It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Urban and roadside trees contribute to health and resilience. However, when trees or branches fall, it can cause injuries or deaths. This study examined trends and variations of injuries and deaths due to tree failure in The Netherlands from 1998 to 2021, considering urban–rural location, sex, age and traffic mode. This study is the first to describe long-term trends in injuries and deaths due to tree failure from 1998–2021. The standardised rate of injuries per 1,000,000 population increased from 0.14 (SE 0.10) in 1998 to 0.91 (SE 0.21) in 2021, with an annual percentage increase of 5.3% (p = 0.002). The data shows a strong increase for rural areas, contrary to urban ones. The annual percentage increase in rural areas was 13.2% (p < 0.001) while injuries in urban areas increased with 3.0% (p = 0.026), which revealed large urban–rural disparities. A trend was absent in the frequency of deaths. More attention needs to be given to investigating causes, drivers and stressors associated with tree failure-related injuries. In particular, efforts should be made to reduce the prevalence in rural areas. The increase in injuries over time makes it necessary to create awareness and share knowledge among residents and local governments about tree failure risks.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Wageningen University and Research, Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy Group, Wageningen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.4818.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0791 5666); Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Domain Agri, Food and Life Sciences, Delft, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.448984.d) (ISNI:0000 0003 9872 5642)
2 Wageningen University and Research, Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy Group, Wageningen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.4818.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0791 5666)
3 Wageningen University and Research, Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy Group, Wageningen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.4818.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0791 5666); Czech University of Life Sciences, Department of Economics, Prague, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.15866.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2238 631X)
4 Wageningen University and Research, Business Economics Group, Wageningen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.4818.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0791 5666)