It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In the last two decades, an exponentially growing number of meta-analyses (MAs) synthesize thousands of peer-reviewed studies on the environmental impacts of farming practices (FPs). This paper describes the iMAP-FP evidence library, a comprehensive dataset on the effects of 34 categories of FPs (such as agronomic practices, cropping and livestock systems, land management options and mitigation techniques) on 34 impacts including climate mitigation, soil health, environmental pollution, water use, nutrients cycling, biodiversity, and agricultural productivity. Through systematic screening, 570 MAs published since 2000 were selected and categorized according to the type of FP. We assessed their impacts, the geographic regions covered, and their quality. We extracted 3,811 effects and their statistical significance associated with sustainable FPs (intervention) compared to a control (typically conventional agriculture) across 223 different intervention-control pairs. Our dataset is accompanied with an online free-access library, which includes a catalogue of synthetic reports summarizing the available evidence on each evaluated FP.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Mantegazza, Otho 4 ; Guerrero, Irene 1 ; Bielza, Maria 5 ; Assouline, Michael 1 ; Koeble, Renate 6 ; Dentener, Frank 1 ; Van der Velde, Marijn 1
; Rega, Carlo 7 ; Furlan, Andrea 7 ; Paracchini, Maria Luisa 1 ; Weiss, Franz 1 ; Angileri, Vincenzo 1 ; Terres, Jean-Michel 1 ; Makowski, David 2
1 Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission, Ispra, Italy (GRID:grid.434554.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 1758 4137)
2 AgroParisTech, University Paris-Saclay, INRAe, Palaiseau, France (GRID:grid.417885.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2185 8223)
3 University of Bari Aldo Moro, Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences (DiSSPA – Entomology and Zoology), Bari, Italy (GRID:grid.7644.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0120 3326)
4 University of Milano, Department of Bioscience, Milano, Italy (GRID:grid.4708.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 2822)
5 s.r.l., Seidor Italy, Milano, Italy (GRID:grid.434554.7)
6 ARHS Developments, Belvaux, Luxembourg (GRID:grid.434554.7)
7 Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium (GRID:grid.270680.b)




