ABSTRACT
Methane adsorption is a critical assessment of the gas storage capacity (GSC) of shales with geological conditions. Although the related research of marine shales has been well-illustrated, the methane adsorption of marine-continental transitional (MCT) shales is still ambiguous. In this study, a method of combining experimental data with analytical models was used to investigate the methane adsorption characteristics and GSC of MCT shales collected from the Qinshui Basin, China. The Ono-Kondo model was used to fit the adsorption data to obtain the adsorption parameters. Subsequently, the geological model of GSC based on pore evolution was constructed using a representative shale sample with a total organic carbon (TOC) content of 1.71%, and the effects of reservoir pressure coefficient and water saturation on GSC were explored. In experimental results, compared to the composition of the MCT shale, the pore structure dominates the methane adsorption, and meanwhile, the maturity mainly governs the pore structure. Besides, maturity in the middle-eastern region of the Qinshui Basin shows a strong positive correlation with burial depth. The two parameters, micropore pore volume and non-micropore surface area, induce a good fit for the adsorption capacity data of the shale. In simulation results, the depth, pressure coefficient, and water saturation of the shale all affect the GSC. It demonstrates a promising shale gas potential of the MCT shale in a deeper block, especially with low water saturation. Specifically, the economic feasibility of shale gas could be a major consideration for the shale with a depth of <800 m and/or water saturation >60% in the Yushe-Wuxiang area. This study provides a valuable reference for the reservoir evaluation and favorable block search of MCT shale gas.
Keywords:
High-pressure methane adsorption
Marine-continental transitional shale gas
Ono-Kondo model
Adsorption thermodynamics
Gas storage capacity model
(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)
1. Introduction
Natural gas, a transitional energy resource, demonstrates a crucial role in global carbon reduction, while its consumption and supply should be balanced necessarily. Shale gas is a type of unconventional natural gas and has been highly valued and commercially developed based on its enormous resource potential and low-carbon nature (Abdollahi et al., 2022; EIA, 2022). After the commercial development of marine shale gas, the exploration of marine-continental transitional (MCT) shale gas has received further attention in China in recent years (Dong et al., 2021). MCT shales and marine shales significantly differ in their composition and geological conditions. The former is characterized by type IIIIIb organic matter (OM) and rich clay minerals (Lu et al., 2023a), while the latter has type I-IIa OM, a high content of brittle minerals (quartz and carbonate), and a low content of clay. The methane adsorption of shale is mainly related to the type and maturity of OM, and is also influenced to some extent by clays (Chalmers and Bustin, 2008; Gao et al., 2022; Feng et al., 2023a, 2023b; Lu et al., 2023b). Besides, the MCT shale is much shallower in depth and has lower reservoir pressure than the marine shale in China (Guo et al., 2021). These characteristics of MCT shale will affect its methane adsorption capacity (MAC) and GSC model.
Conventionally, the MAC of a shale can be characterized by a correlation model between the shale composition and highpressure methane adsorption (HPMA) data (Ji et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2015; Jiang et al., 2022). In such kind of models, the composition is mainly chosen as the contents of total organic carbon (TOC) and clays. However, the models only capture limited characteristic parameters of shales and lack quantitative characterization of information such as OM type and maturity, which leads to poor generalization ability of the models
The geological model of GSC is an essential basis for shale gas evaluation, and it can conclude the capacities of total gas, adsorbed gas, and free gas (Gasparik et al., 2014; Hu and Mischo, 2020). In constructing a geological GSC model, the description of adsorbed gas models is the most important task. Currently, the methane adsorption models have been widely established. Specifically, the Langmuir model characterizes layer adsorption (Ji et al., 2015; Dang et al., 2017); the SDR (supercritical Dubinin-Radushkevich) and SDA (supercritical Dubinin-Astakhov) models are based on adsorption potential and micropore filling (Sakurovs et al., 2007); the SLD (simplified local density) model is based on gas-solid potential energy (Jiang et al., 2018); and the Ono-Kondo model considers adsorption sites (Zhou et al., 2017a; Hu et al., 2021). Furthermore, modified models (Song et al., 2018; Ren et al., 2022) and composite models (Zhou et al., 2017b; Liu et al., 2022a,b) are also proposed, where the modified models are based on the modification of a single model and the composite models are the combination of two single models. However, the composite models are assumed to have two mechanisms of single-layer adsorption and micropore filling coexisting, and this also means more unknown parameters and the potential for computational ambiguity when fitting finite HPMA data (Zhou et al., 2017b). Although fewer parameters need to be fitted for single models, making them more suitable for calculation, the result is sometimes unreasonable. For example, the Langmuir model often produces anomalous results of adsorbed phase density greater than the liquid methane boiling point density (Tian et al., 2016). The SDR model normally does not follow the Henry's law at low pressure, and the current application of the SDR model to fit variable-temperature adsorption experiment data needs to assume a constant value for parameter D (affinity coefficient). However, D is a thermodynamic parameter related to temperature (Okolo et al., 2019), thus a constant D value cannot accurately predict the methane adsorption under variabletemperature conditions (Pan et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017). The iterative integration in the SLD model dramatically increases the computation complexity (Clarkson and Haghshenas, 2016). As for the Ono-Kondo model, there are no assumptions on the adsorption mechanism, and, the adsorption parameters can be fitted from simple calculation. This advantage of Ono-Kondo model has recently attracted great attention in practical applications (Zhou et al., 2017a; Hu and Mischo, 2020).
The GSC model of a shale is assessed by the extrapolation from variable-temperature HPMA experiment data of limited samples. However, it only considers the GSC of the shale with the same maturity and porosity conditions at different depths, and is more suitable for marine shale reservoirs in southern China, such as the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations whose maturity has no correlation with the current burial depth, with an EqRo (equivalent vitrinite reflectance) range of 2.5¡3.0% (Xiao et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2019). The GSC model constructed based on the above conditions shows that the free gas increases with increasing depth. The maturity of MCT shale varies greatly in the Qinshui Basin of China (Su et al., 2005; Hou, 2020; Lu et al., 2023a), and the current depth significantly controls the maturity in the central and eastern parts of the basin (Yin and Guo, 2019; Zhang et al., 2019), thereby affecting the reservoir properties of the shale. In addition, under the influence of in-situ stress, shale pores also decrease with depth, thereby reducing the free gas (Miao et al., 2022). Wang et al. (2013) and Cander (2012) have mentioned the effect of shale porosity on GSC with depth, but no further research has been conducted on the GSC models.
