1. Introduction
Among the devastating pandemic of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), collaborative efforts have been undertaken to develop vaccines serving as a critical countermeasure in the battle against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 binds to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE2) receptors on target cells during viral entry, so most COVID-19 candidate vaccines have been developed to induce anti-spike protein immune responses [1,2].
According to the WHO dashboard, 56% of the total population has been vaccinated with a complete primary series of a COVID-19 vaccine as of December 2023 [3]. Among them, ChAdOx1 nCov-19 (AstraZeneca) is one of the most administered vaccines. It is a replication-defective chimpanzee adenovirus-vectored vaccine expressing the full-length severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike glycoprotein gene. In various studies, ChAdOx1 has been linked to favorable effectiveness against the incidence rate, hospitalization, and mortality rate of COVID-19 in both the first and second doses across different populations and geographical areas [4,5]. However, some adverse effects were also observed, including cutaneous reactions. Notably, nearly 2000 cases of herpes viral infections were reported in the UK between January and June 2021 following AstraZeneca vaccination [6].
Kaposi sarcoma (KS) is a low-grade vascular tumor caused by human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) infection. HHV-8 is a human oncovirus responsible for around 35,000 cases of cancer and 16,000 deaths worldwide each year. (Recent trends in KS incidence and mortality show some fluctuation. The incidence was 41,799 cases in 2018, decreased to 34,270 in 2020, and slightly increased to 35,359 in 2022. Mortality attributed to KS was 19,902 deaths in 2018, decreased to 15,086 in 2020, and then rose to 15,911 in 2022) [7,8,9]. These lesions typically appear at mucocutaneous sites, initially involving the lower extremities, but they have the potential to affect other organs and anatomical locations. Cutaneous KS is characterized by the appearance of purplish, reddish-blue, or dark brown/black macules and papules on the skin that do not blanch under pressure and do not bleed upon palpation. These lesions are typically painless, non-pruritic, and vary in size (0.5 to 2 cm), being symmetrically distributed along the lines of skin tension. These lesions can remain unchanged for months to years, or they may grow rapidly within a few weeks and disseminate [10,11].
The detection of herpesviruses has become more common during the COVID-19 pandemic. Arman Shafiee et al. reported an increase in the detection of herpesviruses during the COVID-19 pandemic [12,13]. Among herpesviruses family, Humaira Lambarey et al. also noted elevated HHV-8 reactivation in non-hospitalized HIV-infected patients during the pandemic [14]. However, it remains unclear whether this cutaneous manifestation is due to the direct invasion of SARS-CoV-2, reactivation of latent HHV-8 viruses by the immunomodulatory capacity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, or other factors. The potential reactivation of HHV-8 as a secondary reaction after vaccine protocols is an important consideration for diagnosis, as a few case reports have already indicated increased HHV-8 reactivation after vaccination without being infected [15,16].
Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic and the widespread administration of various vaccine protocols, this study aims to report a case of classic cutaneous KS that occurred following the first dose of the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine without being infected.
2. Case Report
The patient is a 79-year-old Taiwanese male with a history of controlled hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and coronary artery disease, for which he has been on long-term medications including Amlodipine, Valsartan, Clopidogrel, and Nebivolol. Notably, the patient has no history of any immunosuppressive medications or corticosteroid use. He received the first dose of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine in July 2021. He has no history of SARS-CoV-2 or HIV infection. Two days after vaccination, he developed skin rashes on all four limbs and sought help at the emergency room, where he was prescribed antihistamines, leading to the subsidence of symptoms. Four months later, he returned to the dermatology outpatient department with multiple reddish-blue papules on bilateral legs and feet (Figure 1A,B), along with two larger reddish erythematous papules on his left calf (Figure 1C,D). He denied any other discomforts and stated that he had not previously experienced similar lesions on his body. These lesions appeared gradually after vaccination and had enlarged recently. Excision of the two larger papules on the left calf was performed. The pathological report revealed Kaposi sarcoma, characterized by spindle-shaped tumor cells arranged in vascular spaces, positive for CD34, SMA, and HHV-8, negative for desmin (Figure 2).
Radiotherapy was administered within 2 months after diagnosis, with volumetric modulated arc therapy 4000 cGy/20 fractions to the right foot and left foot and lower leg, and electron beam therapy 4000 cGy/20 fractions to the left upper leg lesion. Three cycles of sequential chemotherapy with Doxorubicin at 20 mg/m2 were administered for locally advanced disease in the following 3 months, with no obvious systemic side effects noted. Following these treatments, no new recurrent lesions were found.
