A Comparative Study of Ni-Based Catalysts Prepared by Various Sol–Gel Routes

Abstract

The use of heterogeneous catalysts to increase the development of green chemistry is a rapidly growing area of research to save industry money. In this paper, mesoporous SiO₂-Al₂O₃ mixed oxide supports with various Si/Al ratios were prepared using two different sol–gel routes: hydrolytic sol–gel (HSG) and non-hydrolytic sol–gel (NHSG). The HSG route was investigated in both acidic and basic media, while the NHSG was explored in the presence of ethanol and diisopropyl ether as oxygen donors. The resulting SiO₂-Al₂O₃ mixed oxide supports were characterized using EDX, N₂ physisorption, powder XRD, ²⁹Si, ²⁷Al MAS-NMR and NH₃-TPD. The mesoporous SiO₂-Al₂O₃ supports prepared by NHSG seemed to be more regularly distributed and also more acidic. Consequently, a simple one-step NHSG (ether and alcohol routes) was selected to prepare mesoporous and acidic SiO₂-Al₂O₃-NiO mixed oxide catalysts, which were then evaluated in ethylene oligomerization. The samples prepared by the NHSG ether route showed better activity than those prepared by the NHSG alcohol route in the oligomerization of ethylene at 150 °C.

1. Introduction

Ethylene oligomerization is one of the most important processes used to produce higher olefins. It provides the raw materials for the production of plastics, lubricants, surfactants, alcohols, etc. In the literature, many studies deal with the use of homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts in ethylene oligomerization [1]. In accordance with the principles of sustainable chemistry, the development of heterogeneous catalysts and processes has been investigated in order to overcome problems and improve existing processes [2]. Several solid catalysts have been explored over the years as metal–organic frameworks, covalent organic framework materials and supported metal on inorganic porous supports, often prepared by a multi-step process [3]. For example, mesoporous aluminosilicates that contain nickel have demonstrated promising catalytic activity and selectivity in olefin oligomerization [3,4]. Since these catalysts with nickel ions also contain acid sites, they are actually bifunctional catalysts. It is commonly recognized that the isolated nickel ions contribute to the ethylene oligomerization process that produces 1-olefins, while the isomerization of primary olefins is catalyzed by acid sites. The result of these reactions is a combination of C4-, C6- and C8-olefins [5]. Oxides and mixed oxides with interesting chemical characteristics (acidity, basicity or redox properties) are used in heterogeneous catalysis, such as in oil refining, environmental catalysis and fine chemicals synthesis [4]. A wide range of materials could be used as supports on which the active phase is stabilized and dispersed. Simple metal oxides, including silica, alumina, aluminum silicates and titanates, are the most common [6]. Starting from metal molecular precursors, oxo bridges between metal atoms are formed by hydrolysis, and polycondensation reactions via the hydrolytic sol–gel process (HSG), which has been very successful in this area [7,8]. HSG offers many adjustable synthesis variables, such as the nature and concentration of precursors, the quantity of water, temperature, solvent, catalysis, drying and aging conditions. One of the major disadvantages of HSG is that it is a multi-step process and is more restrictive; the molecular precursors could have different reaction rates, leading to possible inhomogeneity [9,10]. In the case of mixed oxide synthesis, the homogeneity is clearly correlated to the two–steps of the HSG process: the hydrolysis and polycondensation rates of the precursors. Thus, to control the homogeneity in multi-component systems, the control of the reactivity of each precursor is necessary [9,11]. To resolve this problem, several methods have been investigated [12]. In the last three decades, another sol–gel synthesis pathway has been developed. Its originality comes from the chemical reactions involved in this process. The oxo bridges are formed by the reactions of metal chlorides with an oxygen donor other than water (for example, alkoxides, ethers, alcohols, etc.). The “non-hydrolytic” sol–gel (NHSG) term was proposed by Vioux and coworkers [13]. Since then, this process has been investigated and developed to prepare materials with different morphologies and physicochemical properties for various applications [14,15]. A sol–gel method is considered non-hydrolytic or non-aqueous if the oxygen donor used is not water and if no water is formed during the synthesis; therefore, it uses completely different condensation reactions from those used in an aqueous method. Many NHSG routes have been described that involve various precursors with various oxygen donors [12,16]. NHSG routes, particularly those that use alkoxides or organic ethers as oxygen donors to condense chloride precursors (“alkoxide route”) or ethers (“ether route”), have long been known as simple and efficient methods to prepare homogenous mixed oxide xerogels with mesoporous textures [4]. In comparison to the alkoxide and the ether routes, the alcohol route has received much less attention for the preparation of oxides and mixed oxides [12]. It is formed by the action of alcohols on halides. Bourget et al. reported the synthesis of silica by the alcohol route [17] using a solvent-free non-hydrolytic condensation reaction between silicon tetrachloride and benzyl alcohol as the oxygen donor. The reactions involved in the alcohol route depend on the nature of the alcohol—either primary, secondary or tertiary alcohol. A recent study showed that the oxygen donor has an influence on the morphology, the texture, the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity and the catalytic activity of the final material [18].