The present study proposes a combined experimental and simulation method to investigate the methane adsorption characteristics and GSC model of MCT shale in the Qinshui Basin, China. The HPMA experiments under different temperature and water conditions are conducted on collected MCT shale samples. The Onokondo model is used to fit the experiment data to obtain the adsorption parameters, and a geological GSC model of the shale is established considering the joint constraints of maturity and depth on the shale pores, with the analysis of the influence of reservoir pressure coefficients and water saturation on the geological model. The purpose of this work is to provide a guide to the evaluation and exploration of MCT shale gas in the Qinshui Basin.
2. Material and methods
2.1. Basic information of samples
This study collected nine MCT shale samples from the Taiyuan Formation and Shanxi Formation in the Qingshui Basin of China. These samples represent a series of samples across a maturity range from middle to over-mature stages (Ro ¼ 1.253.90%). The geological overview of the Qingshui Basin, sedimentary characteristics of the Shanxi-Taiyuan formations, and basic information about the studied samples were described in a previous publication (Lu et al., 2023a). Table 1 lists some experimental data that are directly relevant to this study, including Ro, TOC content, mineral composition, micropore volume, and non-micropore specific surface area. In this study, the total porosity of the shale samples was also measured using the method suggested by Chalmers et al. (2012).
2.2. The high-pressure methane adsorption
The HPMA experiments were performed using an ISOSORP-HP Static II instrument. All samples were conducted at an experimental temperature of 313.15 K and a pressure range of 0¡24 MPa. The detailed experimental procedures were described in the references (Xin et al., 2021).
The TOC content of MCT shales in the Qinshui Basin is generally low, with a main range of 1¡2% for the shale samples from the Yushe-Wuxiang area (Zhang et al., 2019). Therefore, this study selected the sample S7 (TOC ¼ 1.71%) for additional methane adsorption experiments at three different temperatures (303.15 K, 333.15 K and 363.15 K) to construct a geological model of GSC variation with depth. In addition, equilibrium water experiments were conducted on S7 (detailed steps can be found in Yang et al. (2016)), and the sample with different water contents was obtained for HPMA experiments (313.15 K) to investigate the effect of water on the geological GSC model. The water content of the sample can be used to calculate the water saturation with Eq. (1).
... (1)
where, W is water content, w. t.%; rw is the density of water; Sw is water saturation; Por is porosity, %; rapparent is the apparent density of shale.
The MAC of a sample obtained from the adsorption experiment is the excess adsorption amount, and its absolute MAC can be converted by the Gibbs model:
... (2)
where, ne and na are excess and absolute MAC, respectively, cm3 /g; rg and rad are bulk phase and adsorbed phase densities, respectively, g/cm3 .
The adsorption experiment data was fitted using the Ono-Kondo model, which has been detailed in the references (Zhou et al., 2017a; Hu and Mischo, 2020), and its equation is given in Eq. (3).
... (3)
where, n0 is the maximum MAC, cm3 /g; ε is the potential energy (J) associated with the interaction between CH4 and adsorbent. k is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the absolute temperature.
2.3. Thermodynamics of adsorption
Adsorption thermodynamics can be used to determine the type of adsorption and indirectly reflect the adsorption force of the adsorbent on the adsorbate. The thermodynamic parameters include adsorption enthalpy (DH) and molar adsorption entropy (DS0 ), which are used to describe the pressure-temperature relationship at an absolute adsorption constant. This relationship (Eq. (4)) can be derived from Tian et al. (2016).
... (4)
where, DH is the adsorption enthalpy (kJ/mol), whose magnitude is equal to the equivalent adsorption heat (Qst, DH ¼ ¡Qst); DS0 is the standard entropy of adsorption (J$mol1 K 1 ); P0 ¼ 0.1 MPa; R is the ideal gas constant and T is the temperature (K).
2.4. GSC estimation under geological conditions
Due to the extremely low gas solubility of methane in water, the total gas basically includes only adsorbed gas and free gas. According to Pan et al. (2016), the GSC model under geological conditions can be expressed by Eq. (5¡7). It should be pointed out that this model describes the maximum reservoir capacity under limited geological conditions
... (5)
... (6)
... (7)
where, ntotal H , na H and nfree H are the total storage capacity, adsorbed gas capacity and free gas capacity at H depth, cm3 /g, respectively; rH a , rH g and rSTP g are the adsorbed phase density, free phase density and density at standard conditions at H depth, g/cm3 , respectively. Free phase density is from the NIST (national institute of standards and technology) database (Lemmon et al., 2022). ne H and rH a are calculated based on variable-temperature adsorption experiment data.
3. Results
3.1. Adsorption isotherms and data fitting
The HPMA results of MCT shale samples at 313.15 K and the adsorption isotherm curves fitted by the Ono-kondo model are shown in Fig. 1a. The model has a perfect fit to the measured data, with the fitting coefficient (R2 ) of >0.99 (Table 1). The excess adsorption amount first increases rapidly with increasing pressure, reaching a maximum at about 8 MPa (0.83¡2.99 cm3 /g), and then starts to decrease with a further increase of pressure. The absolute adsorption curves are shown in Fig. 1b. They rise with increasing pressure. The fitted parameters of the Ono-kondo model are summarized in Table 2. The maximum MAC of the nine samples is between 1.62 cm3 /g and 4.06 cm3 /g, with an average of 2.35 cm3 /g. εs/k ranges from ¡708.69 to ¡1179.35 K, with an average of ¡917.72 K. rad varies from 0.21 to 0.37 g/cm3 , with an average of 0.26 g/cm3 .
The shapes of the excess adsorption isotherms of the sample S7 at different temperatures and water saturation conditions are very similar (Fig. 2). Under dry conditions, the maximum ne decreases from 1.57 cm3 /g to 0.98 cm3 /g as the temperature increases from 303.15 K to 363.15 K (Table 3 and Fig. 3a). Accordingly, n0 reduces from 2.36 cm3 /g to 1.55 cm3 /g εs/k distributes between ¡992.34 K and 957.96 K, with an average of 976.62 K. εs is the potential energy of CH4 molecules interacting with the shale pore surface. It is related to the surface properties and temperature (Sudibandriyo et al., 2010).