3. Discussion
The diagnosis of KS is typically suspected based on the appearance of characteristic lesions and their distribution on the skin. Histopathological confirmation of a diagnosis of KS remains the gold standard. KS characterized by a spindle cell proliferation of irregular, complex vascular channels dissecting through the dermis. Furthermore, immunohistochemistry has been used extensively in KS, with over 100 different primary antibodies evaluated, including CD31, CD34, D2-40, LYVE-1, and so on [10,11,17].
Kaposi sarcoma (KS) is classified into four distinct types based on clinical presentation and the distribution of lesions. These include classic, endemic African, HIV-related, and iatrogenic forms. Our patient, a male, exhibits characteristics most closely aligned with the classic form of KS. This type is predominantly found in patients over 50 years of age from Eastern European and Mediterranean backgrounds, features a male-to-female ratio of 17:1, and mainly affects the lower extremities [10,11,18]. To date, no antiviral treatment has been shown to be truly effective in eradicating latent HHV-8. However, several strategies have been utilized to manage classic KS, with the primary therapeutic goals being symptom palliation and reduction in lesion size. Local treatments such as surgical excision, intralesional chemotherapy, or local radiotherapy are commonly employed.
HHV-8 is essential for oncogenesis and is considered a direct carcinogen. However, its infection alone is insufficient for the development of KS; additional factors such as host immune dysfunction, local inflammation, or reactivation of latent virus are also necessary [11]. Several articles indicate that both COVID-19 infection and COVID-19 vaccination may lead to the incidence and/or reactivation of latent herpesviruses. For instance, Arman Shafee et al.’s meta-analysis highlights a potential association between COVID-19 vaccination and herpesvirus reactivation [12]. COVID-19 is linked to immunosuppression, especially in severe cases. Le Balc’h et al. noted that patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation often develop sepsis-associated immunosuppression, which increases the risk of reactivation of latent herpesviruses, such as herpes simplex virus (HSV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) [19]. Paolucci et al. found a direct correlation between reduced CD8+ T cells and the presence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA, suggesting that COVID-19 severity is associated with opportunistic viral reactivation [20]. Leoni et al. documented a patient with a history of Kaposi sarcoma who developed new skin manifestations during a COVID-19 infection, suggesting a correlation between the two conditions. They observed both HHV-8 and SARS-CoV-2 in the patient’s specimens, highlighting a potential interaction between these viruses [21]. It is essential to consider all viruses from the Herpesviridae family when managing patients who are either infected with or have recently been vaccinated against COVID-19.
In this instance, it seems that the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine served as one of the triggers required to induce KS. There have been several cases reported where physicians have postulated a connection between vaccinations, particularly COVID-19 vaccines, and the reactivation of latent KS. One such case involved a patient with a reactivation of human HHV-8 and the subsequent reappearance of KS lesions following a series of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations (BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273) [22]. Other cases have reported KS development after COVID-19 vaccination [15,16]. Vaccines like MVA-BN have shown exacerbation of KS after administration [23]. Virological rebound of HHV-8 was also observed in classic KS patients after receiving seasonal influenza vaccination [24].
We postulate that the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccination might induce latent HHV-8 reactivation, with multiple potential pathways reported to support this hypothesis.
One potential mechanism involves the spike protein of the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine. Research by Jungang Chen et al. involved transfecting the BCP-1 cell line, which harbors HHV-8, with vectors carrying the SARS-CoV-2 spike or nucleocapsid proteins, along with a control vector. Their findings revealed a significant elevation in the expression of key lytic genes, including RTA, ORF59, and ORF17, in cells transfected with either the spike or nucleocapsid proteins. Moreover, there was a noticeable increase in the production of mature virions, verified through qPCR, in cells that received these SARS-CoV-2 proteins [25]. Considering that the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine encodes the full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein, there is a conceivable risk that the vaccine could induce lytic reactivation of HHV-8 upon encountering cells infected with this virus.
