Introduction
Citizen science is a cost-effective method that engages local community groups through public outreach (Bonney et al., 2016). Also known as participatory research or community-based science, this approach can guide scientific research by shaping research questions, improving project design, and enabling new discoveries (Conrad & Hilchey, 2011). Scientific advancements utilizing citizen science are now evolving into legal frameworks and national scientific policies. For example, the U.S. enacted the federal Crowdsourcing and Citizen Science Act (5 U.S. Code §3724), allowing federal agencies to integrate citizen science into key mission areas.
Citizen science initiatives can help document the distribution and identify new habitats for endangered, threatened, and protected (ETP) marine species, such as sea turtles. Engaging the public in an active role to share sightings of sea turtles enhances data collection and fosters a greater understanding and support for marine conservation (Chandler et al., 2017). For example, in Southern California, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) invites the public to report sea turtle sightings via the West Coast Sea Turtle Sightings form on their website (https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/west-coast/science-data/green-turtle-research-and-conservation-southern-california). The NOAA Citizen Science Strategy provides the framework for scientists to leverage crowdsourced data, significantly enhancing our understanding of sea turtle distribution (Volz et al., 2021). A study utilizing eight years of citizen science data from the San Gabriel River, California demonstrated the effectiveness of this approach in monitoring sea turtle populations in accessible coastal areas (Massey et al., 2023). Similarly, NOAA encouraged SCUBA divers in La Jolla Bay, California, to submit photographs of underwater sea turtle sightings which yielded results indicating fidelity and residency duration at specific dive sites (Hanna et al., 2021).
Figure 1: Regional view of Northwest Mexico highlighting the five foraging areas published by Sandoval-Lugo et al. (2020), with permission to recreate. Colored circles represent different foraging areas, north and south boundaries as published by Sandoval-Lugo et al. (2020), with permission to recreate. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18203/fig-1
Given that sea turtles are highly migratory and often traverse international waters, engaging fishers in México as citizen scientists to report sea turtle sightings can play a crucial role in identifying spatial distribution gaps. This approach has been successfully demonstrated in fisheries to improve stock sustainability (Fulton et al., 2019), and can also lead to better-informed cross-border conservation strategies for sea turtles (Peckham & Maldonado-Díaz, 2012; Senko, Jenkins & Peckham, 2017). In the North Pacific, juvenile loggerhead turtles are known to spend up to 20 years foraging off the Pacific Coast of México’s Baja California peninsula after hatching on nesting beaches in Japan (Briscoe et al., 2016; Briscoe et al., 2021; Seminoff et al., 2014; Peckham et al., 2011). However, until recently, the Baja California Peninsula was thought to act as a land barrier to loggerhead movement into the Gulf of California (GOC) (Seminoff et al., 2004). Citizen science data from fishers reporting accidental captures of sea turtles off the coast of Sinaloa, México revealed the first record of loggerheads in the GOC (Zavala-Norzagaray et al., 2017), enabling researchers to study post-release movements (Sandoval-Lugo et al., 2020). Analysis of the tracked loggerheads identified five distinct foraging sites closely linked to regions of high productivity based on chlorophyll-a and sea surface temperature: the Upper GOC, Bay of Los Angeles (BLA), Guaymas Basin, Tiburón Island, and the Central GOC (Fig. 1). However, none of the tracked individuals were observed in the Bay of La Paz (BLP), one of the most ecologically and socioeconomically important bays in the GOC. Here, we present the first record of loggerhead turtles in the BLP based on opportunistic citizen science sightings submitted from three diverse community groups: coastal residents, artisanal fishers, and SCUBA divers. These records contribute to recent studies regarding the spatial and temporal distribution of loggerhead turtles in the North Pacific, supporting broader international conservation efforts of this endangered population (IUCN, 2022) and underscoring the importance of diverse, collaborative citizen science initiatives.
Materials & MethodsSite description
The BLP is located on the eastern shoreline of the Baja California Peninsula and influenced by the oceanographic connection and economic importance to the GOC (Cisneros-Mata, 2010). Since the BLP is open to the GOC, we used the quadrilateral delineated bathymetry described by del Monte-Luna et al. (2005) as a general guide to select citizen science sightings of loggerheads reported in the BLP. The coastal shallows are characterized with extensive seagrass beds and mangrove forests, nurturing a wide array of marine species, (Félix-Pico et al., 2006) while the San Cosme Corridor and San Lorenzo Channel facilitate water exchange with the open GOC, shaping the mixture of diurnal and semidiurnal currents and habitats (Guevara-Guillén et al., 2018). The BLP is characterized by a shallow extensive continental shelf and is connected to the GOC by two passages: the Northern Alfonso basin and the San Lorenzo Channel (Torres-Hernández et al., 2022). Underwater canyons create refuge zones and nutrient-rich upwelling areas, contributing to the bay’s rich biodiversity and habitat diversity that attract all five Eastern Pacific sea turtle species (Johnson et al., 2016). The BLP is a mixed-use region with marine protected areas, coastal residential and ecotourism areas, and artisanal fishing camps (Fig. 2).
Figure 2: Study area of the Bay of La Paz, Baja Sur, México showing the marine protected areas at various levels from National, RAMSAR, and UN Heritage. A portion of the extensive chain of protected islands throughout the Gulf of California is highlighted that pertains to the Bay of La Paz. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18203/fig-2
Citizen science species validation
Since 2016, Upwell Turtles, a NGO based in California, US, in conjunction with the Mexican Sea Turtle Network, Grupo Tortuguero de Las Californias (GTC) have received hundreds of sea turtle sightings reported opportunistically by various coastal community sectors. Selecting only sightings referencing loggerhead turtles within the general boundaries of the BLP, ten citizen science reports were considered “research-grade” based on the iNaturalist.org criteria (iNaturalist, 2022). iNaturalist.org is a citizen science platform that considers research-grade sightings when at least two researchers can confirm the species. Reports that contained clear photographs were included if two researchers from Upwell or GTC verified the species identification of loggerhead. In lieu of photos, sightings were included if Upwell or GTC verified the sea turtle in the field. If only the carapace of the turtle was available, in the case of stranded dead turtles, we used NOAA diagrams to verify the number of scutes and the shape characteristic to confirm the sighting as a loggerhead.
Citizen science report classification
Each of the turtle sightings located within the BLP verified as loggerhead species were given an unique identification number (01-10). Sightings were grouped into three categories: (1) community sector (coastal residents, recreational divers, or small-scale fishers); (2) sea turtle status (live or dead) and; (3) type of report (stranded, bycatch, swimming), presented in Table 1. Sightings were mapped out using ArcGIS however, since the precision of citizen scientist-provided coordinates varied, the location of sightings was determined using available georeferencing details and cross-referenced with satellite imagery in Google Earth. Locations of fish camps and polygons of marine protected areas (MPA) were added to the GIS maps for reference (Fig. 2).
Table 1: Citizen science reported sightings of loggerhead turtles in the Bay of La Paz, México.
