It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Age data are essential for estimating life history parameters and are thus critical for population assessment, management, and conservation. Traditional vertebrae-based age estimation in elasmobranchs can be costly, time intensive, of low accuracy, and is by necessity lethal. Herein, epigenetic clocks were developed for an elasmobranch, the cownose ray (Rhinoptera bonasus), using aquarium-born individuals (n = 42) with known dates of birth (age range: 7−7,878 days or 0−21 years) and two tissue types (fin clips and whole blood) that can be sampled in a relatively non-invasive manner. Enzymatically-converted restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (ECrad-seq) was used to identify CpG sites that exhibited age-correlated DNA methylation. The epigenetic clocks developed were highly accurate (mean absolute error, MAE, < 0.75 years) and precise (R2 > 0.98). Age-associated CpG sites were identified across tissues, and a multi-tissue clock was also highly accurate (MAE < 1 year) and precise (R2 = 0.97). Using the developed fin clip clock, three wild-caught individuals of unknown age but managed in aquariums for > 22 years were predicted to be 22.10−23.49 years old. Overall, the results have important implications for future epigenetic clock development and noninvasive age estimation in elasmobranchs.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Marine Genomics Laboratory, Department of Life Sciences, Corpus Christi, USA (GRID:grid.264759.b) (ISNI:0000 0000 9880 7531)
2 Ripley’s Aquariums, Orlando, USA (GRID:grid.264759.b); University of Delaware, Delaware Biotechnology Institute, Newark, USA (GRID:grid.33489.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 0454 4791)
3 Ripley’s Aquarium of Myrtle Beach, Myrtle Beach, USA (GRID:grid.33489.35)
4 Ripley’s Aquarium of the Smokies, Gatlinburg, TN 37738, USA, Gatlinburg, USA (GRID:grid.33489.35)
5 Ripley’s Aquarium of Canada, Buffalo, USA (GRID:grid.33489.35)
6 Ripley’s Aquarium of Canada, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.33489.35)
7 Center for Species Survival, Georgia Aquarium, Atlanta, USA (GRID:grid.33489.35)