It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Good data quality is vital for personalising plans in rehabilitation. Machine learning (ML) improves prognostics but integrating it with Multiple Imputation (MImp) for dealing missingness is an unexplored field. This work aims to provide post-stroke ambulation prognosis, integrating MImp with ML, and identify the prognostic influential factors. Stroke survivors in intensive rehabilitation were enrolled. Data on demographics, events, clinical, physiotherapy, and psycho-social assessment were collected. An independent ambulation at discharge, using the Functional Ambulation Category scale, was the outcome. After handling missingness using MImp, ML models were optimised, cross-validated, and tested. Interpretability techniques analysed predictor contributions. Pre-MImp, the dataset included 54.1% women, 79.2% ischaemic patients, median age 80.0 (interquartile range: 15.0). Post-MImp, 368 non-ambulatory patients on 10 imputed datasets were used for training, 80 for testing. The random forest (the validation best-performing algorithm) obtained 75.5% aggregated balanced accuracy on the test set. The main predictors included modified Barthel index, Fugl-Meyer assessment/motricity index, short physical performance battery, age, Charlson comorbidity index/cumulative illness rating scale, and trunk control test. This is among the first studies applying ML, together with MImp, to predict ambulation recovery in post-stroke rehabilitation. This pipeline reliably exploits the potential of incomplete datasets for healthcare prognosis, identifying relevant predictors.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Firenze, Italy (GRID:grid.418563.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 1090 9021)
2 IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Firenze, Italy (GRID:grid.418563.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 1090 9021); University of Florence, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Firenze, Italy (GRID:grid.8404.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 2304)
3 IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Firenze, Italy (GRID:grid.418563.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 1090 9021); Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi (AOUC), Firenze, Italy (GRID:grid.24704.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 1759 9494)
4 IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Milano, Italy (GRID:grid.418563.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 1090 9021)
5 University of Florence, Department of Statistics, Computer Science, Applications, Firenze, Italy (GRID:grid.8404.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 2304)