ID | Site name | Date | Latitude | Longitude | Status | Sighting | Figure | Origin | Verified | Photos |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | CICIMAR | Jun 2018 | 24.14145 | −110.35197 | Dead | Stranded | 5.a | Resident | Field | Yes |
02 | MOGOTE | Jul 2018 | 24.18886 | −110.48245 | Dead | Stranded | 4.a | Resident | Photo | Yes |
03 | EL BAJO | Jul 2018 | 24.6146 | −110.3652 | Live | Swimming | 6.b | Diver | Video | Yes |
04 | EL CAJETE | Aug 2018 | 24.25768 | −110.54869 | Dead | Bycatch | N/A | Fisher | Field | No |
05 | LA DUNA | Jan 2019 | 24.247937 | −110.59781 | Dead | Stranded | 5.b | Resident | Field | Yes |
06 | SAN JUAN de la COSTA | Feb 2019 | 24.342694 | −110.66918 | Dead | Stranded | N/A | Resident | Field | Yes |
07 | MALECON | Dec 2019 | 24.171625 | −110.30731 | Dead | Stranded | N/A | Resident | Photo | Yes |
08 | MOGOTE 2 | Nov 2020 | 24.180556 | −110.44083 | Dead | Stranded | 4.b | Resident | Photo | Yes |
09 | FANG MING | Jul 2022 | 24.4303 | −110.3744 | Live | Swimming | 6.a | Diver | Video | Yes |
10 | LA BASTILLA | Sept 2022 | 24.30387 | −110.5243 | Dead | Bycatch | N/A | Fisher | Field | Yes |
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18203/table-1
Results
The ten confirmed loggerhead turtle sightings observed here present the first record of loggerheads in BLP based on citizen science. Sightings were reported from three diverse community groups: coastal residents, SCUBA divers, and one artisanal fisher. The sightings selected were reported between 2017 and 2023 and all were georeferenced within the BLP (Fig. 3). Among these sightings, 20% were documented as live sightings, while the remaining 80% were recorded as dead sightings (Table 1).
Figure 3: Spatial distribution of loggerhead turtle sightings reported through citizen science in the Bay of La Paz. Fish icons represent small fishing camps. Colored diamonds represent citizen science reports. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18203/fig-3
Within the collection of ten loggerhead sightings in the BLP, we include seven photographs which show one of the bycatch turtles (Fig. 4), four of the six stranded turtles (Figs. 5–8) and the two live swimming turtles reported by SCUBA divers (Figs. 9 and 10). According to one fisher, two separate dead loggerhead turtles were reported as bycatch over a span of four years (Fig. 4). There were six reports of stranded turtles submitted by various individual coastal residents, both local and international seasonal residents. Stranded turtles were reported along the western and southwestern portion of the BLP in the same vicinity of the bycaught turtles adjacent to several fishing communities. The cause of mortality of the stranded turtles could not be confirmed without a full necropsy and due to various stages of decomposition. Yet, two of the stranded turtles were photographed by citizen scientists with anthropogenic debris (Figs. 5 and 6). By contrast, there were two live turtle sightings that were both reported as swimming by individual recreational SCUBA divers on two different occasions at two distinct dive sites (Figs. 9 and 10). Both of the live sightings occurred during recreational dives within the Islas del Golfo de California MPA which comprises all the islands throughout the GOC.
Figure 4: Loggerhead turtle reported verbally by a fisherman as bycatch. ID 10. Photo credit: Zoe Diacou. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18203/fig-4
Figure 5: Stranded loggerhead turtle reported via social media with evidence of plastic debris. ID 02. Photo Credit: Guri Sejzer. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18203/fig-5
Figure 6: Stranded loggerhead turtle reported via social media with evidence of fishing net debris. ID 08. Photo provided by Authors. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18203/fig-6
Figure 7: Stranded loggerhead turtle found in the Ensenada de LaPaz. ID 01. Photo provided by Authors. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18203/fig-7
Figure 8: Stranded loggerhead turtle reported by coastal residents. ID 05. Photo credit: Gabriela Flores Tom. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18203/fig-8
Figure 9: Live swimming loggerhead turtle ID 09. Photo credit: Diana Martín Campilla. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18203/fig-9
Figure 10: Live swimming loggerhead turtle ID 03. Photo credit: Tamara J. Double. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18203/fig-10
Discussion
The sightings reviewed in this paper represent the first records of loggerhead turtles in the BLP based on citizen science data. The sightings, contributed by multiple community groups—coastal residents, SCUBA divers, and artisanal fishers—include live and dead turtles, categorized into three types: swimming, bycatch, and stranded. This diversity of sources and sighting types underscores the value of citizen science in providing new information on marine species distribution, particularly in under-studied and ecologically important regions such as the BLP.
While we cannot stipulate the cause of the strandings, it should be noted that citizen science provided valuable information on a pelagic species identified in a coastal bay. In the North Pacific, loggerhead turtles are typically considered pelagic, especially during their juvenile life stage, with the subpopulation in this region known to nest in Japan and forage off the Pacific coast of the Baja California Peninsula (Briscoe et al., 2016; Seminoff et al., 2014; Peckham et al., 2011). The presence of loggerheads in a coastal bay raises questions as to the significance of the bay and the GOC for foraging and habitat use of this endangered subpopulation. Our findings complement the recent findings of the first record of loggerheads off the coast of Sinaloa (Zavala-Norzagaray et al., 2017). Future research efforts should track loggerhead turtle movements in the BLP to better understand how and the extent to which they are using the bay.
The two live sightings were documented by different divers on separate occasions at two island dive sites within the Islas del Golfo MPA. These divers have also reported sightings of other sea turtle species at these and other dive sites. Given that the BLP is a popular destination for SCUBA divers and snorkelers, these findings present an opportunity to co-create a structured citizen science program that could generate a robust sample size for scientific analysis. SCUBA divers are a reliable subset for citizen science as they frequently revisit the same sites, providing insights into site fidelity, sighting frequency over time, and seasonal usage of specific dive sites (Hanna et al., 2021). Implementing a standardized protocol for volunteer SCUBA divers to capture photographs can help identify individual turtles and offer valuable information on site fidelity and habitat use, similar to the approach used in La Jolla, California (Hanna et al., 2021). This analysis could enhance our understanding of the effectiveness of dive sites within MPAs, leading to improved marine spatial planning for sea turtle conservation (Wallace et al., 2010; Wallace et al., 2023).
The two bycatch reports were submitted by the same fisher, approximately four years apart. According to the fisher, the loggerheads were found dead when they retrieved the catch using coastal bottom-set gillnets targeting finfish and stingrays. Most fishers in the BLP employ gillnets set for as long as three days leading to likely drowning if turtles become entangled (Senko, Jenkins & Peckham, 2017). The bycatch reports suggest the need for incentivized voluntary bycatch monitoring to establish a baseline understanding and co-design of effective mitigation strategies (Morales-Bojórquez et al., 2021). Most fishers do not report bycatch for fear of seasonal closures, loss of fishing permits, or fines (Aguilar-González et al., 2012; Senko et al., 2011; Senko et al., 2014; Senko, Jenkins & Peckham, 2017). Our results suggest that even a small number of reports from fishers can significantly enhance our understanding of species presence in fishing areas by contributing fisheries-dependent data through a citizen science approach (Fulton et al., 2019). In fact, this was observed by just one team of three fishers in Sinaloa who reported loggerheads as bycatch in the shark drift gillnet fishery, leading to new discoveries of foraging habitats in the GOC (Zavala-Norzagaray et al., 2017).
The six reports of dead stranded turtles were opportunistically received from various coastal residents who encountered the turtles on a beach. Given that most sightings involved stranded dead turtles, this likely reflects the greater ease of discovering a dead turtle washed ashore compared to spotting one underwater, particularly considering the pelagic nature of this species. The cause of mortality was not confirmed for any of the stranded turtles, although fishing nets and plastic were found on two individuals (Fig. 5). Considering the strandings occurred along the western side of the BLP, where several fishing camps are located and the two bycaught turtles were reported, it is plausible that these stranded turtles were discarded as bycatch and washed ashore. However, we could not determine the cause of mortality in any case, including the strandings our team verified in the field. Additionally, we cannot confirm that these turtles were utilizing the bay when they stranded; rather, they could have been carried in by ocean currents from more pelagic areas, similar to what occurs in the Gulf of Ulloa (Tomaszewicz et al., 2015; Mancini et al., 2012).