Beyond the spike protein, the adenovirus vector in the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine may also trigger HHV-8 reactivation through immune response and inflammation. Research by Davor Nestić et al. revealed increased expression of IL-6, IL-8, IL-1β, and TNF-α in cells infected with a human adenovirus type 26-based vaccine vector, with IL-6 experiencing the most significant rise. This response is attributed to the Toll-like receptor (TLR) pathway, which promotes IL-6 production by activating the NF-kB transcription factors via MyD88 and TRIF [26]. Mark N. Polizzotto et al. have shown that HHV-8 flares correlate with rises in human IL-6 (hIL-6) or its viral homolog (vIL-6), triggering HHV-8’s lytic phase through the JAK/STAT3 pathway upon binding to its receptor. Such findings indicate that the adenovirus vector in the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine may facilitate IL-6 secretion, potentially causing HHV-8 lytic reactivation [27]. Additionally, the infection with this adenovirus vector could boost the expression of αvβ3 integrin, a molecule involved in angiogenesis and oncogenesis, further implicated in the development of KS [28].
Moreover, the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine’s adenovirus vector comprises DNA strands capable of activating intracellular Toll-like receptors (TLRs) 3, 7, 8, and 9. As outlined by Gregory, Sean M., et al., HHV-8 reactivation may be prompted via the TLR 7/8 pathway through Interferon Regulatory Factors (IRFs). This mechanism not only initiates the lytic replication of HHV-8, allowing the virus to multiply, but also facilitates the virus’s escape from cells destined for apoptosis [29].
These potential mechanisms support our hypothesis that the vaccine could reactivate latent HHV-8. In our case, KS manifested several months post-vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCov-19, a period marked by the absence of other predisposing health issues or medical conditions. While establishing a direct causal link between the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine and the onset of this neoplasm remains elusive, several contributing factors suggest this scenario is plausible. We conducted a survey of potential risk factors and found that, aside from the patient being older and male, he does not belong to a high-risk ethnicity. His immune status is not compromised, as he has no history of HIV or long-term use of immunosuppressive medications. Additionally, he does not have any other comorbidities such as chronic lymphatic obstruction, and there is no family history of KS or other cancers. Despite the unclear specifics of the underlying mechanism, the possibility of HHV-8 reactivation following vaccination protocols should not be overlooked.
However, these theories are currently speculative and should not discourage vaccination. Although Arman Shafee et al.‘s meta-analysis mentioned the possible association between COVID-19 vaccination and herpes virus reactivation, the focus was primarily on varicella-zoster virus (VZV), HSV, EBV, and CMV. Additionally, most of the vaccines included in that study were modified mRNA-based [12]. The relationship between HHV-8 reactivation and adenovirus-vectored vaccines, such as the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, requires further investigation. A thorough investigation is crucial to determine whether this reactivation could be a coincidence or a consequence, either related to reactivation by SARS-CoV-2 infection, the anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, or other factors.
4. Conclusions
This case report suggests a possible connection between the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine and the reactivation of latent HHV-8, leading to the development of KS. The patient, who had no prior history of KS or significant immunosuppressive conditions, developed KS several months after vaccination. Although no direct causal link can be firmly established, this case raises awareness about the potential for COVID-19 vaccines to trigger the reactivation of latent herpesviruses. The immune response induced by the vaccine, particularly the adenovirus vector, may play a role in this reactivation. Further research is needed to explore the mechanisms involved and to assess the risk of such adverse events in broader populations. These findings underscore the importance of monitoring patients with latent viral infections post-vaccination and conducting further studies to ensure the safety and efficacy of vaccination protocols.
Y.-H.L.: conceptualization, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, visualization; Y.-T.L.: writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, visualization; S.-H.C.: writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, visualization; H.-J.Y.: conceptualization, resources, writing—review and editing, supervision; approval of final version: all authors discussed the theories and contributed to the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The Institutional Review Board Committee of Changhua Christian Hospital in Taiwan granted ethical approval for the execution of this study (IRB number: 240608, Approval date: 30 June 2024).
Patient consent was waived as this case report utilized retrospective medical records for internal use at Changhua Christian Hospital. No identifiable patient information was collected or taken outside of the hospital, and the study poses minimal risk. The potential risk to the study subjects does not exceed that of non-participants. This waiver was approved following the review by the hospital’s Institutional Review Board (IRB).
