Helminthic_Infections_In_Communities_In_Rural_Ghana.
25. “Ghana Statistical Services.” Accessed: Nov. 24, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://statsghana.gov.gh/ghfactsheet.php.
26. Kwabla M. P. et al., “Factors associated with COVID-19 knowledge among Ghanaians: A national survey,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 11, p. e0276381, Nov. 2022, pmid:36355696
27. Brodersen K. H., Gallusser F., Koehler J., Remy N., and Scott S. L., “Inferring causal impact using bayesian structural time-series models,” Ann. Appl. Stat., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 247–274, 2015,
28. Carlson R. V., Boyd K. M., and Webb D. J., “The revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: Past, present and future,” Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol., vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 695–713, Jun. 2004, pmid:15151515
29. DHIMS2, “District Health Information Management System 2 (DHIMS2).” Accessed: Jun. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://registry.betterehealth.eu/ehealth-solution/district-health-information-management-system-2-dhims2.
30. Aiello A. E. and Larson E. L., “What is the evidence for a causal link between hygiene and infections?,” Lancet Infect. Dis., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 103–110, Feb. 2002, pmid:11901641
31. Aiello A. E., Coulborn R. M., Perez V., and Larson E. L., “Effect of Hand Hygiene on Infectious Disease Risk in the Community Setting: A Meta-Analysis,” Am. J. Public Health, vol. 98, no. 8, p. 1372, Aug. 2008, pmid:18556606
32. Allegranzi B. and Pittet D., “Role of hand hygiene in healthcare-associated infection prevention,” J. Hosp. Infect., vol. 73, pp. 305–315, 2009, pmid:19720430
33. Vaz Nery S. et al., “The role of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions in reducing soil-transmitted helminths: interpreting the evidence and identifying next steps,” Parasit. Vectors, vol. 12, no. 1, May 2019, pmid:31138266
34. Negsso A. et al., “Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of acute diarrheal disease and pneumonia among under 5 children in Ethiopia- A database study,” PLOS Glob. public Heal., vol. 3, no. 6, Jun. 2023, pmid:37315030
35. Sharma Waddington H. and Cairncross S., “PROTOCOL: Water, sanitation and hygiene for reducing childhood mortality in low- and middle-income countries,” Campbell Syst. Rev., vol. 17, no. 1, Mar. 2021, pmid:37050969
36. Owusu A. B., Yiran G. A. B., Afagbedzi S. K., and Takyi E., “District-level analysis of socio-demographic factors and COVID-19 infections in Greater Accra and Ashanti regions, Ghana,” Front. Public Heal., vol. 11, 2023, pmid:37124776
37. Dzisi E. K. J. and Dei O. A., “Adherence to social distancing and wearing of masks within public transportation during the COVID 19 pandemic,” Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect., vol. 7, Sep. 2020, pmid:34173465
38. Kyei-Arthur F., Agyekum M. W., Afrifa-Anane G. F., Larbi R. T., and Kisaakye P., “Perceptions about COVID-19 preventive measures among Ghanaian women,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 4, Apr. 2023, pmid:37043460
39. Omari R., Zotor F., Baah-Tuahene S., and Arthur W., “Handwashing knowledge, attitudes, and practices in Ghana,” J. Prev. Med. Hyg., vol. 63, no. 1, p. E59, Mar. 2022, pmid:35647375
40. Oppong T. B., Yang H., Amponsem-Boateng C., and Duan G., “Hand Hygiene Habits of Ghanaian Youths in Accra,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 16, no. 11, Jun. 2019, pmid:31163599
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2024 Adu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Background
The human hand has constant contact with the environment, hence requires regular hand hygiene. Hand hygiene has gained recognition because of the COVID-19 pandemic and is a largely effective, affordable preventive measure against infectious diseases. This study used both national and sub-national analyses to evaluate the effect of COVID-19 handwashing guidelines on instances of diarrhea in Ghana.
Methods
Data on diarrhea cases spanning February 2018 and March 2022 were retrieved from the District Health Information Management System (DHIMS 2) using a data extraction guide. The data were summarized using descriptive statistics. The difference in diarrhea cases between the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods was measured using a two-sample t-test across Ghana’s 16 administrative areas. Causal Impact package in R statistical software was employed to determine the impact of the introduction of COVID-19 hand hygiene protocols on diarrheal disease.
Results
A total of 5,645,533 diarrheal cases reported between February 2018 and March 2022 through the routine MIS (DHIMS2) were examined. Fifty-three percent of the cases occurred before the introduction of the hand hygiene protocol. Descriptive statistics indicated a statistically significant decrease in average diarrheal cases during the hand hygiene implementation era (13,463 cases reduction, p<0.001). Sub-national analyses revealed significant reductions in various regions: Greater Accra, Ashanti, Ahafo, Central, Eastern, Northern, Upper East, Upper West, and Volta (p<0.05). Causal impact analysis confirmed 11.0% nationwide reduction in diarrheal cases attributed to the COVID-19 hand hygiene protocols (p<0.001).
Conclusion
This study underscores the effectiveness of COVID-19 hand hygiene protocols in reducing diarrheal morbidity in Ghana, with varying regional impacts. These findings advocate for the sustenance of investments and commitments made at the COVID hand hygiene protocols, particularly in this era where the pandemic appears controlled.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer