Full text

Turn on search term navigation

© 2024 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See:  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.

Abstract

Introduction

Treating older adults with chemotherapy remains a challenge, given their under-representation in clinical trials and the lack of robust treatment guidelines for this population. Moreover, older patients, especially those with frailty, have an increased risk of developing chemotherapy-related toxicity, resulting in a decreased quality of life (QoL), increased hospitalisations and high healthcare costs. Phase II trials have suggested that upfront dose reduction of chemotherapy can reduce toxicity rates while maintaining efficacy, leading to fewer treatment discontinuations and an improved QoL. The DOSAGE aims to show that upfront dose-reduced chemotherapy in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer is non-inferior to full-dose treatment in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), with adaption of the treatment plan (monotherapy or doublet chemotherapy) based on expected risk of treatment toxicity.

Methods and analysis

The DOSAGE study is an investigator-initiated phase III, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial in patients aged≥70 years with metastatic colorectal cancer eligible for palliative chemotherapy. Based on toxicity risk, assessed using the Geriatric 8 (G8) tool, patients will be stratified to either doublet chemotherapy (fluoropyrimidine with oxaliplatin) or fluoropyrimidine monotherapy. Patients classified as low risk will be randomised between a fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin in either full-dose or with an upfront dose reduction of 25%. Patients classified as high risk will be randomised between fluoropyrimidine monotherapy in either full-dose or with an upfront dose reduction. In the dose-reduced arm, dose escalation after two cycles is allowed. The primary outcome is PFS. Secondary endpoints include grade≥3 toxicity, QoL, physical functioning, number of treatment cycles, dose reductions, hospital admissions, overall survival, cumulative received dosage and cost-effectiveness. Considering a median PFS of 8 months and non-inferiority margin of 8 weeks, we shall include 587 patients. The study will be enrolled in 36 Dutch Hospitals, with enrolment scheduled to start in July 2024. This study will provide new evidence regarding the effect of dose-reduced chemotherapy on survival and treatment outcomes, as well as the use of the G8 to choose between doublet chemotherapy or monotherapy. Results will contribute to a more individualised approach in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, potentially leading to improved QoL while maintaining survival benefits.

Ethics and dissemination

This trial has received ethical approval by the ethical committee Leiden Den Haag Delft (P24.018) and will be approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of the participating institutions. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

Trial registration number

NCT06275958.

Details

Title
DOSAGE study: protocol for a phase III non-inferiority randomised trial investigating dose-reduced chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer in older patients
Author
Baltussen, Joosje C 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Frederiek van den Bos 2 ; Slingerland, Marije 1 ; Binda, Trishika R R 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Gerrit-Jan Liefers 3 ; Wilbert B van den Hout 4 ; Fiocco, Marta 5 ; Verschoor, Arjan J 6 ; Marissa Cloos-van Balen 7 ; Holterhues, Cynthia 8 ; Houtsma, Danny 8 ; Jochems, Anouk 9 ; Leontine E A M M Spierings 10 ; Leti van Bodegom-Vos 4 ; Mooijaart, Simon P 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Gelderblom, Hans 1 ; Speetjens, Frank M 1 ; de Glas, Nienke A 1 ; Johanneke E A Portielje 1 

 Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands 
 Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; LUMC Center for Medicine for Older People, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands 
 Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands 
 Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section of Medical Decision Making, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands 
 Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands; Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands 
 Department of Medical Oncology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands 
 Department of Internal Medicine, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands 
 Department of Medical Oncology, Haga Hospital, Den Haag, The Netherlands 
 Department of Medical Oncology, Medisch Centrum Haaglanden Westeinde, Den Haag, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands 
10  Department of Internal Medicine, Alrijne Hospital Leiden, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands 
First page
e089882
Section
Oncology
Publication year
2024
Publication date
2024
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
e-ISSN
20446055
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
3099069493
Copyright
© 2024 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See:  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.