It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The lion (Panthera leo) was extirpated from the Cape region of South Africa during the mid-nineteenth century. Whilst historically classified as a distinct subspecies known as the Cape lion (P. l. melanochaita), recent molecular studies challenge the distinctiveness of this population, suggesting that it represents the southernmost population of the species' Southern Clade. The Cape lion is often cited as having a distinctive skull morphology, which has justified its subspecific classification, but only a limited number of specimens have been available for examination, so that the Cape lion’s skull morphology has not been satisfactorily understood. In this study we collected morphometric data from a greatly enlarged sample of 22 Cape lion skulls, including 12 adults, constituting the largest sample size analysed for this possible subspecies. The results suggest that (1) morphological characteristics of the skull previously thought to distinguish the Cape lion are not diagnostic, and (2) nor is the skull morphology of male and female Cape lions distinct from that of males and females of other southern African lions. Our results independently support those based on molecular investigations, which suggest that the Cape lion was not distinct from other lions within the Southern Clade.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Zoological Museum, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Division of Mammals, Moscow, Russian Federation (GRID:grid.14476.30) (ISNI:0000 0001 2342 9668)
2 National Museums Scotland, Department of Natural Sciences, Edinburgh, UK (GRID:grid.422302.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0943 6159); University of Edinburgh, Institute of Geography, School of Geosciences, Edinburgh, UK (GRID:grid.4305.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7988)
3 Nelson Mandela University, Centre for African Conservation Ecology, Department of Zoology, Gqeberha, South Africa (GRID:grid.412139.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2191 3608)
4 Field Museum of Natural History, Negaunee Integrative Research Center, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.299784.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 0476 8496)
5 Field Museum of Natural History, Negaunee Integrative Research Center, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.299784.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 0476 8496); Roosevelt University, College of Arts and Sciences, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.262640.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2232 1348)
6 University of Oxford, WildCRU, Department of Biology, Abingdon, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948)
7 University of Oxford, WildCRU, Department of Biology, Abingdon, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948); University of Malaysia Terengganu, Institute of Tropical Biodiversity and Sustainable Development, Terengganu, Malaysia (GRID:grid.412255.5) (ISNI:0000 0000 9284 9319)