It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Constrictor agonists set arterial tone through two coupling processes, one tied to (electromechanical), the other independent (pharmacomechanical) of, membrane potential (VM). This dual arrangement raises an intriguing question: is the contribution of each mechanism (1) fixed and proportionate, or (2) variable and functionally biased. Examination began in mouse mesenteric arteries with a vasomotor assessment to a classic Gq/11 (phenylephrine) or Gq/11/G12/13 (U46619) agonist, in the absence and presence of nifedipine, to separate among the two coupling mechanisms. Each constrictor elicited a concentration response curve that was attenuated and rightward shifted by nifedipine, findings consistent with functional bias. Electromechanical coupling preceded pharmacomechanical, the latter’s importance rising with agonist concentration. In this regard, ensuing contractile and phosphorylation (CPI-17 & MYPT1 (T-855 & T-697)) measures revealed phenylephrine-induced pharmacomechanical coupling was tied to protein kinase C (PKC) activity, while that enabled by U46619 to PKC and Rho-kinase. A complete switch to pharmacomechanical coupling arose when agonist superfusion was replaced by pipet application to a small portion of artery. This switch was predicted, a priori, by a computer model of electromechanical control and supported by additional measures of VM and cytosolic Ca2+. We conclude that the coupling mechanisms driving agonist-induced constriction are variable and functionally biased, their relative importance set in accordance with agonist concentration and manner of application. These findings have important implications to hemodynamic control in health and disease, including hypertension and arterial vasospasm.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Western Ontario, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Canada (GRID:grid.39381.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8884)
2 University of Western Ontario, Department of Medical Biophysics, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Canada (GRID:grid.39381.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8884)