Under the moist conditions of the sample S7, as the Sw increases from 0 to 53.96%, the n0 and maximum ne all decrease significantly, from 2.23 cm3 /g to 0.99 cm3 /g and from 1.47 cm3 /g to 0.60 cm3 /g, respectively (Table 3 and Fig. 3b). This is due to the occupation of adsorption sites in the pores by water and the formation of water clusters through hydrogen bonding to block the pores (Gasparik et al., 2012).
3.2. Adsorbed phase density and adsorption space
Methane adsorption phase density is one of the basic parameters of the isothermal adsorption model of shales and can be obtained by fitting experimental data. It is strongly influenced by the temperature and adsorbent-adsorbate interaction. The liquid density is usually considered as the maximum adsorption phase density, and the critical density is the minimum (Do and Do, 2003; Rexer et al., 2013). As seen from the adsorbed phase densities (rad) of the studied samples derived from the ono-kondo model in Tables 2 and 3, they are reasonable, between the critical density and the boiling point liquid density (Fig. 4), without abnormally high values reported (Gasparik et al., 2012; Tian et al., 2016). At the same temperature conditions, rad shows a positive correlation with TOC contents (Fig. 4a). For the relevant results of the variabletemperature experiment of S7, rad decreases with increasing temperature, and they show a negative linear correlation (Fig. 4b).
Except for the sample S6 (high TOC), the adsorbed phase volume (Vad) calculated from the maximum absolute MAC and ra of other samples is slightly larger than the micropore pore volume (Vmic) (Fig. 5). At the same time, the diameter of CO2 molecules is smaller than that of CH4, hence the accessible space of Vmic obtained from the analysis of low-pressure CO2 adsorption experiment should also be larger than the actual methane adsorption space in micropores. This indicates the existence of micropore filling and nonmicropore surface adsorption of methane in shale pores, where the Vad can only take up a portion of the total pore volume and most of the unexploited space in larger pores is filled with free methane, which is consistent with the results of Zhou et al. (2018) for the Longmaxi shale and Wei et al. (2021) for the Shuijingtuo shale.
3.3. Adsorption thermodynamic parameters
Based on Eq. (4), the thermodynamic parameters of S7 were calculated for the selected four different absolute methane adsorption amounts. As shown in Fig. 6a and Table 4, Qst ranges from 17.66¡24.38 (mean 20.98) kJ/mol. Since the adsorption heat of chemisorption is 40e600 kJ/mol (Chen et al., 2019), this adsorption on shale is physical sorption. DS0 reflects the activity of the adsorbent and the behavioral characteristics of the adsorbentadsorbate interaction (Xia et al., 2008). DS0 for S7 ranges from 76.85 to 104.43 (mean 90.93) J$mol1 K1 . The MCT shale in this study has a cast point in Fig. 6b between type III kerogen and clays, with a slightly larger Qst and smaller DS0 compared to the marine shale reported in the literature (Gasparik et al., 2014; Rexer et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2019; Hu and Mischo, 2020), showing a comparable methane adsorption performance with them.
4. Discussion
4.1. Influencing factors of maximum methane adsorption capacity
The maximum MAC of a shale is influenced by its TOC and clay mineral contents, organic matter type, maturity, pore structure, temperature and pressure. Among them, temperature and pressure can be simulated by setting experimental conditions, while these shale characteristic parameters affect each other. The TOC content primarily affects methane adsorption, which is the consensus of several studies (Gasparik et al., 2014). As shown in Fig. 7a, the maximum MAC of the samples in this study is also positively correlated with TOC content (r ¼ 0.63). Maturity affects the development of OM pores (Chen and Xiao, 2014; Lu et al., 2023a), then affects sorption, with enhanced methane adsorption for samples with a similar TOC content as maturity increases. Compared with marine shales, the maximum MAC of the MCT samples is slightly lower under the conditions of the same TOC content and a comparable maturity. The methane adsorption capacity normalized to TOC for the studied samples across their maturity range also shows a positive synergistic relationship with Ro (Fig. 7b). In organic-rich shales, the contribution of clays to the shale MAC is small (Gasparik et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2015), which is because the adsorption of clay minerals is insignificant compared to that of kerogens (Ji et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2012) (Fig. 7a). Although the total clays and the MAC in the studied samples show a certain degree of positive correlation (Fig. 7c), this is mainly due to the covariance between TOC and total clays in the MCT shale (Lu et al., 2023a). Therefore, this correlation is only a numerical, and not a causal one.
As shown in Fig. 7a, for samples with a similar TOC content, the higher the maturity, the greater the maximum MAC. Even for the same composition and maturity, the pore structure of different samples is also obviously variable. Furthermore, the TOC content covers different macerals, and the results of previous studies (Yang et al., 2019; Petersen et al., 2020) showed that the contribution of different macerals in adsorption varies greatly. Therefore, the prediction of maximum MAC from the shale composition is limited to specific shales with similar geochemical properties, and lacks generalizability.
In order to develop the MAC prediction model for the MCT shale of this study, the main factors affecting the shale adsorption performance need to be further discussed. These factors can be classified into two major categories. One is the shale property parameters, including TOC, clays, OM type and maturity, and another is the shale pore properties, i.e., nanopore structure parameters. In case the methane adsorption of shales assumes micropore volume filling and non-micropore surface adsorption (Do and Do, 2003; Zhou et al., 2017b; Sun et al., 2022), Vmic and Snon were chosen as the parameters of nanopore structure expression. The grey relational analysis (GRA) method as suggested by Azzeh et al. (2010) was used to analyze the influence degree of each factor on the MAC. Since all the samples in this study are type III kerogen, the subsequences of GRA are TOC content, clays content, maturity, Vmic and Snon, and MAC is the parent sequence. As shown in the ranking results (Table 5), the two pore structure parameters of the shale are more critical to MAC than its compositional properties. Thus, Vmic and Snon were used to build a multiple regression model of MAC (Eq. (8)). The evaluation results are shown in Table 6. The low values of mean absolute error, mean square error and root mean square error implicate a high accuracy of MAC prediction results.
... (8)
4.2. Geological model of methane storage capacity
In order to build a geological model for predicting the methane content of MCT shales in the Qinshui Basin, the effects arising from the actual geological conditions should be considered. For this basin, using depth as the independent variable for the variety of geological conditions, the dependent variables mainly include the variation of temperature and pressure with depth and the variation of pore structure due to the variation of maturity with depth. The effects of temperature and pressure on shale adsorbed and free gas capacities can be linked through HPMA and free phase density, respectively (by Eq. (5¡7)). Furthermore, the depth constraint on the pore structure can be achieved using the relationship between the depth and maturity in this study area.
The Qinshui Basin was formed in the middle Jurassic, and the Yanshanian tectonic thermal event from the late Jurassic to the end of the Cretaceous caused a substantial increase in the maturity of the Carboniferous-Permian MCT shales and massive methane generation (Su et al., 2005), but there is variability in different areas. In the southern part of the basin, there is a magmatic intrusion, leading to an unusual distribution of maturity (Li et al., 2006), while in the central and eastern part of the basin, along the Yushe-Wuxiang, the distribution of maturity and current depth show synergistic changes (Fig. 8a). Based on the data on the maturity and depth of MCT shales in this region (Yin and Guo, 2019; Zhang et al., 2019), a correlation plot of Ro versus depth is constructed (Fig. 8b, r ¼ 0.89).
The results of Lu et al. (2023a) were used to correlate the pore structure of OM with Ro for the MCT shale in the Qinshui Basin. The evolution of porosity with the effect of buried stress was modeled using data derived from Miao et al. (2022) (Appendix for detailed calculations). Further, it was assumed that the composition and apparent density of the shale were constant, the pressure coefficient was 1, and the water saturation was 30%. Combining the above settings with the variable-temperature methane adsorption parameters under the dry conditions and the porosity and nanopore structure parameters of S7, the GSC based on the evolution of pore space (porosity and pore structure) with depth was calculated according to Eq. (5)¡8, and the corresponding geological GSC model was established (subsequently referred to as the evolutive pore model) (Fig. 9). This model also compares the GSC model for this shale at the fixed porosity and pore structure parameters (subsequently referred to as constant pore model) conditions. For the evolutive pore model, the MAC increases rapidly with increasing depth, reaching a maximum at around 800 m, and then decreases slowly; the free gas and total gas capacities arise with increasing depth and go down slightly after >2800 m. The adsorbed gas capacity dominates at depths <1750 m, while the free gas capacity dominates at depths >1750 m. This shows some differences with the constant pore model. The GSC of the two models is essentially the same at about 1800 m. This is because this depth is essentially the actual depth of the study sample (S7), and both models have the same porosity and pore structure. However, at depth <1800 m, the total GSC based on the evolutive pore model is lower than that of the constant pore model, while at depth >1800 m, the former is greater than the latter, which is because the developed OM pores in the shale at higher maturity stage increase the GSC. It is worth mentioning that for the constant pore model, the free gas capacity presents a continuous increase with the depth. At depth >2800 m, the total gas and free gas capacities of the evolutive pore model tend to decrease, which is a compound effect of the destruction of the OM pore structure at the over-maturity stage (Lu et al., 2023a) and the compression of increased in-situ stress. It can be foreseen that the total GSC of the two models will intersect again at a certain depth (>2800 m), i.e., the total gas capacity of the evolutive pore model will be smaller than that of the constant pore model. However, this exceeds the maximum depth of the MCT shale in this area.
Reservoir pressure has an important influence on GSC and shale gas production. The commercially developed marine shale gas reservoirs in southern China have large burial depths, with a main pressure coefficient range of 0.9e2.0 (Jiang et al., 2023), while the MCT shale reservoirs in the Qinshui Basin have a shallower burial depth and a lower pressure coefficient. The pressure coefficient of coal reservoirs adjacent to the MCT shale in the CarboniferousPermian strata is usually between 0.6 and 1.0 (Wang et al., 2017). The results of GSC calculated as pressure coefficients of 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9 and 1.0 respectively are shown in Fig. 10. The free gas capacity responds most significantly to pressure changes. It decreases rapidly with the decrease of the pressure coefficient, leading to a decline in the total GSC and an increase in the proportion of adsorbed gas. The adsorbed gas capacity is only affected by the pressure coefficient at the shallow depth (<1000 m), and as the depth >1000 m, the loss in adsorbed gas capacity is not significant as the pressure coefficient goes down.
4.3. Impact of water on adsorption gas and geological model of gas capacity
The water saturation of MCT shales in the Qinshui Basin ranges from about 25.5% to 76.4% (Sun et al., 2022). The presence of water in the shale pores affects the methane adsorption behavior and free gas space. Although the occupation of free gas storage space by water has been allowed in Eq. (5), the effects of water adsorption sites and the change in the interaction between adsorbent and sorbent, which affects methane adsorption, also need to be considered (Chalmers and Bustin, 2008). According to the study of Gasparik et al. (2012), with increasing water content in shales, the MAC will reduce until reaching a critical water saturation at which a further increase in water content has little effect on the MAC.
Based on this rule, combined with previous experimental data at different water contents (Table 7), an asymptotic model (y ¼ a þ b cx ) can be used to describe the MAC of the sample in the present study with increasing water saturation (Fig. 11).
As shown in Table 7, the asymptotic model well fits the data of the MCT shale sample of this study and marine shales. In the fitted equation, the value of (a þ b) is close to the MAC of dry samples, a is the MAC after reaching the critical water saturation, b is the maximum loss of adsorption due to the presence of water, and then b/(a þ b) is the maximum percentage of MAC loss due to water. The value of c can reflect the decreasing MAC of shale with increasing water saturation. Overall, water has a greater influence on the adsorption of the MCT shale sample (S7) than that of the marine shales, with the maximum percentage of MAC loss as high as 60.82%.
According to the Sw data of MCT shale in the Qinshui Basin (Sun et al., 2022), the range of water saturation is set from 20% to 70%. According to the evolutive pore model (section 4.2), the GSC model of S7 under different water saturation conditions was further constructed based on the asymptotic model of the effect of water on adsorption (Fig. 12). As the Sw increases from 20% to 70%, the free and total gas capacities decline significantly, and the adsorbed gas capacity does not decrease significantly after Sw > 50%. Compared with the model under dry conditions (Fig. 9), the total GSC decreases from 31.30% to 4.64% under water conditions (from 500 m to 2800 m, respectively, Fig. 12c), i.e., the difference between the two models decreases with increasing depth. This is because the reduction of the adsorption gas allows the conversion of the adsorption phase volume into the storage space for the free gas. For the same water saturation of 30%, the free gas capacity of this model is significantly greater than that of the model based on the absorption parameters under dry conditions (Fig. 12a).
The total gas of 2 m3 /t is used as the baseline of the marine shale gas reservoirs with commercial potential in China (Wang et al., 2012). If this standard is adopted for the MTC shale of the present study, the depth corresponding to this gas content increases significantly with rising water saturation according to the prediction results of Fig. 12c. For instance, the shale reaches a total GSC of 2 m3 /t at the depth of 680 m and 1520 m as the water saturation is 20% and 50%, respectively. When the water saturation exceeds 60%, even if the depth reaches 2800 m (the greatest depth in the study area), the GSC of the shale does not reach 2 m3 /t, i.e., without economic development potential (Fig. 12c). For this lower TOC content MCT shale, the shale gas exploration should be directed to deeper depths (>10001500 m), especially to blocks with lower water saturation.
4.4. Uncertainties and limitations of the GSC model
In the geological GSC model of Fig. 12, the effect of Sw on adsorption is based on the shale with equilibrium water. During the equilibrium water experiments, the water molecules enter the shale nanopores from the outside to the inside, while the transport of shale connate water is from the inside to the outside. This means that the equilibrium water and connate water would have different distributions in the shale nanopore system, which may affect the adsorption. In addition to this, the models describing the effect of water on MAC have not been implemented for different temperature conditions. The main reason is related to two uncertainties in the HPMA experiments of water-bearing shales. One is that water molecules will separate from the sample during the evacuation, and another is that if different temperature gradients are set in the experiments, higher temperature conditions will cause a significant loss of water molecules from the shale, thus affecting the experimental results. Most of the MAC data for water-bearing shales reported in the literature (Shabani et al., 2018; Ren et al., 2019) are based on low-temperature experiments (e.g., 318.15 K). These also corroborate the difficulty of maintaining the water content in shales in high-temperature experiments.
In this study, the relationship between maturity and depth of MCT shale is limited to the Yushe-Wuxiang area to ensure their high correlation coefficient. The effect of maturity not only affects the pore structure of OM but also changes its molecular structure, i.e., as maturity increases, the aromatization of OM molecular structure would be more favorable for methane adsorption (Zhang et al., 2012). However, it has also been shown that differences in surface functional groups have negligible effects on MAC in high and over-mature shales, and that their pore structure mainly influences adsorption (Li et al., 2022), with basically physisorbed mechanism (Fig. 6b). Nevertheless, the effect of the chemical structure evolution of OM on methane adsorption also deserves further study and consideration.
The GSC model constructed with the S7 sample represents the MCT shale with a lower TOC content, which can characterize most of the shale strata in the Qinshui Basin. However, there are also a few shales with a higher TOC content in this basin whose GSC characteristics and models need further investigation. It should be also noted that the GSC model proposed in this study represents the capacity for gas storage, i.e., it is assumed that there are sufficient gas sources in the shale reservoir. Under actual geological conditions, the GSC of shales may be influenced by more factors, such as their gas generation potential and the gas expulsion efficiency, therefore, the model needs to be further validated by obtaining shale gas exploration and development data.
5. Conclusions
This work established an experimental and simulation combination method to explore the HPMA characteristics of MCT shale samples from the Qinshui Basin and the GSC considering the approximate geological conditions.
From the results, compared to the composition characteristics, the shale pore structure parameters of Vmic and Snon have priority in the effect on the methane adsorption. The methane adsorption prediction model based on the two pore structure parameters shows promising predictive performance.
There are differences between the GSC obtained from the evolutive pore model proposed in this study and the conventional constant pore model. The main reason is the evolution of pore structure governed by the depth of the shale.
For the lower TOC content MCT shales, depth, pressure coefficient and water saturation together constrain their shale gas potentials. Even considering the maximum possible pressure coefficient of 1.0, the GSC of the shale does not reach the low limit of development potential (2 m3 /t) when the depth is < 800 m / water saturation >60%. Therefore, the exploration and development of shale gas should be carried out in areas with greater depths, especially in areas with low water saturation.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Chen-Gang Lu: Conceptualization, Writing e original draft, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Software. Xian-Ming Xiao: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision. Zhen-Qian Xue: Conceptualization, Writing e original draft. Zhang-Xin Chen: Supervision, Writing e review & editing. Yin-Tao Dong: Methodology, Software. Yue Feng: Data curation, Investigation. Gang Li: Resources.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the reviewers and editor for their insightful comments and suggestions that significantly enhanced the quality of the manuscript. This work was jointly supported by the Science and Technology Department of Shanxi Province, China (20201101003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1810201) and the China Scholarship Council (202206400012).
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2024.03.027.
ARTICLE INFO
Article history:
Received 12 July 2023
Received in revised form
9 October 2023
Accepted 31 March 2024
Available online 16 April 2024
Edited by Jie Hao and Teng Zhu
* Corresponding author. School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, 100083, China.
** Corresponding author. Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada.
E-mail addresses: [email protected] (X.-M. Xiao), [email protected] (Z.-X. Chen).
References
Abdollahi, R., Motahhari, S., Askari, A., Hematpur, H., Zamani, Z., Tirtashi, R., Daryabandeh, M., Chen, H., 2022. A systematic step-wise approach for shale gas assessment in undeveloped prospects: a case study of Lurestan shale gas area in Iran. Petrol. Explor. Dev. 49 (3), 596e604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S18763804(22)60049-1.
Azzeh, M., Neagu, D., Cowling, P.I., 2010. Fuzzy grey relational analysis for software effort estimation. Empir. Software Eng. 15 (1), 60e90. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10664-009-9113-0.
Cander, H., 2012. Sweet Spots in Shale Gas and Liquids Plays: Prediction of Fluid Composition and Reservoir Pressure. AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition.
Chalmers, G.R.L., Bustin, R.M., 2008. Lower Cretaceous gas shales in northeastern British Columbia; Part I, Geological controls on methane sorption capacity. Bull. Can. Petrol. Geol. 56 (1), 1e21. https://doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.56.1.1.
Chalmers, G.R.L., Bustin, R.M., Power, I.M., 2012. Characterization of gas shale pore systems by porosimetry, pycnometry, surface area, and field emission scanning electron microscopy/transmission electron microscopy image analyses: examples from the Barnett, Woodford, Haynesville, Marcellus, and Doig units. AAPG Bull. 96, 1099e1119. https://doi.org/10.1306/10171111052.
Chen, J., Xiao, X.M., 2014. Evolution of nanoporosity in organic-rich shales during thermal maturation. Fuel 129, 173e181. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.fuel.2014.03.058.
