It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Many species exhibit alternative mating tactics (ARTs), with larger socially dominant males competing for females and smaller males adopting “sneaker” strategies to exploit fertilisation opportunities without competition or courtship. Females typically prefer larger socially dominant males, but their ability to manipulate mating or fertilisation outcomes is largely unknown. Here, using chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, we examined whether the female’s ovarian fluid (OF) differentially influences the temporal patterns of sperm swimming traits in ejaculates from non-preferred sneaker (‘parr’) and preferred (dominant) males. Results demonstrate that OF improves sperm swimming speed and linearity compared to river water, regardless of male mating tactic. We report a novel tactic-specific difference in sperm linearity in which parr male sperm initially maintain straighter trajectories in river water, compared to dominant males, but then rapidly change to less linear and more circular paths over time. Intriguingly, we show that OF counteracts this change in sperm linearity in parr males so that patterns become indistinguishable from dominants when parr sperm swim in OF. Together, these results show that male chinook salmon exhibit differential sperm trait investment strategies depending on reproductive tactic.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Otago, Department of Nursing, Christchurch, New Zealand (GRID:grid.29980.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7830)
2 University of Western Australia, School of Biological Sciences, Crawley, Australia (GRID:grid.1012.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7910); Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, Australia (GRID:grid.452589.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 1799 3491)
3 University of Western Australia, School of Biological Sciences, Crawley, Australia (GRID:grid.1012.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7910)