The loggerhead sightings provided herein by both local and international coastal residents suggest a growing potential for community-based science initiatives in México. By leveraging data from multiple community groups, citizen science can enhance the accuracy and depth of ecological studies, leading to more effective conservation strategies. For example, in the Pelagie Archipelago of the Mediterranean, ecotourists and fishers reported sea turtle sightings and bycatch, which helped distinguish sea turtle occurrences within different areas of the archipelago (Casale et al., 2020). These initiatives demonstrate that engaging diverse community groups in scientific data collection can contribute to understanding and conserving marine species. By promoting community involvement, México can build on this model to enhance its own conservation efforts and ecological studies.
Additional Information and Declarations
Competing Interests
The authors do not have any competing interests. Stephanie J. Rousso is a PhD candidate at CICIMAR-IPN from 2021 - current. Her research is funded by the Mexican government as a graduate scholarship. Stephanie is not currently, nor ever has been an employee of Upwell Turtles.
In 2019, Upwell secured an unrestricted fund, for 1 year, to support research initiatives in Mexico aimed at sea turtle conservation which Stephanie received and administered in Mexico to cover logistics, administration, and coordination of several research projects including Sea Turtle Spotter. Currently, Stephanie does not receive any funding, stipend, administrative support from Upwell.
Upwell supported the research outlined in this manuscript through administrative elements, such as graphics and administrative staff that were allocated to create the field guides of sea turtles used by citizen scientist, costs associated with hosting free public workshops, travel to confirm species identification in the field, visits to the fishing communities and other administrative support for research projects.
Agnese Mancini is employed full time by Grupo Tortuguero de Las Californias A.C.
Author Contributions
Stephanie J. Rousso conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
María Dinorah Herrero Perezrul analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Agnese Mancini performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Alan A. Zavala-Norzagaray analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Jesse F. Senko analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The raw data are available in Table 1 (coordinates) and in Figs. 3, 4, 5, 6 (photos).
Funding
This work was financially supported either in-kind or monetary grants by Upwell Turtles, La Duna Ecology Center, and The Rufford Foundation. Upwell Turtles provided reimbursement for travel, workshop costs, and administrative services. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Aguilar-González ME, Luna-González A, Aguirre A, Zavala-Norzagaray AA, Mundo-Ocampo M, González-Ocampo HA. 2012. Perceptions of fishers to sea turtle bycatch, illegal capture and consumption in the San Ignacio-Navachiste-Macapule lagoon complex, Gulf of California, México. Integrative Zoology 9(1):70-84
Bonney R, Phillips TB, Ballard HL, Enck JW. 2016. Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science 25(1):2-16
Briscoe DK, Parker DM, Bograd S, Hazen E, Scales K, Balazs GH, Kurita M, Saito T, Okamoto H, Rice M, Polovina JJ+1 more. 2016. Multi-year tracking reveals extensive pelagic phase of juvenile loggerhead sea turtles in the North Pacific. Movement Ecology 4:1-12
Briscoe DK, Turner Tomaszewicz CN, Seminoff JA, Parker DM, Balazs GH, Polovina JJ, Kurita M, Okamoto H, Saito T, Rice MR, Crowder LB+1 more. 2021. Dynamic thermal corridor may connect endangered loggerhead sea turtles across the Pacific Ocean. Frontiers in Marine Science 8:630-590
Casale P, Ciccocioppo A, Vagnoli G, Rigoli A, Freggi D, Tolve L, Luschi P. 2020. Citizen science helps assessing spatio-temporal distribution of sea turtles in foraging areas. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 30(1):123-130
Chandler M, See L, Copas K, Bonde AM, López BC, Danielsen F, Legind JK, Masinde S, Miller-Rushing AJ, Newman G, Rosemartin A+1 more. 2017. Contribution of citizen science towards international biodiversity monitoring. Biological Conservation 213:280-294
Cisneros-Mata MA. 2010. The importance of fisheries in the Gulf of California and ecosystem-based sustainable co-management for conservation. In: Brusca R, ed. The Gulf of California: biodiversity and conservation. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. 321-336
Conrad CC, Hilchey KG. 2011. A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 176:273-291
del Monte-Luna P, Arreguín-Sánchez F, Godínez-Orta L, López-Ferreira CA. 2005. Updated bathymetry of La Paz Bay, Baja California Sur, México. CICIMAR Oceánides 20(1–2):75-77
Félix-Pico EF, Holguín-Quiñones OE, Hernández-Herrera A, Flores-Verdugo F. 2006. Mangrove primary production at El Conchalito Estuary in La Paz Bay (Baja California Sur, México) Ciencias Marinas 32(1):53-63
Fulton S, López-Sagástegui C, Weaver AH, Fitzmaurice-Cahluni F, Galindo C, Fernández-Rivera Melo F, Yee S, Ojeda-Villegas MB, Fuentes DA, Torres-Bahena E. 2019. Untapped potential of citizen science in Mexican small-scale fisheries. Frontiers in Marine Science 6:517
Guevara-Guillén C, Shirasago-Germán B, Pérez-Lezama EL, Obeso-Nieblas M. 2018. Variability of chlorophyll, a concentration and halocline depth in La Paz Bay (Gulf of California, México) and the relationship to Pacific large-scale climatic phenomena. Journal of Coastal Research 34(4):920-927
Hanna ME, Chandler EM, Semmens BX, Eguchi T, Lemons GE, Seminoff JA. 2021. Citizen-sourced sightings and underwater photography reveal novel insights about green sea turtle distribution and ecology in Southern California. Frontiers in Marine Science 8:671061
iNaturalist. 2022. iNaturalist. (accessed13 October 2022 )
IUCN. 2022. The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2022-2. https://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed15 October 2023 )
Johnson AF, Girón-Nava A, Moreno-Báez M, Cisneros A, Suárez A, Aburto-Oropeza O. 2016. Marine habitat distributions in the Gulf of California. DataMares, Interactive Resource.
Mancini A, Koch V, Seminoff JA, Madon B. 2012. Small-scale gill-net fisheries cause massive green turtle Chelonia mydas mortality in Baja California Sur, México. Oryx 46(1):69-77
Massey LM, Penna S, Zahn E, Lawson D, Davis CM. 2023. Monitoring Green Sea Turtles in the San Gabriel River of Southern California. Animals 13(3):434
Morales-Bojórquez E, Nevárez-Martínez MO, García-Alberto G, Villalobos H, Aguirre-Villaseñor H, Larios-Castro E, González-Peláez SS, Arizmendi-Rodríguez DI, Martínez-Zavala MDLÁ. 2021. Interaction between marine fauna and the small pelagic fishery in the coastal environment of the Gulf of California, México. Frontiers in Marine Science 8:669176
Peckham SH, Maldonado-Díaz D. 2012. Empowering small-scale fishermen to be conservation heroes. In: Seminoff JA, Wallace BP, eds. Sea turtles of the Eastern Pacific: advances in research and conservation. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press. 173-198
Peckham SH, Maldonado-Diaz D, Tremblay Y, Ochoa R, Polovina J, Balazs G, Dutton PH, Nichols WJ. 2011. Demographic implications of alternative foraging strategies in juvenile loggerhead turtles Caretta caretta of the North Pacific Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 425:269-280
Sandoval-Lugo AG, Espinosa-Carreón TL, Seminoff JA, Hart CE, Ley-Quiñónez CP, Aguirre AA, Jones TT, Zavala-Norzagaray AA. 2020. Movements of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) in the Gulf of California: integrating satellite telemetry and remotely sensed environmental variables. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 100(5):817-824
Seminoff JA, Eguchi T, Carretta J, Allen CD, Prosperi D, Rangel R, Gilpatrick Jr JW, Forney K, Peckham SH. 2014. Loggerhead sea turtle abundance at a foraging hotspot in the eastern Pacific Ocean: implications for at-sea conservation. Endangered Species Research 24(3):207-220
Seminoff JA, Resendiz A, Resendiz B, Nichols WJ. 2004. Occurrence of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) in the Gulf of California, México: evidence of life-history variation in the Pacific Ocean. Herpetological Review 35(1):24-27
Senko J, Jenkins LD, Peckham SH. 2017. At loggerheads over international bycatch: initial effects of a unilaterally imposed bycatch reduction policy. Marine Policy 76:200-209
Senko J, Mancini A, Seminoff JA, Koch V. 2014. Bycatch and directed harvest drive high green turtle mortality at Baja California Sur, México. Biological Conservation 169:24-30
Senko J, Schneller AJ, Solis J, Ollervides F, Nichols W. 2011. People helping turtles, turtles helping people: understanding resident attitudes towards sea turtle conservation and opportunities for enhanced community participation in Bahia Magdalena, México. Ocean & Coastal Management 54:148-157
Tomaszewicz CNT, Seminoff JA, Avens L, Goshe LR, Peckham SH, Rguez-Baron JM, Bickerman K, Kurle CM. 2015. Age and residency duration of loggerhead turtles at a North Pacific bycatch hotspot using skeletochronology. Biological Conservation 186:134-142
Torres-Hernández MY, Trasviña Castro A, Rosales-Villa AR, Souza AJ. 2022. Dynamics of the surface circulation of La Paz bay, México. Continental Shelf Research 235:104664
Volz S, Uccellini L, LeBoeuf N, Oliver C, McLean C, Hann N. 2021. NOAA Citizen Science Strategy. Applying the Power of the Crowd. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce.
Wallace BP, Di Matteo AD, Hurley BJ, Finkbeiner EM, Bolten AB, Chaloupka MY, Hutchinson BJ, Abreu-Grobois FA, Amorocho D, Bjorndal KA, Bourjea J+1 more. 2010. Regional management units for marine turtles: a novel framework for prioritizing conservation and research across multiple scales. PLOS ONE 5(12):e15465
Wallace BP, Posnik ZA, Hurley BJ, Di Matteo AD, Bandimere A, Rodriguez I, Maxwell SM, Meyer L, Brenner H, Jensen MP, LaCasella E+1 more. 2023. Marine turtle regional management units 2.0: an updated framework for conservation and research of wide-ranging megafauna species. Endangered Species Research 52:209-223
Zavala-Norzagaray AA, Ley-Quiñónez CP, Hart CE, Aguilar-Claussell P, Peckham SH, Aguirre AA. 2017. First record of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) in the southern Gulf of California, Sinaloa, México. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 16(1):106-101
Stephanie J. Rousso1,2, María Dinorah Herrero Perezrul2, Agnese Mancini3, Alan A. Zavala-Norzagaray3,4, Jesse F. Senko5,6
1 Upwell Turtles, Monterey, CA, United States of America
2 Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, La Paz, BCS, Mexico
3 Grupo Tortuguero de Las Californias A.C., La Paz, BCS, Mexico
4 Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional Unidad Sinaloa, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Guasave, Sinaloa, Mexico
5 School of Ocean Futures, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America
6 School for the Future of Innovation in Society, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2024 Rousso et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Citizen science is a valuable tool for addressing spatial distribution gaps in endangered species, especially in data-limited regions. Given the logistical and financial challenges of studying migratory species, this cost-effective approach contributes to strategic conservation planning. The Bay of La Paz, located in Baja California Sur, México, is considered an ecologically important region within the larger Gulf of California. Due to its rich biodiversity and abundant natural resources, the region serves as a hub for ecotourism and fishing, affording diverse opportunities for community-based scientific initiatives. This paper examines the value of citizen science contributions from three diverse community groups (i.e., coastal residents, SCUBA divers, and artisanal fishers) to help scientists obtain information on sea turtle distribution in the Bay of La Paz. Our findings represent the first records of loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) in the bay based on ten citizen science reports that include live and dead turtles (either observed swimming, as bycatch, or stranded), providing new information on an endangered pelagic species identified in a coastal bay. Although the sample size is small, our diversity of sources and sighting types highlight the value of collaborative citizen science initiatives in complementing traditional research methods.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer