It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
A machine learning technique merging Bayesian method called Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART) provides a nonparametric Bayesian approach that further needs improved forecasting accuracy in the presence of outliers, especially when dealing with potential nonlinear relationships and complex interactions among the response and explanatory variables, which poses a major challenge in forecasting. This study proposes an adaptive trimmed regression method using BART, dubbed BART(Atr) to improve forecasting accuracy by identifying suspected outliers effectively and removing these outliers in the analysis. Through extensive simulations across various scenarios, the effectiveness of BART(Atr) is evaluated against three alternative methods: default BART, robust linear modeling with Huber’s loss function, and data-driven robust regression with Huber’s loss function. The simulation results consistently show BART(Atr) outperforming the other three methods. To demonstrate its practical application, BART(Atr) is applied to the well-known Boston Housing Price dataset, a standard regression analysis example. Furthermore, random attack templates are introduced on the dataset to assess BART(Atr)’s performance under such conditions.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, School of Statistics and Mathematics, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.443372.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 1922 9516); Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Big Data and Educational Statistics Application Laboratory, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.443372.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 1922 9516)
2 Australian Catholic University, Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Banyo, Australia (GRID:grid.411958.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2194 1270)
3 The University of Queensland, School of Mathematics and Physics, St Lucia, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537)