It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
One of the measures for monitoring microbial resistance is the calculation of the defined daily dose of antimicrobial agents. For this calculation, the weight of an adult of 70 kg is used as a standard, so that application in neonatology is not possible. The aim of this study is to describe the use profile and calculate the defined daily dose (DDD) of antimicrobials in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of a public hospital in the interior of Bahia, Brazil. From March 2020 to December 2021, the medical records of 712 newborns admitted to a NICU between September 2018 and June 2020 were analyzed. A total of 410 newborns diagnosed with neonatal sepsis were included. The most used antimicrobials per patient were gentamicin (408/410; 99.5%), ampicillin (407; 99.3%), amikacin (29; 7.1%) and oxacillin (21; 5.1%), with a mean (SD) treatment duration of 9.8 (3.9) days. The most commonly used combination of antimicrobials was ampicillin with gentamicin, which was used in 406 patients (99.0%). The values for neonatal DDDs were on average 26 times lower than those for adult DDDs. The neonatal DDDs were similar to those observed in other studies. Ampicilin and cefepime were the antimicrobials for which the greatest differences were observed in neonatal DDDs compared with adult DDDs, which differed mainly between maintenance doses, reflecting the lack of international standards in neonatology. Standardization of DDDs as a surveillance measure has the potential to clarify the pattern of antimicrobial use in neonatal patients worldwide and, in particular, to prevent indiscriminate use and bacterial resistance.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Federal University of Sergipe, Graduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, São Cristóvão, Brazil (GRID:grid.411252.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2285 6801); Federal University of Sergipe, Laboratory of Teaching and Research in Social Pharmacy (LEPFS), Department of Pharmacy, São Cristóvão, Brazil (GRID:grid.411252.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2285 6801)
2 State University of Bahia (UNEB), Department of Life Sciences (DCV), Salvador, Brazil (GRID:grid.8399.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0372 8259)
3 Federal University of Sergipe, Laboratory of Teaching and Research in Social Pharmacy (LEPFS), Department of Pharmacy, São Cristóvão, Brazil (GRID:grid.411252.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2285 6801)