It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Data evaluating effectiveness of XBB.1.5-adapted vaccines against JN.1-related endpoints are scarce. This nationwide test-negative case-control study within the US Veterans Affairs Healthcare System aims to estimate vaccine effectiveness (VE) of BNT162b2 XBB.1.5-adapted vaccine compared to not receiving an XBB vaccine of any kind against COVID-19 hospitalization, emergency department or urgent care visits (ED/UC), and outpatient visits. Between September 25, 2023 and January 31, 2024, effectiveness was 24–35% during a period of JN.1 predominance and 50–61% during XBB predominance across all outcomes. VE within 60 days of vaccination during the likely JN.1 period was 32% (95% confidence interval 3–52%) against hospitalization, 41% (23–54%) against ED/UC visits, and 31% (1–52%) against outpatient visits. Corresponding VE during the likely XBB period was 62% (44–74%), 52% (37–63%), and 50% (25–66%) by setting, respectively. Here, we show the importance of strain match to maximize the public health impact of COVID-19 vaccination.
This study evaluates the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 XBB.1.5-adapted vaccine against COVID-19 outcomes within the US Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, finding 50–61% during XBB predominance and 24–35% effectiveness during JN.1 predominance, emphasizing the importance of strain match.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Providence Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Infectious Diseases Research Program, Providence, USA; Providence Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Center of Innovation in Long-Term Support Services, Providence, USA (GRID:grid.458540.8); University of Rhode Island, College of Pharmacy, Kingston, USA (GRID:grid.20431.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 0416 2242); Brown University, School of Public Health, Providence, USA (GRID:grid.40263.33) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9094)
2 Providence Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Infectious Diseases Research Program, Providence, USA (GRID:grid.40263.33); Providence Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Center of Innovation in Long-Term Support Services, Providence, USA (GRID:grid.458540.8); University of Rhode Island, College of Pharmacy, Kingston, USA (GRID:grid.20431.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 0416 2242)
3 Providence Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Infectious Diseases Research Program, Providence, USA (GRID:grid.20431.34)
4 Pfizer Inc. New York, New York, USA (GRID:grid.410513.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 8800 7493)
5 Providence Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Infectious Diseases Research Program, Providence, USA (GRID:grid.410513.2); Providence Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Center of Innovation in Long-Term Support Services, Providence, USA (GRID:grid.458540.8); University of Rhode Island, College of Pharmacy, Kingston, USA (GRID:grid.20431.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 0416 2242)