Abstract

During conversation, people often endeavor to convey information in an understandable way (finding common ground) while also sharing novel or surprising information (exploring new ground). Here, we test how friends and strangers balance these two strategies to connect with each other. Using fMRI hyperscanning, we measure a preference for common ground as convergence over time and exploring new ground as divergence over time by tracking dyads’ neural and linguistic trajectories over the course of semi-structured intimacy-building conversations. In our study, 60 dyads (30 friend dyads) engaged in a real-time conversation with discrete prompts and demarcated turns. Our analyses reveal that friends diverge neurally and linguistically: their neural patterns become more dissimilar over time and they explore more diverse topics. In contrast, strangers converge: neural patterns and language become more similar over time. The more a conversation between strangers resembles the exploratory conversations of friends, the more they enjoy it. Our results highlight exploring new ground as a strategy for a successful conversation.

People employ different conversational strategies to establish social connection. Here, the authors use fMRI hyperscanning to track neural and linguistic trajectories during naturalistic conversation to show that friends diverge, exploring new ground, while strangers converge, seeking common ground.

Details

Title
Hyperscanning shows friends explore and strangers converge in conversation
Author
Speer, Sebastian P. H. 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Mwilambwe-Tshilobo, Laetitia 2 ; Tsoi, Lily 3 ; Burns, Shannon M. 4 ; Falk, Emily B. 5 ; Tamir, Diana I. 6 

 Princeton University, Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton, USA (GRID:grid.16750.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 5006) 
 Princeton University, Department of Psychology, Princeton, USA (GRID:grid.16750.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 5006); University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg School for Communication, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972) 
 Caldwell University, Department of Psychology, Caldwell, USA (GRID:grid.448604.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0383 182X) 
 Pomona College, Department of Psychological Science, Claremont, USA (GRID:grid.262007.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2161 0463); Pomona College, Department of Neuroscience, Claremont, USA (GRID:grid.262007.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2161 0463) 
 University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg School for Communication, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972); University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychology, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972); University of Pennsylvania, Wharton Marketing Department, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972); University of Pennsylvania, Operations, Information, and Decisions Department, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972) 
 Princeton University, Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton, USA (GRID:grid.16750.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 5006); Princeton University, Department of Psychology, Princeton, USA (GRID:grid.16750.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 5006) 
Pages
7781
Publication year
2024
Publication date
2024
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
e-ISSN
20411723
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
3101005730
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.