All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
1. Ramasamy, M.N.; Minassian, A.M.; Ewer, K.J.; Flaxman, A.L.; Folegatti, P.M.; Owens, D.R.; Voysey, M.; Aley, P.K.; Angus, B.; Babbage, G. Safety and immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine administered in a prime-boost regimen in young and old adults (COV002): A single-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet; 2020; 396, pp. 1979-1993. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32466-1] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33220855]
2. Voysey, M.; Clemens, S.A.C.; Madhi, S.A.; Weckx, L.Y.; Folegatti, P.M.; Aley, P.K.; Angus, B.; Baillie, V.L.; Barnabas, S.L.; Bhorat, Q.E. Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: An interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK. Lancet; 2021; 397, pp. 99-111. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32661-1] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33306989]
3. World Health Organization 2023 data.who.int, WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard > Vaccines [Dashboard]. Available online: https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/vaccines (accessed on 6 August 2024).
4. Rahmani, K.; Shavaleh, R.; Forouhi, M.; Disfani, H.F.; Kamandi, M.; Oskooi, R.K.; Foogerdi, M.; Soltani, M.; Rahchamani, M.; Mohaddespour, M. The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in reducing the incidence, hospitalization, and mortality from COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Public Health; 2022; 10, 873596. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.873596] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36091533]
5. Mengstu, S.; Beyene Berha, A. Safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccine in Africa: Systematic review. Infect. Drug Resist.; 2023; 16, pp. 3085-3100. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S401074] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37222988]
6. All UK—Spontaneous Reports Received between 04/01/21 and 16/06/21 for COVID-19 Vaccine Oxford University/AstraZeneca. COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca Analysis; Government of United Kingdom: London, UK, 2021; Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/61e80216d3bf7f054db93895/FOI_21-1036-2.pdf (accessed on 6 August 2024).
7. Bray, F.; Laversanne, M.; Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin.; 2024; 74, pp. 229-263. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834]
8. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin.; 2018; 68, pp. 394-424. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492]
9. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin.; 2021; 71, pp. 209-249. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660]
10. Tschachler, E. Chapter 128. Kaposi Sarcoma and Angiosarcoma. Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology in General Medicine; 8th ed. Goldsmith, L.A.; Katz, S.I.; Gilchrest, B.A.; Paller, A.S.; Leffell, D.J.; Wolff, K. The McGraw-Hill Companies: New York, NY, USA, 2012.
11. Iftode, N.; Rădulescu, M.A.; Aramă, Ș.S.; Aramă, V. Update on Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV or HHV8)–review. Rom. J. Intern. Med.; 2020; 58, pp. 199-208. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/rjim-2020-0017]
12. Shafiee, A.; Amini, M.J.; Arabzadeh Bahri, R.; Jafarabady, K.; Salehi, S.A.; Hajishah, H.; Mozhgani, S.-H. Herpesviruses reactivation following COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Med. Res.; 2023; 28, 278. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01238-9]
13. Shafiee, A.; Teymouri Athar, M.M.; Amini, M.J.; Hajishah, H.; Siahvoshi, S.; Jalali, M.; Jahanbakhshi, B.; Mozhgani, S.H. Reactivation of herpesviruses during COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev. Med. Virol.; 2023; 33, e2437. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmv.2437]
14. Lambarey, H.; Blumenthal, M.J.; Chetram, A.; Joyimbana, W.; Jennings, L.; Orrell, C.; Schäfer, G. Reactivation of Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) by SARS-CoV-2 in non-hospitalised HIV-infected patients. EBioMedicine; 2024; 100, 104986. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.104986] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38306893]
15. Martínez-Ortega, J.I.; Cibrian, A.G.R.; Martinez-Jaramillo, E.; Silva, M.d.C.G. Sporadic Kaposi Sarcoma Following a COVID-19 Vaccine: Mere Coincidence or Something More?. Cureus; 2024; 16, e53925. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.53925]
16. White, E.; Fazio, N.; Tourmouzis, K.; Ryu, S.; Finger, P.T.; Sassoon, J.; Keresztes, R.; Chou, T.; Kaplowitz, K.; Honkanen, R. Unilateral conjunctival Classic Kaposi Sarcoma following a COVID 19 booster. Am. J. Ophthalmol. Case Rep.; 2024; 34, 101986. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2023.101986] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38601193]
17. Pantanowitz, L.; Otis, C.N.; Dezube, B.J. Immunohistochemistry in Kaposi’s sarcoma. Clin. Exp. Dermatol.; 2010; 35, pp. 68-72. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03707.x]
18. Radu, O.; Pantanowitz, L. Kaposi sarcoma. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med.; 2013; 137, pp. 289-294. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2012-0101-RS]
