It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The current study developed a method for quantifying four drugs—Sulfamethoxazole, Trimethoprim, Isoniazid, and Pyridoxine—in rabbit plasma. The method uses gradient liquid chromatography based on analytical quality by design. To achieve separation, a Eclip Plus C18 (250 mm × 5 mm, 4.6 µm) column with L1 packing was used, and analytes were detected at 254 nm at ambient temperature. The optimized mobile phase consisted of 50 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) and Methanol. The concentration of Methanol was 3% (0–5 min), 15% (5–15 min), 55% (15–27 min), and 3% Methanol until the end of the 30-min runtime, and the flow rate was set at 0.95 mL/min. Control Noise Experimentation was used to screen studies, revealing that flow rate, pH, and Methanol concentration significantly affected the analytical attributes. The study identified critical attributes (resolution and asymmetric factor) and developed a quality target method profile. A central composition design was used to optimize the essential parameters. The method developed for the drugs showed peaks at retention times of 6.990 min for Isoniazid, 7.880 min for Pyridoxine, 15.530 min for Sulfamethoxazole, and 26.890 min for Trimethoprim, respectively. The method was validated with linearity in the range of 10–640 ng ml−1, with R2 of 0.9993, 0.9987, 0.9993, and 0.9992 for Sulfamethoxazole, Trimethoprim, Isoniazid, and Pyridoxine, respectively.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Adichunchanagiri University, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Sri Adichunchanagiri College of Pharmacy, BG Nagara, India
2 Nemcare Group of Institution, Department of Pharmacology, NETES Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, Mirza, Kamrup, India
3 Nemcare Group of Institution, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, NETES Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, Mirza, Kamrup, India (GRID:grid.484086.6)
4 Adichunchanagiri University, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Sri Adichunchanagiri College of Pharmacy, BG Nagara, India (GRID:grid.484086.6)
5 Nemcare Group of Institution, Department of Pharmacognosy, NETES Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, Mirza, Kamrup, India (GRID:grid.484086.6)