In this work, we prepared SiO₂-Al₂O₃ supports using classical HSG (acidic and basic media) and NHSG routes (alcohol and ether routes). Because SiO₂-Al₂O₃ supports prepared by NHSG presented more regularly distributed samples and more acidity, they were selected to prepare SiO₂-Al₂O₃-NiO mixed oxide catalysts and test their catalytic activity in the ethylene oligomerization reaction.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Mixed Oxides

Scheme 1 exhibited the experimental conditions for material syntheses following HSG in Acidic Media (AM) and basic media (BM), and NHSG using the ether route (ER) and alcohol route (AR) as oxygen donors.

The composition of samples was determined by EDX analysis. Texture and acidity were characterized for mixed oxides and catalysts, as shown in Table 1. The samples were labeled SixAly(Niz), where x, y and z represent the nominal SiO₂, Al₂O₃ and NiO weight loadings, respectively.

The EDX demonstrates that the experimental weight percentages were close to the expected ones, based on the amounts of reactants, showing that all of the Si and Al atoms (for supports) and Si, Al and Ni atoms (for catalysts) were included in the final oxide. The same behavior was shown when silica-alumina and nickel were prepared by the sol-gel route [19]. The N₂ adsorption–desorption measurements were performed, showing that the texture of all samples depended on the Si/Al ratio and the synthetic route. As shown in Table 1, the average pore diameter (Dp) ranged between 2.7 and 6.5 nm, indicating the mesoporosity of all samples. Samples prepared via HSG showed higher textural properties (in terms of S_BET, Vp and Dp) than those obtained via NHSG. Agliullin et al. noticed the same observation when they used sol–gel processes to prepare porous silica–alumina [20]. For SixAlyNiz mixed oxides, samples prepared by NHSG (the ether route) showed better texture properties than those prepared by NHSG (the alcohol route). Alumina prepared by the ether route also showed a higher specific surface area than one prepared following the alcohol route [18]. The ²⁹Si and ²⁷Al solid-state NMR provides information on the structure of the aluminosilicate network. In the ²⁹Si CP-MAS NMR spectra, all samples exhibited broad resonances (Figure 1), which are typical of amorphous materials [21,22].

In this work, the SixAly supports were composed of amorphous silica, and thus, only Q^N signals were expected. The signal is more or less wide (from −115 ppm to −70 ppm) depending on synthesis conditions for the aluminosilicate mixed oxides containing the same amount of Al (Si₁₀Al₉₀). The ²⁹Si MAS NMR spectrum of the HSG-BM-Si10Al90 consisted of a broad, dissymmetric signal centered at about −95 ppm, indicating different environments of the Si atoms and suggesting a contribution of Q² (−90 ppm), Q³ (−100 ppm) and possibly Q⁴ (−110 ppm) species.

It must be noted that the CP-MAS sequence favors Si nuclei close to protons; thus, these spectra cannot be used to quantify the concentration of each site. Similar ²⁹Si CP-MAS NMR spectra have been reported for mesoporous silica–alumina with a high Al content [23]. In amorphous silica–alumina, the incorporation of a large amount of aluminum in the silica network led to a significant low-field shift of the resonances, indicating the extensive formation of Si-O-Al bridges. A higher low-field shift was observed for the catalyst prepared by NHSG (in red, Figure 1), suggesting a better distribution of Al atoms in the silica matrix and a possible effect of Ni atoms in the electronic environment of Si atoms. The ²⁷Al solid-state MAS NMR spectra (Figure 2) exhibited broad resonances around 70 ppm, 35 ppm and 5 ppm, ascribed to tetra-coordinated (Al^IV), penta-coordinated (Al^V) and hexa-coordinated (Al^VI) aluminum sites respectively [24,25,26].

The tetra-coordinated and hexa-coordinated Al sites are the dominant Al coordinations on alumina and silica–alumina and are associated with introducing Brønsted and Lewis acidity on silica–alumina materials, respectively. The NHSG samples exhibited a higher peak intensity of penta-coordinated aluminum sites than those prepared by HSG. Rarely observed in silica–alumina, the Al^V sites are potential unsaturated Al species, like Al^IV ones, and thus, could be considered available for the formation of Brønsted acid sites [27]. This increase in Al^V concentration at the expense of Al^IV is promising for enhancing both surface Lewis acidity and Brønsted acidity in the NHSG samples. The signal corresponding to the Al^IV sites shifted upfield when the SiO₂ loading increased (Figure 3).

This effect has been previously ascribed to the decreased concentration of aluminum atoms around Al sites [23]. The addition of tetra-coordinated Si atoms in alumina leads to an increase in Al^IV and Al^V sites at the expense of Al^VI ones. This effect is more appreciable in the NHSG samples, suggesting the insertion of AlO₄ tetrahedra in the silica network and a better homogeneity.

The X-ray diffractograms of the silica–alumina mixed oxides prepared by HSG and NHSG are shown in Figures S1 and S2. The XRD measurements showed that the structure of materials depended on the synthesis route. A gamma-alumina phase is detected in the alumina-rich samples prepared by the HSG routes (acidic and basic media) [28,29]. Samples prepared by the NHSG (ether and alcohol routes) are amorphous [30]. The diffractograms of the NHSG catalysts exhibited reflections at 2θ = 37.3°, 43.3°, 62.9° and 76.5°. These values are clearly related to the presence of NiO crystallites [31]. The estimation of particle sizes (from the width of the (200) reflection at 43.3°) is around 25 nm for these two alumina-rich catalysts (Figure S3).

The acidity of supports (Si_xAl_y) and catalysts was determined using temperature-programmed desorption of ammonia (NH₃-TPD). Unfortunately, this technique does not allow discrimination between the acidity that comes from Brønsted and Lewis acidic sites. Table 1 summarizes the total acidity measured for the prepared supports and catalysts. The supports (Si_xAl_y) prepared by NHSG showed higher acidity in terms of the total amount of desorbed NH₃ and density of acidic sites than those prepared by the HSG routes. As shown by the ²⁷Al solid-state NMR study, increasing the concentration of Al^IV and Al^V sites in the NHSG supports enhances their acidity. The SixAlyNiz ternary mixed oxides were prepared following the promising NHSG process. This good choice was confirmed by the high acidity values reached for the four catalysts. The samples prepared by the ether route showed slightly higher acidity than those prepared by the alcohol route. This phenomenon of increasing acidity with increasing Al₂O₃ content is characteristic of silica–alumina, independently of the synthesis process. It was employed for rhenium–silicon–aluminum mixed oxides prepared by a one-step NHSG [32]. Rajagopal et al. carried out a study on the acidity of silica–alumina supports with different percentages of Al₂O₃ prepared by HSG [33]. They demonstrated that with 25% alumina, the acidity was maximum, and the majority of Lewis acid sites were acidic. According to Scokart et al., the acidity of silica–alumina is greater for compositions containing 5 to 25% Al₂O₃ [34]. The high Brønsted acidity of silica–alumina is attributed to hydroxyl groups in the “Si-O-Al mixed phase”. The debate still exists on the structure of these sites in amorphous materials [35]. The Si-O-Al oxo bridge, thus formed by an intimate mixture of silicon and aluminum atoms, is charged more negatively than the oxygen of an Al-OH or a Si-OH. These species are, therefore, likely to generate stronger acidity. These results showed that the acidic properties of the NHSG samples are clearly linked to the structure of the amorphous silica–alumina and especially to the coordination of aluminum, as previously reported [36].

2.2. Catalyst Tests of Ternary Mixed Oxides

NHSG was used to prepare the ternary mixed oxides using a one-step process. This choice was due to the fact that this easy-to-implement process made it possible to prepare homogeneous mixed oxides with good texture and high acidity. Two compositions (Si/Al = 0 and 0.1) and two synthesis conditions were investigated (ether and alcohol routes), leading to the preparation of four catalysts (Table 2).

The Ni-based catalysts were tested in the ethylene oligomerization (Scheme 2).

The reaction was conducted at various experimental conditions: T = 150–350 °C, P = 3.5 MPa and mass hourly space velocity (WHSV) = 10 h⁻¹ (Table S1). Under these conditions, butenes (C4), hexenes (C6) and octenes (C8) were the major products, and only small amounts of olefins with ≥10 carbon atoms were formed. In the C4 fraction, two n-butene isomers were detected: 1-C4 and 2-C4 (cis and trans stereoisomers). As shown in Table 2, the catalysts prepared by the ether route showed higher activity and conversion than those prepared by the alcohol route. However, the C4 selectivity was better for the SixAlyNiz catalysts prepared by the alcohol route.

As shown by XRD, all samples exhibited the presence of NiO crystallites. The higher activity of Si₀Al₉₀Ni₁₀ and Si₁₀Al₈₀Ni₁₀ catalysts prepared by the ether route cannot be explained by a texture effect as these two samples have a near-specific surface area compared to the samples prepared by the alcohol route. The TPD measurements showed that samples prepared by the alcohol route exhibited slightly less acidity and probably higher Brønsted acid sites. The lower catalytic activity of the samples prepared by the alcohol route could be attributed to the existence of isolated Ni²⁺ and Brønsted acidic sites not engaged in the formation of Ni²⁺-Brønsted catalytic sites [37]. We attributed the lower selectivity of the catalysts prepared by the ether route to their higher acidity. Indeed, it is well known that the formation of heavy oligomers from the C4 first product is due to strong acidity [38].

3. Materials and Methods

The SiO₂-Al₂O₃ mixed oxides with two Si/Al ratios (0.0 and 0.1) were synthesized using the following as molecular precursors: tetraethylorthosilicate TEOS (Si(OC₂H₅)₄ 98% from Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), silicon tetrachloride (SiCl₄ 99.98% from Alfa Aesar, Haverhill, MA, USA), aluminum trichloride (AlCl₃ 99.98% from Alfa Aesar, Haverhill, MA, USA) and aluminum isopropoxide (Al(OCH(CH₃)₂)₃ 98% from Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). For the NHSG synthesis, the oxygen donors were dry ⁱPr₂O (H₂O < 4 ppm) and dry CH₂Cl₂ (H₂O < 6 ppm). They were purchased from Aldrich with 99% purity. The drying of these products was realized using an inert SPS (solvent purification system) from Innovative Technology.

3.1. Supports Synthesis

HSG synthesis. A colloidal SiO₂ sol was prepared using TEOS, ethanol and water (1:1:2 volume ratio) in an acidic medium (pH = 1.5, adjusted with HCl). A transparent sol was obtained after stirring the solution for 1 h at room temperature. An Al₂O₃ sol was prepared following Yoldas’ method, starting from an Al(OCH(CH₃)₂)₃ molecular precursor [28,39]. By mixing and stirring the SiO₂ and Al₂O₃ sols, the SiO₂-Al₂O₃ sol was prepared. After aging, the obtained gel was washed with solvents (ethanol, acetone and diethyl ether) successively. The material was dried at room temperature under vacuum for 1 h and for 4 h at 120 °C. The xerogel was crushed and calcined in air at 500 °C for 5 h (at 10 °C min⁻¹).

NHSG synthesis. SiO₂-Al₂O₃ mixed oxides were synthesized under an argon atmosphere (glove box and Schlenk line), starting from SiCl₄ and AlCl₃ as molecular precursors. The reactants were dissolved in 10 mL of dry CH₂Cl₂ inside an autoclave. Following the ether route, the number of moles of ⁱPr₂O was determined from the number of Cl and acac groups. However, in the alcohol route, an excess of alcohol (25 mL) was added. The reaction was realized in an autoclave at 110 °C for a duration of 4 days. The obtained materials were washed (CH₂Cl₂), dried under vacuum and then for 4 h at 120 °C, crushed and calcined in air at 500 °C for 5 h.

Catalysts synthesis. The SiO₂-Al₂O₃-NiO mixed oxides with two Si/Al ratios (0.0 and 0.1) and a NiO content of 10 wt.% were synthesized using the NHSG process. The nickel bis(acetylacetonate) (Ni(acac)₂, Alfa Aesar, Haverhill, MA, USA, 95%) was used as a molecular precursor and mixed with Si and Al ones at the beginning of the synthesis. All the rest of the procedure was the same as described for the NHSG SiAl supports.

3.2. Characterizations

The atomic percentages of Si and Al were obtained by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Measurements were performed using an X-Max Silicon Drift detector mounted on an FEI Quanta FEG 200 scanning electron microscope. The data for each sample are the average of three different measurements to ensure accurate results in the analyses. X-ray powder diffractograms (XRD) were obtained on a Philips X-pert Pro II diffractometer using Kα copper Cu radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) as a radiation source. The solid-state ²⁹Si CP-MAS NMR spectra were recorded on a 59.6 MHz VARIAN VNMRS 300 spectrometer with a MAS (magic angle spinning) probe and 7.5 mm zirconia rotors, using a cross-polarization sequence (CP) with a 3 ms contact time, a 5 s recycling delay and a 5 kHz spinning frequency. The solid-state ²⁷Al NMR spectra were recorded on a 104.26 MHz VARIAN VNMRS 400 spectrometer with a MAS (magic angle rotation) probe with 3.2 mm zirconia rotors, using a single pulse sequence with ¹H decoupling, pulses of 1 μs (corresponding to a pulse angle of π/12), a recycling time of 1 s and a spinning frequency of 20 kHz. The N₂ sorption experiments were carried out at 77 K on a Tristar instrument from Micrometrics. The outgassing of the calcined samples took place overnight at 150 °C under vacuum (2 Pa). The acidity was measured by temperature-programmed desorption of ammonia (NH₃-TPD) on a Micromeritics AutoChem 2910 apparatus with a thermal conductivity detector.

4. Conclusions

Different sol–gel methods, in hydrolytic conditions (acid and basic media) and non-hydrolytic ones (EtOH and ether routes), were successfully used to easily prepare binary and ternary mixed oxides from non-expensive precursors. The silica–alumina supports with two silicon–aluminum ratios (0 and 0.1) were synthesized following these two processes. The sol–gel methods led to very good control of composition. The N₂-adsorption–desorption showed that all samples were mesoporous. The texture strongly depended on the composition and on experimental synthesis (medium, solvent, molecular precursors, etc.). The XRD measurements showed that the structure of materials depended on the synthesis route. A gamma–alumina phase was detected only in the alumina-rich samples prepared by the HSG routes. The supports prepared by NHSG showed higher acidity in terms of total desorbed ammonia and density of acid sites than those prepared by HSG. A better distribution of Al atoms in the silica matrix and a higher acidity for the NHSG samples were revealed by solid-state NMR and NH₃-TPD investigations, respectively. Considering these interesting and well-adapted properties for ethylene oligomerization and despite lower specific surface areas, the NHSG process was selected to prepare ternary SixAlyNiz mixed oxide catalysts. We showed that the catalysis activity in ethylene oligomerization was correlated with the synthesis route of sample preparation. Independent of the temperature reaction, the Ni-based catalysts prepared by the ether route showed higher activity than those prepared by the alcohol route, which exhibited higher selectivity in butene. We attributed these results to differences in the types of acidic sites correlated with Ni-active sites. NHSG has emerged as a simple but powerful method to prepare mesoporous multinary oxide materials, affording one-step syntheses of improved catalysts. In addition, its versatility allows the easy incorporation of dopants such as molybdenum oxide, providing unique opportunities for the discovery of new SiAlNiMo catalysts with superior catalytic performances in ethylene oligomerization.

Author Contributions

A.A.K.: conceptualization, investigation, formal analysis and writing—original draft. K.B.: writing—original draft, review and editing. R.D.A.: Conceptualiza tion, Investigation, Formal analysis. A.M.: writing—review and editing. V.H.: writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of this manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

A.A.K. acknowledges the support of the Iraq Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research (MOHESR).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Figures, Schemes and Tables

Scheme 1. Experimental conditions for materials syntheses following the hydrolytic sol-gel process (HSG) in acidic Media (AM) and basic media (BM) and non-hydrolytic sol-gel using the ether route (ER) and alcohol route (AR) as oxygen donors.

Figure 1. 29Si CP−MAS NMR spectra of prepared Si10Al90 samples following the HSG in Acidic Media (AM) and basic media (BM) and NHSG using the ether route (ER) and alcohol route (AR) as oxygen donors.

Figure 2. 27Al MAS NMR spectra of prepared Si0Al100 samples following HSG in Acidic Media (AM) and basic media (BM) and NHSG using ether route (ER) and alcohol route (AR) as oxygen donors.

Figure 3. 27Al MAS NMR spectra of prepared Si10Al90 samples following HSG in Acidic Media (AM) and basic media (BM) and NHSG using ether route (ER) and alcohol route (AR) as oxygen donors.

Scheme 2. Reaction equation of the formation of C4, C6 and C8 olefins.

Table 1

Expected and experimental composition, texture and acidity of Si_xAl_y samples prepared by different sol–gel routes and Si_xAl_yNi_z samples prepared by NHSG (ether and alcohol routes).

Samples	Route	Expected and Experimental Compositions (wt.%)				Texture				Acidity
		Si/Al	SiO2	Al2O3	NiO	SSA a (m2g−1)	Vp b (cm3g−1)	Dp c (nm)	SSA d µ/(m2g−1)	Total Desorbed-NH3 (mmol g−1)	Density (NH3 nm−2)
Si0Al100	Acidic HSG	0.0 (0.0)	0.0 (0.0)	100.0 (99.7)	-	375	0.4	4.8	40	1.0	1.6
Si0Al100	Basic HSG	0.0 (0.0)	0.0 (0.0)	100.0 (99.7)	-	340	0.4	4.0	42	0.9	1.6
Si0Al100	EtOH NHSG	0.0 (0.0)	0.0 (0.0)	100.0 (99.7)	-	360	0.2	3.1	55	2.8	4.7
Si0Al100	Ether NHSG	0.0 (0.0)	0.0 (0.0)	100.0 (99.9)	-	297	0.4	4.0	35	2.9	5.9
Si10Al90	Acidic HSG	0.1 (0.1)	10.0 (10.3)	90.0 (89.7)	-	286	0.3	4.4	70	1.3	2.7
Si10Al90	Basic HSG	0.1 (0.1)	10.0 (10.2)	90.0 (89.8)	-	400	0.4	3.6	65	1.4	2.1
Si10Al90	EtOH NHSG	0.1 (0.1)	10.0 (9.9)	90.0 (90.1)	-	271	0.4	5.8	60	2.8	6.2
Si10Al90	Ether NHSG	0.1 (0.1)	10.0 (9.8)	90.01 (90.2)	-	170	0.3	6.4	64	3.0	10.6
Si0Al90Ni10	Ether NHSG	0.0 (0.0)	0.0 (0.0)	92.7 (92.9)	7.3 (7.1)	348	0.4	6.5	59	4.8	11.6
Si10Al80Ni10	Ether NHSG	0.1 (0.1)	9.3 (6.3)	83.6 (86.5)	7.1 (7.2)	395	0.3	3.5	45	4.4	6.7
Si0Al90Ni10	EtOH NHSG	0.0 (0.0)	0.0 (0.0)	92.6 (92.8)	7.4 (7.2)	368	0.3	3.1	57	4.3	8.8
Si10Al80Ni10	EtOH NHSG	0.1 (0.1)	9.1 (6.5)	83.8 (86.2)	7.1 (7.3)	286	0.3	2.7	62	4.2	7.0

^a Specific surface area. It was determined by the BET method in the 0.05–0.25 P/P₀ range. ^b Total pore volume at P/P₀ = 0.98. ^c Average pore diameter 4 Vp/S_BET. ^d From t-plot analysis. Total acidity was determined by NH₃-TPD in the range of 100–900 °C.

Table 2

Catalysis activity in ethylene oligomerization of Ni-based catalysts.

Catalyst	Si/Al	Conv. (%)	Activity (mmol g−1 h−1)	Selectivity to (wt.%)
				C4	C6	C8
NHSG-AR-Si0Al90Ni10	0.0	49	175	82	13	3
NHSG-AR-Si10Al80Ni10	0.1	44	157	78	15	4
NHSG-ER-Si0Al90Ni10	0.0	73	261	69	15	3
NHSG-ER-Si10Al80Ni10	0.1	79	282	72	20	5

Conditions: temp. = 150 °C, P = 3.5 MPa, reaction time = 65 min and WHSV =10 h⁻¹.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29174172/s1, Figure S1: XRD patterns of SixAly supports; Figure S2: XRD patterns of SixAly supports; Figure S3: XRD patterns of SixAlyNiz catalysts prepared by NHSG. Table S1: Influence of reaction temperature on the catalytic performances of SixAlyNiz catalysts; Scheme S1: Simplified scheme of the main reactions involved in ethylene oligomerization.

References

1. Andrei, R.D.; Popa, M.I.; Fajula, F.; Hulea, V. Heterogeneous oligomerization of ethylene over highly active and stable Ni-AlSBA-15 mesoporous catalysts. J. Catal.; 2015; 323, pp. 76-84. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2014.12.027]

2. Finiels, A.; Fajula, F.; Hulea, V. Nickel-based solid catalysts for ethylene oligomerization—A review. Catal. Sci. Technol.; 2014; 4, pp. 2412-2426. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4CY00305E]

3. Olivier-Bourbigou, H.; Breuil, P.A.R.; Magna, L.; Michel, T.; Pastor, M.F.E.; Delcroix, D. Nickel Catalyzed Olefin Oligomerization and Dimerization. Chem. Rev.; 2020; 120, pp. 7919-7983. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00076]

4. Debecker, D.P.; Hulea, V.; Mutin, P.H. Mesoporous mixed oxide catalysts via non-hydrolytic sol–gel: A review. Appl. Catal. A Gen.; 2013; 451, pp. 192-206. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2012.11.002]

5. Moussa, S.; Concepción, P.; Arribas, M.A.; Martínez, A. ature of active nickel sites and initiation mechanism for ethylene oligomerization on heterogeneous Ni-beta catalysts. ACS Catal.; 2018; 8, pp. 3903-3912. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b03970]

6. Godelitsas, A.; Charistos, D.; Tsipis, C.; Misaelides, P.; Filippidis, A.; Schindler, M. Heterostructures patterned on aluminosilicate microporous substrates: Crystallization of cobalt(III) tris(N,N-diethyldithiocarbamato) on the surface of a HEU-type zeolite. Microporous Mesoporous Mater.; 2003; 61, pp. 69-77. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1387-1811(03)00356-1]

7. Livage, J.; Henry, M.; Sanchez, C. Sol-gel chemistry of transition metal oxides. Prog. Solid State Chem.; 1988; 18, pp. 259-341. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0079-6786(88)90005-2]

8. West, J.; Hench, L. The sol-gel process. Chem. Rev.; 1990; 90, pp. 33-72.

9. Navas, D.; Fuentes, S.; Castro-Alvarez, A.; Chavez-Angel, E. eview on sol-gel synthesis of perovskite and oxide nanomaterials. Gels; 2021; 7, 275. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels7040275]

10. Catauro, M.; Ciprioti, S.V. Characterization of hybrid materials prepared by sol-gel method for biomedical implementations. A critical review. Materials; 2021; 14, 1788. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14071788]

11. Figueira, R.B. Hybrid sol–gel coatings for corrosion mitigation: A critical review. Polymers; 2020; 12, 689. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym12030689] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32204462]

12. Debecker, D.P.; Mutin, P.H. Non-hydrolytic sol–gel routes to heterogeneous catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev.; 2012; 41, pp. 3624-3650. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2cs15330k] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22377899]

13. Vioux, A. Nonhydrolytic Sol−Gel Routes to Oxides. Chem. Mater.; 1997; 9, pp. 2292-2299. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm970322a]

14. Smeets, V.; Styskalik, A.; Debecker, D.P. Non-hydrolytic sol–gel as a versatile route for the preparation of hybrid heterogeneous catalysts. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol.; 2021; 97, pp. 505-522. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10971-021-05486-1]

15. Izadi, R.; Mahinroosta, M.; Mohammadzadeh, K.; Ashrafizadeh, S.N. An inclusive review on inorganic gels: Classifications, synthesis methods and applications. J. Iran. Chem. Soc.; 2023; 20, pp. 1757-1779. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13738-023-02818-6]

16. Mutin, P.H.; Vioux, A. Nonhydrolytic processing of oxide-based materials: Simple routes to control homogeneity, morphology, and nanostructure. Chem. Mater.; 2009; 21, pp. 582-596. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm802348c]

17. Bourget, L.; Corriu, R.J.P.; Leclercq, D.; Mutin, P.H.; Vioux, A. Non-hydrolytic sol–gel routes to silica. J. Non-Cryst. Solids; 1998; 242, pp. 81-91. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3093(98)00789-3]

18. Saltarelli, M.; de Faria, E.H.; Ciuffi, K.J.; Nassar, E.J.; Trujillano, R.; Rives, V.; Vicente, M.A. Aminoiron(III)-porphyrin-alumina catalyst obtained by non-hydrolytic sol-gel process for heterogeneous oxidation of hydrocarbons. Mol. Catal.; 2019; 462, pp. 114-125. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2018.09.014]

19. Chen, L.; Li, G.; Wang, Z.; Li, S.; Zhang, M.; Li, X. Ethylene Oligomerization over Nickel Supported Silica-Alumina Catalysts with High Selectivity for C₁₀₊ Products. Catalysts; 2020; 10, 180. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/catal10020180]

20. Agliullin, M.R.; Danilova, I.G.; Faizullin, A.V.; Amarantov, S.V.; Bubennov, S.V.; Prosochkina, T.R.; Grigor’eva, N.G.; Paukshtis, E.A.; Kutepov, B.I. Sol-gel synthesis of mesoporous aluminosilicates with a narrow pore size distribution and catalytic activity thereof in the oligomerization of dec-1-ene. Microporous Mesoporous Mater.; 2016; 230, pp. 118-127. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.05.007]

21. May, M.; Asomoza, M.; Lopez, T.; Gomez, R. Precursor Aluminum Effect in the Synthesis of Sol−Gel Si−Al Catalysts: FTIR and NMR Characterization. Chem. Mater.; 1997; 9, pp. 2395-2399. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm970320q]

22. Sánchez-Muñoz, L.; Florian, P.; Gan, Z.; Muñoz, F. Order–Disorder Diversity of the Solid State by NMR: The Role of Electrical Charges. Minerals; 2022; 12, 1375. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/min12111375]

23. Al Khudhair, A.; Bouchmella, K.; Andrei, R.D.; Mehdi, A.; Mutin, P.H.; Hulea, V. One-step non-hydrolytic sol-gel synthesis of mesoporous SiO₂-Al₂O₃-NiO catalysts for ethylene oligomerization. Microporous Mesoporous Mater.; 2021; 322, 111165. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111165]

24. Lippmaa, E.; Samoson, A.; Magi, M. High-resolution aluminum-27 NMR of aluminosilicates. J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 1986; 108, pp. 1730-1735. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja00268a002]

25. Engelhardt, G. Multinuclear solid-state NMR in silicate and zeolite chemistry. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem.; 1989; 8, pp. 343-347. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-9936(89)87043-8]

26. Müller, D.; Gessner, W.; Behrens, H.; Scheler, G. Determination of the aluminium coordination in aluminium-oxygen compounds by solid-state high-resolution 27AI NMR. Chem. Phys. Lett.; 1981; 79, pp. 59-62. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(81)85288-8]

27. Wang, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Baiker, A.; Huang, J. Pentacoordinated aluminum species: New frontier for tailoring acidity-enhanced silica–alumina Catalysts. Accounts Chem. Res.; 2020; 53, pp. 2648-2658. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00459]

28. Zhang, S.; Lee, W. Improving the water-wettability and oxidation resistance of graphite using Al₂O₃/SiO₂ sol-gel coatings. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.; 2003; 23, pp. 1215-1221. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219(02)00284-4]

29. Huang, Y.-F.; Zhang, H.-L.; Yang, Z.-Z.; Zhao, M.; Huang, M.-L.; Liang, Y.-L.; Wang, J.-L.; Chen, Y.-Q. Effects of CeO₂ addition on improved NO oxidation activities of Pt/SiO₂-Al₂O₃ diesel oxidation catalysts. Acta Phys. Chim. Sin.; 2017; 33, pp. 1242-1252. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201703292]

30. Imoisili, P.E.; Nwanna, E.C.; Jen, T.-C. Facile preparation and characterization of silica nanoparticles from South Africa fly ash using a sol–gel hydrothermal method. Processes; 2022; 10, 2440. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pr10112440]

31. Drobná, H.; Kout, M.; Sołtysek, A.; González-Delacruz, V.M.; Caballero, A.; Čapek, L. Analysis of Ni species formed on zeolites, mesoporous silica and alumina supports and their catalytic behavior in the dry reforming of methane. React. Kinet. Catal. Lett.; 2017; 121, pp. 255-274. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11144-017-1149-3]

32. Hensen, E.J.; Poduval, D.G.; Degirmenci, V.; Ligthart, D.J.M.; Chen, W.; Maugé, F.; Rigutto, M.S.; van Veen, J.R. Acidity characterization of amorphous silica–alumina. J. Phys. Chem. C; 2012; 116, pp. 21416-21429. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp309182f]

33. Rajagopal, S.; Marini, H.; Marzari, J.; Miranda, R. Silica-alumina-supported acidic molybdenum catalysts-TPR and XRD characterization. J. Catal.; 1994; 147, pp. 417-428. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jcat.1994.1159]

34. Scokart, P.O.; Declerck, F.D.; Sempels, R.E.; Rouxhet, P.G. Evolution of the acidic properties of silica—Alumina gels as a function of chemical composition: Infrared approach. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 Phys. Chem. Condens. Phases; 1977; 73, pp. 359-371. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/f19777300359]

35. Chizallet, C.; Raybaud, P. Acidity of amorphous silica-alumina: From coordination promotion of Lewis sites to proton transfer. Chemphyschem; 2010; 11, pp. 105-108. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200900797] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19882620]

36. Busca, G. Catalytic materials based on silica and alumina: Structural features and generation of surface acidity. Prog. Mater. Sci.; 2019; 104, pp. 215-249. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.04.003]

37. Seufitelli, G.V.S.; Park, J.J.W.; Tran, P.N.; Dichiara, A.; Resende, F.L.P.; Gustafson, R. The Role of Nickel and Brønsted Sites on Ethylene Oligomerization with Ni-H-Beta Catalysts. Catalysts; 2022; 12, 565. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/catal12050565]

38. Bai, Y.; Cordero-Lanzac, T.; Nova, A.; Olsbye, U.; Taarning, E.; Martinez-Espin, J.S. Selective linear ethylene oligomerization over nickel-containing zeotypes with tetravalent framework heteroatoms. Catal. Sci. Technol.; 2024; 14, pp. 1991-2002. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D3CY01736B]

39. Yoldas, B.E. Alumina sol preparation from alkoxides. Ceram. Bull.; 1975; 54, pp. 289-290.