It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Cash transfer policies have been widely discussed as mechanisms to curb intergenerational transmission of socioeconomic disadvantage. In this paper, we take advantage of a large casino-funded family transfer program introduced in a Southeastern American Indian Tribe to generate difference-in-difference estimates of the link between children’s cash transfer exposure and third grade math and reading test scores of their offspring. Here we show greater math (0.25 standard deviation [SD], p =.0148, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.05, 0.45) and reading (0.28 SD, p = .0066, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.49) scores among American Indian students whose mother was exposed ten years longer than other American Indian students to the cash transfer during her childhood (or relative to the non-American Indian student referent group). Exploratory analyses find that a mother’s decision to pursue higher education and delay fertility appears to explain some, but not all, of the relation between cash transfers and children’s test scores. In this rural population, large cash transfers have the potential to reduce intergenerational cycles of poverty-related educational outcomes.
Being born to a family with low-income has been related to lower socioeconomic status attainment in adulthood. Here, the authors report the effects of exposure to a family income transfer in an American Indian population on educational outcomes of the next generation of children.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 University of California, Center for Population, Inequality, and Policy, Irvine, USA (GRID:grid.266093.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 0668 7243); University of California, Joe C. Wen School of Population & Public Health, Irvine, USA (GRID:grid.266093.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 0668 7243)
2 University of California, Joe C. Wen School of Population & Public Health, Irvine, USA (GRID:grid.266093.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 0668 7243)
3 Duke University, Sanford School of Public Policy, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.26009.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7961)
4 University of California, Department of Psychological Science, Irvine, USA (GRID:grid.266093.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 0668 7243)
5 University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, Burlington, USA (GRID:grid.59062.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7689)