19. Le Balc’h, P.; Pinceaux, K.; Pronier, C.; Seguin, P.; Tadié, J.-M.; Reizine, F. Herpes simplex virus and cytomegalovirus reactivations among severe COVID-19 patients. Crit. Care; 2020; 24, 530. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03252-3] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32859241]
20. Paolucci, S.; Cassaniti, I.; Novazzi, F.; Fiorina, L.; Piralla, A.; Comolli, G.; Bruno, R.; Maserati, R.; Gulminetti, R.; Novati, S. EBV DNA increase in COVID-19 patients with impaired lymphocyte subpopulation count. Int. J. Infect. Dis.; 2021; 104, pp. 315-319. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.12.051]
21. Leoni, E.; Cerati, M.; Finzi, G.; Lombardo, M.; Sessa, F. COVID-19 and HHV8 first spotted together: An affair under electron microscopy. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol.; 2021; 35, pp. e311-e312. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17123]
22. Hitzenbichler, F.; Weber, M.; Salzberger, B. Infection image: Reoccurrence of Kaposis sarcoma after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in an HIV-infected patient. Infection; 2023; 52, pp. 283-284. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-023-02121-9]
23. Volkow, P.; Islas-Muñoz, B.; Carpio-Guadarrama, D.; Pérez-Padilla, R. Exacerbation of Kaposi sarcoma after MVA-BN (Jynneos) vaccination in a person with HIV/AIDS. AIDS; 2024; 38, pp. 129-130. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000003717]
24. Cappelletti, M.; Taddeo, A.; Colombo, E.; Brambilla, L.; Bellinvia, M.; Pregliasco, F.; Villa, M.L.; Della Bella, S. Immunogenicity and safety of seasonal influenza vaccination in patients with classic Kaposi’s sarcoma. J. Investig. Dermatol.; 2012; 132, pp. 2414-2421. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jid.2012.151] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22622418]
25. Chen, J.; Dai, L.; Barrett, L.; James, J.; Plaisance-Bonstaff, K.; Post, S.R.; Qin, Z. SARS-CoV-2 proteins and anti-COVID-19 drugs induce lytic reactivation of an oncogenic virus. Commun. Biol.; 2021; 4, 682. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02220-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34083759]
26. Nestić, D.; Custers, J.; Švec, D.; Majhen, D. Human adenovirus type 26 infection mediated by αvβ3 integrin is caveolin-1-dependent. Microbiol. Spectr.; 2022; 10, e0109722. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01097-22] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35924932]
27. Polizzotto, M.N.; Uldrick, T.S.; Wang, V.; Aleman, K.; Wyvill, K.M.; Marshall, V.; Pittaluga, S.; O’Mahony, D.; Whitby, D.; Tosato, G. Human and viral interleukin-6 and other cytokines in Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus-associated multicentric Castleman disease. Blood J. Am. Soc. Hematol.; 2013; 122, pp. 4189-4198. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-08-519959] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24174627]
28. Rivera-Soto, R.; Dissinger, N.J.; Damania, B. Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus viral interleukin-6 signaling upregulates integrin β3 levels and is dependent on STAT3. J. Virol.; 2020; 94, e01384-19. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01384-19]
29. Gregory, S.M.; West, J.A.; Dillon, P.J.; Hilscher, C.; Dittmer, D.P.; Damania, B. Toll-like receptor signaling controls reactivation of KSHV from latency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2009; 106, pp. 11725-11730. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905316106]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic prompted the rapid development of vaccines, including the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 (AstraZeneca) vaccine. While effective, adverse effects have been reported, including cutaneous manifestations. Kaposi sarcoma (KS), a vascular tumor linked to Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus/human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8), has seen increased detection during the pandemic. This study reports a case of classic cutaneous KS in a 79-year-old male following the first dose of the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine, without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. The patient developed multiple reddish-blue papules on his legs and feet, confirmed as KS through histopathology. Treatment included radiotherapy and sequential chemotherapy with Doxorubicin. The potential reactivation of latent HHV-8 by the vaccine is explored through mechanisms involving the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and adenovirus vector, which may induce immune responses and inflammatory pathways. Although establishing a direct causal link remains challenging, the case highlights the need for vigilance regarding KS reactivation post-vaccination. Further large-scale studies are warranted to elucidate the relationship between COVID-19 vaccines and latent virus reactivation, ensuring comprehensive safety assessments and informed public health decisions.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Division of General Practice, Department of Medical Education, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500209, Taiwan;
2 Department of Education, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404327, Taiwan;
3 Department of Dermatology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500209, Taiwan; Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan