Plain Language Summary: This study used machine learning to analyze health data from the UK Biobank, focusing on people with Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. The analysis revealed two distinct groups within each type of dementia, showing significant differences in genetic risk for heart disease, medication use, and frailty levels. However, these groups did not differ significantly in mortality rates.
Background: Inter-individual variability in frailty levels of people living with dementia motivates deeper investigation into dementia's typical presentations. Machine learning applied to large datasets can help identify disease phenotypes. We used unsupervised machine learning to discover clusters in AD and VaD and examine their association with mortality.
Methods: We used prescription medications, cardiovascular polygenic risk scores, frailty index, Townsend deprivation score, and physical activity data from the United Kingdom Biobank. K-means clustering was applied on each group of AD males (n=1588), AD females (n=1702), VaD males (n=1271), and VaD females (n=910). T-tcsts were used to compare features across clusters. Cox regression was used to determine the relationship between cluster assignment and mortality.
Results: Two clusters were identified for each subgroup. T-tests indicated significant differences (p<0.05) in cardiovascular polygenic risk scores, polypharmacy, and frailty index score between the two clusters across all subgroups. High frailty index clusters commonly paired with elevated genetic cardiovascular risk and greater deprivation. There were no significant associations between cluster membership and mortality (p>0.05).
Conclusions: Differences in frailty severity, cardiovascular genetic risk, and deprivation across clusters highlight variability in AD and VaD. Lack of association between clusters with mortality suggests that outcomes centered around patient well-being may be more relevant for evaluating disease impact and guiding individualized care.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2024. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
1 Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University
2 Geriatric Medicine Research, Nova Scotia Health
3 Department of Medicine, Laval University