Chen, L., Zuo, L., Jiang, Z.X., Jiang, S., Liu, K.Y., Tan, J.Q., Zhang, L.C., 2019. Mechanisms of shale gas adsorption: evidence from thermodynamics and kinetics study of methane adsorption on shale. Chem. Eng. J. 361, 559e570. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.185.
Clarkson, C.R., Haghshenas, B., 2016. Characterization of multi-fractured horizontal shale wells using drill cuttings: 1. Fluid-in-place estimation. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 32, 574e585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.02.056.
Dang, W., Zhang, J.C., Wei, X.L., Tang, X., Chen, Q., Li, Z.M., Zhang, M.C., Liu, J., 2017.
Geological controls on methane adsorption capacity of Lower Permian transitional black shales in the Southern North China Basin, Central China: experimental results and geological implications. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 152, 456e470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.03.017.
Do, D.D., Do, H.D., 2003. Adsorption of supercritical fluids in non-porous and porous carbons: analysis of adsorbed phase volume and density. Carbon 41 (9), 1777e1791. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00152-0.
Dong, D.Z., Qiu, Z., Zhang, L.F., Li, S.X., Zhang, Q., Li, X.T., Zhang, S.R., Liu, H.L., Wang, Y.M., 2021. Progress on sedimentology of transitional facies shales and new discoveries of shale gas. Act. Sed. Sin. 39 (1), 29e45. https://doi.org/ 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2021.002 (in Chinese).
EIA, U.S.E.I., 2022. Proved Reserves of Crude Oil and Natural Gas in the United States. Washington.
Feng, Y., Xiao, X.M., Wang, E.Z., Gao, P., Lu, C.G., Li, G., 2023a. Gas storage in shale pore system: a review of the mechanism, control and assessment. Petrol. Sci. 20 (5), 2605e2636 j.petsci.2023.05.012. Feng, Y., Xiao, X.M., Gao, P., Wang, E.Z., Hu, D.F., Liu, R.B., Li, G., Lu, C.G., 2023b.
Restoration of sedimentary environment and geochemical features of deep marine Longmaxi shale and its significance for shale gas: a case study of the Dingshan area in the Sichuan Basin, South China. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 151, 106186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2023.106186.
Gao, P., Xiao, X.M., Hu, D.F., Lash, G., Liu, R.B., Cai, Y.D., Wang, Z.H., Zhang, B.Y., Yuan, T., Liu, S.Y., 2022. Effect of silica diagenesis on porosity evolution of deep gas shale reservoir of the Lower Paleozoic Wufeng-Longmaxi formations, Sichuan Basin. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 145, 105873. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.marpetgeo.2022.105873.
Gasparik, M., Bertier, P., Gensterblum, Y., Ghanizadeh, A., Krooss, B., Littke, R., 2014. Geological controls on the methane storage capacity in organic-rich shales. Int. J. Coal Geol. 123, 34e51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2013.06.010.
Gasparik, M., Ghanizadeh, A., Bertier, P., Gensterblum, Y., Bouw, S., Krooss, B., 2012. High-pressure methane sorption isotherms of black shales from The Netherlands. Energy Fuel. 26 (8), 4995e5004. https://doi.org/10.1021/ ef300405g.
Guo, S.B., Wang, Z.L., Ma, X., 2021. Exploration prospect of shale gas with Permian transitional facies of some key areas in China. Pet. Geophys. Explor. 43 (3), 377e385þ414. https://doi.org/10.11781/sysydz202103377 (in Chinese).
Hou, X.W., 2020. Study on Gas Controlling Mechanism and Coupled Accumulation of Deep Coal Measure Gases in Qinshui Basin. China university of Mining and technology, p. 273 (in Chinese).
Hu, K., Mischo, H., 2020. High-pressure methane adsorption and desorption in shales from the Sichuan basin, Southwestern China. Energy Fuel. 34 (3), 2945e2957. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b04142.
Hu, K., Tang, J.R., Mischo, H., 2021. Investigation of supercritical shale gas adsorption in shale based on the Ono-Kondo lattice model. J. China Coal Soc. 46 (8), 2479e2487. https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.CB21.0783 (in Chinese).
Ji, L.M., Zhang, T.W., Milliken, K.L., Qu, J.L., Zhang, X.L., 2012. Experimental investigation of main controls to methane adsorption in clay-rich rocks. Appl. Geochem. 27 (12), 2533e2545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.08.027 . Ji, W.M., Song, Y., Jiang, Z.X., Chen, L., Li, Z., Yang, X., Meng, M.M., 2015. Estimation of marine shale methane adsorption capacity based on experimental investigations of Lower Silurian Longmaxi formation in the Upper Yangtze Platform, south China. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 68, 94e106. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.marpetgeo.2015.08.012.
Jiang, P.F., Wu, J.F., Zhu, Y.Q., Zhang, D.K., Wu, W., Zhang, R., Wu, Z., Wang, Q., Yang, Y.R., Yang, X., Wu, Q.Z., Chen, L.Q., He, Y.F., Zhang, J., 2023. Enrichment conditions and favorable areas for exploration and development of marine shale gas in Sichuan Basin. Acta Pet. Sin. 44 (1), 91e109. https://doi.org/10.7623/ syxb202301006 (in Chinese).
Jiang, W.B., Cao, G.H., Luo, C., Lin, M., Ji, L.L., Zhou, J., 2022. A composition-based model for methane adsorption of overmature shales in Wufeng and Longmaxi Formation, Sichuan Basin. Chem. Eng. J. 429, 130766. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.cej.2021.130766.
Jiang, Z., Zhao, L., Zhang, D.X., 2018. Study of adsorption behavior in shale reservoirs under high pressure. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 49, 275e285. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jngse.2017.11.009.
Lemmon, E.W., Bell, I.H., Huber, M.L., McLinden, M.O., 2022. Thermophysical properties of fluid systems. In: NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg MD, 20899.
Li, T.F., Tian, H., Xiao, X.M., Cheng, P., Zhou, Q., Wei, Q., 2017. Geochemical characterization and methane adsorption capacity of overmature organic-rich Lower Cambrian shales in northeast Guizhou region, southwest. China. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 86, 858e873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.06.043.
Li, W., Stevens, L.A., Zhang, B., Zheng, D.Y., Snape, C., 2022. Combining molecular simulation and experiment to prove micropore distribution controls methane adsorption in kerogens. Int. J. Coal Geol. 261, 104092. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.coal.2022.104092.
Li, W., Zhang, Z.H., Yang, Y.C., Han, L.G., Shao, M.H., 2006. Constraining the hydrocarbon expulsion history of the coals in Qinshui Basin, North China, from the analysis of fluid inclusions. J. Geochem. Explor. 89 (1e3), 222e226. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2005.11.047.
Liu, D.M., Jia, Q.F., Cai, Y.D., Gao, C.J., Qiu, F., Zhao, Z., Chen, S.Y., 2022a. A new insight into coalbed methane occurrence and accumulation in the Qinshui Basin, China. Gondwana Res. 111, 280e297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.08.011.
Liu, X.Y., Zhang, L.H., Li, S.X., Zhang, J.H., Zhao, Y.L., Zhang, R.H., Guo, J.J., Tang, H.Y., Zhang, F., 2022b. Supercritical methane isothermal adsorption model considering multiple adsorption mechanisms in shale. Acta Pet. Sin. 43 (10), 1487e1499. https://doi.org/10.7623/syxb202210011 (in Chinese).
Lu, C.G., Xiao, X.M., Gai, H.F., Feng, Y., Li, G., Meng, G.M., Gao, P., 2023a. Nanopore structure characteristics and evolution of type III kerogen in marine-continental transitional shales from the Qinshui basin, northern China. Geoe. Sci. and Eng, 211413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2022.211413.
Lu, C.G., Xiao, X.M., Xue, Z.Q., Chen, Z.X., Li, G., Feng, Y., 2023b. Fractal and multifractal characteristics of nanopores and their controlling factors in marineecontinental transitional shales and their kerogens from Qinshui Basin, northern China. Nat. Resour. Res. 32 (5), 2313e2336. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11053-023-10222-3.
Merkel, A., Fink, R., Littke, R., 2015. The role of pre-adsorbed water on methane sorption capacity of Bossier and Haynesville shales. Int. J. Coal Geol. 147e148, 1e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2015.06.003.
Miao, F., Wu, D., Liu, X.Y., Xiao, X.C., Zhai, W.B., Geng, Y.Y., 2022. Methane adsorption on shale under in situ conditions: gas-in-place estimation considering in situ stress. Fuel 308, 121991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121991.
Okolo, G.N., Everson, R.C., Neomagus, H.W.J.P., Sakurovs, R., Grigore, M., Bunt, J.R., 2019. The carbon dioxide, methane and nitrogen high-pressure sorption properties of South African bituminous coals. Int. J. Coal Geol. 209, 40e53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2019.05.003.
Pan, L., Xiao, X.M., Tian, H., Zhou, Q., Cheng, P., 2016. Geological models of gas in place of the Longmaxi shale in southeast Chongqing, south China. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 73, 433e444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.03.018.
Petersen, H.I., Sanei, H., Gelin, F., Loustaunau, E., Despujols, V., 2020. Kerogen composition and maturity assessment of a solid bitumen-rich and vitrinite-lean shale: insights from the Upper Jurassic Vaca Muerta shale, Argentina. Int. J. Coal Geol. 229, 103575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2020.103575.
Ren, W.X., Guo, J.C., Zeng, F.H., Wang, T.Y., 2019. Modeling of high-pressure methane adsorption on wet shales. Energy Fuel. 33 (8), 7043e7051.
Ren, W.X., Zhou, Y., Guo, J.C., Wang, T.Y., 2022. High-pressure adsorption model for middle-deep and deep shale gas. Earth Sci. 47 (5), 1865e1875. https://doi.org/ 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b01024 (in Chinese).
Rexer, T.F., Benham, M.J., Aplin, A.C., Thomas, K.M., 2013. Methane adsorption on shale under simulated geological temperature and pressure conditions. Energy Fuel. 27 (6), 3099e3109. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef400381v.
Rexer, T.F., Mathia, E.J., Aplin, A.C., Thomas, K.M., 2014. High-pressure methane adsorption and characterization of pores in Posidonia shales and isolated kerogens. Energy Fuel. 28 (5), 2886e2901. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef402466m.
Sakurovs, R., Day, S., Weir, S., Duffy, G., 2007. Application of a modified DubininRadushkevich equation to adsorption of gases by coals under supercritical conditions. Energy Fuel. 21 (2), 992e997. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef0600614.
Shabani, M., Moallemi, S.A., Krooss, B.M., Alexandra, A.H., Ziba, Z.P., Ghalavand, H., Littke, R., 2018. Methane sorption and storage characteristics of organic-rich carbonaceous rocks, Lurestan province, southwest Iran. Int. J. Coal Geol. 186, 51e64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2017.12.005.
Song, X., Lü, X.X., Shen, Y.Q., Guo, S., Guan, Y., 2018. A modified supercritical DubinineRadushkevich model for the accurate estimation of high pressure methane adsorption on shales. Int. J. Coal Geol. 193, 1e15. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.coal.2018.04.008.
Su, X.B., Lin, X.Y., Zhao, M.J., Song, Y., Liu, S.B., 2005. The upper Paleozoic coalbed methane system in the Qinshui basin, China. AAPG Bull. 89 (1), 81e100. https:// doi.org/10.1306/07300403125.
Sudibandriyo, M., Mohammad, S.A., Robinson, R.L., Gasem, K.A.M., 2010. OnoeKondo lattice model for high-pressure adsorption: pure gases. Fluid Phase Equil. 299 (2), 238e251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2010.09.032.
Sun, J., Xiao, X.M., Cheng, P., 2022. Methane absorption of coal-measure shales with and without pore water from the Qinshui Basin, North China: based on highpressure methane absorption experiments. Int. J. Coal Geol. 263, 104116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2022.104116.
Sun, Z.X., Zhang, W., Hu, B.Q., Pan, T.Y., 2006. Features of heat flow and the geothermal field of the Qinshui Basin. Chin. J. Geophys. 49 (1), 130e134 (in Chinese).
Tian, H., Li, T.F., Zhang, T.W., Xiao, X.M., 2016. Characterization of methane adsorption on overmature Lower SilurianeUpper Ordovician shales in Sichuan Basin, southwest China: experimental results and geological implications. Int. J. Coal Geol. 156, 36e49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2016.01.013.
Wang, F.Y., Guan, J., Feng, W.P., Bao, L.Y., 2013. Evolution of overmature marine shale porosity and implication to the free gas volume. Petrol. Explor. Dev. 40 (6), 819e824. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(13)60111-1.
Wang, J., Bao, H.Y., Lu, Y.Q., Liu, Y., Zhang, M.Y., 2019. Quantitative characterization and main controlling factors of shale gas occurrence in Jiaoshiba area, Fuling. Earth Sci. 44 (3), 1001e1011 (in Chinese).
Wang, M.Z., Wang, B., Sun, F.J., Zhao, Y., Cong, L.Z., Yang, J.S., Yu, R.Z., Luo, J.Y., Zhou, H.M., 2017. Quantitative evaluation of CBM enrichment and high yield of Qinshui Basin. Nat. Gas Geosci. 28 (7), 1108e1114. https://doi.org/10.11764/ j.issn.1672-1926.2017.06.016 (in Chinese).
Wang, S.J., Yang, T., Zhang, G.S., Li, D.H., Chen, X.M., 2012. Shale gas enrichment factors and the selection and evaluation of the core area. Strategic Study of Cae 14 (6), 94e100. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-1742.2012.06.013 (in Chinese).
Wei, S.L., He, S., Hu, M.Y., Yang, W., Guo, X.W., Iglauer, S., Zhai, G.Y., 2021. Supercritical high-pressure methane adsorption on the lower Cambrian Shuijingtuo shale in the Huangling anticline area, south China: adsorption behavior, storage characteristics, and geological implications. Energy Fuel. 35 (24), 19973e19985. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c02702.
Xia, X., Naumann D Alnoncourt, R., Muhler, M., 2008. Entropy of adsorption of carbon monoxide on energetically heterogeneous surfaces. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 91 (1), 167e172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-007-8440-x.
Xiao, X.M., Wang, M.L., Wei, Q., Tian, H., Pan, L., Li, T.F., 2015. Evaluation of lower Paleozoic shale with shale gas prospect in south China. Nat. Gas Geosci. 26 (8), 1433e1445. https://doi.org/10.11764/j.issn.1672/1926.2015.08.1433 (in Chinese).
Xin, D., Tang, S.H., Zhang, S.H., Xi, Z.D., 2021. Declining high-pressure sorption isotherms on shale and coal: systematic comparison of the contributing factors. Energy Fuel. 35 (19), 15695e15708. https://doi.org/10.1021/ acs.energyfuels.1c02455.
Yang, C., Xiong, Y.Q., Zhang, J.C., Liu, Y.K., Chen, C., 2019. Comprehensive understanding of OM-hosted pores in transitional shale: a case study of Permian Longtan shale in south China based on organic petrographic analysis, gas adsorption, and X-ray diffraction measurements. Energy Fuel. 33 (9), 8055e8064. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b01410.
Yang, F., Ning, Z.F., Zhang, R., Zhao, H.W., Krooss, B.M., 2015. Investigations on the methane sorption capacity of marine shales from Sichuan Basin, China. Int. J. Coal Geol. 146, 104e117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2015.05.009.
Yang, F., Xie, C.J., Ning, Z.F., Krooss, B.M., 2016. High-pressure methane sorption on dry and moisture-equilibrated shales. Energy Fuel. 31 (1), 482e492. https:// doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02999.
Yin, L.L., Guo, S.B., 2019. Full-sized pore structure and fractal characteristics of marine-continental transitional shale: a case study in Qinshui Basin, north China. Acta Geol. Sin. Engl. 93 (3), 675e691. https://doi.org/10.1111/17556724.13856.
Zhang, M., Fu, X.H., Zhang, Q.H., Cheng, W.P., 2019. Research on the organic geochemical and mineral composition properties and its influence on pore structure of coal-measure shales in Yushe-Wuxiang Block, South Central Qinshui Basin, China. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 173, 1065e1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.petrol.2018.10.079.
Zhang, T.W., Ellis, G.S., Ruppel, S.C., Milliken, K., Yang, R.S., 2012. Effect of organicmatter type and thermal maturity on methane adsorption in shale-gas systems. Org. Geochem. 47, 120e131. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.orggeochem.2012.03.012.
Zhou, S.W., Wang, H.Y., Xue, H.Q., Guo, W., Li, X.B., 2017a. Discussion on the supercritical adsorption mechanism of shale gas based on Ono-Kondo lattice model. Earth Sci. 42 (8), 1421e1430. https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2017.543 (in Chinese).
Zhou, S.W., Wang, H.Y., Xue, H.Q., Guo, W., Li, X.B., 2017b. Supercritical methane adsorption on shale gas: mechanism and model. Chin. Sci. Bull. 62 (35), 4189e4200. https://doi.org/10.1360/N972017-00151 (in Chinese).
Zhou, S.W., Xue, H.Q., Ning, Y., Guo, W., Zhang, Q., 2018. Experimental study of supercritical methane adsorption in Longmaxi shale: insights into the density of adsorbed methane. Fuel 211, 140e148. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.fuel.2017.09.065.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Methane adsorption is a critical assessment of the gas storage capacity (GSC) of shales with geological conditions. Although the related research of marine shales has been well-illustrated, the methane adsorption of marine-continental transitional (MCT) shales is still ambiguous. In this study, a method of combining experimental data with analytical models was used to investigate the methane adsorption characteristics and GSC of MCT shales collected from the Qinshui Basin, China. The Ono-Kondo model was used to fit the adsorption data to obtain the adsorption parameters. Subsequently, the geological model of GSC based on pore evolution was constructed using a representative shale sample with a total organic carbon (TOC) content of 1.71%, and the effects of reservoir pressure coefficient and water saturation on GSC were explored. In experimental results, compared to the composition of the MCT shale, the pore structure dominates the methane adsorption, and meanwhile, the maturity mainly governs the pore structure. Besides, maturity in the middle-eastern region of the Qinshui Basin shows a strong positive correlation with burial depth. The two parameters, micropore pore volume and non-micropore surface area, induce a good fit for the adsorption capacity data of the shale. In simulation results, the depth, pressure coefficient, and water saturation of the shale all affect the GSC. It demonstrates a promising shale gas potential of the MCT shale in a deeper block, especially with low water saturation. Specifically, the economic feasibility of shale gas could be a major consideration for the shale with a depth of <800 m and/or water saturation >60% in the Yushe-Wuxiang area. This study provides a valuable reference for the reservoir evaluation and favorable block search of MCT shale gas.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, 100083, China
2 Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada
3 CNOOC Research Institute, Beijing, 100028, China